Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
155 user(s) are online (137 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 155

more...


Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (DanL)




Re: Likelihood of Fulop Getting Reelected
#91
Home away from home
Home away from home



likely, for the reasons given, but #notmymayor.

and make it difficult challenge him. read the news, which is not his emails or press releases, but Terrence McDonald and the Jersey Journal -

https://twitter.com/terrencemcd

https://twitter.com/jerseyjournal

maybe he will actually do and or complete a few things that he said he would - at least between now and next November.

Posted on: 2017/1/25 12:39
 Top 


Re: Jersey City mayor-elect orders end to citywide reval
#92
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

stateaidguy wrote:


It's hard to compute the net change in taxes due to PILOTing, but assuming that these buildings would be built anyway even if they had to pay normal taxes, my guess is that on the net, JC's PILOTed properties increase taxes for everyone else in Jersey City and certainly increase taxes for people living in other towns in Hudson County.



Posted on: 2017/1/14 18:28
 Top 


Re: Something wrong with paying for new developments we can't afford | Morgan
#93
Home away from home
Home away from home


except that it is and it is sad that jersey city is at the root of it.


Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

DanL wrote:

where is Earl Morgan wrong?

while the Croson study and our property tax inequity could be dismissed as inherited institutional racism, there is racial disparity in Jersey City and the city rather than stepping up to fix it only drags its feet and stalls at continued great expense.



Just because it's about money and classism doesn't mean it's about race.

Posted on: 2017/1/6 2:02
 Top 


Re: Seth Boyden Housing Project Complex to Become PATH Station Village
#94
Home away from home
Home away from home



this sounds like a sop in attempts to justify the expense of extending the PATH to Newark Airport. there is no shortage of increasing PATH ridership and only two tunnels under the north river.

Posted on: 2017/1/6 2:00
 Top 


Re: Something wrong with paying for new developments we can't afford | Morgan
#95
Home away from home
Home away from home



where is Earl Morgan wrong?

while the Croson study and our property tax inequity could be dismissed as inherited institutional racism, there is racial disparity in Jersey City and the city rather than stepping up to fix it only drags its feet and stalls at continued great expense.


Posted on: 2017/1/4 1:49
 Top 


Re: Critics target Jersey City over outside law firm
#96
Home away from home
Home away from home


we'll see.

and yes, I agree, but unfortunately that would secure you very limited support.

Quote:

Sutherland wrote:
... If I were running for Mayor, I would focus more on my history of advancing valuable initiatives for the benefit of the City, my skills that will enable me to do that and my strategy to continue doing that INSTEAD of squawking about non-existent drama.


Posted on: 2016/12/29 3:13
 Top 


Re: Critics target Jersey City over outside law firm
#97
Home away from home
Home away from home


more likely than not, has something to do with our mayor abruptly dropping out of the 2017 race for NJ governor.

Posted on: 2016/12/23 2:11
 Top 


Jersey City bike group pushes for Grand Street redesign
#98
Home away from home
Home away from home


Jersey City bike group pushes for Grand Street redesign
Asks City Council for protected bike lanes, ?road diet? for pedestrian & overall safety

JERSEY CITY, Dec. 13 ? Grand Street, a vital but dangerous arterial road, should be the first in the city to be redesigned as a truly Complete Street, the advocacy group Bike JC said today, asking the city government to support their plan.

The nonprofit group?s proposal, dubbed Grand Street Vision, would implement a ?road diet? on the busy street, reducing its four existing lanes to three. This is an increasingly common redesign method proven to greatly improve safety for all road users?especially pedestrians?by calming motor traffic, reducing excessive top speeds and curbing reckless driving. A road diet was recently implemented nearby on Hoboken?s Observer Highway.

In the space saved, the Grand Street plan would install physically separated, protected bike lanes?also increasingly common in New York and large cities, but also already in use in Hoboken, Newark, and other small and midsize cities, with construction underway in Secaucus. The plan also calls for pedestrian-specific improvements such as ?bumpouts,? which give more time and space to those crossing streets.

