Yvonne wrote:
I just found out that Fulop cut the part time staff for budget reasons but found money for this vertical garden.

JPhurst wrote:
More on how telecommuting may affect commercial real estate long term.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/08/tec ... Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
i don't see how one can blame trump or the republican for the problems stemming from the pandemic. yes, he was slow to react or comprehend seriousness of the problem but then factor in past experiences with sars, mers, h1n1, ebola, zika..

On today's briefings, Trump had a timeline showing important dates. On January 17, 2020, there was no reported US cases. By the time he closed on January 31, 2020, there was some cases but no deaths. Slow...how, especially when the WHO is saying it is not transmitted from human to human?

Since whe did the US follow the WHO. Doesn't the US spend billion$ for the best damn intelligence in the world. LOL

Then why pay WHO $450 million a year from the US? Of course the US should follow an international health organization. Perhaps there should be an investigation.

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
i don't see how one can blame trump or the republican for the problems stemming from the pandemic. yes, he was slow to react or comprehend seriousness of the problem but then factor in past experiences with sars, mers, h1n1, ebola, zika..

On today's briefings, Trump had a timeline showing important dates. On January 17, 2020, there was no reported US cases. By the time he closed on January 31, 2020, there was some cases but no deaths. Slow...how, especially when the WHO is saying it is not transmitted from human to human?

RichMauro wrote:
Has the air quality inside the theater been improved?
I'd love to return to it, but I had respiratory issues for days after my last visit.

bodhipooh wrote:
Quote:

brewster wrote:
Quote:

JCGuys wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
It is obvious some folks on JClist do not go to public meetings in various neighborhoods, it is not Yvonne, it is hundreds of people complaining about loss parking, especially bikes lanes at the expense of cars. There were hundreds of people at Hudson Catholic School including St. Peter's University, making the same complaint. Not to mention, the businesses that are hurt because shoppers go else. Really, how selfish are some comments. In fact the city should do a survey on the people of people that shop in Bayonne or other towns due to the loss of parking.

Thanks for proving my point. Parking, parking, parking but no concern on how parking impacts housing affordability.

Or transit. You could put BRT on a set of N-S JC roads and have a virtual subway, except for...parking. And I actually agree with part of Yvonne's position, more short term parking for local commerce. But what we should have is more and better metered parking in commercial districts the way Hoboken has. But that's a non-starter, since it would take away resident street parking. Even Key foods should have a row of 15 minute meters out front, If I want to drop in for eggs or zucchini on my way driving home from somewhere, I can't, since the daylighting of the corners there's not even illegal spots to use.

But, why advocate for metered, surface parking? Why not *underground* parking? It’s truly astounding that we have not embraced underground parking more widely in the US. Most cities seem to have embraced surface lots, or the incredibly inefficient/wasteful practice of dedicating the first few floors of buildings to be parking decks. If Jersey City pushed for subterranean lots, we could free up a ton of street space for other purposes (wider sidewalks, bike lanes, more retail and commercial space in buildings, more housing units per building, etc) while ensuring that the need for parking is satisfied.

All over Europe, cities of all sizes (including tiny ones) have embraced underground lots and it really is a game changer for improving walkability as well as aesthetics. Why not borrow from that idea and push for our city to do the same?

Imagine an underground lot under city hall; that would satisfy the parking needs for all of the Grove street businesses and restaurants, and the city could then reclaim all the space taken by metered spots to make room for more lanes, or to widen sidewalks. Or, if you want to think more boldly, you could make all of the Grove area into a car-free, pedestrian zone. The underground lot would allow for people to be close to where they need to go, which is the usual complaint, while allowing for efficient use of city surfaces.

MDM wrote:
[quote]
hero69 wrote:


anyone, ever convert a fluorsecent fixture into one that can take led bulbs?[quote]


Done all the time


Ballast Bypass (most energy efficient method) re-wire the light that the new LED tube runs on line voltage.

Ballast compatible: Just pop it in.

Memorial Sloan has been doing the ballast bypass method. They have been getting their bulbs from Tri State LED, which based on their performance tests, proved to be the most reliable.

JaclynFulop wrote:
Liberty Humane Society Set To Expand 1st in State $10 Spay &
Neuter Program; 1502 Animals Served in 2019 Alone[/size]

Exchange Physical Therapy Group & Jaclyn Fulop Partner with Liberty Humane Society
to Raise $200k to Support Program; Announce Second Major Fundraiser


We all know that spay and neuter services are essential to stabilizing animal populations and preventing more homeless pets. But too often cost prevents pet owners and cat caretakers from taking this life-saving step.

We are thrilled to continue to bring low-cost spay/neuter to the communities we serve, in memory of Chloe Fulop, the beloved dog who inspired the creation of this program.

