Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
77 user(s) are online (66 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 77

more...


Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (ianmac47)




Re: Jersey City teachers union seeks 19% pay hike over 3 years, sources say
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:

Not sure what you're talking about, but DTJCview literally just posted facts proving a teacher's average salary is comparable to the average college graduate salary here in JC. You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own (mysterious) facts.


You and DTJCview must both be a product of Jersey City public schools, because your reading comprehension skills are not every good.

Yes, there are facts. But drawing conclusions when you totally misread the facts or don't understand the data is even worse than having an uninformed opinion.

Posted on: 2014/10/2 14:35
 Top 


Re: Port Authority plans to extend PATH to Newark airport
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

moobycow wrote:
Meanwhile in Austin they get a brand new 9.5 mile line with 16 stations in an area with no existing right away for $1.4B.

http://projectconnect.com/central-corridor-urban-rail


Light rail built along the surface is not an equal comparison to building an elevated heavy rail line.

Posted on: 2014/10/1 19:17
 Top 


Re: Jersey City teachers union seeks 19% pay hike over 3 years, sources say
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:
You're comparing teachers who only need to be smarter than the average JC kid with the Ivy League MBA types who work at GS?

We don't need 'steps' for teachers to earn PhD's to get compensated extra for teaching 3rd graders how to spell.


Shit in, shit out.

Posted on: 2014/10/1 19:11
 Top 


Re: Jersey City teachers union seeks 19% pay hike over 3 years, sources say
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

dtjcview wrote:
Quote:

ianmac47 wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:

We could argue this forever, but the idea of a 9 1/2 month work year, traditional pension that is almost history in the private sector, and lifetime Cadillac pensions for the teacher and spouse is part of a model that is now unsustainable. And workplace legal protections are now so strong that many of the original reasons for teacher unionization are gone.



Except that the market is saying the only people who want jobs as teachers are mediocre while competent people are going into the private sector. So the shortened work year, pension and healthcare apparently isn't as attractive as you are claiming.


New grads aren't really interested in pensions and healthcare. Give them a bronze-level healthcare plan, a 4% match into a 401k, and 30-50% increase in base salary and that will match anything the private sector will offer. And would end up costing little more than at present.

Oh. And a career that rewards them for performance, not tenure. The brightest and smartest are motivated by success and not simply service.


Median salary in Jersey City: $52,623

Average salary at Goldman Sachs -- a business in Jersey City -- is $135,000... per quarter.


Median salary at a big law firm is down from its high, but its still $145,000 a year.


You don't need to know how to do common core math to understand that law and finance pay more than being a teacher, which is why talented people end up not teaching.


http://www.nalp.org/2012_associate_salaries


http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/20 ... achers_median_salary.html

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/ ... y-for-3-months-is-135-594

Posted on: 2014/10/1 18:52
 Top 


Re: Jersey City teachers union seeks 19% pay hike over 3 years, sources say
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:

We could argue this forever, but the idea of a 9 1/2 month work year, traditional pension that is almost history in the private sector, and lifetime Cadillac pensions for the teacher and spouse is part of a model that is now unsustainable. And workplace legal protections are now so strong that many of the original reasons for teacher unionization are gone.



Except that the market is saying the only people who want jobs as teachers are mediocre while competent people are going into the private sector. So the shortened work year, pension and healthcare apparently isn't as attractive as you are claiming.

Posted on: 2014/10/1 17:08
 Top 


Re: Jersey City teachers union seeks 19% pay hike over 3 years, sources say
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

ianmac47 wrote:
If you aren't happy with teacher performance, paying less is not going to help. That's like going to McDonald's and being disappointed that the food isn't as good as a high end steak house. Its like saying, "I don't want to pay more than $5,000 for a car, but I want it to last for 100,000 miles, get great fuel efficiency, and need little repair work." Its like going skydiving and choosing your parachute based on which one costs the least amount of money. Its like ordering a PBR and then getting angry it tastes like water.

