fat-ass-bike wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:

Guess you've had your head in the sand for the past several decades.

Back on planet Earth, the extremely "progressive" Prime Minister of Canada reacted with "deep sorrow" to the death of "Cuba's longest serving President," who was a "remarkable leader."

A very bad year for the Democrats indeed.

http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2016/11/26/s ... an-president-fidel-castro

Like TRUMP, Fidel Castro had supporters - They will be mourning his death in Cuba for 9 days, while others are celebrating his death in Florida.

JCMan8 wrote:

Guess you've had your head in the sand for the past several decades.

Back on planet Earth, the extremely "progressive" Prime Minister of Canada reacted with "deep sorrow" to the death of "Cuba's longest serving President," who was a "remarkable leader."

A very bad year for the Democrats indeed.

http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2016/11/26/s ... an-president-fidel-castro

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Very bad year for the democrats... Hillary looses the election and now they've lost their most favorite totalitarian butcher, Fidel Castro.

You must live in a fantasy land if you really believe this.

And it's a really odd critique considering the Republican party is best friends with Vladimir Putin. I never have understood why Republicans (and especially Trump) are so fond of a Soviet-era ex-KGB dictator. Seems borderline treasonous.

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
'Best friends'? Obama has caved to Putin on just about everything, he may be Putin's best friend. He caved on the land grab, caved on missile shields, caved on Syria . . .

I think we have different definitions of "caved" because personally, I'm glad Obama hasn't gotten involved in a bunch of wars just so we can dick swing with Russia. Not like Republicans would do any differently, they'd probably just watch and then praise how manly and handsome he looked while doing it, and then get on their knees.


Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
What is not to believe? The socialist democrats have always spoken favorably of Fidel and his island utopia.

I think I'll need a citation on that. Democrats have just had a more realistic approach to Cuba than Republicans. Democrats have realized that normalizing relations will work better than a failed embargo that has accomplished nothing for 60 years.

Monroe wrote:
'Best friends'? Obama has caved to Putin on just about everything, he may be Putin's best friend. He caved on the land grab, caved on missile shields, caved on Syria . . .

TheBigGuy wrote:
What is not to believe? The socialist democrats have always spoken favorably of Fidel and his island utopia.

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Very bad year for the democrats... Hillary looses the election and now they've lost their most favorite totalitarian butcher, Fidel Castro.

You must live in a fantasy land if you really believe this.

And it's a really odd critique considering the Republican party is best friends with Vladimir Putin. I never have understood why Republicans (and especially Trump) are so fond of a Soviet-era ex-KGB dictator. Seems borderline treasonous.

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Very bad year for the democrats... Hillary looses the election and now they've lost their most favorite totalitarian butcher, Fidel Castro.

You must live in a fantasy land if you really believe this.

And it's a really odd critique considering the Republican party is best friends with Vladimir Putin. I never have understood why Republicans (and especially Trump) are so fond of a Soviet-era ex-KGB dictator. Seems borderline treasonous.

TheBigGuy wrote:
Very bad year for the democrats... Hillary looses the election and now they've lost their most favorite totalitarian butcher, Fidel Castro.

Monroe wrote:
Another woman to the inner circle-go KT McFarland!

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

JCman24 wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Meanwhile, maybe you shouldn't put a radical anti-Semite, Muslim Brotherhood promoting fella as the head of the DNC!

It's possible to be not anti-Semitic (even Jewish) and be critical of Israel. Since when do you care about Jews?

I grew up in a mostly Jewish neighborhood, and many of my closest friends are Jews.

But when I read that Breitbart is alt-right and pro-Nazi, it cracks me up-Breitbart conceived Breitbart News while on a trip to Israel, he and his co-founder were Jewish, and one of Breitbart's platform is to support Israel. Sure sounds like a bunch of neo-Nazis to me!

And yes, you can be somewhat critical of Israel with being anti-Semitic-as you can be critical of Obama without being racist, but tell that to any Democrat and they'll dispute it.

JCman24 wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Meanwhile, maybe you shouldn't put a radical anti-Semite, Muslim Brotherhood promoting fella as the head of the DNC!

It's possible to be not anti-Semitic (even Jewish) and be critical of Israel. Since when do you care about Jews?

