JERSEY CITY LIST - Re: Democratic Convention [NOT Jersey City]

Re: Democratic Convention

#446

Home away from home

Joined:
2011/11/30 12:46
Last Login :
2017/8/3 1:06

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1907

Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
So a recent IRS filing states that for all the millions taken in that filing year only 5.47% was given out to charities.

Now they are raking in millions more to celebrate Bill's birthday. These people have no shame.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/15/bill-cli ... t-stop-influence-peddling
mmmmk, do u understand how charities work, endowments.....

Ha! Clearly you don't understand how non-profits work.

I've audited them for a living. A 5% program expense rate is pitiful.. far worse than your average non-profit. Educate yourself before you post.

Here you go genius... http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/16/c ... t-charitable-grants-2014/

Perhaps you need to read the entire thread.... because you made my point about the Clinton Foundation.

Relax, genius.. I was actually supporting your point.

Posted on: 2016/9/19 1:11

Re: Democratic Convention

#445

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1674

Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
So a recent IRS filing states that for all the millions taken in that filing year only 5.47% was given out to charities.

Now they are raking in millions more to celebrate Bill's birthday. These people have no shame.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/15/bill-cli ... t-stop-influence-peddling
mmmmk, do u understand how charities work, endowments.....

Ha! Clearly you don't understand how non-profits work.

I've audited them for a living. A 5% program expense rate is pitiful.. far worse than your average non-profit. Educate yourself before you post.

Here you go genius... http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/16/c ... t-charitable-grants-2014/

Perhaps you need to read the entire thread.... because you made my point about the Clinton Foundation.

Posted on: 2016/9/19 1:10

Re: Democratic Convention

#444

Home away from home

Joined:
2011/11/30 12:46
Last Login :
2017/8/3 1:06

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1907

Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
So a recent IRS filing states that for all the millions taken in that filing year only 5.47% was given out to charities.

Now they are raking in millions more to celebrate Bill's birthday. These people have no shame.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/15/bill-cli ... t-stop-influence-peddling
mmmmk, do u understand how charities work, endowments.....

Ha! Clearly you don't understand how non-profits work.

I've audited them for a living. A 5% program expense rate is pitiful.. far worse than your average non-profit. Educate yourself before you post.

Posted on: 2016/9/18 23:56

Re: Democratic Convention

#443

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1674

Well... this has to be the most stupid useless post on this blog ever!

Quote:

fat-ass-bike wrote:

Posted on: 2016/9/18 23:26

fat-ass-bike

Re: Democratic Convention

#442

Home away from home

Joined:
2006/11/13 18:42
Last Login :
2022/2/28 7:31

From 280 Grove Street

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 4192

Posted on: 2016/9/18 22:54

My humor is for the silent blue collar majority - If my posts offend, slander or you deem inappropriate and seek deletion, contact the webmaster for jurisdiction.

Re: Democratic Convention

#441

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1674

Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
So a recent IRS filing states that for all the millions taken in that filing year only 5.47% was given out to charities.

Now they are raking in millions more to celebrate Bill's birthday. These people have no shame.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/15/bill-cli ... t-stop-influence-peddling
mmmmk, do u understand how charities work, endowments.....

Absolutely do.... that is why I made my comment, look at legitimate charities and admin costs never exceed the annual grants issued. They are not supposed to be "profitable".

Posted on: 2016/9/18 22:28

hero69

Re: Democratic Convention

#440

Home away from home

Joined:
2004/11/14 2:38
Last Login :
2023/1/30 21:43

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3792

Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
So a recent IRS filing states that for all the millions taken in that filing year only 5.47% was given out to charities.

Now they are raking in millions more to celebrate Bill's birthday. These people have no shame.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/15/bill-cli ... t-stop-influence-peddling

mmmmk, do u understand how charities work, endowments.....

Posted on: 2016/9/18 16:51

Re: Democratic Convention

#439

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1674

So a recent IRS filing states that for all the millions taken in that filing year only 5.47% was given out to charities.

Now they are raking in millions more to celebrate Bill's birthday. These people have no shame.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/15/bill-cli ... t-stop-influence-peddling

Posted on: 2016/9/18 13:00

drifterx

Re: Democratic Convention

#438

Home away from home

Joined:
2010/9/5 2:25
Last Login :
2022/2/1 5:25

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 350

Republicans have been saying about their own candidate. Is it too late to call the whole thing off?

Posted on: 2016/9/17 13:36

Re: Democratic Convention

#437

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1674

Is it to late for the democrats to have another convention? I get the feeling that Airship Hillary is slowly crashing faster than the Hindenburg.

Posted on: 2016/9/17 0:50

MDM

Re: Democratic Convention

#436

Home away from home

Joined:
2010/7/9 11:16
Last Login :
4/15 15:15

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 2741

Hillary donors! You might want to check your credit card statements.

