OneSkirt wrote:
How is this thread still a thing???

Yvonne wrote:
Baloney, remember the lie? Same sex marriage will not bother/hurt anyone. Even right now Chicago is following the lead of same sex couples who are suing because their feelings are hurt. Yes, some people will follow their conscience. Chicago introduced a bill to force that says, ?All health care facilities shall adopt written access to care and information protocols that are designed to ensure that conscience-based objections do not cause impairment of patients? health?? They are taking their lead from same sex couples who sued florist and bakers who put God first. Prochoice people needs more doctors and other healthcare workers, they are forcing people to violate their conscience. Same sex marriage and this new law are destroying the first amendment, we are no better than some countries that outlaw religion and real choice.
http://illinoisrighttolife.org/senate ... 4+passed&utm_medium=email

Yvonne wrote:
You Matt, are bringing up two different things. First, I don't buy there is no connection to gays and sex to minors. Last year, there was a program on EWTN, the Catholic network which shown gays who are now doing the Courage program. The program is for gays who choose to live a chaste life. It is not a program to be straight. The men have different reasons for choosing this program one said for him his drug addiction was part of his gaylife style and in order to be clean he had to be chaste. But one thing all the men said, they became involved in the lifestyle as teens either 13 or 14 years old. An older man had sex with them. They all admitted they enjoyed the sex and don't considered it rape then. I wish some psychologist would do a true study on this by this subject and not worry about the political consequences. The next time EWTN reruns this program, I would definitely post something here. On the second subject you brought up serving on serving gays. It was reported through Wikileaks that the gay community wanted to weaken the laws of religion. That means ignore the rights of religion. Do you remember the lie that was told? Same sex marriage will not hurt anyone? Well, that is a lie. The laws on marriage in orthodox churches were there before the supreme court made their ruling but the supreme court has no say in matter of religion. I have rented to gays but that is not the same thing as baking a cake which violates someone's religion.

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

matt07302 wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
I took the information from Wikimedia, show me article where mainstream gay group disavow NAMBLA. Even the NY Times has an article having the ACLU defending this group. By the way many gay groups also support the ACLU.
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/01/us/ ... between-men-and-boys.html

Are you suggesting that because "many gay groups" support the ACLU that they are pro pedophile?


The Catholic Church systematically covered up their own pedophiles. That is not a third party connection. That is direct to the top people of the Church.

I am saying gay men in the priesthood molested those boys just like the hero the late Harvey Milk molested boys too. His friend and biographer Randy Shilts, wrote in his book, "The Mayor of Castro Street," that "Harvey always had a penchant for young waifs with substance abuse problems." He was known to have several man-boy sexual relations. One of his paramours, 16-year-old runaway Jack McKinley, eventually committed suicide. Returning to the subject of the Catholic Church gay men should not apply for the priesthood. Amazingly, Harvey Milk in now on a post stamp as a hero, yet the priests who did the exact same thing are in prison.

matt07302 wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
I took the information from Wikimedia, show me article where mainstream gay group disavow NAMBLA. Even the NY Times has an article having the ACLU defending this group. By the way many gay groups also support the ACLU.
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/01/us/ ... between-men-and-boys.html

Are you suggesting that because "many gay groups" support the ACLU that they are pro pedophile?


The Catholic Church systematically covered up their own pedophiles. That is not a third party connection. That is direct to the top people of the Church.

Yvonne wrote:
I took the information from Wikimedia, show me article where mainstream gay group disavow NAMBLA. Even the NY Times has an article having the ACLU defending this group. By the way many gay groups also support the ACLU.
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/01/us/ ... between-men-and-boys.html

Yvonne wrote:
The Huffingpost is not an independent, it is totally part of the left agenda and the Advocate is totally promotes gays rights. So they are not an independent source. Johns Hopkins started transgender operations, for them to say it does not work, people listen. By the way, another group associated with promoting gay rights is the North American Man Boy Love Association which claims it is also part of gay community, but how many people here support that agenda? This is part of their message from Wikimedia: In achieving these goals, NAMBLA aims to co-operate with the mainstream LGBT community and women's liberation movements.

Yvonne wrote:
This transgender law by Obama for the public schools happened because emails by DNA and LGBT group. They want to weaken religious freedom.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new ... us-freedom-project-19756/

Yvonne wrote:
Tell that to Johns Hospital, they stopped doing surgery because it does not solve the real problems.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/micha ... ental-disorder-sex-change

Yvonne wrote:
I feel sorry for transgender people. I once saw a African-American male on the PATH, dressed like a woman with Caucasian makeup. He would have been a handsome black male instead he tried to be a white female. I said a silent prayer for him. This is really sad.

Yvonne wrote:
The people who is best at answering this question are the one who had a sex change and now regret the actions. They know better than anyone else.
http://www.sexchangeregret.com/

jcneighbor wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
I always enjoy when the truly ignorant bigots continue to demonstrate and even promote how proud they are to remain ignorant bigots...

Indeed. And Yvonne still hasn't answered the question...

Pebble wrote:
I always enjoy when the truly ignorant bigots continue to demonstrate and even promote how proud they are to remain ignorant bigots...

Yvonne wrote:
This transgender law by Obama for the public schools happened because emails by DNA and LGBT group. They want to weaken religious freedom.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new ... us-freedom-project-19756/

Yvonne wrote:
I can only say you are not a woman on the subway train. Your perspective is totally male, radryan03. Another story by a pervert. People go for exposing, touching then finally rape: http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/20 ... n.html#incart_river_index

Yvonne wrote:
I suggest people here stop judging me since I do not follow the culture. Yes, I have views and even science backs me up. Men and women are different. No man here has breast fed a baby, had a menstrual cycle or gave birth. Yes, woman do want privacy and I am not the only one that way. The woman in Macys with her daughter panic. What about her rights? We are giving transgender people super rights that precludes ordinary rights. I have seen enough men on the subway in NYC platform who touch themselves. Those are the creeps that will go into a woman's private space and rape them. Everyone here want to ignore that problem. I don't.