Bike JC members and supporters are planning to attend the Municipal Council meeting Dec. 14 in numbers, to demonstrate their approval, while several speakers are slated to address the project during the regular public comment portion of the meeting. Bike JC trustees testified Monday at the council?s caucus session; in response, the council agreed in principle to create a committee dedicated to such advanced road redesign projects.

The Grand Street Vision plan would greatly improve connections for cyclists between the many diverse and distinct neighborhoods along Grand Street, from Bergen-Lafayette to Exchange Place, as well as the waterfront bike/walk pathway, and Liberty State Park, long a haven for both recreational and racing cyclists. Exact designs and details of the plan have not been determined; Bike JC is trying to build community and government support for the project as a concept.

Bike JC has been gathering grassroots support for Grand Street Vision proposal since June of 2015, and has collected over a thousand signatures on petitions supporting it, mostly from people living on and around Grand Street.

-30-

CONTACT: Tony Borelli, tony@bikejc.org

Posted on: 2016/12/15 3:37
 Top 


Re: 25-year tax break on tap for new Downtown Jersey City tower
#99
Home away from home
Home away from home


this is insanity. more subsidies, enough already, as if the land wasn't valuable enough and would not be developed regardless. the city is handing the land owners a direct subsidy. if it is not dirty, it leaves one at least feeling that their is a quid pro quo.


Posted on: 2016/12/10 4:14
 Top 


Re: Any update on inspections for current round of re-evaluations?
Home away from home
Home away from home



and Jersey City further delays the reval (till after the next election) while tax inequity continues.

Quote:

jerseymom wrote:
By Terrence T. McDonald | The Jersey Journal
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on November 29, 2016 at 5:16 PM, updated November 29, 2016 at 5:24 PM

JERSEY CITY -- Two months after the citywide property revaluation was set to begin in earnest, home inspections have been delayed as city and state officials work to finalize the city's tax maps.

City spokeswoman Jennifer Morrill said she could not estimate when inspectors would start looking at homes. Morrill said after a contract was approved in September for an appraisal company that will conduct the reval, "the state requested amendments to the tax maps."

The state Treasury confirmed the maps are an issue.

More

Posted on: 2016/12/1 2:42
 Top 


Re: Complete Streets - Bike JC's Grand Street Vision
Home away from home
Home away from home


this article says it all -

http://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/ ... ncrease-safety-traffic-us

Why America?s roads are so much more dangerous than Europe's

A jump in traffic fatalities over the past two years has brought well-deserved media attention to this tragic aspect of American life. Such deaths are up 7 percent in 2015, and 10 percent for the first six months of 2016 ? a phenomenon news outlets are describing as ?surprising,? ?sudden,? and ?unexpected,? an unpleasant departure from the historic trend toward greater safety. We are on track to kill 38,000 vehicle occupants, motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians in 2016.
The Big Idea logo This piece is part of The Big Idea, a section for outside contributors' opinions about, and analysis of, the most important issues in politics, science, and culture.

The White House has issued a call to action, asking researchers to scrutinize the data on all road deaths. Officials there appealed to the public as well for ideas about combating distracted, drunken, and other dangerous driving.

Attention to traffic death is long overdue, but to focus on the recent increase means missing a much bigger point.

Even before that spike upward, per capital traffic fatalities in the US were already the highest in the industrialized world. No other developed country tolerates the level of carnage on their roads that we do. This national failure has been overlooked for far too long. Studying short-term variations in our safety record is important, but it can also distract us from investigating the forces contributing to our horrendous safety record compared to our peers.

The Dutch also developed the concept of ?self-explaining? roads, especially for rural areas. These have design features that are consistent with the speed appropriate for the location: Curves, medians, bike lanes, and roundabouts nudge the driver toward a given speed.

In the US, in contrast, standard engineering practice calls for wide, straight streets in almost all situations. This approach prompts inappropriate speeds that we then try to correct after the fact with speed bumps, police speed traps, and a bunch of remedies that would not be needed if streets were designed appropriately in the first place.


I for one, believe that jersey city has been dragging its feet.