Hillary Clinton?s campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters by purposefully and repeatedly overcharging them after they make what?s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website, multiple sources tell the Observer.

The overcharges are occurring so often that the fraud department at one of the nation?s biggest banks receives up to 100 phone calls a day from Clinton?s small donors asking for refunds for unauthorized charges to their bankcards made by Clinton?s campaign. One elderly Clinton donor, who has been a victim of this fraud scheme, has filed a complaint with her state?s attorney general and a representative from the office told her that they had forwarded her case to the Federal Election Commission.

?We get up to a hundred calls a day from Hillary?s low-income supporters complaining about multiple unauthorized charges,? a source, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of job security, from the Wells Fargo fraud department told the Observer. The source claims that the Clinton campaign has been pulling this stunt since Spring of this year. The Hillary for America campaign will overcharge small donors by repeatedly charging small amounts such as $20 to the bankcards of donors who made a one-time donation. However, the Clinton campaign strategically doesn?t overcharge these donors $100 or more because the bank would then be obligated to investigate the fraud.

http://observer.com/2016/09/exclusive ... rcharging-poorest-donors/

Posted on: 2016/9/16 13:39

135jc

Re: Democratic Convention

#435

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/7/17 3:05
Last Login :
2023/6/22 2:50

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 953

Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Not sure why they are comparing that empty pantsuit to FDR.

The point was not to compare the persons or their competencies but used as an example to make the point that you don't have to be healthy to be a good president.

The 2 are not related and the current obsession about the candidates health is absurd in my opinion.

But I give up as that seems too hard to understand...

.

Her health is relevant. To say otherwise is absurd! Also, Trump is not 6'3"

Posted on: 2016/9/15 15:18

JCMan8

Re: Democratic Convention

#434

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/11/10 20:38
Last Login :
2018/2/1 3:02

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3071

Trump released his last annual physical records on the Dr. Oz show this morning. Here are the numbers:

Height 6'3"

Weight 236

Cholesterol 169

HDL: 63

LDL: 94

Tri's: 61

PSA: .15

BP: 116/70

Blood sugar: 99

Liver/thyroid: normal

Colonoscopy from 2013: no polyps

EKG in April was normal

Testosterone was 441 which is very high according to Dr. Oz.

Dr. Oz said: "If a patient of mine had these records, I'd be really happy and send them on their way."

Meanwhile Hillary is getting thrown into a black van like a "side of beef" according to a cop on the scene, and may not live through her first term. She's too weak to even campaign. Now we know why she never gives press conferences.

Posted on: 2016/9/15 15:05

Re: Democratic Convention

#433

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Not sure why they are comparing that empty pantsuit to FDR.

The point was not to compare the persons or their competencies but used as an example to make the point that you don't have to be healthy to be a good president.

The 2 are not related and the current obsession about the candidates health is absurd in my opinion.

But I give up as that seems too hard to understand...

Posted on: 2016/9/15 14:56

drifterx

Re: Democratic Convention

#432

Home away from home

Joined:
2010/9/5 2:25
Last Login :
2022/2/1 5:25

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 350

Well, FDR was a Democrat who gave the government a lot of power in the form of regulation and social programs. He would probably be closer to Sanders than any of the other poor choices we have now.

I just find it funny that you so-called conservatives think FDR is great.

Posted on: 2016/9/15 14:34

135jc

Re: Democratic Convention

#431

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/7/17 3:05
Last Login :
2023/6/22 2:50

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 953

Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Not sure why they are comparing that empty pantsuit to FDR.

Earlier on this topic someone compared Trump to Michael Bloomberg, since they are both businessmen.

As much as I admired the job Bloomberg did post 9/11 I felt he got a little full of himself. He change the term limits and then back before leaving office and basically through his actions said New Yorker's were too dumb to choose which size soda was good for them.

Posted on: 2016/9/15 14:31

SOS

Re: Democratic Convention

#430

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/9/18 3:58
Last Login :
2021/9/23 15:07

From Between Thought and Expression

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 907

Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Not sure why they are comparing that empty pantsuit to FDR.

Earlier on this topic someone compared Trump to Michael Bloomberg, since they are both businessmen.

Posted on: 2016/9/15 14:14

stillinjc

Re: Democratic Convention

#429

Home away from home

Joined:
2011/11/28 22:22
Last Login :
2023/9/27 23:03

From Jersey City yo!

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 638

Not sure why they are comparing that empty pantsuit to FDR.

Posted on: 2016/9/15 11:55

JCMan8

Re: Democratic Convention

#428

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/11/10 20:38
Last Login :
2018/2/1 3:02

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3071

I just think it's funny that many would try to compare a corrupt, chronically dishonest, dying sleeze to one of America's great Presidents.

