Dear RCScott:

Looks like you may be right and Nextdoor is not owned by FB. Or it is? There are posting saying both. This post says that FB has a competing platform, Neighborhoods. https://marketrealist.com/p/who-owns-nextdoor/

Now that I think about it, I'm not sure what is worse. That Nextdoor was owned by FB which appears to be wrong or that Nextdoor an independent startup is just as Orwellian as the Chineses corrupted and monopolistic FB.

Please keep the corrections coming. This is how truth comes out!

Yours,

Mao

Dear Mr. RScott:

Thanks for your correction, if you are correct. There is, however, a lot of basis to believe that Nextdoor is owned or otherwise controled by FB.

See, for example, https://www.mediagistic.com/blog/nextd ... ntly%20reached%20out%20to,Facebook%20Audience%20Network%20(FAN).

Cheers,

Mao

Some clips about a film, Utopia, also an Amazon series, is about the need for population control and to reset by creating a virus and a vaccine that sterilizes (a protein and amino acid).


Here's the link. You can listen but it looks like Youtube scrambles the picture.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87F2jX5Qk2Y

The why of all this is unfathomable. Evil genocidal plan? Confluence of idiots and mass psychosis?

Alex Berenson sees Pfizer now preparing to batten down the hatches when everything hits the fan:


https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/if ... vaccine-company-executive

LOL, would gladly post in Latin but not only would the censor miss it but so would my friends and neighbors.

This entire idea of shutting down the discussion because its "dangerous" is crazy and foreign. True, western democracies had censored speech traditionally, basically based on concerns about obscenity and blasphemy. The First Amendment was written to prevent the Federal Government from censoring political speech. This became controlling over the states after the enactment of the 14th Amendment.

SCOTUS has repeatedly held that even speech which on its face is dangerous- advocating the killing of groups or the over throw of the government is still protected.

The Common Law does have provisions for addressing false speech in Libel and slander actions. It also has provisions for addressing speech that causes immediate harm, e.g. yelling fire in a crowded theater- that is a basis for inciting a riot etc and creates liability.

The posters who seem unable to communicate without making juvenile personal attacks seem to have amnesia about how this country was until a few years ago. Ironically, there are almost no restrictions on obscenity and none on blasphemy.

Yet now our scientists, doctors, teachers, judges, lawyers are being terrorized into a party line.

Wanted to generate some appreciative feedback for JCLIST, but no luck.

I don't post on FB and have no Twitter Account. I do, however, use Nextdoor. Apparently, they are now owned by FB.

Nextdoor's censor is truly Orwellian. A post there which questions or attacks the vaccines for covid is not allowed to be put up. Moreover, I am then blocked prospectively unless I swear to follow the censor.

If one speaks indirectly or in code, it will be posted. However, it is inevitably taken down within an hour or two.


Even an abstract post to discuss freedom of speech and censorship was taken!

An experience, perhaps, of things to come.

Congrats to JCLIST for allowing free speech- in particular about the Wuhan flu and various responses to it.

Why are almost all of the other established platforms engaging in view point discrimination?

Why are the professional societies, corporate interests, universities, unions, churches all tripping over themselves to virtue signal that they are on the side of the anti reason and anti speech.

And why are most normal people not freaked out by this???????

https://www.bitchute.com/video/RbEtHaVCeNYs/


Three hours of Joe Rogan chatting with Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of MRNA.

As for Trump, he may have his ego too invested in operation warp speed. Anyway, it looks like these vaccines had already been developed along side of the manufacture of the virus itself.

https://zero-sum.org/mass-formation-ps ... irus-narrative/#CloseToMe



ass phenomenon to solve the problems.

(00:09:57): Mass formation is actually a symptomatic solution for a real psychological problem. In my opinion, this crisis in the first place is a large societal and psychological crisis much more than a biological crisis, let’s say. From this state of mental intoxication you can explain all the rest of the phenomenon of totalitarianism. The mental intoxication leads to a narrowing of the field of attention. It makes people only see what is indicated by the narrative.

(00:10:41): For instance, people see the victims of the Corona virus, but they don’t seem to see at the cognitive level, the collateral damage of the lockdowns and all the victims that are claimed by the lockdowns. They are also not able, at an emotional level, to really feel empathy for the victims of the lockdowns. That is not because they are very egoistic. No, it’s just an effect of this psychological phenomenon. And it’s definitely—even as a consequence of mass formation, people do not get egoistic at all. But rather, to the contrary, mass formation focuses your attention so much on one point that you can take everything away of people—their psychological and physical wellbeing, their material wellbeing—you can take it away and they will not even notice it.