Posted on: 2016/12/1 2:22
 Top 


Re: Complete Streets - Bike JC's Grand Street Vision
Home away from home
Home away from home


yes, I realize that as a city we have hard time just trying to tie our shoes, but one has to try and try everything.

a city has to do everything, do a good job protecting residents from crime, pollution, and flooding, educate most of our children, protecting our homes from crime and fire, clean our streets and provide sanitation, recreation and other cultural experiences, and of course economic growth and manage development/redevelopment. and all the while while providing a safe environment for car drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians

it can't do just one, it must do all. and Bike JC believes that a protected bike lane is another piece in the big puzzle to make Jersey City a good place to live, work, visit and invest.

Quote:

brewster wrote:
Dan, without enforcement no amount of engineering like stop signs and separate lanes will keep cyclists and pedestrians safe. Most accidents involving bikes happen with turning vehicles in the intersection rather than midblock, correct? If they speed and won't stop at signals and signs because they know they will never be ticketed, no one is safe, no matter whether they're in a car, on a bike or walking.

My family and I cycle too, though perhaps not as much as yours, but I see engineering as a solution that comes AFTER you enforce the law and see what needs tweaking. It's like getting a guard dog without having tried actually locking your door.

Posted on: 2016/11/21 4:12
 Top 


Re: Complete Streets - Bike JC's Grand Street Vision
Home away from home
Home away from home


Of course the the bike lanes need to be connected into a network and double parking needs to be addressed. Bike JC has raised and advocated on these issues continuously and relentlessly. And I also have full confidence that our city planners are capable of and educated to design and implement a bike lane system and a protected bike lane. Its done all over the the country and the world.

Short of Bike JC implementing it their selves what is there left to do?

Same goes for Brewster comments, and I believe the idea is to change the physical environment to reduce the need for enforcement. Note that if one looks at the proposed design (over on Facebook) there are three traffic lanes not two.

Quote:

bodhipooh wrote:
Funny... while Bike JC is lobbying for protected bike lines, cyclists like me are just hoping for a comprehensive, rational bike lane plan that doesn't consists of haphazardly placed bike lanes that start and stop suddenly and which do not join or connect with other lanes.

I am not shitting on their plans (and, I am glad someone is advocating for the interests of cyclist in JC) but let's get real... we need to come up with a bike lane plan that makes sense, and then get it implemented and, most importantly, we NEED ENFORCEMENT! The bike lanes along Grove Street are a joke; they have become the protected, safe "double parking" zone of JC. And, to be honest, I just don't think a bike lane along Grand Street will be ANY different than the existing one on Columbus, which starts/end randomly in the middle of that road.

Posted on: 2016/11/21 2:48
 Top 


Complete Streets - Bike JC's Grand Street Vision
Home away from home
Home away from home


Bike JC asks for your support in the creation of Jersey City's first protected bike lane on Grand Street.

Motor vehicular, cycling and pedestrian traffic has dramatically increased in Jersey City over the last few years, particularly on Grand Street. As Bike JC looks to expand upon the existing bike-lane network, we understand the need to install protected bike lanes on our busiest roads. Bike JC's vision begins with Grand Street.

Grand Street runs through several neighborhoods and serves as a connection to major routes and highways. Grand Street also borders the entrance to Liberty State Park for many Jersey City residents and is lined with multiple schools, community centers, houses of worship, commercial and residential districts and the Jersey City Medical Center.

Protected bike lanes have proven to be the best tool for encouraging an increase in cycling among the majority of people who are interested in getting around by bike but are concerned about safety. Protected bike lanes are safer for cyclists, create increased awareness and reduces speeding amongst drivers, increase safety at intersections for pedestrians and cyclists and have proven to dramatically reduce the number of cyclists who ride on sidewalks.

A recent study of protected bike lanes in the US and Canada proves how effective protected bike lanes are throughout both countries and staunchly supports Bike JC's Grand Street Vision. We ask that residents, businesses, schools, houses of worship and the representatives of Jersey City join in our vision and support the creation of Jersey City's first protected bike lane on Grand Street.