If you want better teachers, you need to pay them more. You want smarter teachers, you need to pay them more. You want better educated teachers, you ned to pay them more. Why would anyone with half a brain and masters degree come to work in a shitty government building, deal with the administrative bullshit, nasty parents, nasty students, work from 7 in the morning until 5 at night, and earn a fraction of what they could make in a professional career?


Most want to well compensate great teachers. And have the flexibility to fire lousy teachers. The NJEA is the roadblock to those ends. Once a teacher gets tenure it's almost impossible to fire them for being bad teachers. As I recall the number of teachers fired for poor performance (and by that I mean as teachers, not counting ones that come in stoned or drunk, or are having sex with students, or have other criminal issues) is so tiny that it would be laughable if it wasn't so bad for the kids.


Schools were historically one of the greatest employee abusers. Corruption dictating hiring and firing, particularly political corruption. Older teachers who tended to be paid more were often fired simply because they were paid more. Long story short, teachers unionized for same reason many other workers unionized: abusive employers. Or out another way: tough shit, the workers are unionized, deal with it.

Unions protecting bad teachers doesn't negate the fact that the people most qualified to be teachers can earn many times more money working in professional careers.

Posted on: 2014/10/1 16:02
 Top 


Re: Jersey City teachers union seeks 19% pay hike over 3 years, sources say
Home away from home
Home away from home


If you aren't happy with teacher performance, paying less is not going to help. That's like going to McDonald's and being disappointed that the food isn't as good as a high end steak house. Its like saying, "I don't want to pay more than $5,000 for a car, but I want it to last for 100,000 miles, get great fuel efficiency, and need little repair work." Its like going skydiving and choosing your parachute based on which one costs the least amount of money. Its like ordering a PBR and then getting angry it tastes like water.

If you want better teachers, you need to pay them more. You want smarter teachers, you need to pay them more. You want better educated teachers, you ned to pay them more. Why would anyone with half a brain and masters degree come to work in a shitty government building, deal with the administrative bullshit, nasty parents, nasty students, work from 7 in the morning until 5 at night, and earn a fraction of what they could make in a professional career?

Posted on: 2014/10/1 15:26
 Top 


Re: Whole Foods in JC?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

devilsadvocate wrote:

I would drive a little farther to avoid Newark.


Whole Foods in Newark is not the Whole Foods Jersey City needs, but it is apparently the Whole Foods you deserve.

Posted on: 2014/9/30 19:56
 Top 


Re: PATH is down again today!
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

hero69 wrote:
PATH should be given to the MTA


There really isn't any incentive in the world to make this acceptable to the MTA.

Posted on: 2014/9/28 16:51
 Top 


Re: PATH is down again today!
Home away from home
Home away from home


Ultimately the difference between investing in the World Trade Center and the Pulaski skyway is that the World Trade Center will generate money for the Port Authority.

Real estate investments and transportation have long been a mutual beneficial method of generating money. The federal government incentivized building a national rail network by offering land grants for railroads. They built the system and then profited from the land either by developing it or selling once it was connected to the network. Trolly companies would buy up land and develop a network, profiting not from the transportation but the real estate development that gain value from transportation that loses money.

The original WTC complex also generated passengers for the then near bankrupt Hudson Tubes that the Authority had become responsible for maintaining. That was during a time when nobody worried about crowding on the train.

There are plenty of things to be critical of the Port Authority for, but developing the WTC and the underground mall is not one of them. These are capital investments that will pay dividends, and help fund the agency in the future. The whole point of the agency is to act as a regional economic investor, collecting profits that are reinvested in the region (rather than collected as shareholder profits as in a private corporation). The problem has been in recent years, that governors on both sides of the river, of both parties, have funneled money into projects that are not capital investments -- items like the Pulaski Skyway are big ones, but there are plenty of smaller things as well.

Posted on: 2014/9/26 14:30
 Top 


Re: Seattle tunnel will end up with frightening cost overruns . . .
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Again, there was no offer from the Feds as far as additional money (please quote me an amount, or percentage) as a grant. Low interest loans are still NJ taxpayer obligations, without a concurrent shared obligation from any other stakeholder.