(00:11:41): That’s one of the major consequences of mass formation. It’s exactly the same as hypnosis, as classical hypnosis. When a hypnotist—during hypnosis someone’s attention is focused on one point, you can cut in his flesh, the person will not notice it. That is what happens all the time. When a hypnosis is used as a kind of an anesthesia during a surgical operation, a rather simple hypnotic procedure is sufficient to make people completely insensitive to pain. You can, without any problem, cut in their flesh. Even under some circumstances you can perform an open heart operation in which the surgeon cuts straight through the breastbone and the patient will not notice this. That shows us that the focusing of attention is so strong, both in mass formation or in hypnosis, that people are really insensitive to all the personal losses they experience as a consequence.

(00:12:51): Another consequence, that is very typical for totalitarian states, is that people become radically intolerant for dissonant voices. Because if someone tells another story, if someone claims that the official story is wrong, then this person threatens to wake the people up and they will get angry because they’re confronted with the initial anxiety and the initial psychological discontent. So they direct all that aggression at these dissonant voices, at the other voices. And at the same time, they are radically tolerant for their leaders, for the people who pronounce the mainstream narrative. These people can actually cheat and lie and manipulate and do everything they want, but they will always be forgiven by the crowd because the crowd seems to think that they do it for their own sake. That’s also part of the mechanism of mass formation.

Even if we would succeed in waking up the masses now, they would fall prey to a different story in a few years. And they would be hypnotized again, IF, IF we do not succeed in solving the real problem of this crisis. Namely the question: Why did we as a society get in this state in which a large part of the population feels anxious, depressed, experiences a lack of sense, feels socially isolated? That is the real problem. And if we do not succeed in finding out where this problem comes from then the masses will always be susceptible to leaders who try to lure them into a mass formation. So I think the real question in this crisis is: What is there in our view of man and of the world in the way in which we look at life that makes us experience lack of sense-making? In my opinion we must conclude that it is something in our materialistic mechanistic view of man in the world that leads up to a radical destruction of the real social structures and social bonds and of the feeling that life makes sense.

OPINION: DON’T VACCINATE YOUNG CHILDREN
By RUSSELL BLAYLOCK, MD
Mon,11/15/21-4:00PM, 2,860 Reads
I find it incredible that several writers have found the deaths of thousands of mostly healthy people after receiving a virtually untested “vaccine” as something we should ignore, all based on manipulated statistics. Benjamin Disraeli was correct— “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies and statistics”. It has been shown by VAERS data that the number of deaths linked to the COVID-19 vaccines after the first six months of their release exceeds all the deaths linked to other vaccines given over the past 30 years. These COVID-19 “vaccine” related deaths are increasing at a shocking rate, by several hundred each week.

What really concerns many of us is the rush to vaccinate children aged five to 11 with, what many of us consider, a deadly “vaccine”. Our children are already over-vaccinated and adding these deadly vaccines will, in my opinion and others, mean thousands of small children will possibly die and tens of thousands more will be left permanently ruined by these biological agents. Do these “vaccine” proponents think it would be acceptable for small children to die from a vaccine they do not need, and which has now been shown to be highly ineffective?

There is a major difference between a perfectly healthy child dying from a naturally spread disease and dying following a so-called “treatment” to protect someone else. Especially when that child’s risk from the disease is virtually nil. Experts in vaccine injuries are warning of a possible explosion of autoimmune diseases in these children, including juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and asthma. Neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases are also a major concern.

Studies have shown that the vast majority of deaths associated with this virus occurred among people over age 70, most in their 80s and that the majority of the 9,367 deaths now reported with the vaccines by VAERS also occurred among this very same age group. Additionally, these COVID-19 deaths are also occurring by far among people who have serious co-morbid conditions and a poor prognosis without the virus.

Two highly regarded studies have recently shown that these COVID-19 vaccines powerfully suppress all immune cells utilized in fighting viruses, thus making these vaccinated children (and adults) highly susceptible to not only the Covid-19 viruses, but all viruses. Another study out of Sweden found that the spike protein from the vaccines, much to their surprise, entered the nucleus of the immune cells and inactivated two essential DNA repair enzymes. They concluded this would incapacitate the immune system of these vaccinated individuals. Paralysis of DNA repair enzymes would also put the vaccinated child at a very high risk of developing one of the hematological malignancies, such as lymphomas or leukemias. In essence, we could see an explosion of childhood leukemias or lymphomas among these vaccinated children.

Mag St. Andrews 211201

We now know that vaccinated individuals can spread the virus variant. Studies have shown that the vaccinated have very high levels of these viruses in their nasopharynx.

Dr. Peter McCullough published his results of early treatment of COVID-19 infected patients and reported that in his patients he has seen an 85% reduction in hospitalizations and especially ICU admissions—that equates to saving the lives of 85% of the infected people in his practice. The CDC ordered doctors not to administer early treatment, but rather allow these people to deteriorate to the point they were severely ill before any treatment was initiated. What this means nationally is that had early treatment been the standard, 595,000 people out of the claimed 700,000 Covid-19 deaths, could have survived, mostly in good health. That means that 85% of the people that died, died unnecessarily because of a CDC imposed policy.

