Pebble wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:

Why wouldn't they work to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

Why wouldn't they cheat to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

You meant that, right?

How is it "cheating"?

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Today Obama threw down the 'sexist' attack, saying that's what men are if they don't vote for crooked Hillary.

Does anyone remember him thinking this in 2008 when he said she wasn't fit to be POTUS??

Panic mode Level Hard.

Yes Comrade! Liberals scared because Trump is winning! Don't pay attention to democrat poll -
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election Clinton up by 11 points or smarty pants Princeton showing Hillary 97% chance - http://election.princeton.edu/

We have the best supporters! Now KKK on board! KKK nice guys!

Liberals scared of their doom next week!

Only look at IBB poll - http://www.investors.com/politics/ibd ... esidential-election-poll/ - all others NO GOOD.

Go Trump! Make American great again just like good old days 1939!

Your McCarthy impersonation is funny, but many polls show Trump winning.

Take a look at this one that was released today for Virginia, a state Hillary desperately needs. From Hampton University/CPP Poll: Trump 44/Hillary 41.

A 15 point shift towards Trump in a month. America is waking up to the horror that would result in electing a criminal into office.

But she's certainly breaking barriers. First Presidential candidate in U.S. History to be under an active FBI criminal investigation on Election Day.

https://mobile.twitter.com/PpollingNum ... status/793889001757347841

There certainly is movement but people have made up their minds. Look at the rest of polls for VA - Oct 30:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2 ... ection-forecast/virginia/

You claim that people have made up their minds but this is your wishful thinking, not fact.

The poll I cited was just released. I bet we will see more such favorable Trump polls in the coming days as Hillary continues to crumble.

Also, going to your link, do you see the trendline for Trump? It's skyrocketing up. Plenty of time for that to continue before the election. And you know as well as I do that if he wins Virginia, he stands a very good chance of winning the whole thing.

SOS wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Today Obama threw down the 'sexist' attack, saying that's what men are if they don't vote for crooked Hillary.

Does anyone remember him thinking this in 2008 when he said she wasn't fit to be POTUS??

Panic mode Level Hard.

Yes Comrade! Liberals scared because Trump is winning! Don't pay attention to democrat poll -
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election Clinton up by 11 points or smarty pants Princeton showing Hillary 97% chance - http://election.princeton.edu/

We have the best supporters! Now KKK on board! KKK nice guys!

Liberals scared of their doom next week!

Only look at IBB poll - http://www.investors.com/politics/ibd ... esidential-election-poll/ - all others NO GOOD.

Go Trump! Make American great again just like good old days 1939!

Your McCarthy impersonation is funny, but many polls show Trump winning.

Take a look at this one that was released today for Virginia, a state Hillary desperately needs. From Hampton University/CPP Poll: Trump 44/Hillary 41.

A 15 point shift towards Trump in a month. America is waking up to the horror that would result in electing a criminal into office.

But she's certainly breaking barriers. First Presidential candidate in U.S. History to be under an active FBI criminal investigation on Election Day.

https://mobile.twitter.com/PpollingNum ... status/793889001757347841

There certainly is movement but people have made up their minds. Look at the rest of polls for VA - Oct 30:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2 ... ection-forecast/virginia/

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Today Obama threw down the 'sexist' attack, saying that's what men are if they don't vote for crooked Hillary.

Does anyone remember him thinking this in 2008 when he said she wasn't fit to be POTUS??

Panic mode Level Hard.

Yes Comrade! Liberals scared because Trump is winning! Don't pay attention to democrat poll -
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election Clinton up by 11 points or smarty pants Princeton showing Hillary 97% chance - http://election.princeton.edu/

We have the best supporters! Now KKK on board! KKK nice guys!

Liberals scared of their doom next week!

Only look at IBB poll - http://www.investors.com/politics/ibd ... esidential-election-poll/ - all others NO GOOD.

Go Trump! Make American great again just like good old days 1939!

Your McCarthy impersonation is funny, but many polls show Trump winning.

