iGreg wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:

People in Manhattan in rent controlled properties get offers in the millions to move out. It is very much a thing when you are sitting on valuable property.

Miilion's Poops ?

or Millions of Poops ?

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
[Quote:

135jc wrote:
A pretty good perspective.

http://nypost.com/2017/08/18/ny-democ ... -is-a-monumental-mistake/

No. It isn?t. It?s a strawman. NOBODY is trying to erase history. People that hate racism want symbols erected for the sole purpose of intimidation taken down. Nobody ever makes the argument that students shouldn?t learn about Gen. Lee in history class.

Then why don't we talk about the real truth....

Which terrorist political party was responsible for suppressing human rights of slaves freed by Lincoln (R) and future generations, 100+ years, following the Northern Victory. And who celebrated his assassination?

Which party openly supported the KKK, instituted the Jim Crow Laws and enabled the violent attacks and murders of Civil Right Marchers?

Which party today openly leverages the memories of their own atrocities and their violent legacy to maintain political power through fear.

Here is a clue.... it ain't the Republicans.

GrovePath wrote:
A lot of Downtown bars have "Doormen" or whatever you call them -- and they openly sell drugs - also it seemed like lots of dealing going on all around at Lucky 7's Block Party a few weeks back. Is there much undercover action on this?

Monroe wrote:
So our President is going back to the policy that existed under all 8 years of Obama? That's getting people wound up? Where were they during those 8 years??

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
No, Pebble, he retired because many of his patients could not afford Obamacare, they can afford only to pay the fines or the bronze plan, which is no insurance at all. He is not retired from medicine, he decided to work for an insurance company by visiting patients in their homes. This prevents them from using nursing homes. The bottom is - Obamacare is a mess. Arizona had a 116% increase in 2016. Government does some things well, but it is horrible at managing education and healthcare.

ask those people who had no insurance before Obamacare, who didn't go to the doctor, if Obamacare is a mess to them....ask those people who couldn't get coverage due to pre-x conditions

Look this is not what Obama promised. Perhaps you should ask Arizona residents how they felt when their preminums increase16%.
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/10/25/arizona-obamacare-premiums/

135jc wrote:
I should clarify. I was not suggesting you are out of work Pebble, I was referring to the guy in your article.

So you result in name calling if someone disagrees with you? Very mature! I guess William H Buckley said it best

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views"

135jc wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Tony, tony, please link us to your concerns over the last 8 years over the EB5 abuses. Ya know, when your guy Barack Hussein Obama was in the White House, and his fanboy Chuckie Schumer was the Senate leader. Get back to me when you dig that up, thankee!

Gee can't seem to find anything showing Obama's son in law/top advisor (lol) directly profiting off of this abuse. Let me know when you dig that up big guy!

You are right he doesn't. Instead Obama has a half brother that he allows to live in poverty

Monroe wrote:
Tony, tony, please link us to your concerns over the last 8 years over the EB5 abuses. Ya know, when your guy Barack Hussein Obama was in the White House, and his fanboy Chuckie Schumer was the Senate leader. Get back to me when you dig that up, thankee!

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:

Quote:

Monroe wrote:
A perfect example why PBS should be defunded from Federal funding, as this is overtly political. Where the eff was PBS during the Obama administration on this subject? The program has been in existence for years and supported by many Democrats.

You're OBSESSED with someone who isn't the president anymore. Why do you assume people who don't like Trump would be okay with that same shitty behavior as long as it came from a democrat? Obama wasn't the father in law of the people profiting off these sales. That's the big difference that you willfully ignore.

Any news source that isn't FOX news only appears to have a liberal bias because you've been brainwashed and can no longer think rationally. It's so sad and pathetic.

Silly response. PBS couldn't care less about the people involved in this program unless they were criminally involved, then dogpiles on Kushner. If you don't have a clue, you may rent or buy one to connect the dots. Senator Schumer? LOVED the program in NY, where the gerrymandering was done to include Harlem and Bed Stuy to get stuff built-much, much larger $ than in JC.

