Re: Flood Zone Real Estate
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
I think this is the flood map you should be using. Most all of downtown JC is a flood zone. This zone is usually an AE zone, which means it's an established flood zone. The feds will require flood insurance for all AE zones. Type in your address and then click the PDF link for more details. Having lived here for 10 years I wouldn't live anywhere south of Columbus. They always get hammered. There are two areas that seem to be safe. 1 is around where Erie and Bay meet and around there. Also, up on the East side of Hamilton park is safe from floods. Lastly, there is a hill in Paulus Hook on Montgomery street. That's the highest point in downtown JC. These properties will NOT require flood insurance. Remember, flood insurance is around 500 per year for non-flood zones, 5000 a year for established flood zone, and will be 30k a year for "velocity zones" which generally are right on the beach. That is why people on the shore are abandoning their homes as they aren't worth insuring.
http://www.region2coastal.com/sandy/table
Posted on: 2013/8/9 14:28
|
|||
|
Re: Visitor Parking Permits/Parking Regulations
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
A simple question. Can anyone without a permit park in any of the zones Friday night trough Monday morning? Or do you need a zone permit to park in the zones over the weekend?
Posted on: 2010/10/22 16:05
|
|||
|
Private Lot Parking in Downtown
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
For the last 5 years I've happily parked my car on the street near Toricos, but I have a desire to get a newer car and I feel off-street parking will be necessary.
Could anyone please recommend a private lot downtown that they are happy with (I live near Torico's so near there would be best)? Also, I don't want it to be valet (I want to take my keys with me). Lastly, I drive my car to work every day, so it needs to be sort of convenient to get to. Thanks very much in advance.
Posted on: 2010/6/2 13:26
|
|||
|
Re: Framing Shop in JC - Suggestions Please?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
+2 for Gallerie Hudson. They've done beautiful work for me too. I dropped off a custom poster for framing yesterday. Great to work with, but not inexpensive.
Posted on: 2010/5/3 17:35
|
|||
|
Re: Condo Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
I understand that people want to own because then they feel like they've "made it". But if you are on a "tight budget" I'm not sure owning is for you. Just my 2 cents.
Posted on: 2010/5/3 15:53
|
|||
|
Re: Condo Opinion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Why would you buy a place you aren't totally happy with? You should be able to get exactly what you want in this real estate market.
Posted on: 2010/5/3 15:16
|
|||
|
Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
I'm one of those gentrifying yuppies. And yes, you nailed the absurdity of wannabe rich people (JC first, tomorrow Chelsea!) moving into slums to find an idyllic authenticity, I was truly lol. I would also have mentioned strollers full of hierloom tomatoes and arugala salads, but well done nevertheless. Gentrifying yuppies really don't want authenticity or urban grit at the end of the day, they want suburban bliss in the shell of something they can claim is authentic. Look at Chipotle in Manhattan. Where are all the mom and pop coffee shops they claim to love? I guess they prefer chain store burritos.
Posted on: 2010/4/29 18:55
|
|||
|
Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
If you look into the history of Katyn you would know that most of the people killed were Polish workers and state emplyees (doctors, professors, police officers, university graduates, political prisoners), not soldiers. Get schooled. Running away is not cowardice when you have no power, expectation, or ability to fight.
Posted on: 2010/4/29 15:09
|
|||
|
Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
I love the monument. I don't think the artist was a hack at all. I always bring vistors from out of town to see it.
I also see the statue as a perfect metaphor for living in Jersey City given the politics around here. Would you rather have a statue of a unicorn running up a rainbow or of Mayor Healy passed out? The statue stays.
Posted on: 2010/4/29 13:38
|
|||
|
Re: City To Conduct First Property Revaluation Since 1988
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
I'm sorry you've had a bad experience renting. I've parked on the street for 5 years and the only thing that happened to my car is that the infamous downtown fence and car scratcher scratched it a bit a year ago, and on halloween 3 years ago someone sprayed shaving cream on it. I think it helps that I live across from the police station on Erie. Also, its an old car. lol The rent vs buy calculator I posted is only useful if you compare nearly identical properties in nearly identical locations. You can't compare your rent downtown with your owning costs outside downtown, that's an apples and oranges comparison. A good comparison would be comparing the cost of owning a 1 bedroom at 77 hudson with renting a 1 bedroom at 70 Greene. Those buildings are even attached so its a very fair comparison. Also, regarding your contention that the gays are moving outside downtown.... I would have to disagree. Although Pavonia ave near Journal Square still remains a popular alternative to downtown. Also, a lot of gay men bought in the heights during the peak. You know how that worked out... not good. Since Star Bar has become a big hit with the mo's many people who decamped to Journal Square and the heights are returning downtown which is establishing a pretty decent gay nightlife scene.
