Lima17 wrote:
Quote:

cousin wrote:
Quote:

Wishful_Thinking wrote:
Quote:

asny10011 wrote:
What would be the point of wasting tax payer dollars on incarcerating this animal? Waste of life. We have to be careful of generalizations as that could lead to racism, which is not PC and should not be supported, but I know what you mean...

Quote:

heights wrote:
The idiot should be charged with attempted murder and terrorism. As far as recouping some money towards the medical bills probably not likely. Lately it seems that those that cause either intentional harm or do it by choice do not have a pot to kiss in. These indigents do things on a whim. It is unfortunate that this game or whatever they call it is the new inner city ghetto fad/trend. I am not sure if I was PC enough for some JCLISTERs but demographics being what they are only breeds this kind of sport.

I sure hope you two have been given a life-time pass from jury duty! You were not there, and only know what little information the article gives you, and - apparently - know nothing about the definition of criminal assault, and yet are jumping to all these conclusions.

Hopefully for the young woman's sake - she is going to need a lot of strength and trust to get back to living her life normally - and ours - as potential victims ourselves - this will be handled intelligently.

We certainly shouldn't jump to any conclusions but one thing we do know is that there is a ruluctance on the part of the mainstream media to report on black on white crimes. For example, a couple weeks ago a young man of color randomly chose an elderly chinese man on an East Village street and beat him to death. This was good for about 15 seconds on ABC TV News and we never heard another word about it. Compare this to the coverage of a professional basketball team owner who uses the term "black people"-- this was in the news every day for about 3 weeks and we were calling for his head on a stake. Does the mainstream media report equally?

Come on cuz, if you're going to make that case, you're choosing two terrible examples to make your case.

The reason one story gets more coverage is about $$$, and not the media protecting one race. They?re going to report the stories that are going to sell more papers, or have more clicks on the internet.

It?s more salacious story to read about an old senile billionaire, who is a racist, yet he has a much younger black (mixed or whatever) girlfriend.

Like it or not, more people rather read about a scandal that involves sex & money, than another boring murder.

cousin wrote:
Quote:

Wishful_Thinking wrote:
Quote:

asny10011 wrote:
What would be the point of wasting tax payer dollars on incarcerating this animal? Waste of life. We have to be careful of generalizations as that could lead to racism, which is not PC and should not be supported, but I know what you mean...

Quote:

heights wrote:
The idiot should be charged with attempted murder and terrorism. As far as recouping some money towards the medical bills probably not likely. Lately it seems that those that cause either intentional harm or do it by choice do not have a pot to kiss in. These indigents do things on a whim. It is unfortunate that this game or whatever they call it is the new inner city ghetto fad/trend. I am not sure if I was PC enough for some JCLISTERs but demographics being what they are only breeds this kind of sport.

I sure hope you two have been given a life-time pass from jury duty! You were not there, and only know what little information the article gives you, and - apparently - know nothing about the definition of criminal assault, and yet are jumping to all these conclusions.

Hopefully for the young woman's sake - she is going to need a lot of strength and trust to get back to living her life normally - and ours - as potential victims ourselves - this will be handled intelligently.

We certainly shouldn't jump to any conclusions but one thing we do know is that there is a ruluctance on the part of the mainstream media to report on black on white crimes. For example, a couple weeks ago a young man of color randomly chose an elderly chinese man on an East Village street and beat him to death. This was good for about 15 seconds on ABC TV News and we never heard another word about it. Compare this to the coverage of a professional basketball team owner who uses the term "black people"-- this was in the news every day for about 3 weeks and we were calling for his head on a stake. Does the mainstream media report equally?

Wishful_Thinking wrote:
Quote:

asny10011 wrote:
What would be the point of wasting tax payer dollars on incarcerating this animal? Waste of life. We have to be careful of generalizations as that could lead to racism, which is not PC and should not be supported, but I know what you mean...

Quote:

heights wrote:
The idiot should be charged with attempted murder and terrorism. As far as recouping some money towards the medical bills probably not likely. Lately it seems that those that cause either intentional harm or do it by choice do not have a pot to kiss in. These indigents do things on a whim. It is unfortunate that this game or whatever they call it is the new inner city ghetto fad/trend. I am not sure if I was PC enough for some JCLISTERs but demographics being what they are only breeds this kind of sport.

I sure hope you two have been given a life-time pass from jury duty! You were not there, and only know what little information the article gives you, and - apparently - know nothing about the definition of criminal assault, and yet are jumping to all these conclusions.

Hopefully for the young woman's sake - she is going to need a lot of strength and trust to get back to living her life normally - and ours - as potential victims ourselves - this will be handled intelligently.

asny10011 wrote:
What would be the point of wasting tax payer dollars on incarcerating this animal? Waste of life. We have to be careful of generalizations as that could lead to racism, which is not PC and should not be supported, but I know what you mean...

Quote:

heights wrote:
The idiot should be charged with attempted murder and terrorism. As far as recouping some money towards the medical bills probably not likely. Lately it seems that those that cause either intentional harm or do it by choice do not have a pot to kiss in. These indigents do things on a whim. It is unfortunate that this game or whatever they call it is the new inner city ghetto fad/trend. I am not sure if I was PC enough for some JCLISTERs but demographics being what they are only breeds this kind of sport.

heights wrote:
The idiot should be charged with attempted murder and terrorism. As far as recouping some money towards the medical bills probably not likely. Lately it seems that those that cause either intentional harm or do it by choice do not have a pot to kiss in. These indigents do things on a whim. It is unfortunate that this game or whatever they call it is the new inner city ghetto fad/trend. I am not sure if I was PC enough for some JCLISTERs but demographics being what they are only breeds this kind of sport.

fat-ass-bike wrote:
I doubt the turd will be able to pay for the medical costs he caused - I hope someone king hits him in the head in prison!

10/10 for the restraint exhibited by the friend who caught the turd ... many would have introduced his face to the pavement

LoKo498 wrote:
Why do u a$s H0les keep calling it a "Knockout Game"!
Keep calling it a game & these lil dicks gon keep doing it!

Sam112 wrote:
What kind of macho bull can you claim from picking on someone weaker. Yes, no one should be targeted for such attacks (or any attacks), but it still amazes me that these jerks think punching someone who is not expecting it and/or who is weaker makes them a man. All is says to me, is that they are little chickens. If you want to fight, go box in a ring -- let's see how long you last.