On line petition - https://www.change.org/p/city-of-jerse ... sey-city-complete-streets

See Facebook post with before and after proposed protected bike lane renderings -

https://www.facebook.com/groups/371263 ... malink/10154832864742048/

Posted on: 2016/11/20 16:33
 Top 


Re: Jersey City school board member John Reichart to resign
Home away from home
Home away from home


I hope him and his family are healthy, otherwise, he is leaving office office after only a year, which sucks.

should not have run in the first place. he is up there with Marvin Adames.

Posted on: 2016/11/16 3:55
 Top 


Re: Local musicians gear up to recreate The Band's Last Waltz
Home away from home
Home away from home


the old Maxwell's was set up for kids to attend. we went to a few shows when kids were young and my daughter saw Shonen Knife. though, they were always with us.

did you ask?

fyi, Irving Plaza is a good place to see bands if underage also.

and of course you should have sent him to the cemetery for the Ghost of Uncle Joe's show and others.


Quote:

brewster wrote:
Too bad they don't do this in a family friendly venue. My teenage son would love this, he adores The Band, Dylan etc.

Posted on: 2016/11/16 3:46
 Top 


Re: Vote YES for 2 city questions
Home away from home
Home away from home



so, do we want more efficient, effective and proactive local government? well then, vote yes on municipal questions #1 to move local elections to November and have greater voter and minority participation (turnout.) consolidate elections and empower more citizens to vote. otherwise the status quo continues and small voting blocs (not those that really focus on local issues) that are filled with patronage employees and those that benefit from having things stay the way they are will continue to carry the day.

believe in democracy.

Posted on: 2016/11/7 2:50
 Top 


Re: Vote Yes on Jersey City Public Question 2 - Establishment of a Local Open Space Trust Fund
Home away from home
Home away from home



I do, I have in-laws that are also home owners in JC, along with my wife's parents and brothers who pay property taxes through their rent. Besides, I do not believe that it is a good idea to disenfranchise people that own or rent in tax abated properties. It is unfortunately our government that gave those deals away and still doing it.

Posted on: 2016/11/5 1:12
 Top 


Re: Vote YES for 2 city questions
Home away from home
Home away from home


agree, good reason to support these two questions, and vote no on expanding casino gambling. our family, my wife and I, her parents and two brothers, along with assorted in-laws will be voting that way along with the half a dozen of us in ward b will also be voting for John Hallanan.



Quote:

neverleft wrote:
.
(I would vote YES for Question #1 just for the fact that Matsikoudis/Healy tried to get it thrown off of the ballot. You know it has got to be good for Jersey City?s forward progress if Matsikoudis/Healy wanted it off the ballot. And this clown wants to run for Mayor in 2017. lol) (?Matsikoudis/Healy 2017 ? why save taxpayers money!?)


JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL QUESTION #1

Should the Charter of the City of Jersey City, governed by Mayor-Council Form C, be amended as permitted under that plan, to provide for the holding of its regular, non-partisan municipal elections on the same date of the general election in November, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:69A-34.1(b)?

JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL QUESTION #2

Should the Municipal Council of the City of Jersey City establish a Municipal Open Space, Recreation and Historic Property Preservation Fund, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:12-15.7 to be funded at a rate not to exceed $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation of each annual tax levy commencing with the first tax quarter for calendar year 2017 and used exclusively for the acquisition, development and maintenance of lands for recreation, conservation and historic purposes?

INTERPRETIVE STATEMENT

The purpose of this non-binding referendum vote is to ascertain the voters? opinion concerning whether or not the City of Jersey City should establish its own Open Space Preservation Trust Fund to fund the acquisition, development and maintenance of recreational, conservation and historic lands. The annual yearly rate would be $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation, meaning that a property assessed at $100,000 would pay no more than $20 per year to the Open Space Preservation Trust Fund.

Posted on: 2016/11/5 1:02
 Top 


Vote Yes on Jersey City Public Question 2 - Establishment of a Local Open Space Trust Fund
Home away from home
Home away from home


Vote Yes on Jersey City Public Question 2

Establishment of a Local Open Space Trust Fund

On Election Day, November 8, 2016 the voters of Jersey City will have a lot to consider both on a National and local level through a series of very important ballot questions.

