Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
218 user(s) are online (199 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 218

more...




Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users






Re: Pedestrian fatality numbers are bad for Hudson seniors
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2006/11/13 18:42
Last Login :
2022/2/28 7:31
From 280 Grove Street
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4192
Offline
Do we need a sign for our seniors ?

Resized Image

Posted on: 2008/12/13 19:49
My humor is for the silent blue collar majority - If my posts offend, slander or you deem inappropriate and seek deletion, contact the webmaster for jurisdiction.
 Top 


Re: Pedestrian fatality numbers are bad for Hudson seniors
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2006/10/23 18:47
Last Login :
2018/2/27 0:25
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 901
Offline
Quote:
K-Lo wrote:
The right on red law after a full stop has been so totally abused. Many drivers don't even slow down anymore, let alone come to a full stop.


The big sign on Grove Street at Columbus telling northbound traffic NO TURN ON RED during weekday rush hours must be the most blatantly ignored sign in all of JC. No one, not even the NJ Transit buses, follows that particular rule of the road. The occasional oddball who decides to obey is typically met with angry honking frm behind. I've noticed cop cars parked at that intersection totally oblivious - or indifferent - to this as well. If JC wanted to quickly raise some revenue, they could start handing out tickets at that intersection (and double the fine for a bus)! Surely that's gotta be more lucrative than trolling for people who've parked beyond the alloted 2 hours?

Posted on: 2008/12/13 17:52
 Top 


Re: Pedestrian fatality numbers are bad for Hudson seniors
#5
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Hide User information
Joined:
2008/8/9 19:18
Last Login :
2010/2/13 7:42
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 40
Offline
If you want something positive, perhaps the "Crime And Safety" tag isn't the best place to start.

Just sayin'.

Posted on: 2008/12/13 3:31
 Top 


Re: Pedestrian fatality numbers are bad for Hudson seniors
#4
Newbie
Newbie


Hide User information
Joined:
2008/12/2 18:44
Last Login :
2008/12/12 18:31
Group:
Banned
Posts: 2
Offline
Hey GrovePath...I have an idea!
Start posting something positive...it is the Holiday season you know?

Maybe something about charities and those who are helping, etc. Not everyone is bad or bad at driving or disregarding others.

Posted on: 2008/12/12 18:46
 Top 


Re: Pedestrian fatality numbers are bad for Hudson seniors
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2008/9/10 17:55
Last Login :
2016/10/21 19:48
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1294
Offline
The right on red law after a full stop has been so totally abused. Many drivers don't even slow down anymore, let alone come to a full stop.

Two weeks ago, I saw someone make a right turn from the left lane at a red light on State highway at Baldwin Avenue. That was a new one for me, even in Jersey City.

Posted on: 2008/12/12 16:39
 Top 


Re: Pedestrian fatality numbers are bad for Hudson seniors
#2
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2006/11/30 3:15
Last Login :
2010/9/16 19:10
From Paulus Hook
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 108
Offline
Wow, this is no surpise. I have never seen so much blatant disregard for traffic signals then I do in Jersey City. I have said this before, it is the wild wild west. And it is EVERYONE. Residents, workers, livery cabs.

Following traffic rules really needs to start at a resident level. Take some pride in your city.

Posted on: 2008/12/12 16:36
 Top 


Pedestrian fatality numbers are bad for Hudson seniors
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/9/15 19:03
Last Login :
2023/8/15 18:42
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 9302
Offline
Pedestrian fatality numbers are bad for Hudson seniors

Friday, December 12, 2008

TRENTON - Trying to cross the street is deadly for senior citizens in New Jersey.

A Tri-State Transportation Campaign study finds the state had a higher fatality rate for senior pedestrians than the rest of the country between 2005 and 2007.

Seniors represent 12.2 percent of the population, but accounted for 22 percent of the fatalities. In Hudson County, there were 11 senior citizen pedestrian deaths between 2005 and 2007 - or 5.58 per every 100,000 residents.

Seniors comprise 31.4 percent of Hudson County's 35 pedestrians killed in the three-year span, though they make up only 10.4 percent of the population, the study showed. Those 75 years and older account for only 5 percent of the total population, but 17.1 percent of pedestrian fatalities.

At 5.58, the pedestrian fatality rate for seniors was 5.0 times that of residents younger than 65. For those aged 75 years plus, the fatality rate (6.34) was 5.7 times that of their younger neighbors.

Using federal highway traffic safety data, the group says Atlantic County was the most dangerous in terms of the senior population compared to the number killed. Eight of the 38 pedestrians killed in the county during the three-year period were 65 or older.

The group recommends banning right turns at red lights at busy intersections and timing lights to give seniors more time to cross.

Posted on: 2008/12/12 15:11
 Top 








[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017