These young children, in essence, would be vaccinated with potentially dangerous vaccines for a virus which in well over 99% of cases, will not make them sick. Worse still, most authorities agree, these children are not transmitting the virus. So, why are they being subjected to these experimental “vaccines”?

We have seen that vaccinating pregnant women can increase the risk of miscarriage if they are vaccinated during the first trimester of their pregnancy. Based on my careful study of the effects of immune stimulation during pregnancy (as with vaccines) I have warned that we could see a dramatic increase in autism and schizophrenia in these offspring, especially if vaccinated during the second and third trimester. I have published this immune mechanism in several scientific journals.

Which one of you proponents of forced vaccination of these very young children would be willing to exchange the life of their own child or grandchild for an elderly relative, a relative with only a few months or years of life left on this earth. I certainly would never consider such a selfish or inhumane idea. I have experienced the terrible agony and ongoing grief of losing my grandchild at age 7 years—I would have been more than glad to have died in his place. The thought that I would sacrifice the life of my child or grandchild so that I could live or extend an elderly relative’s life a few months or years is beyond any consideration.

Mag Benson Companies 211201

These children have an extremely low danger from this virus or the variant, but thousands will die, and hundreds of thousands may be permanently damaged by these “vaccines.” Will the proponents of these “vaccines” respond coldly to these vaccine-induced deaths in “statistical terms” and ignore the thousands of individual children that will have died as these same cold-hearted people have with the tens of thousands of dead vaccinated adults?

What kind of civilization sacrifices its young so the extreme elderly might survive just a little longer? There are many ways to protect the elderly population beyond ineffective, dangerous “vaccinations.” I know, I am one of these elderly.

Russell L. Blaylock, M.D., is a Northsider. He is a retired neurosurgeon and Associate Editor-in-Chief of Surgical Neurology International

Don't do it- unless you want your kid to have myocarditis, a stroke, seizures, an anaphylactic reaction- in the short term and who knows the medium and long term?

Thanks, Jersey Mom!

Sung High Latin Mass tonight at Our Lady of Sorrows at 7:00 PM, corner of Ocean and Claremont, for the feast of All Saints.

Solemn Sung Requiem tomorrow at 5:00 PM for All Souls.

Does anyone know anything about the Jersey City Tax Assessor becoming extremely aggressive in shaking down churches and non profits with enormous tax based on alleged violations of tax exempt status?

https://vimeo.com/638787141/5a7cbafb73

Send this to every NJ voter you know who still has some semblance of sanity. Even if you are vaccinated and believe its the right thing, deceitful, intrusive and coercive governmental overreach must be resisted. Like Governor Newsome in California, if he retains the governor's office he will double down and NJ will be worse than California.

From your lips to God's hears, Bigman.

This guy is great. Send to everyone you know.

https://twitter.com/billyprempeh?lang=en

Credible reports say that Murphy will impose vaccine mandates on New Jersey after the election. Since NJ seems always in competition with California to be the worst state in the union, I suspect we can expect mandates for public employees, probably private employers. Will he also require these "leaky vaccines" that do not work and have proven dangerous side effects to be jabbed into all school children- public, private and parochial? Probably! How could power be such an aphrodisiac to cause a man to destroy our liberty and threaten our health all while everyone says like sheep- "he's keeping us safe."

And since the Democratic machine has been harvesting votes for the last month, is there any doubt who is going to win? Does not help, of course, that the GOP put up a sort of Murphy lite as a candidate- though a much more likeable and normal guy.

The SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) is a far left Marxist inspired hate group who goes around calling every normal person an extremist. I don't know anything about the Oath Keepers but I do know that the rule of law is being undermined by the Left.

good for them Your demand for vaccination status is harrassing, hysterical, and improper.

Oh no! Very sad if true. Another piece of old Jersey City gone.

Also, all over eastern Australia, there are massive protests. But it seems too little too late there.

All over Europe there have been huge and spontaneous demonstrations against the Covid tyranny. Why are we doing nothing. The two biggest anti vax groups are PhDs and Blacks. Lets make our voices heard.

I am an employment lawyer. A year ago, no one would have defended the firing of employees in private or public sectors under the current circumstances. T

Even if, arguendo, the vaccine is safe and provides some protection, this tyranny must be opposed or else the rule of law will be done and then there will be no place to hide.

Free our political prisoners!

This article summarizes the world of the anti vaxers.https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downl ... /vaccine-death-report.pdf It is explicitly conspiratorial. One author is a GP, trained in upstate NY boarded at Lenox Hill. Not sure the other. I read it quickly and when I came to the part where it said that the Pandemic of 1918 was really a vaccine pandemic, I thought that was absurd and that the entire papers was, therefore, suspect.