Posted on: 2010/4/29 13:25
|
|||
|
Re: City To Conduct First Property Revaluation Since 1988
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
Renting has worked out well for me the last 5 years. I'd be paying much more per month out the window had I purchased a similar apartment, and I'd also be underwater. I don't think I have to rent forever per your suggestion, in fact I think that owning is great most of the time and I want to be a homeowner someday, but we are not living in normal times. The old adage of buy any property and wait just won't pan out anymore for anyone with a time horizon less than 10 years. Buying near the peak matters and affects your lifetime net worth. I always pop the numbers into these rent versus buy calculators for JC properties and comparable JC apartments. Even though downtown JC is down 15-20% from peak prices the numbers still don't add up. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/bu ... /buy-rent-calculator.html I see no compelling reason to jump into the market in the next 6 - 12 months. However, things could change after that time frame, especially after the reval shakes out. A walk around Paulus Hook and Harsimus Cove will reveal huge numbers of For Rent signs. My building has had a perpetual for rent sign for 8 months. I'm trying to get another 5-10% off my current rent (2 blocks from Grove street Path). If I don't get it, I'll move somewhere else. I'm already paying 22% below the rent I paid in 2008. Paying 30% less would be sweet. I feel bad for those stuck in JC properties they recently bought. If you bought at peak and your taxes were artifially low due to no renovations???It might hurt
Posted on: 2010/4/29 0:58
|
|||
|
Re: City To Conduct First Property Revaluation Since 1988
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
I guess my visits to open houses in JC these past few weekends have been in vain. I was already hesitant to buy since we probably haven't seen the end of the real estate decline. Now I'll also have to worry about property taxes possibly going up significantly after a reval. The whole point of owning is that you can have mostly fixed costs and save equity, whereas rental costs vary more. For instance, my rental costs for the same apartment went up 25% between 2005 and 2008 and the rent is now lower than my original rent in 2005.
Has Hoboken had a reval recently? I know they had a 40% property tax increase recently but I don't think that was a reval, just an adjustment forced by the state. Anyone know?
Posted on: 2010/4/28 14:01
|
|||
|
Re: Tell me where to get Sushi please...
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Komegashi on Montgomery. Ask for the off-menu Mountain roll. It's delicious.
Posted on: 2010/2/9 1:15
|
|||
|
Re: Ready to give up living in this city...
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
I agree with you that there is a loss of dignity that occurs after living in JC a few years. I moved here from Boston, having previously lived in New Hampshire. Those are places where the government is more or less on your side, where new contruction luxury condos are actually luxury condos, not shoddy gut jobs with Ikea cabinets. I'm glad I didn't buy anything in 2005, because now I'd be stuck. On the other hand, living in JC instead of Manhattan has allowed me to accumulate a lot of savings. Back in 2005 a one bedroom in JC seemed like a stretch financially. Now one bedroom condos in manhattan seem doable. That wouldn't have been possible without my 5 years in JC. I was hoping JC could become an urban alternative to Manhattan. But really, JC combines all the worst attributes of NYC with all the worst attributes of NJ. You aren't getting the best of both worlds, you are getting the worst of both. But, living here is OK as a renter. PATH is OK except at 3 AM. A stroll to Toricos in summer is a joy. My gym is conveniently located across the street from my apartment. But I won't be investing in Real Estate here. I'll move before I give these crooks 10k a year in property taxes. No thank you. If you buy a place in JC you are basically signing on to be abused by your representatives. Its a cruel joke. Even though I rent I go to the assembly meetings. I'm glad people are stirring the pot, but I don't think there is enough critical mass.
