Frank_M wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
While you seem obsessed with the concept of projection, no projection of any sort is occurring. Instead, it's a modern form of character assassination. There isn't actually any merit behind the charges...

I mentioned projection only a few times, but you suggest that I might be obsessed? Well, if three mentions of a subject on my part constitutes obsession, where does that leave you and your posts? (A: It leaves you projecting the quality on to me.)

The less you?re aware of your shadow and its tendency for irrational projection, the more influence you let it have over you. The problem is that it wants to remain hidden and we don't want to see it.

SOS wrote:
Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million
A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec. 19, are pushing to block Trump from winning a majority of votes.
By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 11/23/16 07:33 AM EST

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11 ... -popular-vote-2016-231790

Is Trump really our new president? Way behind in popular vote. No mandate.

SOS wrote:
Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million
A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec. 19, are pushing to block Trump from winning a majority of votes.
By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 11/23/16 07:33 AM EST

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11 ... -popular-vote-2016-231790

Is Trump really our new president? Way behind in popular vote. No mandate.

matt07302 wrote:
Donald Trump is a climate change denier. As the caretakers of this small little ball in the cosmos we must take steps to save our home for the future of our species. Yet this man wants to keep burning coal, drilling oil and killing our home. Next time you get out of the city, look up and see all the billions of suns and think about how alone we all are in this universe and how remarkable our very existence is.

None of this bullshit about "Make America Great Again" matters if we don't have a habitable, tiny, little, blue ball for us all coexist on.

Leon Fuerth...
"I don't think that humanity is guaranteed a pass out of the problems that it is creating for itself. If we fail then it is possible thyat we can never again, at any price, obtain the kind of future that we may be able to secure for ourselves if we succeed. The technological means are are at hand. The wealth exists. The question always is whether or not the wisdom exists. In any strategic system, time is the most precious resource. It's the one thing that can not be replenished.""

JCMan8 wrote:
While you seem obsessed with the concept of projection, no projection of any sort is occurring. Instead, it's a modern form of character assassination. There isn't actually any merit behind the charges...

SOS wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Recount!

Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results
By Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 10:23 PM ET, Tue November 22, 2016

(CNN)Hillary Clinton's campaign is being urged by a number of top computer scientists to call for a recount of vote totals in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, according to a source with knowledge of the request.

The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides on a call last Thursday.
The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source.

The group informed John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman, and Marc Elias, the campaign's general counsel, that Clinton received 7% fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic voting machines, which the group said could have been hacked.
Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review.
Neither Halderman nor John Bonifaz, an attorney also pressing the case, responded to requests for comment on Tuesday evening. Their urging was first reported by New York magazine.
A message left with President-elect Donald Trump's transition team also was not immediately returned.

There were widespread concerns about hacking ahead of this month's election, including the Obama administration accusing Russia of attempting to breach voter registration data. But election officials and cybersecurity experts said earlier this month that it is virtually impossible for Russia to influence the election outcome.
A former Clinton aide declined to respond to questions about whether they will request an audit based on the findings.
Additionally, at least three electors have pledged to not vote for Trump and to seek a "reasonable Republican alternative for president through Electoral College," according to a statement Wednesday from a group called the Hamilton Electors, which represents them.
"The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College as the last line of defense," one elector, Michael Baca, said in a statement, "and I think we must do all that we can to ensure that we have a reasonable Republican candidate who shares our American values."

Desperation time.

I don't think it's gonna happen and way past desperation time.

But isn't Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, pick for national security advisory kind of nutjob? And Nicky Haley - what does she know about the UN or Washington politics? I think she's a bold pick for any position, but there are many people more qualified. Welcome to Trumpland!

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Recount!

Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results
By Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 10:23 PM ET, Tue November 22, 2016

(CNN)Hillary Clinton's campaign is being urged by a number of top computer scientists to call for a recount of vote totals in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, according to a source with knowledge of the request.

The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides on a call last Thursday.
The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source.

The group informed John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman, and Marc Elias, the campaign's general counsel, that Clinton received 7% fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic voting machines, which the group said could have been hacked.
Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review.
Neither Halderman nor John Bonifaz, an attorney also pressing the case, responded to requests for comment on Tuesday evening. Their urging was first reported by New York magazine.
A message left with President-elect Donald Trump's transition team also was not immediately returned.

There were widespread concerns about hacking ahead of this month's election, including the Obama administration accusing Russia of attempting to breach voter registration data. But election officials and cybersecurity experts said earlier this month that it is virtually impossible for Russia to influence the election outcome.
A former Clinton aide declined to respond to questions about whether they will request an audit based on the findings.
Additionally, at least three electors have pledged to not vote for Trump and to seek a "reasonable Republican alternative for president through Electoral College," according to a statement Wednesday from a group called the Hamilton Electors, which represents them.
"The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College as the last line of defense," one elector, Michael Baca, said in a statement, "and I think we must do all that we can to ensure that we have a reasonable Republican candidate who shares our American values."