And anyone who doesn't think that the costs would not be more is stupid, partisan, or both.

I'm all for restarting the process-with a logical terminus where it would actually help rail connectivity with Grand Central, with shared pain as far as the inevitable cost overruns, and greater seed money from the Feds that our Senators have historically been unable to deliver to regional taxpayers-it's green, people claim it's the Region Core and critical, and it's shovel ready to start. Obama should be all over it.


The project is no longer shovel ready. The project would need to be redesigned as the Hudson Yards development has since rendered the previous plan impossible to execute as is.


Posted on: 2014/9/25 16:03
 Top 


Re: Seattle tunnel will end up with frightening cost overruns . . .
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Nonsense, of course. NY depends on NJ commuters, who pay NY state income tax without demands on schools, police and fire protection, spend incredible amounts of money at NYC retail establishments, etc.

And the Port Authority of NY and NJ was not a partner whatsoever in sharing ANY portion of cost overruns. It was all on NJ, which is why it was killed.

And the Democrats love to talk about paying your 'fair share'. In this case only NJ was paying it, which wasn't fair.


I hope you enjoy the next indefinite suspension of the PATH.

Posted on: 2014/9/25 14:38
 Top 


Re: Seattle tunnel will end up with frightening cost overruns . . .
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:

Absolutely, for all practical purposes there is no limit (see the Big Dig in Boston) on cost overruns in large projects, which is why there needs to be a prior agreement on how the obligation is shared among the stakeholders.


Again, let me point out how while everyone on the west bank of the Hudson was losing their shit over the indefinite closure of the PATH train, there was no adverse effect in New York. Most people didn't even notice. You can desperately cling to this idea that New York should pay for the overruns or some greater portion than the allocation that came from the Port Authority until all the rail tunnels between the two states shut down and still, even then, nobody in New York City will give a shit.

Posted on: 2014/9/25 2:36
 Top 


Re: Seattle tunnel will end up with frightening cost overruns . . .
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:
With mass transit = being good and green, and Obama in NY pushing the UN global warming initiatives, how about the Feds throwing ten billion or so to upgrade mass transit in the strategic region core? Shovel ready jobs and all that.



ARC is not shovel ready anymore. It was. It was funded. Christie cancelled.

Posted on: 2014/9/24 23:18
 Top 


Re: PATH is down again today!
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

Rorschach wrote:
At least Fulop is speaking up and taking on the PA. Christie the Hutt is missing in action.


The fire that caused the problem happened in NYC. Where's your Cuomo critique?


You are grossly over estimating how much Cuomo's constituents care about the PATH.

Did New York City stop functioning because the PATH went down? Did most New Yorkers even notice? Does the average New York resident even know what the PATH is, or even that it exists?

The PATH shutdown created a major crisis for Jersey City, Hoboken and NJTransit commuters who rely on the PATH, amounting to the disruption of thousands of New Jersey residents' lives. The disruption of the lives of a few dozen people who commute from New York to Hoboken is not something that appears on the radar of a governor. It probably doesn't even rate for the mayor of New York. The point is, as much as you want to point fingers at Cuomo, he doesn't give a shit. Nor do his constituents.

If the PATH shut down indefinitely, life in New York City would go on uninterrupted. We know this because it has already happened after Sandy. Expecting Cuomo to care even a fraction as much as Christie should care is like expecting Santa Claus to deliver Easter eggs.

Posted on: 2014/9/24 14:46
 Top 


Re: PATH is down again today!
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:
If a pigeon shit on a transformer and started a fire that shut down the PATH some would find a way to blame Christie and at the same time give his Democrat counterpart Cuomo a pass.





Cuomo isn't really a Democrat.

Posted on: 2014/9/24 14:30
 Top 


Re: Seattle tunnel will end up with frightening cost overruns . . .
Home away from home
Home away from home


Do you hear that sound?

That silence is New York not giving a shit that the PATH is suspended indefinitely.

Meanwhile, in New Jersey, the world is coming to an end.