Posted on: 2010/2/4 17:53
|
|||
|
Re: worth buying in downtown JC?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Shiny new Brooklyn and Queens condos used to be demanding much higher prices, now those prices are 25% lower on average. I think JC is following a similar trend. Neither place is "degentrifying" but they are "deflating". Check out Curbed for more info.
Check out this article. http://curbed.com/archives/2010/01/19 ... al_at_northside_piers.php
Posted on: 2010/1/29 20:00
|
|||
|
Re: Crescent Court?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
OK, knew that sounded too good to be true.
Posted on: 2010/1/29 18:31
|
|||
|
Re: Crescent Court?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
Crescent Court has a 30 year abatement for residents? Please explain. Most condos downtown have 5 year abatements. Does Crescent Court really have 30? Crescent Court just became interesting.... Given the volatility of taxes in JC a 30 year guarentee would be compelling...
Posted on: 2010/1/29 18:18
|
|||
|
Laundering and Dry Cleaning
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
I've been going to the Dry Cleaning/Laundering place on Newark ave since I moved here 5 years ago. Its the place just a few hundred feet from the Grove Path. Golden Dry Cleaners. I remember when my laundered shirts were 1.25 and pants 3 dollars. Now the shirts are 2 dollars and the pants are 5 dollars. What other options do I have downtown that would be recommended?
Posted on: 2010/1/29 16:54
|
|||
|
Re: New Low? Downtown Jersey City 1BR Duplex Under $200K with deeded yard....
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
Amen brother. Why buy a house if you change jobs every 5 years and need to relocate. A big issue with this recovery is that people can't relocate to new jobs because their houses are underwater. Renters don't have that issue and can relocate at the end of a lease.
Posted on: 2010/1/29 16:14
|
|||
|
Re: worth buying in downtown JC?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
No, you can get a far nicer rental for less and no stress about JC going bankrupt or taxes going up. Remember, at one time renting was at a premium to owning. Now the premium is at owning, and with 22% tax increases in JC this year the situation is getting worse. Also wait for JC to be reassessed for taxes. Then you'll know what you're signing up for and won't get a nasty surprise in a few years. Until the bubble deflates and jobs come back to NYC I wouldn't buy in JC or Manhattan. The only place I'd buy is in a place that has already recovered, like Boston, or San Francisco. Don't be a knife catcher. You don't know how far down it will fall. Also, most economists are expecting a double dip in house prices once the federal stimulus goes away in March. What do you have to lose by waiting a year?
Posted on: 2010/1/29 16:09
|
|||
|
Re: Rally at City Hall Wednesday, Jan 27?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Ok it's getting fiesty now. Some yelling and hooting.Best quote so far "how about affordable housing for people who pay taxes!"
Posted on: 2010/1/28 0:22
|
|||
|
Re: Property Taxes will increase as Jersey City introduces $507 Million budget
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
I can tell you personally that the despicable treatment of new residents in JC and Hoboken by local governments prevents me from buying here. When you buy a home, you are making an implicit vote of confidence in the state and local governments where the home resides. I will likely forever be a renter as long as I'm in NJ due to the horrible state of affairs. The state and city of JC can hardly stay afloat. Why would I invest in that?
Posted on: 2010/1/27 17:45
|
|||
|
Re: The Saffron - 213 Newark Avenue
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
The auction established 400k as the market price of the BEST 2 bedrooms in this building (do you think the bidders picked the crappy 2 bedrooms or the best ones?). If they price all the 2 bedrooms at 400k I think they'll do alright, even though it appears the whole building is constructed of elmers glue and dust. If they want 500k for 2 bedrooms, I see the belly up scenario playing out.