Monroe wrote:
A perfect example why PBS should be defunded from Federal funding, as this is overtly political. Where the eff was PBS during the Obama administration on this subject? The program has been in existence for years and supported by many Democrats.

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
I just heard that not only was this guy a Bernie supporter, he actually worked on the Sander's campaign. Maybe we need background checks for political workers?

What would that do? People need access to mental healthcare not acccess to firearms.

Took that right off a bumper sticker? If life could only be lived through Hallmark greeting cards and bumper stickers.

With all your attention riveted on the Portland incident, still have not seen you denounce the incident from this morning. Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump did that sooner than you!

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Gun control has nothing to do with Kathy Griffith carrying around a severed POTUS head, or Caesar dressed as our POTUS being stabbed to death in Shakespeare in the Park.

Wow if those two incidents in which no one was actually harmed are so disturbing for you then you must be really upset about the victim in Portland who was killed trying to protect two Muslim girls from that racist lunatic. Right? Weird how our president barely mentioned those attacks but has you foaming at the mouth over a photograph and a play. I wonder why that is...

First, the lunatic out west was, like today's shooter, a Bernie fan. Next, our President didn't 'barely' mention it, he reacted quite strongly. Finally, I'm hardly frothing at the mouth. Other than that you're spot on, as usual!

And he hated Hilary, supported Trump, and clearly expressed alt right anti-Muslim views. You're holding onto the fact that at one point he supported Bernie even though his Facebook clearly shows he ended up ultimately supporting Trump. It took Trump three days to eventually tweet out a comment about it. That's a strong reaction to you? How so?

Hey Monroe- Bernie has already released a sincere and lengthy statement denouncing this guy compared to Trump taking an entire weekend to tweet. Just an FYI. I'm sure you'll ignore this post since it points out all the inaccuracies in the talking points you've been fed. :)

Once again strange response... I have yet to see you denounce the violent attack this morning yet you seem to be concerned only about who expressed condolences first after two violent incidents with no connection. Odd...

Monroe wrote:
I just heard that not only was this guy a Bernie supporter, he actually worked on the Sander's campaign. Maybe we need background checks for political workers?

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Gun control has nothing to do with Kathy Griffith carrying around a severed POTUS head, or Caesar dressed as our POTUS being stabbed to death in Shakespeare in the Park.

Wow if those two incidents in which no one was actually harmed are so disturbing for you then you must be really upset about the victim in Portland who was killed trying to protect two Muslim girls from that racist lunatic. Right? Weird how our president barely mentioned those attacks but has you foaming at the mouth over a photograph and a play. I wonder why that is...

Strange response... interesting how you connect random dots and draw your odd conclusions or questions.

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Gun control has nothing to do with Kathy Griffith carrying around a severed POTUS head, or Caesar dressed as our POTUS being stabbed to death in Shakespeare in the Park.

Wow if those two incidents in which no one was actually harmed are so disturbing for you then you must be really upset about the victim in Portland who was killed trying to protect two Muslim girls from that racist lunatic. Right? Weird how our president barely mentioned those attacks but has you foaming at the mouth over a photograph and a play. I wonder why that is...

First, the lunatic out west was, like today's shooter, a Bernie fan. Next, our President didn't 'barely' mention it, he reacted quite strongly. Finally, I'm hardly frothing at the mouth. Other than that you're spot on, as usual!

And he hated Hilary, supported Trump, and clearly expressed alt right anti-Muslim views. You're holding onto the fact that at one point he supported Bernie even though his Facebook clearly shows he ended up ultimately supporting Trump. It took Trump three days to eventually tweet out a comment about it. That's a strong reaction to you? How so?

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Gun control has nothing to do with Kathy Griffith carrying around a severed POTUS head, or Caesar dressed as our POTUS being stabbed to death in Shakespeare in the Park.