Take a look at this one that was released today for Virginia, a state Hillary desperately needs. From Hampton University/CPP Poll: Trump 44/Hillary 41.

A 15 point shift towards Trump in a month. America is waking up to the horror that would result in electing a criminal into office.

But she's certainly breaking barriers. First Presidential candidate in U.S. History to be under an active FBI criminal investigation on Election Day.

https://mobile.twitter.com/PpollingNum ... status/793889001757347841

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:

Why wouldn't they work to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

Why wouldn't they cheat to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

You meant that, right?

Pebble wrote:

Why wouldn't they work to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
I find it very funny that there is "outrage" over Bernie getting "cheated." Seriously, why is anyone surprised that a political party didn't want someone that wasn't a member to be their nominee?

Why wouldn't they work to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

As for the emails... There is no actual information about them. All we know is that Anthony Weiner's computer had emails on them which contained the ClintonMail domain. They could be emails we've already seen. They could be emails that aren't classified. They could be emails talking about the latest pant suit that should be ordered. Heck, we don't even know if these emails are from or to Hillary.

In the end, Donald Trump is a racist that courts racists. If you're ok voting for a guy like that and having a racist represent the United States of America, by all means. Otherwise, you'll pull the lever for someone else.

And if you are comfortable turning the country over to the Clinton Family, a family who indulge in extreme crony capitalism, possess questionable ethics and embrace a morality on par with 19th century robber barons so be it.

If we accept your premise that Trump is a racist, at least we have hope that he will act in a civil manner similar to party leading democrats like Bryd and Gore who were members of the Ku Klux Klan and changed their racist views with time.

But who knows, like Hillary says... you need to have a public face and a private face with public policy.... now which one are you voting for?

Pebble wrote:
I find it very funny that there is "outrage" over Bernie getting "cheated." Seriously, why is anyone surprised that a political party didn't want someone that wasn't a member to be their nominee?

Why wouldn't they work to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

As for the emails... There is no actual information about them. All we know is that Anthony Weiner's computer had emails on them which contained the ClintonMail domain. They could be emails we've already seen. They could be emails that aren't classified. They could be emails talking about the latest pant suit that should be ordered. Heck, we don't even know if these emails are from or to Hillary.

In the end, Donald Trump is a racist that courts racists. If you're ok voting for a guy like that and having a racist represent the United States of America, by all means. Otherwise, you'll pull the lever for someone else.

SOS wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Today Obama threw down the 'sexist' attack, saying that's what men are if they don't vote for crooked Hillary.

Does anyone remember him thinking this in 2008 when he said she wasn't fit to be POTUS??

Panic mode Level Hard.

Yes Comrade! Liberals scared because Trump is winning! Don't pay attention to democrat poll -
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election Clinton up by 11 points or smarty pants Princeton showing Hillary 97% chance - http://election.princeton.edu/

We have the best supporters! Now KKK on board! KKK nice guys!

Liberals scared of their doom next week!

Only look at IBB poll - http://www.investors.com/politics/ibd ... esidential-election-poll/ - all others NO GOOD.

Go Trump! Make American great again just like good old days 1939!

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Today Obama threw down the 'sexist' attack, saying that's what men are if they don't vote for crooked Hillary.

Does anyone remember him thinking this in 2008 when he said she wasn't fit to be POTUS??

Panic mode Level Hard.

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Today Obama threw down the 'sexist' attack, saying that's what men are if they don't vote for crooked Hillary.

Does anyone remember him thinking this in 2008 when he said she wasn't fit to be POTUS??

Panic mode Level Hard.

Monroe wrote:
Today Obama threw down the 'sexist' attack, saying that's what men are if they don't vote for crooked Hillary.

Does anyone remember him thinking this in 2008 when he said she wasn't fit to be POTUS??

135jc wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

You seem to care a lot about this issue , neverleft, as you keep posting the same thing about it over and over again.
And by the way, it is not questionS but 1 question.

Clinton was told that one question would be about the water scandal in Flint. Do you think that was a game changer in the election?

What Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it. But do you think the answer to that question determined the outcome of the primary. Really?

Where there is smoke there is fire Manu. Stop wasting everyone's time. There are countless examples of Clinton and her team breaking the rules. If you chose to ignore it fine but stop trying to insist Hillary is innocent in this.

manu wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

You seem to care a lot about this issue , neverleft, as you keep posting the same thing about it over and over again.
And by the way, it is not questionS but 1 question.

Clinton was told that one question would be about the water scandal in Flint. Do you think that was a game changer in the election?

What Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it. But do you think the answer to that question determined the outcome of the primary. Really?

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

You seem to care a lot about this issue , neverleft, as you keep posting the same thing about it over and over again.
And by the way, it is not questionS but 1 question.

Clinton was told that one question would be about the water scandal in Flint. Do you think that was a game changer in the election?

What Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it. But do you think the answer to that question determined the outcome of the primary. Really?

This "impartial" debate moderator secretly tipped Hillary off about more than one question, not just one. And yes, this is a very big deal.

Most glaringly, no media outlet has asked Hillary about why she cheated. It is undeniable she received this advance information. Why isn't she being held accountable? It would be the #1 story for a week if Trump was caught cheating at the debates.

Further, CNN fired this woman but she remains the head of the DNC. Why? Does CNN have higher ethical standards for their employees than the Democratic National Committee does?

Come on. Stop the fake outrage.

As I said, what Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it.
But she leaked a question about the water scandal in Flint at a debate that was happening in Flint, Michigan. Don't you think the candidates were expecting the question?

Did you find any of the questions asked at the debates to be surprising/unexpected? They all know what they will be asked and they all prep for the questions... I mean all of them except Trump as I guess he does not believe in preparing for debates...

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

You seem to care a lot about this issue , neverleft, as you keep posting the same thing about it over and over again.
And by the way, it is not questionS but 1 question.

Clinton was told that one question would be about the water scandal in Flint. Do you think that was a game changer in the election?

What Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it. But do you think the answer to that question determined the outcome of the primary. Really?

This "impartial" debate moderator secretly tipped Hillary off about more than one question, not just one. And yes, this is a very big deal.

Most glaringly, no media outlet has asked Hillary about why she cheated. It is undeniable she received this advance information. Why isn't she being held accountable? It would be the #1 story for a week if Trump was caught cheating at the debates.

Further, CNN fired this woman but she remains the head of the DNC. Why? Does CNN have higher ethical standards for their employees than the Democratic National Committee does?

Come on. Stop the fake outrage.

As I said, what Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it.
But she leaked a question about the water scandal in Flint at a debate that was happening in Flint, Michigan. Don't you think the candidates were expecting the question?

Did you find any of the questions asked at the debates to be surprising/unexpected? They all know what they will be asked and they all prep for the questions... I mean all of them except Trump as I guess he does not believe in preparing for debates...

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

You seem to care a lot about this issue , neverleft, as you keep posting the same thing about it over and over again.
And by the way, it is not questionS but 1 question.

Clinton was told that one question would be about the water scandal in Flint. Do you think that was a game changer in the election?

What Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it. But do you think the answer to that question determined the outcome of the primary. Really?

This "impartial" debate moderator secretly tipped Hillary off about more than one question, not just one. And yes, this is a very big deal.

Most glaringly, no media outlet has asked Hillary about why she cheated. It is undeniable she received this advance information. Why isn't she being held accountable? It would be the #1 story for a week if Trump was caught cheating at the debates.

Further, CNN fired this woman but she remains the head of the DNC. Why? Does CNN have higher ethical standards for their employees than the Democratic National Committee does?

Come on. Stop the fake outrage.

As I said, what Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it.
But she leaked a question about the water scandal in Flint at a debate that was happening in Flint, Michigan. Don't you think the candidates were expecting the question?

Did you find any of the questions asked at the debates to be surprising/unexpected? They all know what they will be asked and they all prep for the questions... I mean all of them except Trump as I guess he does not believe in preparing for debates...

