Browsing this Thread:
2 Anonymous Users
Re: Contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Gaughan does not use or believe in email. He once was quoted saying email is for yuppies. Gaughan is so out of touch.
Quote:
Posted on: 2010/3/2 19:00
|
|||
|
Re: Contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
gaughan is my councilman and he of course missed the vote last week. I emailed to see how he WOULD have voted to give him the benefit of the doubt. 5 days later no response. i guess i should have included a money order w/ my damn email.
this is the 2nd email i've sent his office that has been ignored.
Posted on: 2010/3/2 18:16
|
|||
|
Re: Contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
|
Your kidding right? Bill Gaughan doesn't no who the company is? So he just cashes contribution checks without looking to see who there from and why? Typical JC answer........ We need all new council members except Fulop who care about JC and not there own pocket.....
Posted on: 2010/3/2 16:20
|
|||
|
Re: Contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
No "law was broken" technically, but the law itself is BROKEN.
Posted on: 2010/3/2 16:02
|
|||
|
Re: Contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
|
Remember the controversy involved with the bidding process for Hamilton park? Supposedly the developers of Hamilton square were awarded the job. Then complaints surfaced that the developer had knowledge of the other bids (inside info.) and used it to submit the lowest bid. As a result the bidding was done all over again and the job went to another contractor.
Does anyone have a copy of the article they could post?
Posted on: 2010/3/2 15:54
|
|||
|
Re: Contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
At the next council meeting, can someone ask about this so that Steve can say everyone on this council received contributions except for me. That was awesome last time. And this time, some members received specific donations.
Posted on: 2010/3/2 15:26
|
|||
|
Re: Contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I would just like to take this opportunity to let members of the city council know that my favorable written opinion of them can be bought. If I receive a monetary ?contribution? from one of them. After I receive a check in the mail, I will post one positive comment concerning the specific councilperson here on JC list per day, and I will write in to refute any negative comments made of such councilperson with high minded conviction. The sort of high mended conviction that only money can buy!
As a side note, Nadia Lopez would have to pay quite a bit more for this service as she is a special case.
Posted on: 2010/3/2 14:33
|
|||
|
Contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Jersey City contract goes to firm that gave to council members' campaigns, but no law broken
By Melissa Hayes/The Jersey Journal March 02, 2010, 7:00AM Winning bidder for a Jersey City municipal contract donated to the campaigns of council members. Officials say pay-to-play law not violated. A company that donated to the campaigns of Jersey City City Council members has been awarded a contract that will bring it up to $100,000. But, say city officials, the city's pay-to-play law has not been violated because the company -- Certified Products Co. of Jersey City -- was the low bidder on a job to provide automotive fluids and lubricants for the city's Department of Public Works. The company won the contract fair and square and it was awarded appropriately to the lowest responsible bidder, city spokesman Jennifer Morrill said yesterday. According to the resolution passed Wednesday, Certified Products was the lowest of three bidders, with a $165,517.50 bid. The resolution cites "budgetary constraints" as the reason for capping the open-ended contract at $100,000. Councilman Steven Fulop, who sponsored the pay-to-play legislation that was adopted Sept. 23, 2008, thought the awarding of the contract might have violated the law once he learned of the donations. But the law only applies to professional services contracts, such as agreements entered into with attorneys and architects. "Whether bid or not bid, the intention is that if you are a city vendor you should not be contributing, as it compromises judgment," Fulop argued. Certified Products Co. donated $500 on June 1 to Councilman Michael Sottolano and Councilwoman Viola Richardson's joint campaign fund in last year's runoff election. And on March 2, 2009, the company donated $1,000 to Team Jersey City, which in addition to Sottolano and Richardson includes Council President Peter Brennan, Councilwomen Willie Flood and Nidia Lopez, and Councilmen Bill Gaughan and Mariano Vega. Gaughan's individual campaign received a $450 donation on Feb. 26, 2009, and Richardson's individual campaign got $1,000 on Oct. 10, 2008. The company also donated $1,500 to the Hudson County Democratic Organization on Sept. 23, 2008. "I have no idea who this company is," Gaughan said last night. "If there was an award and the lowest responsible bidder was granted an award, then I voted because they were the lowest responsible bidder." Heather Taylor, communications director for Citizen's Campaign, which drafted the pay-to-play law adopted by many municipalities in the state, said a newer model includes a clause related to contracts that are bid but that it wouldn't have stopped Certified Products Co. from being awarded a contract. The ordinance only prohibits a vendor from making political contributions once they are awarded a contract. Once the contract is up, the company could go back to contributing.
Posted on: 2010/3/2 14:04
|
|||
|