Posted on: 2010/1/15 16:08
|
|||
|
Re: Real estate prices in Jersey City
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
The 100k down payment is a leveraged equity investment -- basically the same as buying stocks on margin - and will appreciate or depreciate at a multiple of whatever the rate of appreciation of the home is. Roughly speaking, if you put down 100K on a 400K home that appreciates at 3% per year, your 100K will appreciate at 12% per year. Conversely, if your home loses value you will lose 4x the amount too. Just like any leveraged investment. Over time you are deleveraging as you build up equity, which reduces the multiplier effect (up or down). So there is actually a very important time component to how you think about your down payment as an investment. Again, there are many factors to consider but your down payment isn't dead money -- you just need to think about how you would otherwise invest it and compare possible returns. And as wibbit said, the tax benefit should always be included in calculations, as it is a huge contributor to both affordability and house prices. Also, you aren't really $2666 "out the window". You need to compare that to the next best alternative (the cost of rent) and of course include the tax benefit to find your true opportunity cost.[/quote] Good points Scottacus. I will factor in the tax deduction. Assuming 28% tax rate. Mortgage interest (out the window) = $1318 (based on 400k mortgage) Property Taxes (out the window) = $ 250 (based on 500 pretax) Condo Fees (out the window) = $500 Total out the window per month factoring in tax savings= $2068 Principal (equity!) = $480
Posted on: 2009/12/8 11:17
|
|||
|
Re: Real estate prices in Jersey City
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
Thanks to everyone for the thoughtful replies. A real estate thread on JClist that didn't turn into a flame war? Amazing. We should clarify something in the original calculation, the 100k down payment is NOT included in the 2800 buying per month scenario. In the renting scenario, you still have the 100k, in the buying scenario you don't. That has to be considered and really makes the cost more than 2800 a month. More like 3200 a month if you consider you just lost 100k of investable money. Also, you really aren't socking away any significant principal the first 5 years. Here's how my numbers break down. Lets consider 400k condo, 500 month maintenance. 500 a month taxes. All pretty lowball for what most people pay around here. Mortgage interest (out the window) = $1666 Property Taxes (out the window) = $ 500 Condo Fees (out the window) = $500 Total out the window per month = $2666 Principal (equity!) = $480 I'm all for equity, but is a $2666 out the window worth $480 equity creation per month? Its all religion/philosophy/politics so just do whatever you want, I'm sure you'll love your new condo. Also, if you really found a condo that sold for 300k and would rent on the market for $2300 kudos to you. Sounds impossible to me.... maybe you found the perfect short sale.
Posted on: 2009/12/7 17:50
|
|||
|
Re: Real estate prices in Jersey City
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
I would definitely buy a condo if it were the same price as renting. But buying is nearly twice as expensive for the same space. I pay 1650 to rent a 750 sq foot loft with 12' x 8' windows in both rooms a block from Grove street PATH station. Buying the same place would probably run me 2800 a month. If you find a similar place as mine with "the same responsibilites" for 1650 please let me know!
Posted on: 2009/12/7 5:24
|
|||
|
Re: The Saffron - 213 Newark Avenue
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
These auction prices will set the bar for all of Saffron going forward. Any potential buyer can find the auction prices on the internet and anyone who is interested in the Saffron will be looking to spend a similar amount or less, not more. Auctions are the most accurate way to perform "price discovery". The true value is not 20% higher. If it were, that price would have been established at the auction... it wasn't. Also, which "nice finishes" are you referring to. The plastic substance coutertops or the beautiful electric stoves? Or the second bedrooms which felt more like offices at best?
Posted on: 2009/11/15 21:16
|
|||
|
Re: 213 Newark Avenue Named "The Saffron"
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
These sq foot prices are actually pretty good. They range between 380 and 420 a square foot, except for the sucker who paid 440k at 480 a square foot (I have the bidders guide which listed suggested price and actual sq foot). Also the suggested prices on the 2 bedroom condos were in the mid to high 5s. That means these sold for 25-30% below list price. All the papers are saying they went for 10% below list. Not quite. I expected new construction cookie cutter condos would fall to 400 a square foot, looks like we're there. This doesn't mean that 77 Hudson and Crystal Point will go to that price, but Grove Point, A, Waldo Lofts are pretty cookie cutter.... and they are still looking for high 400s a square foot.... Sadly, the layouts sucked at Saffron and its all electric energy so I didn't bother going to the auction. I feel like you have to adore a place now to even consider buying, and I didn't love Saffron.
Posted on: 2009/11/14 21:10
|
|||
|
Re: Ode to my lost home/ My first posting in 11 years of living here
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
No hard feelings. We are all in this together. Obama told me so.
Posted on: 2009/11/14 18:27
|
|||
|