Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
130 user(s) are online (119 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 130

more...




Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users






Re: Voting 'No' on question #2 (motor fuel tax)
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/3/2 4:49
Last Login :
2018/6/12 15:20
From Downtown Ex Pat happy in McGinley Sq.
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 844
Offline
And now there's this. I don't get this one AT ALL!! So maddening!!


Ballot Question 2: A 'no' vote on transportation means higher gas taxes, not lower

Posted on: 2016/11/8 18:20
 Top 


Re: Voting 'No' on question #2 (motor fuel tax)
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/12/18 2:57
Last Login :
2017/9/14 20:15
From Crystal Point
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 747
Offline
From what I'm reading we are screwed either way.

Excerpts from http://www.northjersey.com/news/gas-t ... ballot-question-1.1688548

"One of the bills in the legislative package Christie signed, A10, authorizes up to $12 billion in borrowing for transit projects ? but that borrowing is ?contingent? on Question 2?s passage, according to the non-partisan Office of Legislative Services.

Guadagno said the state?s Transportation Trust Fund is deeply indebted and that adding $12 billion to the debt load would increase costs for taxpayers down the line.

?A no vote is a vote against billions in debt without the means for repayment,? according to a fact sheet Guadagno posted on Twitter. ?A no vote will force the Legislature to reexamine the gas tax hike bill ? because the gas tax grab is tied in with the overall scheme.?

If the ballot question fails, the Legislature could simply pass a new bill to authorize the borrowing of any amount different from $12 billion, without linking it to a referendum, according to Chris?tie?s Treasury Department.

?Regardless of the outcome of the ballot question, the Legislature could still authorize more than the $12 billion currently being contemplated,? Treasury spokesman Willem Rijksen said.

Prieto said both houses of the Legislature would have the votes to pass that new bill ?in a heartbeat,? or any kind of ?cleanup? bill if needed.

Posted on: 2016/11/8 16:29
 Top 


Re: Voting 'No' on question #2 (motor fuel tax)
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/7/9 11:16
Last Login :
10/30 16:49
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2743
Offline
Quote:

OneSkirt wrote:
Its a very very deceptively worded question. I too only found out the reasons to vote NO late last night.

Our press failed to cover this one correctly.


Same here. I really want roads and rail funded. I would tolerate higher gas taxes if it was really going to the roads and rail system.

Turns out we are just voting for more of the same. NJ will be bonded to death at some point.

Posted on: 2016/11/8 16:16
 Top 


Re: Voting 'No' on question #2 (motor fuel tax)
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/3/2 4:49
Last Login :
2018/6/12 15:20
From Downtown Ex Pat happy in McGinley Sq.
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 844
Offline
Its a very very deceptively worded question. I too only found out the reasons to vote NO late last night.

Our press failed to cover this one correctly.

Posted on: 2016/11/8 15:49
 Top 


Re: Voting 'No' on question #2 (motor fuel tax)
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/7/9 11:16
Last Login :
10/30 16:49
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2743
Offline
https://ballotpedia.org/New_Jersey_Ded ... Revenue_to_Transportation,_Public_Question_2_(2016)


Question 2 and transportation bonds

Gov. Christie signed Assembly Bill 10 on October 14, 2016. One provision of the bill would authorize up to $12 billion in bonds for transportation projects if voters approve Question 2.[8] If Question 2 is rejected, then the $12 billion would not be authorized. According to a New Jersey Department of Treasury spokesperson, the legislature has the power to pass a new bill authorizing the $12 billion in bonds without making it contingent upon a ballot measure.

Posted on: 2016/11/8 15:40
 Top 


Re: Voting 'No' on question #2 (motor fuel tax)
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/11/17 1:11
Last Login :
1/7 4:19
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1241
Offline
should have posted this before election day. My understanding of the question was that it would ensure the existing gas taxes can not be redirected to other funds and must be used for the transportation fund. What's this about issuing new bonds?

Posted on: 2016/11/8 15:26
 Top 


Voting 'No' on question #2 (motor fuel tax)
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/7/9 11:16
Last Login :
10/30 16:49
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2743
Offline
I am all for 100% of the motor fuel tax going to fund transportation. The people that use the roads the most, pay the most. Traffic goes up, so does revenue.

My issue is that the question allows the legislature to bond without voter approval. The legislature has continuously raided the transportation trust fund and now the revenues go 100% just to cover the interest.

If this question passes, we will be right back where we are now as the legislature will bond against the additional revenues. The TTF should be a 'pay as you go' program, without being drained by additional bonding.

Posted on: 2016/11/8 14:10
 Top 








[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017