Wow if those two incidents in which no one was actually harmed are so disturbing for you then you must be really upset about the victim in Portland who was killed trying to protect two Muslim girls from that racist lunatic. Right? Weird how our president barely mentioned those attacks but has you foaming at the mouth over a photograph and a play. I wonder why that is...

First, the lunatic out west was, like today's shooter, a Bernie fan. Next, our President didn't 'barely' mention it, he reacted quite strongly. Finally, I'm hardly frothing at the mouth. Other than that you're spot on, as usual!

Monroe wrote:
Gun control has nothing to do with Kathy Griffith carrying around a severed POTUS head, or Caesar dressed as our POTUS being stabbed to death in Shakespeare in the Park.

JCMan8 wrote:
Liberals - who are brainwashed by vicious lies from our traitorous mass media - have now resorted to trying to kill Republicans because they can't win elections.

"Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., told Fox News he left just before the shooting. As he walked to his car, a man asked DeSantis if it was Republicans or Democrats practicing. About 3 minutes later, at around 7:15 a.m., the shooting began, DeSantis said. It reportedly lasted about 10 minutes.

Without the Capitol Hill police it would have been a massacre," Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., told Fox News, describing the scene as "sort of a killing field."

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/14/ ... multiple-people-shot.html

TheBigGuy wrote:
Do you suppose Comey has the meeting notes where Loretta Lynch told him not to use the phrase HRC Email Investigation.... but refer to it as a "email server matter"?

And what a coincidence that HRC and her leftist media rump swabs were using the same euphemism to describe what for anyone else would be called an investigation.

Remember how they finally got her to sit down and talk with her about her email server matter. I believe Comey personally handled that too because that is a personal service delivered by all FBI Director's to corrupt democrat presidential candidates. The democrat elites love their "white glove" FBI service.

Monroe wrote:
lol-SOS, you do know that the GWB was never shut down, don't you? You may want to think the whole thing through a little better.

PremiumContent wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Racist, anti-Semite Sharpton won't be getting any more White House visits anytime soon-and is not letting someone bring a cake on a plane racist anyway? Did a white family get to keep their cake onboard?

Trump claims to be friends with Sharpton and has donated to his organization. I hope this news doesn't trigger you.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
I may have to bike downtown today to see the billowing clouds of chalk dust, after our President took Chuckie Schumer's October suggestion and got rid of Comey. Wait, Chuckie was for it before he was against it??

Brillant move by our great leader Trump to end investigation into campaign ties with Russia. Similar move worked so well by Nixon. Liberal progressive democrats say this like throwing gasoline on fire. How can it fail?

Comey himself told Trump on three separate occasions that he wasn't being investigated for anything.

So no, not like Nixon. And "liberal progressive democrats" say all sorts of things, but none of them are usually true.

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

TonyTwoPoops wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Being amused by seeing snowflakes think they're promoting change and resistance by chalking a message is crying and whining?

I'm not promoting chalk messages. But if they bother you enough to create a new thread about it, you need to put your big boy pants on.

Except a) I didn't start the thread, and b) I'm not bothered, I'm amused. It's like watching a 2 year old throw himself on the floor in the supermarket and cry that he can't get some new cereal he saw on tv.

Can't everyone see how hard he doesn't care by his comments on this thread?!

My first post on this thread was #53-after you'd posted many times . . . as I said, I'm not offended, I'm amused. Every chalk scratching is another snowflake acting out for all of us to see. It's hilarious!

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Being amused by seeing snowflakes think they're promoting change and resistance by chalking a message is crying and whining?

I'm not promoting chalk messages. But if they bother you enough to create a new thread about it, you need to put your big boy pants on.

Except a) I didn't start the thread, and b) I'm not bothered, I'm amused. It's like watching a 2 year old throw himself on the floor in the supermarket and cry that he can't get some new cereal he saw on tv.