Posted on: 2014/9/23 20:18
 Top 


Re: Connect PATH to 6 train, or $4 billion MALL?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:

The ARC tunnel wasn't signed off, they had only started a pilot hole. Is a project really underway when the financing isn't agreed upon? Nope.

No one knew about it, why not? It sounds like a great idea that would've served a great purpose. Why didn't McGreevey push it? Murky? Even under McGreevey the PA wasn't transparent it seems.


Probably because the ARC tunnel, while not in the process of being dug, was at that point about ten years in the making. It began with Christie Todd Whitman (R) as governor. Donald DiFrancesco (R) also supported the tunnel. So McGreevey comes along and, this is assuming he even knew about the proposal to extend the PATH, has two choices. He can move along a project that has bipartisan support and and estimated completion date of about the time his new daughter graduates high school, or he can try his luck with some unsupported, seemingly insane proposal by a democrat from Brooklyn who can't deliver federal funding, will still require years of study, and isn't necessarily going to have the support of an antagonistic Republican party. McGreevey chose to continue a project that had the support of two sitting NJ senators, a retired NJ senator, two former Republican governors, two former Democratic governor's, and a cabinet member of the sitting Republican President, not the out of nowhere proposal from minor Congressman from Brooklyn.

The ARC tunnel also matched McGreevey's broader strategy for New Jersey which included reigning in sprawl, encouraging transit oriented smart growth, and expanding transit facilities. A new tunnel would have connected Bergen County directly to Manhattan (and generated $18 billion in increased property value). Extending the PATH along the east side would be great for Jersey City, Hoboken and Newark. But McGreevey was the governor for the whole state, looking at priorities for the whole state, and, coming from central New Jersey, certainly focused on the middle portions of New Jersey rather than the gold coast. For Woodbridge, where he was mayor for two terms, ARC would mean more train service. For Middlesex County, it would mean a new train line connecting Monmouth and acted as a development catalyst for then closing Fort Monmouth. ARC also meant connecting western New Jersey along the Pennsylvania border with rail service. None of those new lines are possible without the ARC tunnel, and linking the PATH with the Lexington Ave line would not have helped any of these other places have better access to jobs in New York City.

Posted on: 2014/9/16 19:39
 Top 


Re: WORD Bookstore
Home away from home
Home away from home


Bridgett M. Davis Reads Into the Go-Slow at WORD with Tayari Jones, a Jersey City resident and professor at Rutgers Newark.

http://englishkillsreview.com/bridget ... o-slow-with-tayari-jones/

Posted on: 2014/9/15 13:48
 Top 


Re: nj.com: 7 things to know about the proposed No. 7 subway extension into Secaucus
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:

NJ residents commuting to work in NY pay a shitload of NYS taxes, and think about the services they consume-breakfast, lunch, dinner, coffee, taxis, haircuts-I could go on for hours.

Expecting NY to not pay their 'fair share' (as the Democrats like to say) is stupid when it comes to partnering on projects that benefit both, and it's not fair as well. Which is why Christie told them to call back when they're ready to be a partner and not a taker of NJ taxpayer money.


In case you haven't noticed, the north Jersey office vacancy rate is between 20% and 30%, with the higher vacancy rates farther from New York City. Midtown is under 10%. Manhattan is adding millions of square feet of office space. That means jobs. Job growth is in the city, not New Jersey. For a variety of reasons, corporations are moving to urban cores, not suburban office parks. Meanwhile, NJ office parks are closing, being sold off, or converted into alternative uses. Over the next decade, another 5 to 7 million square feet office space is going to become available in NYC.

Over the same period, it will be much easier to get from the east into the urban core. The 7 train connection to the Hudson Yards opens next year. Two or three years after that the LIRR will connect to Grand Central. There is already talk of bringing Metro North to Penn Station along the Hudson River. All that means is the suburbs north and east of the job centers in Manhattan will be better connected with faster and easier links to all those high paying jobs. All of those people are NY State residents who don't give a #OOPS# about getting to Secaucus. Nobody wants to spend billions of dollars just to make easier to get to Medieval Times.