What do they have in common, aside from the horrible health part? Both running for the same office?

Posted on: 2016/9/15 2:58

iGreg

Re: Democratic Convention

#427

Home away from home

Joined:
2015/4/15 3:56
Last Login :
2019/3/11 14:10

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1044

Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

iGreg wrote:

Quote:

In 1940, he was already not healthy, ended his 2nd term, did a third, ...

nig plz

he was a gimp in a wheelchair that was ALWAYS hidden from view when on camera - and he pulled that shit off

just now ppl are seeing skanktits is on the verge of a cliff dive
and shit gonna get real when a livestream debate shows her release a fresh brown stream down her pants leg that her colostomy bag misses

What is your point exactly? if you have one i mean...

the point manu man child is she got a real shot at glory

unless she blows it and shits herself live stream or falls off the goddam stage trying

Posted on: 2016/9/15 0:46

Re: Democratic Convention

#426

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

iGreg wrote:

Quote:

In 1940, he was already not healthy, ended his 2nd term, did a third, ...

nig plz

he was a gimp in a wheelchair that was ALWAYS hidden from view when on camera - and he pulled that shit off

just now ppl are seeing skanktits is on the verge of a cliff dive
and shit gonna get real when a livestream debate shows her release a fresh brown stream down her pants leg that her colostomy bag misses

What is your point exactly? if you have one i mean...

Posted on: 2016/9/15 0:43

iGreg

Re: Democratic Convention

#425

Home away from home

Joined:
2015/4/15 3:56
Last Login :
2019/3/11 14:10

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1044

Quote:

In 1940, he was already not healthy, ended his 2nd term, did a third, ...

nig plz

he was a gimp in a wheelchair that was ALWAYS hidden from view when on camera - and he pulled that shit off

just now ppl are seeing skanktits is on the verge of a cliff dive
and shit gonna get real when a livestream debate shows her release a fresh brown stream down her pants leg that her colostomy bag misses

#holla @ yo toilet paper

Posted on: 2016/9/15 0:24

Edited by iGreg on 2016/9/15 0:42:17

Re: Democratic Convention

#424

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
New emails reveal that Hillary was so sick before giving a speech last year that "she could barely climb the podium steps."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic ... ed-emails-refers-man.html

"Walking pneumonia" indeed. Some of you are so gullible.

He also said:
"In an email exchange Powell had with another former Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, her called Benghazi a 'stupid witch hunt.'"

You are right. Some of you are so gullible...

That may be true but you are deflecting from the main issue: Hillary's health.

She's clearly been in poor health for a while.

For a long time, it was all about Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi... Not a big issue for you anymore? That is quite surprising after all the money spent investigating it. I actually think money is still being spent... So, are we done with Benghazi, now?

Are you so simple-minded that you can only focus on one issue at a time?

There's plenty to talk about with Hillary's corruption and failure, including the Clinton Foundation, Benghazi, and Libya.

But right now the single most important issue is her poor health. You are aware that actually being President is far more grueling than campaigning, no? Just look how much Obama and W Bush aged during their terms.

Since Hillary has been collapsing for quite a while, and very well may have a serious disorder, evidenced in part by her being so sick last year she could barely walk up to the speech podium, she doesn't seem physically fit to handle the duties of the office.

Was Roosevelt a bad president?

lol really?

Yay. Really? why? was he?

In his 4th term, of course not. Can't be a good president if you aren't alive. You used an awful example there.

What about the 3 previous terms? Was he healthy during them?

You mean when he was 58 years old or younger? How is that comparable to an ailing 70 year old in Hillary?

Use better examples next time. You f*cked up and are too stubborn to admit it.

Life expectancy for a man in 1945 was 63.
Life expectancy for a woman in 2016 in over 80.

From Wikipedia: "Roosevelt, who was a chain-smoker, had been in declining health since at least 1940"

Still a bad example? would you like to reconsider?

Nope, keep championing FDR as a bastion of health. No one else is laughing at you. Really.

This is absolutely not what I said. You are dishonest or have reading comprehension issues or both.

I championed him as an unhealthy but good president. Re-read my posts. I think I proved my point.
You were entertaining though.

And he was absolutely unhealthy in his 3rd term but covered it up so he could get elected for his 4th term.. and then died 3 months in. Regarding his 4th term, forget being a good president, it was a complete disaster.

This is the exact type of concern that is being raised with Hillary right now and you use him as an example? Out of all the possible examples to use, FDR was one of the worst. But keep digging that hole.

In 1940, he was already not healthy, ended his 2nd term, did a third, ...

But keep changing your stories. You might get it right at one point.

I will let you dig the hole. You are too good at it.

