|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
 
|
Well that's completely 'back to the future' isnt it? The Port Authority was formed to move away from that particular model by building a Trans Hudson Freight Rail Crossing, something they have neglected to do for a century.
Posted on: 2017/11/11 3:03
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Yonges Island-based Metal Trades builds its biggest barge
Metal Trades, a family owned shipbuilder on Yonges Island, has launched its largest project to date — a 370-foot-long barge designed to take cargo off highways in the New York area. The barge will transport rail cars across the Hudson River on a floating barge freight train line connecting Greenville Yard in Jersey City and the 65th Street Yard in Brooklyn. It will be used by New York New Jersey Rail LLC, a short-line railroad owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The vessel is designed to hold up to 18 60-foot-long rail cars filled with cargo weighing up to a combined 5.1 million pounds. http://www.postandcourier.com/busines ... e7-b43d-4bc944243f4e.html
Posted on: 2017/11/11 2:18
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
Joined:
2005/12/18 2:57 Last Login : 2017/9/14 20:15 From Crystal Point
Group:
Registered Users
Posts:
747
 |
Is the Hudson a vital waterway for NJ? Should we build islands like the Chinese to begin to assert our control over the river?
Posted on: 2017/5/9 16:11
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
RFP issued for Cross Harbor Freight Movement ProjectA request for proposals (RFP) has been issued for a Tier II environmental study, advanced planning and engineering work for the proposed Cross Harbor Freight Movement Project, which would connect New York City directly to the national freight-rail grid. http://www.progressiverailroading.com ... t-Movement-Project--51572
Posted on: 2017/5/9 15:28
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Ha! The double decker PATH idea/suggestion is definitely one of the dumbest ones we have seen in this board. But, the bridge idea is an equal non starter. There is no way you could build a viable, practical pedestrian bridge to span the Hudson from JC to Lower Manhattan. Such a bridge would have to rise to about 200 feet, so if won't interfere with existing traffic. Now imagine trying to get from 0 to 200 feet by walking up steps or an incredibly steep ramp (you couldn't build a shallow ramp because it would require an insane amount of space to do so) and you will soon realize that such a requirement would preclude most people from ever using such a bridge. Even if you were to use elevators, that could prove impractical as you would have long lines to go up and down. A pedestrian or bike bridge from JC Lower Manhatan is a pipe dream.
Posted on: 2015/9/28 14:11
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
T-Bird is effing nutz!! Bike lanes on a future above ground bridge, yes please. But a effing tunnel under the Hudson, along with diesel trains?! LoL!!!! The bar is very low, yet this is even a worse idea than the guy that wanted to run double decker PATH trains on the 33rd line using the existing tunnel. And that was impossible. lol
Posted on: 2015/9/28 11:45
Edited by JCGuys on 2015/9/28 12:06:57
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Where do diesel trains and bikes share tunnels? How does the ventilation work? I'm pretty sure there won't be ventilation shafts popping up every couple hundred feet under the harbor. We have to maintain a navigable channel, after all. How do you ventilate a miles-long tunnel that diesel trains use to a degree that cyclists would be comfortable breathing the air? I'm not an engineer, but would be interested in hearing about examples.
Posted on: 2015/9/28 2:51
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Do you have any notion of how expensive "roadbed" in a tunnel is? I'm not talking about the pavement but the width you need to provide the lanes you're talking about. These tunnels aren't flexibly sized, you don't just say "add another 12 ft please". Assuming a 2 track tunnel you're essentially asking for capacity for another track, a 50% increase of capacity. This is not a "while you're at it..." What do you think the market for this is? The Brooklyn Bridge only has about 1550 cycle commuters, we would have a small fraction of that, few people would cycle over one of the Hackensack River bridges to get to this tunnel. As I've said before, it would be cheaper to provide free helicopter service. But what should happen is more subsidy to ferries. It's disgusting that our ferries cost $8 and the Staten Island Ferry is free. There's political pull for you. The PA should be using tolls and train fares to subsidize ferries taking pressure off the trains, not building big dicks in the sky or fixing a skyway that any responsible state government would have fixed itself.
Posted on: 2015/9/28 0:31
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
Joined:
2008/10/19 1:18 Last Login : 2020/9/25 20:40 From somewhere else
Group:
Registered Users
Posts:
1609
|
Quote:
What the hell are you talking about? I'm not suggesting spending billions of dollars for a bike tunnel. I'm saying I hope someone with half a brain involved in this process stops to think "hey, these two tunnels could be the last crossings built for 50 to 100 years, would it be possible to accommodate bikes?" And not in a riding-with-the-trains kind of way. Segregated but in the same tube. It's done elsewhere and you are mistaken if you think only "a few people" would use something like that.
Posted on: 2015/9/27 23:24
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Speaking only for myself, I would not want to bike through a tunnel full of diesel freight trains.
Posted on: 2015/9/27 3:34
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
What a cool project! I wonder if there is anyway to include this project with the planned $20 billion tunnel for Amtrak.
Posted on: 2015/9/26 22:36
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Amazing. An entire century later, the PA is back to addressing the Hudson freight rail crossing, the reason it was created. A mission it forsook to assemble an empire of lucrative crossings, airports and office towers.
Anyone who's really interested in how we got to this point in our transportation infrastructure needs to read The Power Broker about Robert Moses (Pulitzer winner), and Empire on the Hudson about the PA. The latter is not as critical a look as the former but still very interesting. T-Bird, get over it. Billions will NOT be spent to allow a few people to pedal across the Hudson. Take the bike on a ferry or bus, or move to Brooklyn if this is at the top of your list.
Posted on: 2015/9/26 22:23
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
Joined:
2008/10/19 1:18 Last Login : 2020/9/25 20:40 From somewhere else
Group:
Registered Users
Posts:
1609
|
I wonder if there's a way to incorporate bicycle access either in this tunnel, if it gets built or the eventual Amtrak tunnel. A bit unorthodox, perhaps, but probably won't be another opportunity for a very long time.
Posted on: 2015/9/26 10:49
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
aw shucks! spend the money on the tunnel and finance it with 100 year bonds. what would happens to barges if/when there is a storm or the river freezes. better yet ....add passenger rail and have a fork into lower manhattan.
Posted on: 2015/9/26 3:44
|
|||
|
||||
|
The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area traffic
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
The $7.4B freight tunnel that could ease tri-state area trafficBy JERSEY CITY — A freight rail tunnel that would cost at least $7.4 billion is one of two final options being considered by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to cut pollution and reduce congestion by taking trucks off the region's roads. An environmental impact statement released by Port Authority today identified a tunnel across New York Harbor between Jersey City and Brooklyn as one of two "preferred alternatives" for its Cross Harbor Freight Program. The program is intended to reduce the number of trucks that now carry shipping containers between the two states, mainly from terminals in Newark and Elizabeth to New York City, Long Island, and other other points east and north. The Port Authority held public hearings on the cross harbor program in February, when the agency was still weighing ten proposed alternatives, including five tunnel options with costs ranging from $7.4 to $10 billion. The tunnel option chosen in today's report, which would carry rail cars only would be at the low end of that cost range. More expensive tunnel options included one that would accommodate truck traffic as well as rail. The other preferred alternative named in today's environmental report is a so-called enhanced rail car float operation, which would carry rail cars across the harbor on barges. The Port Authority already operates a rail float facility between Brooklyn and a rail head at the Greenveille Yard in Jersey City, though capacity is limited. Read more: http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2015 ... i-state_area_traffic.html
Posted on: 2015/9/25 21:40
|
|||
|
||||