Whether or not a tunnel is built, the jobs are coming to New York City.

Posted on: 2014/9/14 22:14
 Top 


Re: nj.com: 7 things to know about the proposed No. 7 subway extension into Secaucus
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Considering how little pork we get back from DC I'd say it would be equitable for the Feds to pay half, and the rest broken up equally between NY, NJ, and the Port Authority. Cost overruns would be shared equally.


Why would New York pay for something that will primarily benefit New Jersey (and if there are casinos, hurt NYC casinos which already have subway access)?

Also, thanks to Christie's cancelling ARC, bridgegate, and using money for the Pulaski, there's a good bet NY won't let funding from the Port Authority be used for such a large project that benefits NJ.

There was a bipartisan plan that would have brought better access to North Jersey and Christie killed it. Live with it.

Posted on: 2014/9/13 22:15
 Top 


Re: East Village Apartments Sit Empty Because Rent Is Too High, Report Says
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

margel wrote:
This article is utterly ridiculous. It is a free capitalist market (with the exception of rent stabilized/controlled apartments, but that's another story). Prices will rise as high as demand allows. Very simple Econ 101.

The idea that prices will be so high that the apartments will just sit empty is absurd. The longer an apartment sits empty, the more pressure the owner will have to reduce the price and get it filled.


The other exception to the free market is zoning. And historic preservation laws. And height limits. And floor area ratio limits. And tax policies to encourage specific construction. And exemptions granted for public good. And occasional use of eminent domain. But you know, other than that, FREE MARKET.

Posted on: 2014/9/13 22:12
 Top 


Re: Isn't enough space' on street, so park in garages
Home away from home
Home away from home


The problem in Jersey City as is the problem in Hoboken is that parking permits are greatly undervalued. Market rate parking is between $150 to $300 a month depending on where you park. That street parking permits are 1% the cost of parking in a garage. That's the problem. Raise the cost of a street permit to $1,800 a year and more people will park in garages.

Posted on: 2014/9/11 13:47
 Top 


Re: Would 'bus rapid transit' help spur development in JC outside of DT?
Home away from home
Home away from home


The main problem with Bus Rapid Transit in the United States is that American elected officials see it as a service that is the cheap alternative to actually investing in infrastructure, meaning BRT in the United States is basically as useless as non-BRT systems.

A successful BRT system needs dedicated travel lanes, traffic signal control facilitating only green lights for buses, elevated platforms, pre-pay fare zones and continuous regular service (which in the NYC metro area would include 24hour service on par with PATH and MTA trains).

Unfortunately, because American politicians are unduly influenced by the wealthy, BRT is treated as a low cost alternative to trams or heavy rail. Take for instance NJTransit's BRT system, the Go Bus in Newark. Instead of having pre-pay stations, riders "As you enter, pay your fare or show your pass to the driver," -- just like every other bus route. One improvement of the Go Bus is that they are "easily identified with special signage," an improvement over most other NJTransit stops that are poorly labeled. Still, without platforms, passengers load slowly, and buses still have to take extra time accommodating wheelchairs. Go Bus doesn't run on dedicated lanes or have control of traffic signals -- meaning the buses are stuck in traffic just like any other bus or private car. Basically, NJTransit's first BRT attempt is nothing more than a pretty paint job, but that's much cheaper than building a light rail line.

NYC's BRT are somewhat better, but still a long way away from what they should be. Most Select Buses have dedicated bus lanes, but the city does a poor job of enforcement and often the lanes are used by cars for double parking or deliveries, meaning buses still end up stuck in traffic. Select Buses don't have traffic signal control -- prohibited by NY State law -- but at the time they services were introduced, officials have been working to change the laws allowing buses control. Its yet to happen. The Select Buses do have a pre-pay system, but the main problem with them is that they are not integrated with the subway, and monthly card holders must pay an extra fee to ride the Select Bus, meaning the city is treating the Select Buses as something special rather than part of the integrated system. The Select Buses are an improvement over NJTransit's Go Bus, but still not anything that should be taken seriously without significant improvement to the service.