Posted on: 2016/9/15 0:07

Re: Democratic Convention

#423

Home away from home

Joined:
2011/11/30 12:46
Last Login :
2017/8/3 1:06

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1907

Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
New emails reveal that Hillary was so sick before giving a speech last year that "she could barely climb the podium steps."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic ... ed-emails-refers-man.html

"Walking pneumonia" indeed. Some of you are so gullible.

He also said:
"In an email exchange Powell had with another former Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, her called Benghazi a 'stupid witch hunt.'"

You are right. Some of you are so gullible...

That may be true but you are deflecting from the main issue: Hillary's health.

She's clearly been in poor health for a while.

For a long time, it was all about Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi... Not a big issue for you anymore? That is quite surprising after all the money spent investigating it. I actually think money is still being spent... So, are we done with Benghazi, now?

Are you so simple-minded that you can only focus on one issue at a time?

There's plenty to talk about with Hillary's corruption and failure, including the Clinton Foundation, Benghazi, and Libya.

But right now the single most important issue is her poor health. You are aware that actually being President is far more grueling than campaigning, no? Just look how much Obama and W Bush aged during their terms.

Since Hillary has been collapsing for quite a while, and very well may have a serious disorder, evidenced in part by her being so sick last year she could barely walk up to the speech podium, she doesn't seem physically fit to handle the duties of the office.

Was Roosevelt a bad president?

lol really?

Yay. Really? why? was he?

In his 4th term, of course not. Can't be a good president if you aren't alive. You used an awful example there.

What about the 3 previous terms? Was he healthy during them?

You mean when he was 58 years old or younger? How is that comparable to an ailing 70 year old in Hillary?

Use better examples next time. You f*cked up and are too stubborn to admit it.

Life expectancy for a man in 1945 was 63.
Life expectancy for a woman in 2016 in over 80.

From Wikipedia: "Roosevelt, who was a chain-smoker, had been in declining health since at least 1940"

Still a bad example? would you like to reconsider?

Nope, keep championing FDR as a bastion of health. No one else is laughing at you. Really.

This is absolutely not what I said. You are dishonest or have reading comprehension issues or both.

I championed him as an unhealthy but good president. Re-read my posts. I think I proved my point.
You were entertaining though.

And he was absolutely unhealthy in his 3rd term but covered it up so he could get elected for his 4th term.. and then died 3 months in. Regarding his 4th term, forget being a good president, it was a complete disaster.

This is the exact type of concern that is being raised with Hillary right now and you use him as an example? Out of all the possible examples to use, FDR was one of the worst. But keep digging that hole.

Posted on: 2016/9/14 23:32

Re: Democratic Convention

#422

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1674

I guess it begs the question, will HRC sleep through the 300 am phone call when North Korea sends a ICBM intoJapan ?

Posted on: 2016/9/14 23:09

Re: Democratic Convention

#421

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
New emails reveal that Hillary was so sick before giving a speech last year that "she could barely climb the podium steps."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic ... ed-emails-refers-man.html

"Walking pneumonia" indeed. Some of you are so gullible.

He also said:
"In an email exchange Powell had with another former Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, her called Benghazi a 'stupid witch hunt.'"

You are right. Some of you are so gullible...

That may be true but you are deflecting from the main issue: Hillary's health.

She's clearly been in poor health for a while.

For a long time, it was all about Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi... Not a big issue for you anymore? That is quite surprising after all the money spent investigating it. I actually think money is still being spent... So, are we done with Benghazi, now?

Are you so simple-minded that you can only focus on one issue at a time?

There's plenty to talk about with Hillary's corruption and failure, including the Clinton Foundation, Benghazi, and Libya.

But right now the single most important issue is her poor health. You are aware that actually being President is far more grueling than campaigning, no? Just look how much Obama and W Bush aged during their terms.

Since Hillary has been collapsing for quite a while, and very well may have a serious disorder, evidenced in part by her being so sick last year she could barely walk up to the speech podium, she doesn't seem physically fit to handle the duties of the office.

Was Roosevelt a bad president?

lol really?

Yay. Really? why? was he?

In his 4th term, of course not. Can't be a good president if you aren't alive. You used an awful example there.

What about the 3 previous terms? Was he healthy during them?

You mean when he was 58 years old or younger? How is that comparable to an ailing 70 year old in Hillary?

Use better examples next time. You f*cked up and are too stubborn to admit it.

Life expectancy for a man in 1945 was 63.
Life expectancy for a woman in 2016 in over 80.

From Wikipedia: "Roosevelt, who was a chain-smoker, had been in declining health since at least 1940"

Still a bad example? would you like to reconsider?

Nope, keep championing FDR as a bastion of health. No one else is laughing at you. Really.

This is absolutely not what I said. You are dishonest or have reading comprehension issues or both.

I championed him as an unhealthy but good president. Re-read my posts. I think I proved my point.
You were entertaining though.

Posted on: 2016/9/14 22:53