JERSEY CITY LIST - Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra) [NOT Jersey City]

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#88

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/11/10 20:38
Last Login :
2018/2/1 3:02

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3071

Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

iGreg wrote:

Quote:

Trump seems to agree on the needs of infrastructure improvements as he called the US a third world country...

And in many ways he is correct, imagine if our military budget for protecting sovereign nations was used within our own borders.

Trump can!

Sorry but Trump cannot.

Trump actually wants to lift the spending caps and increase the military budget...
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/art ... ng-as-clinton-gap-narrows

Wouldn't u think charging countries for using our military would allow us to increase the budget?
no...many countries would not pay. are you kidding me?

Are you kidding me? These countries signed treaties and contracts where they agreed to pay. They have violated their agreements and failed to do so.

What makes you think it will be difficult to get them to honor their promises?

Posted on: 2016/9/27 23:15

hero69

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#87

Home away from home

Joined:
2004/11/14 2:38
Last Login :
2023/1/30 21:43

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3792

Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

iGreg wrote:

Quote:

Trump seems to agree on the needs of infrastructure improvements as he called the US a third world country...

And in many ways he is correct, imagine if our military budget for protecting sovereign nations was used within our own borders.

Trump can!

Sorry but Trump cannot.

Trump actually wants to lift the spending caps and increase the military budget...
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/art ... ng-as-clinton-gap-narrows

Wouldn't u think charging countries for using our military would allow us to increase the budget?

no...many countries would not pay. are you kidding me?

Posted on: 2016/9/27 22:59

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#86

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/7/17 3:05
Last Login :
2023/6/22 2:50

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 953

Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

iGreg wrote:

Quote:

Trump seems to agree on the needs of infrastructure improvements as he called the US a third world country...

And in many ways he is correct, imagine if our military budget for protecting sovereign nations was used within our own borders.

Trump can!

Sorry but Trump cannot.

Trump actually wants to lift the spending caps and increase the military budget...
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/art ... ng-as-clinton-gap-narrows

Wouldn't u think charging countries for using our military would allow us to increase the budget?

Posted on: 2016/9/27 22:41

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#85

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Trump has raised more than $13 million since the debate.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... ion-in-past-24-hours.html

Impressive number but he has raised this amount in the last 24 hours, not since the debate...
Is taking liberty with facts and exaggerations contagious among Trump supporters?

Posted on: 2016/9/27 22:24

SOS

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#84

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/9/18 3:58
Last Login :
2021/9/23 15:07

From Between Thought and Expression

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 907

Quote:

Monroe wrote:
TIME magazine poll on the debate has over 800,000 votes, and Trump winning 59-41 percent.

The post debate polls were rigged according to NYOST

http://nypost.com/2016/09/27/online-p ... n-the-debate-were-rigged/

...online results from about 70 debate polls were particularly egregious because Trump supporters ?artificially manipulated? the results ?to create the false narrative? that he won.

Trump supporters using Reddit and 4chan message boards bombarded the online polls and spread the effort to Twitter to catapult the hashtag ?#Trumpwon? to the No. 1 trending topic.

Established pollster, Neil Newhouse, says online surveys encourage a ?stuffing the ballot box? mentality...

Posted on: 2016/9/27 22:23

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#83

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/11/10 20:38
Last Login :
2018/2/1 3:02

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3071

Trump has raised more than $13 million since the debate.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... ion-in-past-24-hours.html

Posted on: 2016/9/27 21:58

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#82

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

iGreg wrote:

Quote:

Trump seems to agree on the needs of infrastructure improvements as he called the US a third world country...

And in many ways he is correct, imagine if our military budget for protecting sovereign nations was used within our own borders.

Trump can!

Sorry but Trump cannot.

Trump actually wants to lift the spending caps and increase the military budget...
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/art ... ng-as-clinton-gap-narrows

Posted on: 2016/9/27 21:10

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#81

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/7/17 3:05
Last Login :
2023/6/22 2:50

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 953

Quote:

iGreg wrote:

Quote:

Trump seems to agree on the needs of infrastructure improvements as he called the US a third world country...

And in many ways he is correct, imagine if our military budget for protecting sovereign nations was used within our own borders.