JCMan8 wrote:
You are so full of it, linking to Nate Silver of all people (along with the Washington Post, owned by a guy who bragged about buying the paper just to influence this election) as if that means anything.

Want some facts? Just today, the Pennsylvania State Police raided the offices of a (surprise surprise) Democratic organization for engaging in suspected voter fraud. Hopefully all responsible get arrested, and voter ID laws are passed to help thwart these fraud schemes.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/ ... oup-evidence-voter-fraud/

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

You seem to care a lot about this issue , neverleft, as you keep posting the same thing about it over and over again.
And by the way, it is not questionS but 1 question.

Clinton was told that one question would be about the water scandal in Flint. Do you think that was a game changer in the election?

What Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it. But do you think the answer to that question determined the outcome of the primary. Really?

This "impartial" debate moderator secretly tipped Hillary off about more than one question, not just one. And yes, this is a very big deal.

Most glaringly, no media outlet has asked Hillary about why she cheated. It is undeniable she received this advance information. Why isn't she being held accountable? It would be the #1 story for a week if Trump was caught cheating at the debates.

Further, CNN fired this woman but she remains the head of the DNC. Why? Does CNN have higher ethical standards for their employees than the Democratic National Committee does?

manu wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

You seem to care a lot about this issue , neverleft, as you keep posting the same thing about it over and over again.
And by the way, it is not questionS but 1 question.

Clinton was told that one question would be about the water scandal in Flint. Do you think that was a game changer in the election?

What Brazile did was improper and she was fired over it. But do you think the answer to that question determined the outcome of the primary. Really?

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Is this a serious post? You admit that voter registration fraud is common and easy to commit and then claim without any evidence that it's very difficult to turn these fake registrations into actual votes?

Why exactly do you think these Democrats are breaking the law and registering dead people to vote? For the fun of it?

THIS IS EXACTLY MY POINT! You don't even understand the difference between voter registration fraud and voter fraud!

Committing voter registration fraud doesn't require you to be successful in the act. The example in that article is a perfect demonstration of it. Someone tries to register dead people for voting, or for Mickey Mouse. The elections board reviews the registrations and says "of course this person can't vote."

See? It's incredibly easy to fill out a registration form for whatever you want. Actually getting that registration accepted and then getting somebody to show up and vote is an entirely different thing.

The main occasion when voter fraud happens is when somebody votes early or by absentee ballot and then shows up to their regular polling place to vote again (which wouldn't be stopped by ID laws). And guess what?? The election board catches that stuff! Just like the example posted in that other thread.

You say you want proof that voter fraud isn't an issue, but the proof is out there, constantly, in easy to find places, and yet you will willfully ignore it to push this stupid narrative of a problem that does not exist.

Here's a source for you to promptly ignore:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/th ... -id-laws-and-voter-fraud/
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/v ... re-in-american-elections/

Even if there were hundreds of cases of voter fraud each year (which is an extremely generous estimate) it's not enough to sway any election.


If you really are concerned about elections being stolen, you should be concerned about laws that disenfranchise voters, or voter roll purges, or the fact that many ballot boxes are easy hackable electronics that have no paper audit trail and are proprietary software being handled by private companies. THOSE are the real issues.

Not some random jagoff like Ann Coulter voting twice in an election.

You are so full of it, linking to Nate Silver of all people (along with the Washington Post, owned by a guy who bragged about buying the paper just to influence this election) as if that means anything.

Want some facts? Just today, the Pennsylvania State Police raided the offices of a (surprise surprise) Democratic organization for engaging in suspected voter fraud. Hopefully all responsible get arrested, and voter ID laws are passed to help thwart these fraud schemes.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/ ... oup-evidence-voter-fraud/

Are you for real JCMan8? You criticized The Washington Post for being bias but illustrate your point with an article from Thegatewaypundit.com to illustrate your point. Seriously?

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

neverleft wrote:
The amazing thing about how Clinton got the debate questions ahead of time is that there are NO articles criticizing Team Clinton and Clinton for using them to prepare answers for the debates. Poor Bernie he was robbed.