Desperation time.

SOS wrote:
Recount!

Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results
By Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 10:23 PM ET, Tue November 22, 2016

(CNN)Hillary Clinton's campaign is being urged by a number of top computer scientists to call for a recount of vote totals in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, according to a source with knowledge of the request.

The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides on a call last Thursday.
The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source.

The group informed John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman, and Marc Elias, the campaign's general counsel, that Clinton received 7% fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic voting machines, which the group said could have been hacked.
Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review.
Neither Halderman nor John Bonifaz, an attorney also pressing the case, responded to requests for comment on Tuesday evening. Their urging was first reported by New York magazine.
A message left with President-elect Donald Trump's transition team also was not immediately returned.

There were widespread concerns about hacking ahead of this month's election, including the Obama administration accusing Russia of attempting to breach voter registration data. But election officials and cybersecurity experts said earlier this month that it is virtually impossible for Russia to influence the election outcome.
A former Clinton aide declined to respond to questions about whether they will request an audit based on the findings.
Additionally, at least three electors have pledged to not vote for Trump and to seek a "reasonable Republican alternative for president through Electoral College," according to a statement Wednesday from a group called the Hamilton Electors, which represents them.
"The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College as the last line of defense," one elector, Michael Baca, said in a statement, "and I think we must do all that we can to ensure that we have a reasonable Republican candidate who shares our American values."

AlexC wrote:
I'll tell you all Trump supporters, this is gonna be a fun 4 years! LOL

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

AlexC wrote:
I'll tell you all Trump supporters, this is gonna be a fun 4 years! LOL

It already is, especially when the racist/misogynist just appointed a woman of color to be UN representative! Damn him!

AlexC wrote:
I'll tell you all Trump supporters, this is gonna be a fun 4 years! LOL

AlexC wrote:
whatever - but, he doesn't have a mandate:

Hillary Clinton's Popular Vote Lead Is 1.7 Million And Growing:

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/22/5030526 ... ontinues-counting-ballots

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

AlexC wrote:
whatever - but, he doesn't have a mandate:

Hillary Clinton's Popular Vote Lead Is 1.7 Million And Growing:

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/22/5030526 ... ontinues-counting-ballots

Keep telling yourself that.

Libs took a major ass-kicking:

POTUS
Senate
House
SCOTUS

Nooooo, but no mandate... Waaaaaaah.

AlexC wrote:
whatever - but, he doesn't have a mandate:

Hillary Clinton's Popular Vote Lead Is 1.7 Million And Growing:

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/22/5030526 ... ontinues-counting-ballots

Monroe wrote:
I don't any of the Trump haters talking the US financial markets today-DOW breaks 19,000. The loony left (NYTimes 'Nobel Prize winner Krugman) said stocks would tank. Oopsie.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

psyop wrote:
lol re-election, after what's about to go down that's hilarious.

Do you think some "progressives" and most media outlets engaging in a years-long temper tantrum is going to stop him from getting re-elected? Lol.

psyop wrote:
lol re-election, after what's about to go down that's hilarious.

AlexC wrote:
No, sorry, it's different this time. The country has elected a racist, delusional, misogynist, egotistical sexual predator as the most powerful person in the world.

He has empowered the KKK and Neo Nazis, in addition to installing cabinet appointments to people that preached creating a registry for Muslims and stated Interment as Constitutional.

His VP is anti-LGBT and vowed to reverse marriage equality, reproductive rights and promised to defund Planned Parenthood.

He may be ignorant, but the real tragedy is not appointing and surrounding himself of people in his administration that can actually send a message to (as you stated) "give him a fair chance as President"


Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Obama is still president, though apparently not much of a leader according to your standard. Violent groups are attacking white people who are suspected to be Trump supporters yet Obama cant be bothered to say a word against them.

The only one disavowing problem supporters is Trump.

As for the rest of your posts, you are clearly very biased and I suspect you will hate Trump no matter what he does. No matter, the election is over and many voters rejected your "unqualified and dangerous" assertions. For your sake I hope you try to overcome your biases and give him a fair chance. He's our president regardless, and I think he will do great things for the middle and working classes.

JCMan8 wrote:
Obama is still president, though apparently not much of a leader according to your standard. Violent groups are attacking white people who are suspected to be Trump supporters yet Obama cant be bothered to say a word against them.

The only one disavowing problem supporters is Trump.

As for the rest of your posts, you are clearly very biased and I suspect you will hate Trump no matter what he does. No matter, the election is over and many voters rejected your "unqualified and dangerous" assertions. For your sake I hope you try to overcome your biases and give him a fair chance. He's our president regardless, and I think he will do great things for the middle and working classes.