The Jersey City Parks Coalition has advocated for the creation of a Municipal Open Space, Recreation and Historic Property Preservation Fund to create dedicated funding for our municipal parks, open spaces and preservation of our historic resources. It is a non-binding referendum which means the City is gauging the residents? willingness to pay a small amount of money directed specifically to improve, repair, develop and acquire open space and parks and the preservation of historic structures.

JERSEY CITY PUBLIC QUESTION 2 - ESTABLISHMENT OF A LOCAL OPEN SPACE TRUST FUND

Should the Municipal Council of the City of Jersey City establish a Municipal Open Space, Recreation and Historic Property Preservation Fund, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:12-15.7 to be funded at a rate not to exceed $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation of each annual tax levy commencing with the first tax quarter for calendar year 2017 and used exclusively for the acquisition, development and maintenance of lands for recreation, conservation and historic purposes?

Much like what?s being proposed here, Hudson County voters approved a countywide open space trust fund in 2003 that is expected to bring in $20 million this year (that tax is one cent per $100 of assessed value). In Jersey City, the fund was used to expand Boyd McGuiness Park, rehabilitate soccer fields at Caven Point, fund the creation of Berry Lane Park and more.

Over the last 10 years numerous Coalition Projects were funded through HC Open Space Funding bringing over $500,000 of improvements to these Jersey City parks and historic sites:

Historic ? Pershing Field: The America Triumphant statue and the Fourth Regiment Arch were restored
Parks ? Van Vorst Park: Children?s Sprayground in conjunction with Green Acres Funding
Historic ? The Historic Harsimus Cemetery: Preservation of the Gate Keepers home/structure
Parks ? Village Park: The full rehabilitation of the abandoned First Street Park

Since 1988, the United States has seen 2,524 ballot initiatives approving new taxes for open space, according to the Trust for Public Land. 1,902 have passed. As of last November, voters have approved open space trust funds in 237 New Jersey municipalities and all 21 counties. The only municipality in Hudson County with its own open space trust fund is Hoboken, approved by voters in 2007. The ballot initiative was passed 62 to 38 percent. The two-cents-per-$100 tax led to an expected $2.24 million this year.

To levy the tax after voters have approved a ballot question, the county or municipal governing body must adopt an ordinance that establishes the dedicated tax, sets up a separate trust fund to hold the tax proceeds, and states the purposes for which they may be used, as proposed in the ballot question. Full public disclosure and a review of all expenditures would be required and only used for identified purposes. Another advantage would be that the City becomes eligible for a greater match of funds through the State Green Acres program and other public & private sources maximizing the City?s investment.

A YES vote assures that in the future old and dying trees in our parks will be readily replaced, park equipment will be repaired quickly and updated periodically, parks will be kept safe and usable for everyone. There will even be funds available for historic preservation of significant Jersey City structures and sites. It?s up to you. Make certain to vote on November 8th and let?s keep Jersey City parks and historic sites the best they can be for many future generations.

Posted on: 2016/11/5 0:54
 Top 


Re: Jersey City school board election November 8, 2016
Home away from home
Home away from home



Other that the Jersey Journal articles, there is -

http://hudsoncountyview.com/l/jersey-city/

and this blog by a local writer has some coverage -

https://urdoingitright.com/category/school-board-elections/


Posted on: 2016/10/29 8:35
 Top 


Re: Vote No for 2 city questions
Home away from home
Home away from home


in a presidential year, we can go to the polls for the general election in November (previously school board in the following April), municipal elections, municipal runoffs, primary elections then another general elections (for governor). that was 6, now 5 times with in a year to go to the polls.

in theory, the no arguments may have validity, but in reality more people and more minorities will vote. noting there are always exceptions and outlier elections.

so, well said.


Quote:

jc_dweller wrote:
Quote:

Leo168 wrote:
There is no benefit to the City or the constituents by moving it.


How about a reduced number of times that one must go to the polls? There are plenty of people who have to arrange their work schedules to fit that in. That's a MAJOR benefit. Additionally, moving it will result in increased participation because more people show up on a November election date. It's cheaper for the city to have a reduced number of election dates for those concerned with the city budget. Shall I go on?