** **
Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

CNN announced in a statement soon after the email became public Monday that Brazile had tendered her resignation and the network accepted it on Oct. 14, days after the controversy over Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign initially broke.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Is this a serious post? You admit that voter registration fraud is common and easy to commit and then claim without any evidence that it's very difficult to turn these fake registrations into actual votes?

Why exactly do you think these Democrats are breaking the law and registering dead people to vote? For the fun of it?

THIS IS EXACTLY MY POINT! You don't even understand the difference between voter registration fraud and voter fraud!

Committing voter registration fraud doesn't require you to be successful in the act. The example in that article is a perfect demonstration of it. Someone tries to register dead people for voting, or for Mickey Mouse. The elections board reviews the registrations and says "of course this person can't vote."

See? It's incredibly easy to fill out a registration form for whatever you want. Actually getting that registration accepted and then getting somebody to show up and vote is an entirely different thing.

The main occasion when voter fraud happens is when somebody votes early or by absentee ballot and then shows up to their regular polling place to vote again (which wouldn't be stopped by ID laws). And guess what?? The election board catches that stuff! Just like the example posted in that other thread.

You say you want proof that voter fraud isn't an issue, but the proof is out there, constantly, in easy to find places, and yet you will willfully ignore it to push this stupid narrative of a problem that does not exist.

Here's a source for you to promptly ignore:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/th ... -id-laws-and-voter-fraud/
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/v ... re-in-american-elections/

Even if there were hundreds of cases of voter fraud each year (which is an extremely generous estimate) it's not enough to sway any election.


If you really are concerned about elections being stolen, you should be concerned about laws that disenfranchise voters, or voter roll purges, or the fact that many ballot boxes are easy hackable electronics that have no paper audit trail and are proprietary software being handled by private companies. THOSE are the real issues.

Not some random jagoff like Ann Coulter voting twice in an election.

You are so full of it, linking to Nate Silver of all people (along with the Washington Post, owned by a guy who bragged about buying the paper just to influence this election) as if that means anything.

Want some facts? Just today, the Pennsylvania State Police raided the offices of a (surprise surprise) Democratic organization for engaging in suspected voter fraud. Hopefully all responsible get arrested, and voter ID laws are passed to help thwart these fraud schemes.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/ ... oup-evidence-voter-fraud/

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Is this a serious post? You admit that voter registration fraud is common and easy to commit and then claim without any evidence that it's very difficult to turn these fake registrations into actual votes?

Why exactly do you think these Democrats are breaking the law and registering dead people to vote? For the fun of it?

THIS IS EXACTLY MY POINT! You don't even understand the difference between voter registration fraud and voter fraud!

Committing voter registration fraud doesn't require you to be successful in the act. The example in that article is a perfect demonstration of it. Someone tries to register dead people for voting, or for Mickey Mouse. The elections board reviews the registrations and says "of course this person can't vote."

See? It's incredibly easy to fill out a registration form for whatever you want. Actually getting that registration accepted and then getting somebody to show up and vote is an entirely different thing.

The main occasion when voter fraud happens is when somebody votes early or by absentee ballot and then shows up to their regular polling place to vote again (which wouldn't be stopped by ID laws). And guess what?? The election board catches that stuff! Just like the example posted in that other thread.

You say you want proof that voter fraud isn't an issue, but the proof is out there, constantly, in easy to find places, and yet you will willfully ignore it to push this stupid narrative of a problem that does not exist.

Here's a source for you to promptly ignore:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/th ... -id-laws-and-voter-fraud/
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/v ... re-in-american-elections/

Even if there were hundreds of cases of voter fraud each year (which is an extremely generous estimate) it's not enough to sway any election.


If you really are concerned about elections being stolen, you should be concerned about laws that disenfranchise voters, or voter roll purges, or the fact that many ballot boxes are easy hackable electronics that have no paper audit trail and are proprietary software being handled by private companies. THOSE are the real issues.

Not some random jagoff like Ann Coulter voting twice in an election.