Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
131 user(s) are online (100 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 131

more...


Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (mr_bunny)




Re: Home Video Security System - Recommendations?
#1
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

vindication15 wrote:
Can anyone recommend an outdoor home video security system which is wireless and requires simple installation? Price is not a factor. Thanks!

Looking for a system which will allow me to detect motion, see in the dark, and is weatherproof.


Check out surveillance-video.com. Or just to go into their shop at 387 Canal Street, just outside of the Holland Tunnel. They can put together a nice system. You want Infrared cameras for day and night use. Simple recorders go to HD, but you can also get systems that connect online.

Installation advice? After installing a system and recording some shoplifters I didn't have a good shot of their face because I placed the cameras around 8' off the floor, just like you see on all surveillance footage. I recommend putting one camera low, at most chest level through a window or some other protected area so you get a good face shot.

good luck

Posted on: 2012/2/9 7:47
 Top 


Re: 2 reported killed in car crash in Downtown Jersey City
#2
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

brewster wrote:
Quote:

mr_bunny wrote:
Quote:

heights wrote:
I've been told at the Heights police captain's meeting that there are not enough police officers to go around, that it would spread the force thin to cover every infraction pattern out there. Plus their jurisdiction only allow them certain levels of enforcement. The halls of justice are only as strong as it's weakest link.



I think the weak link is the JC public accepting that same old story from JCPD that there is nothing that they can do, not enough resources.


Then why aren't we inviting red light and speeding cam operators to set up more locations here? Enforcement plus cashflow to city with zero outlay. Seems like a no brainer. The contract and implementation just needs to be made to prioritize enforcement rather than cashflow. There should be signs at every major road entrance to JC: "traffic laws enforced by radar cameras", so everyone knows and it's not a "gotcha".


Yes, Yes... That is easy. Outside contractors would love to get the contracts. They and the city can rake it in and put down control over the major streets and intersections. It is also good to get REAL cops pulling people over, but they can't do it because they are too overworked and underpaid. (yea right)

Posted on: 2012/1/22 0:43
 Top 


Re: 2 reported killed in car crash in Downtown Jersey City
#3
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:


Having lived in Hoboken for a dozen years, prior to moving to JC, I can tell you that no one in the know illegally parks too close to the crosswalks - traffic tickets and booting raise revenue there.

I wish that we could hire additional staff to enforce parking rules - I nose my car into cross walks as I often can't see past the cars parked right up to the stop signs.



In HP, everyday I see Parking Authority 'Interceptors' simply pass by cars parked up to or in the crosswalks. Why don't they ticket? They seem to be only concerned with cars that don't move for street cleaning. Must be some sort of orders from higher up.

Posted on: 2012/1/22 0:33
 Top 


Re: 2 reported killed in car crash in Downtown Jersey City
#4
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

heights wrote:
I've been told at the Heights police captain's meeting that there are not enough police officers to go around, that it would spread the force thin to cover every infraction pattern out there. Plus their jurisdiction only allow them certain levels of enforcement. The halls of justice are only as strong as it's weakest link.



I think the weak link is the JC public accepting that same old story from JCPD that there is nothing that they can do, not enough resources.

Posted on: 2012/1/21 21:17
 Top 


Re: HD Experts: Questions on using JC Comcast?
#5
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

4bailey wrote:
I was looking at the APC Power Conditioners at Best Buy (we?ve both got Best Buy gift cards to use up). Do you think the ?Power Conditioner? thing is just hype or can I get by with an A/V style surge protector?


4bailey,

I am not home theater expert, but I am a two channel audiophile.

If you want protection from spikes I like a simple HIGH quality surge protector. It should not be made of plastic and the best place to get one is from a high end store like Stereo Exchange in NYC. (just an example)

"Power conditioners" tend to degrade your signal unless you spend over $500 and you still have to do your research in the audio reviews to be sure that others have had positive results. The term "power conditioner" is thrown around a lot for a wide range of power products and most are as you asked, hype.

If you are adding an outlet, make it a dedicated circuit. That is, has its own circuit breaker in the main electric box. This will help keep interference from dimmer switches and household appliances out of your signal.

In the big picture the above will only make a slight difference. A little here and a little there end up making a noticeable difference in the end.

