Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
Joined:
2012/10/12 12:58 Last Login : 2016/5/8 0:52 From Jersey City
Group:
Registered Users
Posts:
288
|
Quote:
+1
Posted on: 2015/4/19 21:41
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
This project is done to bail out the HUB or Brandywine. The HUB cannot keep tenants and Brandywine is responsible for the payment of the 108 loan, they develop the HUB and now they are building the city hall annex as a cash cow to pay back the loan. http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/20 ... nning_in_jersey_city.html
Posted on: 2015/4/19 2:17
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Newbie
Joined:
2015/4/16 21:29 Last Login : 2015/5/22 16:54 From Barrow St, Jersey CIty
Group:
Registered Users
Posts:
2
|
The hub bank branch went to public bid/RFP. One bank responded. Investors bank is well capitalized (look them up), has a strong balance sheet, pay NJS's form of deposit insurance, in addition to FDIC, and the city struck a deal with them that ultimately saves tax payers a significant amount of money for the banking services they provide to the municipality. Hoboken, Red Bank, and other NJ municipalities are quite pleased with using Investors. The CEO was born in and grew up in Jersey City.
Posted on: 2015/4/18 17:44
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The HUB had a bank but it closed, I believe it was the Bank of America. The city has invested a great deal of money in the HUB including the 108 loan that was given in 1998. Brandywine is still paying the 108 loan and I personally believe we place the city hall annex there to bail out Brandywine since they were not making any money at the HUB. Now Brandywine will have the funds to pay back the 108 loan. Other properties were condemned for a city hall annex, including the Hispanic church opposite city hall which is now a parking lot and the property sold to he Medical Center.
Posted on: 2015/4/17 23:29
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Just like many inner city residents didn't REALLY want supermarkets for 40 years. The market is always right, except when it isn't. When there's far more check cashing joints than banks, you know somethings wrong. One thing is it can be cheaper to pay the check casher than risk the ridiculous fees if you bounce a check.
Posted on: 2015/4/17 22:45
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Generally speaking the money should be housed in the bank that provides the best return on the deposits, not the bank that will do a politicians bidding.
You and Fulop are assuming that the residents will benefit from these new banking services, services that the residents could very well get in other ways if they wanted to. If these residents really wanted these banking services then a bank branch would come about in its own volition. Bottom line is Fulop shouldn't really be so proud of this. It's sad that he is.
Posted on: 2015/4/17 22:04
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Can you cite the last time an institutional depositor rather than the bank's stockholders lost it's capital in an American bank failure? It's a hard topic to search. Quote:
How is it "wrong"? The money has got to go somewhere. Wrong would be the traditional kickback to the Pol or party, as opposed to using the leverage to try and benefit the citizens.
Posted on: 2015/4/17 19:40
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
When you lend money to a bank by depositing funds into it you are always taking a risk that it can be lost by that bank. That's one of the reasons why they pay interest to the depositor. The inherent risk in depositing funds into a bank is highlighted by the existence of the FDIC.
Fulop is compounding the inherent risk in this situation by making the decision to deposit our taxpayer money into a bank not based on any risk/reward analysis of the bank but because he wants to gain political points. He wants a branch to open up in a neighborhood he prefers - a neighborhood that if it needed a bank branch at all it would have people living in it that would pay for the banking services thus attracting a branch being opened by some bank without any incentives coming from Fulop. He has a fiduciary responsibility when it comes to our tax money and this decision by him goes against that responsibility. And that fact that Robert Moses of all people did something similar is irrelevant. Two wrongs don't make a right. Neither one of them should have done it.
Posted on: 2015/4/17 19:09
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Please explain how you think the city's money is at risk. Do you really think the bank will abscond with it, or go bankrupt leaving nothing left? This is a classic use of gov't funds, Robert Moses used similar tactics with the many millions in cash flow he controlled, not always for the public's benefit. How close does a bank really need to be? If you google 07304 + bank there are a 1/2 dozen banks in 1/2 mile below Communipaw. The Hudson City & Cap 1 are ~10 minute walk from the Hub.
Posted on: 2015/4/17 18:42
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
Joined:
2005/11/12 17:04 Last Login : 5/7 14:26 From Downtown JC, VVP Area
Group:
Registered Users
Posts:
560
|
Quote:
I couldn't agree more-
Posted on: 2015/4/17 16:23
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
It's disturbing how proud Fulop is of this deal. Essentially he bribed a small bank to open up a branch in a certain area using millions of dollars of Jersey City taxpayer's money - our money, not his money. He's put our money at risk for his own personal political gain.
And he's thumping his chest about it. Something's terribly wrong here.
Posted on: 2015/4/17 13:59
|
|||
|
Re: A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I attended the caucus meeting when this was discussed. Taxpayers will have $75 million of our dollars in that bank.
Posted on: 2015/4/17 1:52
|
|||
|
A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
A plan to bring banks to N.J.'s low-income neighborhoods | Opinion By By Steven Fulop and Phyllis Salowe-Kaye Just as important, Investors will help residents with financial literacy programs to make them not just aware of services the bank offers but also how to be better banking consumers. At the same time, the city will also support additional financial literacy programs run by New Jersey Citizen Action to help neighborhood start-ups qualify for loans. Steven Fulop is mayor of Jersey City and Phyllis Salowe-Kaye is executive director of New Jersey Citizen Action. http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2 ... ow-income_neighborho.html
Posted on: 2015/4/17 1:41
|
|||
|