Trump can!

Posted on: 2016/9/27 19:46

iGreg

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#80

Home away from home

Joined:
2015/4/15 3:56
Last Login :
2019/3/11 14:10

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1044

Quote:

Trump seems to agree on the needs of infrastructure improvements as he called the US a third world country...

And in many ways he is correct, imagine if our military budget for protecting sovereign nations was used within our own borders.

Posted on: 2016/9/27 19:43

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#79

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Lester Holt did his best to throw it to Hillary by not pushing her on the email scandal, not even mentioning the issues around the foundation or Benghazi among other issues.

Very true. He was very biased but was smart about it and expressed it subtly, through giving Hillary endless softball questions, staying away from her many many problems, and giving Trump a barrage of negative questions.

Still, I would have liked to have seen Trump attack her more. Let her get away with too much. He did ok but I'd like to see a stronger performance the next time around.

Or maybe next time he could explain how he will bring back all the jobs back from Mexico and China as it is one of his main campaign promise but does not seem to have a plan for it... or was not able to articulate it yesterday despite been asked... or maybe it is another secret plan...

His plan if you paid attention is to rewrite our trade agreements. To start taxing companies who build products or employ staff overseas that wish to sell back to the US. We are still the biggest global consumer we can call the shots. His biggest mistake was not pressing on why the emails were deleted. Lester let it slide but sure pushed Trump on the birther movement.

I paid attention and that was his answer to not have more leave the country, not to bring them back as that would apply to companies that decide to delocalize production and consequently close plants/offices in the US.
He made the distinction himself. He did not offer a plan to bring back the manufacturing jobs that are not located in the US anymore. I invite you to re-watch that part of the debate.

And I won't go into discussing the efficacy of such a policy as it would most probably negatively impact the competitiveness of American companies but this is another topic...

Did you pay attention to Hillary's answer when asked what she would do to create jobs?

Absolutely nothing. Her only response was to claim the government will create more jobs by subsidizing renewable energy such as solar. Which, as Trump pointed out, is a horrible idea because Obama already tried it and the result was the government was on the hook for more than $500 million with nothing to show for it.

At least trying to stem job loss and rewrite trade agreements to bring jobs back (which I agree he didn't get into for some reason but always says at his rallies), along with lowering the corporate tax rate for job creation is some kind of plan, as opposed to a proven failure.

This is not what she said. She said investing in badly needed infrastructure improvement as well as new energy would create jobs, instead of focusing on trying to save coal industry related jobs and she is right.

Trump seems to agree on the needs of infrastructure improvements as he called the US a third world country...

Posted on: 2016/9/27 19:29

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#78

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/7/17 3:05
Last Login :
2023/6/22 2:50

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 953

Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Lester Holt did his best to throw it to Hillary by not pushing her on the email scandal, not even mentioning the issues around the foundation or Benghazi among other issues.

Very true. He was very biased but was smart about it and expressed it subtly, through giving Hillary endless softball questions, staying away from her many many problems, and giving Trump a barrage of negative questions.

Still, I would have liked to have seen Trump attack her more. Let her get away with too much. He did ok but I'd like to see a stronger performance the next time around.

Or maybe next time he could explain how he will bring back all the jobs back from Mexico and China as it is one of his main campaign promise but does not seem to have a plan for it... or was not able to articulate it yesterday despite been asked... or maybe it is another secret plan...

His plan if you paid attention is to rewrite our trade agreements. To start taxing companies who build products or employ staff overseas that wish to sell back to the US. We are still the biggest global consumer we can call the shots. His biggest mistake was not pressing on why the emails were deleted. Lester let it slide but sure pushed Trump on the birther movement.

I paid attention and that was his answer to not have more leave the country, not to bring them back as that would apply to companies that decide to delocalize production and consequently close plants/offices in the US.
He made the distinction himself. He did not offer a plan to bring back the manufacturing jobs that are not located in the US anymore. I invite you to re-watch that part of the debate.

And I won't go into discussing the efficacy of such a policy as it would most probably negatively impact the competitiveness of American companies but this is another topic...

The point is if they sell here then it benefits them to pay his tax.

He also very clearly stated that he believed lowering corporate tax would create jobs here in the US.

