user1111 wrote:
Women's clothing are always more expensive. They use more fabric when making women's top garments. Most men don't have breast. If the garments are made in the USA then its a good deal, if not then not so much. Women with small breast can always buy the men's version just size it down..

bricks wrote:
How has this guy still not been caught? I thought for sure that this would be solved within days of the pics being publicized. Perhaps that yuppie/hipster outfit was just an incredible disguise.

iGreg wrote:
Quote:

JCman24 wrote:
Yes. Did you call the PD?

No he called the 'whiny man with a itchy vag' service help center and they recommended a ointment.

asny10011 wrote:
it sounds like an awfully cumbersome way to get to campus, drive your car, negotiate parking, catch a bus or take a light rail to get to class.

MattSchapiro wrote:
Things got noticeably safer on Jersey Ave and its surrounds after the traffic-calming measures instituted by Councilwoman Osborne. There is and always will be room for improvement, but credit where it's due -- the increase in stop signs and 'stop for pedestrian' signs have made a huge difference.

dtjcview wrote:

Course you don't give a shit about anyone except yourself Yvonne.

Yvonne wrote:
It is obvious JCMan24, you have not attended a council meeting. Citizens from all over this city come to various meetings, without those parking lots, you are basically telling citizens their comments are not important. Let me remind you, mass transit is a joke here. There was more buses in the 1960s and 1970s than today. Besides bus routes do not travel pass midnight. Some meetings are past midnight when city packs over 100 items (resolutions and ordinances) on the agenda. Every time we get a reformer in city hall, the public always lose. The last reformer gave the water department to United Water and our bills increased regardless of our water saving devices. Now this reformer wants to take away free speech by eliminating parking.

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

K-Lo wrote:
Are "civilians" allowed to use that lot? I thought it was designated for city personnel.

In the evening when the personnel has left, citizens have been using both parking lots to attend public meetings. That has been the tradition for a long time, especially for handicapped and seniors. Eliminating the lots is telling the public their input is not necessary to the public conversation.

DanL wrote:
there is a resolution, Res. 15.517 to declare the "City Hall Study" area as a redevelopment area on the agenda for this weeks caucus and council meeting.

is the city trying to break the historic district zoning and now be able to grant another downtown tax abatement?

btw, if you wish to attend, the meetings are at 10 am.

Yardl3y wrote:
Hi all, wondering if anyone can help me figure out what was done to my fireplace. It looks like it was sealed however half of it is hollow and the other is filled in with brick. As you can see in the video below, the hollow side was covered using what looks like sticks and plaster which makes me think it was done long ago, but why? I assume they would have needed the fireplace to keep the room warm back then. Any help would be really appreciated as we're thinking about opening up the cavity.


https://youtu.be/BaD_YSnfMes

fat-ass-bike wrote:
Interesting - it wasn't all the long ago JClisters complaining how motorists (bikes and cars) were running stop signs and speeding in residential streets ... yet some always want to blame some-one else's actions then their own ... isn't that being self-righteous?

Didn't we have someone just admit to speeding in our neighborhood and nearly collecting a mother and child?

We have some consistent 'buck passing' going on to justify illegal behavior or accountability issues