Posted on: 2016/10/20 1:45
 Top 


Re: FULOP, DEAL WITH PEDESTRIAN & BIKE SAFETY!!
Home away from home
Home away from home



local enforcement is a local MUNICIPAL issue and falls under the mayor and his appointees. if the mayor does not get on board, nothing happens.

and the crowd sourcing (where do you want a stop sign or speed bump) might have been a start, but what good is a stop sign nailed to a telephone pole if not enforced.

changing the physical environment (complete streets) is a piece that also pretty much starts at the mayor's level like does enforcement.

Posted on: 2016/10/16 14:13
 Top 


Re: FULOP, DEAL WITH PEDESTRIAN & BIKE SAFETY!!
Home away from home
Home away from home


no, people should be able to bike on JFK, if there was a will, it could be calmed.

look at the map of JC bike lanes -

https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7162854,-74.0811764,14z/data=!5m1!1e3

there are no connected north/south or east/west routes. it only isolates JC neighborhoods into district separated areas. starting to stripe bike lanes was just that, a start. but then nothing.

on any given day, 3 of the 4 people in my household bike to work or school, that is less cars on the road, and less people on our overcrowded buses.

Quote:

GlitterQueen wrote:

Quote:
I walk or ride my bike on JFK 7 days a week, and it is terrifying.

You really shouldn't ride on JFK. Or expect the city to put real bike lanes onto JFK.

One of the goals of bicycle routes is that it encourages cyclists to avoid the roads with faster and more auto traffic.

I highly recommend you find a parallel route.


I don't know any parallel routes to JFK which room for bike lanes. Westside ave and bergan ave barely have room for cars. There is only room on JFK for bike lanes at least from the West side(and I'm pretty sure from the heights). They have them on Columbus and that road used to be a clusterfuck.

Biking is becoming more and more of a norm in America and the infrastructureure needs to be updated to reflect this change. Jersey city can't continue this car only mentality.[/quote]

Posted on: 2016/10/1 15:34
 Top 


Re: Fulop won't run for governor, will back Murphy, sources say
Home away from home
Home away from home


like what?

most major things were well under way when he took office, a few others that were accomplished from the JCPA and JCIA mergers that were poorly executed, packed with dead weight and failed to achieve the anticipated savings, along with smaller things like murals, speed bumps and bike lanes, were done half ass and poorly. bigger than JC issues like paid sick time and raising hourly pay were done from the hip and no analyses and study done. whats is left, the pedestrian plaza?

and that is before getting to the major failings with shrugging off the increase in the murder rate as targeted and addressing the increasing demand on aging/deteriorating infrastructure and the horrendous racial disparity of property taxes.

really, has he started to have an impact on making local government more efficient and effective, more honest and open, (because there are evidence based ways to do that) things that directly impact our lives?

he is riding the wave of the big boom that followed the "great" recession, and squandering for us the benefits. his predecessors, may have been flawed, but were decent mostly well intended people from our culture of local politics. even you have a hard time saying that about the mayor.





Quote:

thor800 wrote:
Quote:

AMo wrote:
I think Moran is kind to suggest that Fulop remember "why he got into this game" in the first place. The "why" was self promotion, plain and simple. There were no core beliefs, only a lust for power. It's time that he return to the private sector where he will be free to cut deals that advance his interests, free from the inconvenience of considering the public good.


all politicians seek to advance themselves. even with his unbridled ambition, hes done more than any previous JC mayor

Posted on: 2016/10/1 15:21
 Top 


Re: Parking Issues Around Hamilton Park
Home away from home
Home away from home


yeah, it did not come out right, free bus tickets are for the 2/2.5 mile threshold or greater.


Quote:

dtjcview wrote:
Quote:

DanL wrote:
....
and if you are beyond the mileage distance for free bus tickets, 2 miles for middle school and 2 1/2 miles for high school, there are nj transit bus tickets offered for 1/3 off, $1.10, but there is no place in jersey city to purchase them.
....


That seems backward. Should only issue free bus tickets to kids that live > 2-3 miles from the school.