Posted on: 2016/9/27 19:16

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#77

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/11/10 20:38
Last Login :
2018/2/1 3:02

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3071

Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Lester Holt did his best to throw it to Hillary by not pushing her on the email scandal, not even mentioning the issues around the foundation or Benghazi among other issues.

Very true. He was very biased but was smart about it and expressed it subtly, through giving Hillary endless softball questions, staying away from her many many problems, and giving Trump a barrage of negative questions.

Still, I would have liked to have seen Trump attack her more. Let her get away with too much. He did ok but I'd like to see a stronger performance the next time around.

Or maybe next time he could explain how he will bring back all the jobs back from Mexico and China as it is one of his main campaign promise but does not seem to have a plan for it... or was not able to articulate it yesterday despite been asked... or maybe it is another secret plan...

His plan if you paid attention is to rewrite our trade agreements. To start taxing companies who build products or employ staff overseas that wish to sell back to the US. We are still the biggest global consumer we can call the shots. His biggest mistake was not pressing on why the emails were deleted. Lester let it slide but sure pushed Trump on the birther movement.

I paid attention and that was his answer to not have more leave the country, not to bring them back as that would apply to companies that decide to delocalize production and consequently close plants/offices in the US.
He made the distinction himself. He did not offer a plan to bring back the manufacturing jobs that are not located in the US anymore. I invite you to re-watch that part of the debate.

And I won't go into discussing the efficacy of such a policy as it would most probably negatively impact the competitiveness of American companies but this is another topic...

Did you pay attention to Hillary's answer when asked what she would do to create jobs?

Absolutely nothing. Her only response was to claim the government will create more jobs by subsidizing renewable energy such as solar. Which, as Trump pointed out, is a horrible idea because Obama already tried it and the result was the government was on the hook for more than $500 million with nothing to show for it.

At least trying to stem job loss and rewrite trade agreements to bring jobs back (which I agree he didn't get into for some reason but always says at his rallies), along with lowering the corporate tax rate for job creation is some kind of plan, as opposed to a proven failure.

Posted on: 2016/9/27 19:09

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#76

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

135jc wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Lester Holt did his best to throw it to Hillary by not pushing her on the email scandal, not even mentioning the issues around the foundation or Benghazi among other issues.

Very true. He was very biased but was smart about it and expressed it subtly, through giving Hillary endless softball questions, staying away from her many many problems, and giving Trump a barrage of negative questions.

Still, I would have liked to have seen Trump attack her more. Let her get away with too much. He did ok but I'd like to see a stronger performance the next time around.

Or maybe next time he could explain how he will bring back all the jobs back from Mexico and China as it is one of his main campaign promise but does not seem to have a plan for it... or was not able to articulate it yesterday despite been asked... or maybe it is another secret plan...

His plan if you paid attention is to rewrite our trade agreements. To start taxing companies who build products or employ staff overseas that wish to sell back to the US. We are still the biggest global consumer we can call the shots. His biggest mistake was not pressing on why the emails were deleted. Lester let it slide but sure pushed Trump on the birther movement.

I paid attention and that was his answer to not have more leave the country, not to bring them back as that would apply to companies that decide to delocalize production and consequently close plants/offices in the US.
He made the distinction himself. He did not offer a plan to bring back the manufacturing jobs that are not located in the US anymore. I invite you to re-watch that part of the debate.

And I won't go into discussing the efficacy of such a policy as it would most probably negatively impact the competitiveness of American companies but this is another topic...

Posted on: 2016/9/27 18:50

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#75

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/7/17 3:05
Last Login :
2023/6/22 2:50

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 953

Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Lester Holt did his best to throw it to Hillary by not pushing her on the email scandal, not even mentioning the issues around the foundation or Benghazi among other issues.

Very true. He was very biased but was smart about it and expressed it subtly, through giving Hillary endless softball questions, staying away from her many many problems, and giving Trump a barrage of negative questions.

Still, I would have liked to have seen Trump attack her more. Let her get away with too much. He did ok but I'd like to see a stronger performance the next time around.

Or maybe next time he could explain how he will bring back all the jobs back from Mexico and China as it is one of his main campaign promise but does not seem to have a plan for it... or was not able to articulate it yesterday despite been asked... or maybe it is another secret plan...

