Re: Better ways than abatements to address Jersey City's affordable housing crisis | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Meanwhile, in NY, Governor Cuomo has insisted on new 'prevailing wage' rules for construction-whose added costs are expected to reduce the number of affordable housing units by 17,000 (of the 80,000 de Blasio wants to get built).
Good for the union donors, bad for the working poor. Very analogous to our TTF costs as well.
Posted on: 2016/7/25 11:46
|
|||
|
Re: Better ways than abatements to address Jersey City's affordable housing crisis | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/11/13 18:42 Last Login : 2022/2/28 7:31 From 280 Grove Street
Group:
Registered Users
Posts:
4192
|
NY / NJ is importing their own 'middle class' via the H1B visa to finance to cost of housing increases ... but it will not last for long!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NK0Y9j_CGgM
Posted on: 2016/7/25 11:34
|
|||
My humor is for the silent blue collar majority - If my posts offend, slander or you deem inappropriate and seek deletion, contact the webmaster for jurisdiction.
|
||||
|
Re: Better ways than abatements to address Jersey City's affordable housing crisis | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Don't the housing projects still exist, or is that the 575 units they are speaking of ?
Posted on: 2016/7/25 3:52
|
|||
Get on your bikes and ride !
|
||||
|
Re: Better ways than abatements to address Jersey City's affordable housing crisis | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The answer to this problem isn't trying to lever low income people into luxury buildings, it's ZONING! The R-1 zoning (2 unit 35' high) of most of the city is reducing the density there while the density Downtown is increasing. I'm not talking about hi-rises, just the kind of 4 unit houses of which there are thousands already all over JC.
What if the R-5 contemplated for the Village (4 floor 4U) would be universally extended? All the Bayonne boxes being built all over town would be 4 unit instead! The scale economics of building 4U could mean that they might be held as rentals, instead of the expense of building just 2 always meaning they're condo's. Wait, OMG, what about the parking!!!! Cities are dense, it's what makes them cities. Get over it. Look at this ridiculous and hideous street. This lot should have been a single midrise building with dozens of units, of which there are hundreds of prewar examples all over JC. Maybe even with some nice storefronts. But wait, ridiculous outdated HUD financing rules makes it MUCH more difficult to build mixed use. But that's another tale.
Posted on: 2016/7/25 3:46
|
|||
|
Better ways than abatements to address Jersey City's affordable housing crisis | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Better ways than abatements to address Jersey City's affordable housing crisis | Opinion By By DONAL MALONE Most of the new housing created in Jersey City since the 1980s has been luxury or market rate housing. That continues today as the ratio of luxury or market rate housing units built annually is in the many thousands compared to a few hundred affordable ones. According to the city, in 2015, 24,000 new market rate-housing units were either built or approved for construction while only 575 affordable housing units were created or preserved. This is woefully inadequate in a city in which a quarter of households earn less than $25,000 a year and more than 40 percent earn below $50,000 a year. In 2014, half of renters and homeowners with a mortgage spent 30 percent or more of household income on housing. This is up from one-third in 2000. Read more: http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2 ... _address_jersey_city.html
Posted on: 2016/7/25 2:30
|
|||
|