One of the most modern systems is actually in Bogot?, Columbia, as reported in the NYTimes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/world/americas/10degrees.html

Building out a system like the one in Columbia would probably be a successful way of bringing transit to a lot of outer areas of the NYC-Metro region, including Jersey City, Union City, North Bergen and beyond. But New Jersey's elected officials will never be willing to commit to the investment necessary to make the system work and function correctly, and a botched roll out will only harm long term prospects for transit overall.

Posted on: 2014/9/8 14:54
 Top 


Re: WORD Bookstore
Home away from home
Home away from home


Jenn Northington of WORD Bookstores interview: http://englishkillsreview.com/a-conve ... rector-at-word-bookstore/

Posted on: 2014/9/8 13:23
 Top 


Re: Jersey City tax abatement policy unfairly benefits union workers, group says in lawsuit
Home away from home
Home away from home


Easily solution: vote to unionize.

Posted on: 2014/9/2 16:50
 Top 


Re: Jersey City considers turning Newark Avenue into pedestrian plaza
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

tommyc_37 wrote:
The street itself has nothing to do with Newark,


Its the road that leads to Newark.

Posted on: 2014/8/21 17:51
 Top 


Re: PATH Riders Cry for Chivalry
Home away from home
Home away from home


A lot of people who are currently in their child bearing years are narcissists who think the world revolves around them. I suspect most of the time pregnant women are on the train, nobody has actually noticed that they are pregnant. I would be more interested in knowing how many people have asked for a seat and then been denied.

Posted on: 2014/8/18 13:43
 Top 


Re: New PATH Station - Marion
Home away from home
Home away from home


Its probably worth noting that any additional stations are at least a decade away given the long term planning on the Port Authority.

As to articulated trains, they will almost certainly need to be new equipment. Luckily the MTA is already investigating articulated trains. The new PA5 cars are basically modified R143 rolling stock used on the 4,5,6, so if the MTA develops new articulated vehicles, its possible the 6th generation Port Authority cars could be as well.

One possibility to expand current capacity could be replacing seats on the trains with folding seats that lock closed at rush hour allowing more space. Again, the MTA has experimented with this, though I'm not sure what the result was.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/n ... ush-hour-article-1.314241


Long term, the PATH will need longer rush hour-hours. Part of the reluctant likely stems from how rail operators are scheduled. Typically, to service rush hours, two things happen. One, overnight crews finish at the end of rush hour, so they can't work longer because they are the end of their shift. Second, rush hour train crews work for a period in the morning and a period in the afternoon with time off at half-pay in between. Its likely that the current shut off times for rush hour service are based around minimizing overtime and not hiring extra crews.

As far as the HBLR system, there is a straight portion on the track designed for a station. More than a decade ago, a developer was looking to build a high rise on the land and would have constructed the light rail station as part of the plan-- it would have gone through the tower's base. However, mostly do to opposition from Height's residents concerned about their views, the tower was not built. NJTransit is currently considering construction of a station there but probably needs more development around the site or might use it as a carrot to get approval for the redevelopment of the rail yard. (Thats a sticky issue because legally they don't need approval, since they are state land, but do want it politically. Hoboken's Zimmer, who is frightened of development, has done her best to stop it.) Anyway, long term planning has a station going in there near Jersey Ave. That doesn't really help get people across the river though.

Posted on: 2014/8/12 18:09
 Top 


Re: New PATH Station - Marion
Home away from home
Home away from home


Remember the 9 train? That was skip-stop along the 1 that was discontinued when they realized how retarded an idea it is for a train on a single track to skip stations. Buses can skip stations because they are not confined to a track. Maybe you can get NJTransit to install a Marion bus station. The Port Authority had no interest in building a station there when Healy suggested it four years ago. They certainly don't have more interest in the idea now.

Posted on: 2014/8/8 15:24
 Top 



TopTop
« 1 ... 5 6 7 (8) 9 10 11 ... 81 »






Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017