His plan if you paid attention is to rewrite our trade agreements. To start taxing companies who build products or employ staff overseas that wish to sell back to the US. We are still the biggest global consumer we can call the shots. His biggest mistake was not pressing on why the emails were deleted. Lester let it slide but sure pushed Trump on the birther movement.

Posted on: 2016/9/27 18:33

I_heart_JC

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#74

Home away from home

Joined:
2007/11/15 21:43
Last Login :
2020/3/22 6:01

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 805

Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

It was totally rigged. Trump was intentionally given a bad microphone.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/27/was-that ... ms-he-got-bad-debate-mic/
crooked hillary rigging donald's mike

any mic that Trump is speaking into is a bad mic.

Posted on: 2016/9/27 18:19

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#73

Home away from home

Joined:
2009/4/24 18:36
Last Login :
2019/11/18 4:28

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 225

Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Lester Holt did his best to throw it to Hillary by not pushing her on the email scandal, not even mentioning the issues around the foundation or Benghazi among other issues.

Very true. He was very biased but was smart about it and expressed it subtly, through giving Hillary endless softball questions, staying away from her many many problems, and giving Trump a barrage of negative questions.

Still, I would have liked to have seen Trump attack her more. Let her get away with too much. He did ok but I'd like to see a stronger performance the next time around.

Or maybe next time he could explain how he will bring back all the jobs back from Mexico and China as it is one of his main campaign promise but does not seem to have a plan for it... or was not able to articulate it yesterday despite been asked... or maybe it is another secret plan...

Posted on: 2016/9/27 18:05

hero69

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#72

Home away from home

Joined:
2004/11/14 2:38
Last Login :
2023/1/30 21:43

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3792

Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

It was totally rigged. Trump was intentionally given a bad microphone.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/27/was-that ... ms-he-got-bad-debate-mic/

crooked hillary rigging donald's mike

Posted on: 2016/9/27 17:54

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#71

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/11/10 20:38
Last Login :
2018/2/1 3:02

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 3071

Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Lester Holt did his best to throw it to Hillary by not pushing her on the email scandal, not even mentioning the issues around the foundation or Benghazi among other issues.

Very true. He was very biased but was smart about it and expressed it subtly, through giving Hillary endless softball questions, staying away from her many many problems, and giving Trump a barrage of negative questions.

Still, I would have liked to have seen Trump attack her more. Let her get away with too much. He did ok but I'd like to see a stronger performance the next time around.

Posted on: 2016/9/27 17:11

sullyx

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#70

Home away from home

Joined:
2007/3/19 18:28
Last Login :
2020/3/10 14:50

From hamilton park

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 292

Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Lester Holt did his best to throw it to Hillary by not pushing her on the email scandal, not even mentioning the issues around the foundation or Benghazi among other issues.

Posted on: 2016/9/27 17:08

utterly deplorable

SOS

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#69

Home away from home

Joined:
2012/9/18 3:58
Last Login :
2021/9/23 15:07

From Between Thought and Expression

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 907

Quote:

07310 wrote:
I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

It was totally rigged. Trump was intentionally given a bad microphone.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/27/was-that ... ms-he-got-bad-debate-mic/

Posted on: 2016/9/27 16:53

07310

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#68

Home away from home

Joined:
2004/11/8 3:36
Last Login :
2020/5/9 11:15

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 969

I'm surprised the Orange Anus hasn't said the debate was rigged.

Posted on: 2016/9/27 16:29

corybraiterman

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#67

Home away from home

Joined:
2008/7/3 5:49
Last Login :
2022/4/28 22:07

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1384

without reading this thread (because seriously, fck this thread) http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/even ... won-the-debate-1787121521

Resized Image

Posted on: 2016/9/27 15:40

iGreg

Re: 9/26/2016: Presidential Debate (Hofstra)

#66

Home away from home

Joined:
2015/4/15 3:56
Last Login :
2019/3/11 14:10

From JC

Group:
Registered Users

Posts: 1044

Y'all know Clinton put the D in Democrat

Drop Dems Panties

Posted on: 2016/9/27 15:36