Posted on: 2016/9/26 2:58
 Top 


Re: Parking Issues Around Hamilton Park
Home away from home
Home away from home


most people that I know are ok with their children riding the public buses from middle school on. but the problem is - the busses are two crowded and too full, and will sometimes pass kids (and me) by. they also are stuck in regular traffic compounded by double parked cars through out the city.

and if you are beyond the mileage distance for free bus tickets, 2 miles for middle school and 2 1/2 miles for high school, there are nj transit bus tickets offered for 1/3 off, $1.10, but there is no place in jersey city to purchase them.

its seems there is a great deal of opportunity to get cars off the roads, but there is little effort devoted to it.

while there are citibikes near many of the schools, there are not bike racks that kids could use.


and to those that would like parking where their homes do not provide parking, please realize that are plenty of places on the fringe of the city where there are homes with/and driveways that may suit ones needs. in the short term, rent parking, in the long term, move ...



Quote:

elsquid wrote:
Quote:

dtjcview wrote:

Aren't school buses the solution to that?


Maybe for kids who live far away from their schools. A better solution is kids walking or biking or using existing mass transit, all things that I did as a kid in both NYC and the burbs.

Today we have a vicious cycle: Parents say it's too dangerous or time-consuming for kids to bike or walk everywhere, so they drive the kids to school, creating more car traffic, which makes it even more dangerous and time-consuming for everyone.

One study found that 22% of morning rush-hour traffic is parents driving kids to school.

Posted on: 2016/9/24 2:26
 Top 


Re: Bus options - from St Peter's Univ to City hall
Home away from home
Home away from home


if you wait by the Grove St. PATH station, you can catch either bus, so no need to wait that long at that time of day.

Quote:

SRhia wrote:
I missed the Montgomery-West bus by 30 seconds today at 4:09, and had to wait until 4:45pm for the next one - and of course, was caught in the downpour for 15 min...

oh well, the joys of traveling by bus...

Posted on: 2016/9/15 1:54
 Top 


Re: Bus options - from St Peter's Univ to City hall
Home away from home
Home away from home


yes, kind of amusing ...

both the "80" and "Montgomery Westside" go from the Grove St PATH Station to St. Peter's (Montgomery St. and Kennedy Blvd.) The Montgomery Westside has a much more direct route (is quicker) and runs about every 20 to 30 minutes. The 80 runs more frequently during rush hours and you can text with NJ Transit to determine when the next bus will come.

Adult fare is $1.60, Children age 5 thru 11 are $0.75 and 4 and under are free. Weekends and holidays, Children 5 thru 11 are free with an a adult passenger.

Lyft (and Uber) runs $6 to $10 depending on time of day.







Quote:

greenville wrote:
Montgomery-Westside bus runs this exact route. Cant believe nobody in jclist knows. http://acbuscorp.com/m-w/

Posted on: 2016/9/15 0:29
 Top 


Re: Hard Grove Cafe
Home away from home
Home away from home


of course they went down to planning to see the plans. that is how things work in jersey city. most plans are not online for your convenience.

and one cannot wait to see how things turnout, people need to express their concerns based on experience, because once changes/variances are granted there is no turning back. there are no trial periods to see how it works out.

there is no compelling reason to allow a bar or restaurant in a residential area where one did not exist in recent times. why shouldn't people be able to have a reasonable expectation that zoning will be stable when they buy property (unless in a redevelopment plan). there is restaurant row where regulations were relaxed to create a destination area. and restaurant row has been expanded.

there are rules for a purpose and when they are changed there should be buy in from those immediately impacted.


Quote:

dr_nick_riviera wrote:
Quote:

Bread wrote:
If you wish to see the plans that show there is only one way in and that is the same way out, the Planning Department at 30 Montgomery St, will be happy to show them to you.

Then you will be able to see for yourself.


Sorry, burden of proof is on the accuser. Making what sound to be unrealistic claims and telling me if I want to see evidence I need to march to city hall and ask is ridiculous.

Did you yourself do that? I think not. It's easy enough for people to jump on the NIMBY bandwagon and keep making ridiculous claims. Sorry Bread and mfadam, it's on you to back up your claims.

As I said, I suspect you won't because it'll invalidate every stupid argument you're trying to make.

Posted on: 2016/9/13 3:18
 Top 



TopTop
« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 7 ... 39 »






Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017