Low and behold, it turns out that mainstream history actually mentions the vaccine conspiracy theory for 1918!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/

The world just keeps getting more and more weird.

I know people in this post Christian society have strong feelings about the need to be able to murder inconvenient children, but there is no way Roe v. Wade is coherent Constitutional law. The Texas law should be upheld and Roe reversed. It will be of now import though to these McNair students who are padding their resumes.

Feast of Our Lady of Sorrows, Traditional Latin Mass, Wednesday, September 15, 2021. Please come to celebrate the patronal feast of Our Lady of Sorrows, at the corner of Ocean Avenue and Clairemont this Wednesday evening. September 15, 2021, at 7:00 pm. The Mass will be proceeded by the singing of the Litany of Our Lady of Sorrows and the rededication of the beautiful marble statue of Our Lady that is being restored to her place above the tabernacle on the High Altar. The Mass Ordinary is Haydn's Missa Brevis (also known as the little organ Mass). The propers will be sung by the Men's Schola. A festive pot luck supper will follow in the church Hall. The food will be good and plentiful! Off street parking is available in the lot.

The article in Nature reports that the study was withdrawn but hardly asserts anything definitive against Ivermectin. And it is a sad truth that the most hallowed scientific journals have been prostituted, e.g. The Lancet publishing the Open letter of 100 Signatories who were corralled by Drazick to falsely assert that it was highly unlikely that the virus was made in a lab (we now know it was very likely to have been made in a lab, and very likely Wuhan Lab 4).

To what extent then do you believe in free speech?

Or freedom to control one's medical treatment?

You clearly do not believe in discussion or argument based on reason and fact.

Also, I guess you are just a hater since I have asked you several times why you wish people who refuse the vaccine to die. Would one say this about anyone else? Substitute heroine addict or homosexual or Amish person or Christian Scientist....No person would foam at the mouth wishing their suffering and death....Yet you continue to do that for those who are not vaccinated.

I, btw, had the virus. Why in the world would I get the shot when the adverse effects occur 5X more frequently if you had the virus (and natural immunity is the best, broadest, and most robust).

On a very different point, and not to put you in to orbit, but some of us have sincerely held beliefs that the use of stem cells from aborted fetuses makes acceptance of the vaccine cooperation with material evil.

Ah carumba, Rivera and Papadage. As I said, I hope you are correct. I pray you are correct. Please give me real studies that take my experts on and not merely propoganda.

Why are we tolerating such a high level of adverse effects?

Why are we outlawing Ivermectin?

Why is the efficacy of the vaccine overstated?

If the vaccines work, why the coercion?

Why is free speech considered so offensive?

Why the personal attacks. Both of you jump to attack my competency as a lawyer. I would say that I am more competent than the average lawyer but I know I can improve.

Yours,

Mao

ear Papadage:

Thank you for the link about Hoffe. I am glad to see criticism of his understanding of the d-dimer test. Dr. Hoffe, I believe, never asserted that this was peer reviewed and indicated it was his own research and his own clinical experience. Let's hope he is wrong, but he does not appear to be a quack. The debunking sites are just attack machines.

Brindle, a medical professor with a distinguished career who has been canceled is not a quack The article you cite, merely asserts that the spike protein is not dangerous. We know that is false because the dangerous side effects are a result of the spike protein. Even if these were rare (they do not seem to be rare enough), the spike protein is the mechanism. I think it is admitted that the spike protein was designed to stay in the arm muscle and not circulate, but that is not what happens. It goes everywhere

Weinstein, contra your assertion, says a lot about the dangers of the vaccine, the unconscionable behaviour of big pharma, and the efficacy of various treatments, e.g. Ivermectin and hydroxichloriquen.

McCullough lied about his affiliations. Medpage is hysterical anti anti vax. Lied? He had a long career with Baylor. If it ended in Feb 2021 in retaliation for his whistleblowing, how does that undermine his credibility?

I read the medical stuff as a layman and as someone who regularly cross examines medical witnesses. I think your bias prevents you from seeing any of the uncertainty and the real questions and dangers as well as the real inadequacies of the vaccines. The public was told about relative efficacy, not absolute efficacy and so these really don't work.


I have a pretty good grasp of the US Constitution, in fact, and represent many civil rights plaintiffs. These executive orders are all illegal and without basis. The courts are simply showing themselves to be useless. Vaccine mandates are not constitutional. Mask mandates are not constitutional. The CDC suspending evictions is ridiculously unconstitutional and a basis for impeaching Biden since he has tried to bolster this.

Remember, the Constitution has separation of powers and limits governmental action. That has all gone out the window. We need to fight to restore it.

Yours,

Mao

PS
Dr. Rivera- again you merely attack and do not reason.