I think you can accomplish that by helping your daughters grow to be wise, not by sheltering them. A cheap restaurant concept won?t turn them into slutily costumed bubbleheads who flirt with idiots for tips. We have some of the most conservative attitudes among peer nations, but have some of the most immature outlets. Coincidence?

tommyc_37 wrote:
Probably the kind of place that will bring in the Miller Light chugging crowd from out of town.

GrovePath wrote:
Do you mean even more drunken derelicts wondering over after they are kicked out of the Titled Kilt?

gibbons70 wrote:
Yay for chain restaurants!!!

snowflake20 wrote:
Sorry but I'm not bringing my kids to some place where the women are dressed like scottish tarts.

RiverRat wrote:
Women should be able to wear whatever they want, but when they are objectified like this, it tends to attract some sad and ugly men.

snowflake20 wrote:
My kids see me naked all of the time. My issue isn't nudity, which is normal, my issue is the way the women are dressed. They look like they are out of a Brazzers porno.

asdfdf23 wrote:
It has been open for some time. Have been once about 3-4 weeks ago.
It's ok. Their are lots of boobs flaunted if that is your thing. (Actually, who doesn't like them?) All of the waitresses were friendly.
It's not my scene so haven't been back.

snowflake20 wrote:
Hooters gets a bad reputation but the women are not dressed like the women in the picture above.

snowflake20 wrote:

My point was, I'm not a prude and I'm aware of porn on the internet. And yes, I've read articles on Gawker and Jezebel etc about the porn industry as well. I still wouldn't bring my kids to that restaurant because those women are dressed like porn stars, or at the very least that really slutty maid on American Horror Story.

trambone wrote:
The fact that you know what the studio Brazzers is somewhat disqualifies your points.

snowflake20 wrote:

My issue isn't nudity, which is normal, my issue is the way the women are dressed. They look like they are out of a Brazzers porno. I'm not going to want to explain why the women serving them are dressed like that, nor do I want them to think it's OK for them to dress like that when they get older. I'll just preemptively not take them. Believe me, I am not a freaking prude. But I certainly don't need to my girls think it's OK to sexualize themselves to make money.

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

Frank_M wrote:

The restaurant employs a pathetically cheap concept so we can reject it for simply being cheap, not for its potential to appall Quakers who will never step foot inside.

I think you have a total misunderstanding of what Quakers are. Depending on what sect of Quaker you're from, or where you grew up, Quakers can either be very conservative (like in the midwest or Africa) or they can be very liberal people that range from free-love hippies to civil rights advocates. Most of the Quakers along the East Coast, even down South, are of the liberal mindset, and as such wouldn't have a problem with the place. Don't talk shit if you don't know shit. Quaker 4 lyfe yo.

CSXrailfan wrote:
Quote:

colleen wrote:
Your girls/kids see you naked all the time? Are they not yet of school age? Are they the same gender as you? Cuz otherwise I think I'm gonna throw up in my own mouth a little bit.
I mean,seriously, dude, wear a towel or a robe or some clothes!

1. Not even the most effeminate dude in JC would name himself "snowflake20".

2. Not even the most awful boring dad in JC would take every chance possible to talk about his kids online, as snowflake20 does. It's a woman.

That said, as a former child of parents, please folks: Don't let your kids see you naked. They do not want to see that shit.

trambone wrote:
2. I welcome this place. My fiance and I go to Hooters together and this place will be nearer. Finally somewhere closer for us to cry about the Mets.

3. I hope they're as family friendly as Hooters and have a "kids eat free night"

1stStGuy wrote:
Quote:

trambone wrote:
3. I hope they're as family friendly as Hooters and have a "kids eat free night"

Take your kids to Applebee's. Please let there be SOME place in the Hoboken/JC area that isn't overrun by offspring, and the parents who think said crotch-fruit can do no wrong.

trambone wrote:
3. I hope they're as family friendly as Hooters and have a "kids eat free night"

snowflake20 wrote:

My kids see me naked all of the time. My issue isn't nudity, which is normal, my issue is the way the women are dressed. They look like they are out of a Brazzers porno. I'm not going to want to explain why the women serving them are dressed like that, nor do I want them to think it's OK for them to dress like that when they get older. I'll just preemptively not take them. Believe me, I am not a freaking prude. But I certainly don't need to my girls think it's OK to sexualize themselves to make money.

colleen wrote:
Your girls/kids see you naked all the time? Are they not yet of school age? Are they the same gender as you? Cuz otherwise I think I'm gonna throw up in my own mouth a little bit.
I mean,seriously, dude, wear a towel or a robe or some clothes!

snowflake20 wrote:
My kids see me naked all of the time. My issue isn't nudity, which is normal, my issue is the way the women are dressed. They look like they are out of a Brazzers porno. I'm not going to want to explain why the women serving them are dressed like that, nor do I want them to think it's OK for them to dress like that when they get older. I'll just preemptively not take them. Believe me, I am not a freaking prude. But I certainly don't need to my girls think it's OK to sexualize themselves to make money.

heights wrote:
Quote:

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

Frank_M wrote:
Quote:

snowflake20 wrote:
Yikes! They do realize how family oriented this area is? Sorry but I'm not bringing my kids to some place where the women are dressed like scottish tarts. I thought they were opening another melting pot in that location...I guess not.

While an uncomfortable relationship with the human body is common for Americans, the position that our children will be negatively affected if they see a half a boob is still a load of crap. What has decades of that attitude gotten us? At best, a desperate fascination with cheap titillation.

The restaurant employs a pathetically cheap concept so we can reject it for simply being cheap, not for its potential to appall Quakers who will never step foot inside.

I think you have a total misunderstanding of what Quakers are. Depending on what sect of Quaker you're from, or where you grew up, Quakers can either be very conservative (like in the midwest or Africa) or they can be very liberal people that range from free-love hippies to civil rights advocates. Most of the Quakers along the East Coast, even down South, are of the liberal mindset, and as such wouldn't have a problem with the place. Don't talk shit if you don't know shit. Quaker 4 lyfe yo.

Nixon was a Quaker