Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
206 user(s) are online (185 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 206

more...




Browsing this Thread:   2 Anonymous Users






Re: City might have to pay 2 fire chiefs because of union contract
#4
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2006/9/13 14:54
Last Login :
2011/7/18 17:14
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 94
Offline
I don't understand. I thought that the Chief was appointed outside the Merit System and not a civil service position- that's how the JCPD is. Also, the Chief should not be in a Union. He is management.

On the other hand, if it is civil service, the City can utilize the so called rule of three to skip candidates on the list- it lets you skip two people on the list to get to a third. Since the other individuals on the list are said to be uninterested, it would work. Another strange thing here- the article says the Fire Director solicited an opinion from an outside firm. This sounds like insubordination. The Fire Director has no authority to solicit a legal opinion from an outside firm. The Fire Director has to go the Corporation Counsel who issues opinions that bind the City. I wonder who paid this outside lawyer? Outside legal bills have to be approved by the City Counsel. Also, this firm, I think, has a reputation as a union side shop- not the place the Mayor should be getting the skinny on the relevant law.

Posted on: 2007/3/26 15:33
 Top 


Re: City might have to pay 2 fire chiefs because of union contract
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2006/2/9 14:13
Last Login :
2009/6/1 2:41
Group:
Banned
Posts: 358
Offline
Gary-

The thing you missed though, is that taxpayers are going to be stuck paying a higher pension for this guy once he does retire.

Posted on: 2007/3/26 14:53
 Top 


Re: City might have to pay 2 fire chiefs because of union contract
#2
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/6/11 20:50
Last Login :
2009/12/26 15:56
Group:
Banned
Posts: 74
Offline
Thank god this guy is elder and going to be forced to retire in the next 6 months. Can you imagine if he was younger and the taxpayers would get stuck with two salaries for any legnth of time? God I sure wish that I got promoted based on my senority. I'd be close to CEO now. Regardless this is neglegience by the mayor, and I love how he is using ignorance as an excuse.

Posted on: 2007/3/26 14:41
 Top 


City might have to pay 2 fire chiefs because of union contract
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/9/15 19:03
Last Login :
2023/8/15 18:42
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 9302
Offline
City might have to pay 2 fire chiefs

Jersey Journal
Monday, March 26, 2007

Let's call this one the tale of two chiefs, because by possibly violating a union contract with its fire department, Jersey City could find itself in the odd position of having to pay for not one, but two fire chiefs.

A confidential letter penned by an attorney hired by the city indicates that the city "does not have strong defense," in opposing a grievance filed by Deputy Fire Chief Joseph Gallagher, who claims he was passed over for a promotion to fire chief - despite being No. 1 on the seniority list.

Jersey City Mayor Jerramiah Healy instead appointed William Sinnott, who was fifth on the seniority list.

The letter, dated March 7, from Florham Park attorney Stephani Schwartz of the law firm Schwartz and Edelstein, says Fire Department Director Armando Roman asked her firm's advice concerning the chief's promotion in January.

At the time, Roman was warned that promoting Sinnott over Gallagher would potentially violate the union agreement. "Gallagher indicated an interest in the promotion," Schwartz said in the letter.

The attorney also said the contract's language concerning provisional appointments says they must be based on seniority. "Numbers 2, 3, and 4 (on the seniority list) advised Jersey City, in writing, they were not interested in the position," Schwartz continued.

"There are no other provisions in the contract which permit Jersey City to bypass someone on the seniority list for a provisional appointment," Schwartz said.

If Roman sought advice pertaining to the appointment in January, it was already too late. Healy named Sinnott to the $155,677-a-year fire chief's post on Dec. 28.

"Jersey City does not have strong defense in this matter," Schwartz continues in the letter. She goes on to suggest offering Gallagher a "monetary settlement."

However, Gallagher said he's not interested in a settlement. He wants to be chief of the department. And why not? The $149,204-a-year salary he currently makes would increase, as would the size of his pension.

But the mayor said he believed when he made the appointment and continues to believe now that he has the authority to appoint the fire chief. He claims he had no knowledge when he tapped Sinnott to be chief that he was bound by the union contract to name someone from the seniority list.

"No one ever told me that," the mayor said. "When I served as a member of the Jersey City City Council, Deputy Chief Sinnott appeared from time to time to brief the council on various matters.

"I was impressed with him then and I still am. He still lives in Jersey City."

The mayor noted that Gallagher, who has been a Jersey City firefighter since 1965, will reach the state's mandatory retirement age of 65 in August, giving him barely five months on the job and requiring yet another appointment.

On the other hand, Sinnott, at 63, can continue on the job for at least another year and a half before reaching the mandatory retirement age.

Posted on: 2007/3/26 14:12
 Top 








[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017