billtimslee wrote:
Don't be Jealous because I am more intelligent and Successful than the Loser and DullMoment

nugnfutz wrote:

Sweet...i totally suck at pool...and im sure u can kick my ass for $20-$100 bucks a game. Actually dude or dudette...let u off lightly...we can play for beers :)

BrightMoment wrote:
Quote:

nugnfutz wrote:
BM - kick ur ass anywhere, anytime at 8-ball, 9-ball, straight, snooker, billiards...name ur poison. I'm not very good, but i got a nice stick :)

Oh ...and can you give me the short answer plz....fell asleep on the long one. Not worth my time. But thats ur Zzzzzzzz.

Yeah, well it's been 5 years since I last picked up a cue in open league competition, but I'm sure I could still kick YOR butt! Straight pool, call pocket only, all balls pocketed not called are spotted, 14 to 1 continuous till 144 points scored. Any table in Jersey City. Let me know when and where.

nugnfutz wrote:
BM - kick ur ass anywhere, anytime at 8-ball, 9-ball, straight, snooker, billiards...name ur poison. I'm not very good, but i got a nice stick :)

Oh ...and can you give me the short answer plz....fell asleep on the long one. Not worth my time. But thats ur Zzzzzzzz.

nugnfutz wrote:
Quote:

BrightMoment wrote:
Quote:

nugnfutz wrote:
Q.E.D.

Quod Ego Dic(k)o, "because I say so" or quo errat demonstrator, "where the demonstrator errs".

Figures.

When I signed up to this website i agreed not to entered into personal flames with other people. And when I have, I believe I have had enough humility to apoligise when needed.

Think you've forgotton that BM. You just proved my assertions with your intolerance and total dismissal of anyone that doesn't share you views nor experience.

LOL! nugngutz you have as little humor as you have more than enough pomposity. My proclaiming your laziness in not doing a search on this site for your answer is not "...dismissal of anyone that doesn't share your views now experience.", it's a statement of fact that the answers are here on this site. Your debate tactic of trying to state that this shows "intolerance" is not about my views or anyone else's views you disagree with here other than again your lack of research skills.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QED = An abbreviation of the Latin phrase "quod erat demonstrandum". It literally translates as "which was to be demonstrated", and is a formal way of ending a mathematical, logical or physical proof. It's purpose is to alert the reader that the immediately previous statement, which naturally was arrived at by an unbroken chain of logic, was the original statement that we were trying to prove.


Again, your definition of Q.E.D. is only one of many definitions of this Latin acronym. My humorous take you find "intolerant" because it disagrees with your so-called "proof". If you had a sense of humor I wouldn't have to explain to you that my "black square" of the 8 ball is both a humorous commentary on the traditional use of a black square in mathematical proofs to indicate:

Q.E.D.

"End-of-proof symbolism in the present day is often the symbol ■ (solid black square), also called tombstone or Halmos symbol (after Paul Halmos, who pioneered its use)"

if you don't know what "behind the 8 ball" means you didn't spend enough time in pool rooms as some of us did.

Check here for further definitions of QED, beyond your own, nugnfutz:

Variations on the abbreviation

In English speaking countries the letters have been humorously interpreted as "Quite Easily Done" or "Quickly and Easily Done", "Quite Easily Demonstrated", or, occasionally, "Quite Eloquently Done", or "Quite Enough Done". Other humorous expansions in the context of mathematical proofs are "Question Every Detail" or "Question Every Deduction", suggesting that the reader should check that the proof is indeed correct as claimed, or "Qualitatively Extracted Deduction" or "Quit and Eat Dinner." It has also been rendered as quod ego dico, "because I say so" or quo errat demonstrator, "where the demonstrator errs".

There is another Latin phrase, with a slightly different meaning, but a similar, if less common usage. Quod erat faciendum is translated as "which was to be done." This is usually shortened to Q.E.F.. As with Q.E.D., Q.E.F. is a translation of the Greek geometers' closing ὅπερ ἔδει ποιῆσαι (hoper edei poiēsai). Euclid used this phrase to close propositions which were not precisely "proofs", but rather examplar constructions. The distinction between Q.E.D. and Q.E.F. is roughly equivalent to the distinction between a proof and an illustration of the proof.

Alternatively, some people prefer to use the more tongue-in-cheek WWWWW or W5 which stands for the English "Which Was What We Wanted."

This abbreviation has as many foreign equivalents as there are languages; in French and German (two languages a mathematician might see often) it is respectively C.Q.F.D, for "ce qu'il fallait d?montrer", and W.Z.B.W, for "was zu beweisen war". Other variants may be found in the language Wikipedias on the sidebar.

BrightMoment wrote:
Quote:

nugnfutz wrote:
Q.E.D.

Quod Ego Dic(k)o, "because I say so" or quo errat demonstrator, "where the demonstrator errs".

Figures.

nugnfutz wrote:
Q.E.D.

billtimslee wrote:
Quote:

BrightMoment

What a Loser this guy is, Get a Life Man
Instead of spending 4 hours composing your reply you could have just posted something useful such as a link to the thread or answer the question if you know what the answer is. Get off the computer for a few hours a day man and Live, Damn it, Live your Life.

I have confidence you can do it

-- FYI-- His response will be full of images,quotes, or useless videos because he has nothing worthwhile to contribute...

billtimslee wrote:
Quote:

BrightMoment

What a Loser this guy is, Get a Life Man
Instead of spending 4 hours composing your reply you could have just posted something useful such as a link to the thread or answer the question if you know what the answer is. Get off the computer for a few hours a day man and Live, Damn it, Live your Life.

I have confidence you can do it

-- FYI-- His response will be full of images,quotes, or useless videos because he has nothing worthwhile to contribute...

BrightMoment

nugnfutz wrote:
Q.E.D.

alb wrote:
Quote:

BrightMoment wrote:
Do a search, nugnfutz. Info was posted here and long topic discussion. I have confidence in your "detective" skills.

But did the thread talk about who got the money and how it was allocated?

I think the organizations hiring the officers pay something like $15 an hour directly to the officers, but I don't remember clearly where I heard that figure and maybe it's off.

BrightMoment wrote:
Do a search, nugnfutz. Info was posted here and long topic discussion. I have confidence in your "detective" skills.

nugnfutz wrote:
We see cops directing traffic downtown everywhere. How much do they get, how much does the City get, and how much lines the pockets of their bosses?