The event is November 14th from 7:30pm-9:30pm in Harborside JC Atrium.

Tickets are $40 and proceeds go directly to Spay& Neuter Program

Tickets can be purchased : https://www.exchangephysicaltherapygroup.com/make-a-donation

brewster wrote:
Quote:

jimvfx wrote:
Hi all,

Does anyone know how I can go about disposing of old fluorescent tubes (I have about a dozen of them).

Will normal trash pick them up?

Thanks in advance!

best

Jim

One option is bring them to Home Depot, I've brought bags of them there.

neverleft wrote:
.
Jersey City’s loss is Rutgers’ gain: Dormant museum collection 'gifted’ to state university

Updated 6:42 PM; Today 4:42 PM (10/4/2019)
By Ron Zeitlinger | The Jersey Journal

The sign sits in front of 350 Montgomery St., a silent reminder of an institution that thrived for more than 100 years, then ran into financial troubles and died a slow death.

“Jersey City Museum” says the sign in white letters, just below an official Jersey City logo. The sign belongs to the city. The museum, which closed in 2010 and reopened briefly in 2012, did not.

https://www.nj.com/hudson/2019/10/jers ... -to-state-university.html

K-Lo2 wrote:
The dollar store appears to be unaffected, if the third picture in the article is accurate.

And Nick....

asny10011 wrote:
the “lift” is always breaking downthere... i don‘t need it but i’m tired of seeing all their updates about the lift not working at Grove St.

Also, the weekend closures to WTC really suck. Why can‘t they run direct trains to 33rd on weekends??

SgtAnthonyPark wrote:
IMPORTANT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CALLED BY SGT. ANTHONY PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND INVITES ALL TO MAY 30TH MEETING:
Developers are proposing a 21 UNIT LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT covering ?36-42 Waverly St?.
Please join us to review and respond to the developers and to discuss future development in the Heights.
Thursday May 30th, 7:00 PM
Christ Hospital meeting room, ?176 Palisade Ave, 07306

[img width=300]https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/59640889_2144396912296792_6010324921320734720_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&_nc_oc=AQnlMbbNycmXKK-kYxZ3Dnsj5OiTkG2N4hQC0GdiYU3TIVjOAecCW-39RoPCrBjuubE&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&oh=90efeb5c108915c394f73412e1573ea7&oe=5D510113[/img]

brewster wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

brewster wrote:
Quote:

JCBORN wrote:
You can only convert to condos if the building is empty?

I believe you can convert it with tenants, and even sell the unit, though you won't get the same price with a rent controlled tenant as you would vacant.

Quote:

MDM wrote:
If she is in Zone R-1 (most of the Heights is R-1), she could only build a Bayonne Box 2 family. Better off rebuilding the 4 family.

Get the right builder and it will be a new building. I've seen it several times now that they leave a stick or 2 of the original standing as a "grandfathered zoning fig leaf" and basically build a completely new building. One 4 family, they even raised the ceiling height of every floor and doubled the lot coverage.

her building is 4 family....no rent control...bayonne boxes are fugly but i guess they make money...how much to build a bayonne box?

You don't understand, what we're saying is she's better off rebuilding the 4 family completely and give lip service to the zoning.

brewster wrote:
Quote:

JCBORN wrote:
You can only convert to condos if the building is empty?

I believe you can convert it with tenants, and even sell the unit, though you won't get the same price with a rent controlled tenant as you would vacant.

Quote:

MDM wrote:
If she is in Zone R-1 (most of the Heights is R-1), she could only build a Bayonne Box 2 family. Better off rebuilding the 4 family.

Get the right builder and it will be a new building. I've seen it several times now that they leave a stick or 2 of the original standing as a "grandfathered zoning fig leaf" and basically build a completely new building. One 4 family, they even raised the ceiling height of every floor and doubled the lot coverage.

Yvonne wrote:
When LeFrak was negotiating with JC, it had strong rent control laws. LeFrak refused to build high rises unless JC changed the laws and it did. New construction has a 99 year free period from rent control so basically, no rent control. That change happened sometime in the 1980s. It is the reason why so many older buildings became condos. In the 1970s many older building in downtown and Journal Square were rent controlled, basically, they are now all condos.

MDM wrote:
Quote:

wow, I thought rent control only applied to older buildings built before 1969(?) containing 5 units or more. So, are you saying that JC could impose rent control on all those high rises?

From what I understand, Jersey City currently does not apply rent control to new construction. However, they could, but the State law preempts the city from doing so until the building is five years old.

Fulop's opponent in the last election ran on a platform of expanding rent control right down to single family homes.