Monroe wrote:
Meanwhile, maybe you shouldn't put a radical anti-Semite, Muslim Brotherhood promoting fella as the head of the DNC!

AlexC wrote:
You're equating a group that champions women's rights, works to protect the LGBT and minority communities, promotes policies to help the poor, such as minimum wages and subsidized health care to a bunch of Nazis?

Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Breitbart is no more alt right than HuffPost is alt left and Communist/tyrannical/God Hating/gun confiscating. Well, maybe it is for confiscating guns.

AlexC wrote:
California is the 6th largest economy in the world, bigger than that of France. So they should have more say.

This is akin to equal-opportunity programs which I'm sure you oppose.

I think those people in the heartland who gave him the win is going to be disappointed. Maybe this time they'll realize they voted against their interest.

Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million
A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec. 19, are pushing to block Trump from winning a majority of votes.
By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 11/23/16 07:33 AM EST

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11 ... -popular-vote-2016-231790

Is Trump really our new president? Way behind in popular vote. No mandate.

He has a mandate, as has been explained many times on this board, including directly to you.

And you must have missed this post. Allow me to direct your attention to it:

Hillary's popular vote lead is primarily only due to one state, California. It would hardly be democratic if we all had to follow the will of that one state, so it's a good thing that's not how it works!

Outside California, Clinton Is A Big-Time Popular Vote Loser

http://www.investors.com/politics/com ... -time-popular-vote-loser/

AlexC wrote:
You're equating a group that champions women's rights, works to protect the LGBT and minority communities, promotes policies to help the poor, such as minimum wages and subsidized health care to a bunch of Nazis?

Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Breitbart is no more alt right than HuffPost is alt left and Communist/tyrannical/God Hating/gun confiscating. Well, maybe it is for confiscating guns.

Monroe wrote:
Breitbart is no more alt right than HuffPost is alt left and Communist/tyrannical/God Hating/gun confiscating. Well, maybe it is for confiscating guns.

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Recount!

Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results
By Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 10:23 PM ET, Tue November 22, 2016

(CNN)Hillary Clinton's campaign is being urged by a number of top computer scientists to call for a recount of vote totals in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, according to a source with knowledge of the request.

The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides on a call last Thursday.
The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source.

The group informed John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman, and Marc Elias, the campaign's general counsel, that Clinton received 7% fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic voting machines, which the group said could have been hacked.
Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review.
Neither Halderman nor John Bonifaz, an attorney also pressing the case, responded to requests for comment on Tuesday evening. Their urging was first reported by New York magazine.
A message left with President-elect Donald Trump's transition team also was not immediately returned.

There were widespread concerns about hacking ahead of this month's election, including the Obama administration accusing Russia of attempting to breach voter registration data. But election officials and cybersecurity experts said earlier this month that it is virtually impossible for Russia to influence the election outcome.
A former Clinton aide declined to respond to questions about whether they will request an audit based on the findings.
Additionally, at least three electors have pledged to not vote for Trump and to seek a "reasonable Republican alternative for president through Electoral College," according to a statement Wednesday from a group called the Hamilton Electors, which represents them.
"The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College as the last line of defense," one elector, Michael Baca, said in a statement, "and I think we must do all that we can to ensure that we have a reasonable Republican candidate who shares our American values."

Desperation time.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million
A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec. 19, are pushing to block Trump from winning a majority of votes.
By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 11/23/16 07:33 AM EST

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11 ... -popular-vote-2016-231790

Is Trump really our new president? Way behind in popular vote. No mandate.

He has a mandate, as has been explained many times on this board, including directly to you.

And you must have missed this post. Allow me to direct your attention to it:

Hillary's popular vote lead is primarily only due to one state, California. It would hardly be democratic if we all had to follow the will of that one state, so it's a good thing that's not how it works!

Outside California, Clinton Is A Big-Time Popular Vote Loser

http://www.investors.com/politics/com ... -time-popular-vote-loser/

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

AlexC wrote:
I'll tell you all Trump supporters, this is gonna be a fun 4 years! LOL

It already is, especially when the racist/misogynist just appointed a woman of color to be UN representative! Damn him!