Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
186 user(s) are online (155 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 186

more...




Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users




« 1 2 (3)


Re: NYT: Jersey City May Require Paid Sick Leave
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/6/10 16:06
Last Login :
2020/10/28 15:39
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 290
Offline
I am hoping Fletcher Gensamer can come and give us the right-wing tea partier point of view on this.

Posted on: 2013/9/4 19:19
 Top 


Re: NYT: Jersey City May Require Paid Sick Leave
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1674
Offline
Quote:

vindication15 wrote:
Quote:

MDM wrote:
So more and more marginal businesses will reduce employment or move workers to part-time to avoid the new law.


there should be measures to also protect paid part time workers. I think the notion of every job is a good job is false. If that were true, we should be able to hire our children again and pay them 50 cents an hour.

A job should have some decency associated with it - living wage and paid sick time off are part of that decency.

I applaud Fulop for this.



I guess you need to see the details. 30 days employment (full/part time??) to earn one sick day is stated however you could be technically employed but only work 4 hours a week and still get a paid day off after 30 days if you are sick?

Obama had the senate/house first to 2 years in office and failed to do anything in terms of fixing the economy and here we are today with the economy still flat. I understand what Fulop is doing, but I think there are more pressing needs for the city then working on this kind of stuff.



Posted on: 2013/9/4 18:07
 Top 


Re: NYT: Jersey City May Require Paid Sick Leave
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/1/19 4:04
Last Login :
2017/4/20 19:08
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1080
Offline
Quote:

MDM wrote:
So more and more marginal businesses will reduce employment or move workers to part-time to avoid the new law.


there should be measures to also protect paid part time workers. I think the notion of every job is a good job is false. If that were true, we should be able to hire our children again and pay them 50 cents an hour.

A job should have some decency associated with it - living wage and paid sick time off are part of that decency.

I applaud Fulop for this.

Posted on: 2013/9/4 17:16
 Top 


Re: NYT: Jersey City May Require Paid Sick Leave
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/7/13 15:03
Last Login :
7/5 23:54
From Western Slope
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4638
Offline
Quote:

MDM wrote:
So more and more marginal businesses will reduce employment or move workers to part-time to avoid the new law.

Maybe that the underlying theme !

Posted on: 2013/9/4 16:31
Get on your bikes and ride !
 Top 


Re: NYT: Jersey City May Require Paid Sick Leave
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/7/9 11:16
Last Login :
10/30 16:49
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2743
Offline
So more and more marginal businesses will reduce employment or move workers to part-time to avoid the new law.

Posted on: 2013/9/4 14:19
 Top 


NYT: Jersey City May Require Paid Sick Leave
#1
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/2/24 20:45
Last Login :
2014/8/23 19:32
From hamilton park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 145
Offline
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/04/nyr ... ve.html?ref=nyregion&_r=0

The New York Times
September 3, 2013
Jersey City May Require Paid Sick Leave
By KATE ZERNIKE
Calling it a matter of ?basic human dignity,? the mayor of Jersey City wants to require all but the smallest businesses to provide their employees paid sick days.

The bill would make the city, which is New Jersey?s second largest, the first in the state and one of the few nationwide to require paid sick leave. It is modeled on similar laws enacted in several cities over the last several years.

But it would go further than most, requiring any business with 10 or more employees to provide up to five paid sick days each year. Companies with fewer employees would have to provide five unpaid sick days.

In contrast, a bill passed by the New York City Council this year ? after a veto by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg ? will require employers with 20 or more employees to provide paid sick leave when it takes effect next year; the following year, it will extend to workplaces with 15 or more employees. The city exempted manufacturers, as does a state law in Connecticut that requires employers with 50 or more workers to provide paid sick leave.

The policy proposed by Mayor Steven Fulop in Jersey City would not include that exemption. As in other cities, workers would earn a day of sick time for each 30 days worked.

Mr. Fulop, who worked in his parents? deli in Newark when he was growing up, said he had fashioned his proposal so as not to hurt the businesses, like bodegas or start-ups, that struggle most.

?But once you get to a point that you have a stable work force, with 10 or more people,? he said, ?it?s a reasonable thing to say they shouldn?t be at risk for losing their jobs or penalized if unfortunately they get sick or a loved one does.?

As financial firms have moved across the Hudson River, Jersey City has become more affluent; Mr. Fulop, 36, first moved there to work for Goldman Sachs. But he said the policy was aimed particularly at helping lower-wage workers.

?It?s an opportunity to make sure that employers who move here are conscious of this basic dignity for working families,? Mr. Fulop said.

The mayor, who was sworn in on July 1, will propose the bill to the City Council next week; its chances are considered good, given that the majority of the members are aligned with him.

A coalition of community and union groups is pushing the bill as a matter of good public health: food service workers who can stay home are less likely to spread germs, as are sick children whose parents can stay home with them, thanks to the bill.

?We think that people understand that it?s important for workers not to have to choose between taking care of their loved ones and a day?s pay,? said Kevin Brown, a vice president of a local service workers union.

In other cities that have debated paid sick leave, opponents have argued that it is too expensive, particularly for small businesses. While Portland, Ore.; Washington; and San Francisco have all passed paid sick-leave policies, about a half-dozen states have passed laws prohibiting municipalities from doing so. But studies have shown that most employers ultimately support the policy, and report that it has not made them less profitable.

Posted on: 2013/9/4 13:45
 Top 




« 1 2 (3)




[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017