Posted on: 2008/4/17 23:59
 Top 


Re: Stop Signs on Erie Street - Steven FUlop
#6
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:


If you actually spent time observing Monmouth Street traffic during the morning and evening rush hours, reasonable people would conclude otherwise.


Monmouth is very bad during the commute hours. I cross at 8th street and it is always a dash between cars. Honking horns and middle fingers is how I get greeted in the morning.

There are four "yield to pedestrian" signs installed at Monmouth and Pavonia, but drivers don't care because police don't enforce them. Yield signs do not work.

Posted on: 2008/4/4 3:17
 Top 


Re: Stop Signs on Erie Street - Steven FUlop
#7
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


39:4-36. Driver to yield to pedestrian at crosswalk; exceptions; vehicles approaching stopped vehicle from rear; yield of right-of-way by pedestrian The driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection, except at crosswalks when the movement of traffic is being regulated by police officers or traffic control signals, or where otherwise prohibited by municipal, county, or State regulation, and except where a pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian crossing has been provided, but no pedestrian shall suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle which is so close that it is impossible for the driver to yield. Nothing contained herein shall relieve a pedestrian from using due care for his safety.
Whenever any vehicle is stopped to permit a pedestrian to cross the roadway, the driver of any other vehicle approaching from the rear shall not overtake and pass such stopped vehicle.

Every pedestrian upon a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway.

Nothing contained herein shall relieve a driver from the duty to exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian upon a roadway.

Posted on: 2008/3/27 16:48
 Top 


Re: Barack Obama for President
#8
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

lecxe wrote:
Mr_Bunny... don't change the subject. (Something many Obama detractors claim he did with his speech.) Brian_em's original post had no mention of Farrakhan.

You agreed 100% to everything he said. So I took the both of you to task about it & to post evidence in your defense. How did you guys respond? No evidence.. just opinion & conjecture.


I have been aware of The Trinity United Church of Christ's fondness for Farrakhan for some time now. When reading brian's post that fact was dominant in my mind, even more than the comments of Rev, Wright. The views of Farrakhan and what brian_em posted as descriptions of the church are in line. Unlike you, I didn't follow up with half a dozen posts explaining every nuance of my agreement and I didn't mention Farrakhan at the time because it was not the purpose of my post. I just wanted to share with brian_em that someone on the other side of the isle agreed with him. Simple and short. I didn't chime in earlier because I thought some of your responses were rude.

If we are trying to determine the politics of Obama's church shouldn't their endorsement of Farrakhan be put on the table. Do you think it's not important? I know you are detail oriented, but look at the big picture.

I really think it is terrible. Obama had my vote, but I can not in good conscience cast a vote for someone who belongs to an organization that holds Farrakhan in such high regard. He made his bed, now he has to sleep in it.

Good luck Obama.

Posted on: 2008/3/27 4:34
 Top 


Re: Barack Obama for President
#9
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

lecxe wrote:
I'm still waiting for mr_bunny or brian_em to show me a youtube clip of Wright preaching children to "hate white people" & stating that "white people are un-evolved humans".

Isn't it interesting that they can't find one after all this time.


That's right... pat yourself on the back, but I still agree with brian_em's post.

Rev. Wright has made some questionable statements. Racist? Intolerant? Truth? How people react to Rev. Wright's statements is based on personal interpretation. Nonetheless, the church gave Farrakhan their Trumpeter Life Achievement award.? Farrakhan is not the embodiment of unity and tolerance. Slick move in an election year.

Rev. Wright, Farrakhan, and Obama all holding hands. That is just how it looks and it may cost Obama the election. Rev. Wright complains about the rich white people running the show and now that Obama has a good shot at becoming President, he could be the one to spoil the election.

Posted on: 2008/3/26 23:55
 Top 


Re: Barack Obama for President
#10
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

brian_em wrote:
The fact that Obama is still in the race after this astonishes me.

Now, I will give him the benifit of the doubt when it comes to how close his relationship is to Rev. Wright. I'm a conservative, but have many friends and acquaintances who have extremist views towards our government. And their voice doesn't influence me in any way.

But besides Rev. Wrights actions, the entire ordeal goes much further than that. If you look up the church in general, you will see the entire position of that church is racist and extremist. It's not just one psycho who will spit hatred here and there. If you saw the commercial for the church, you will understand. It's strange, almost, cult-like.

It brings up HUGE questions about Obama. Why in the world would he be a part of this church if he doesn't believe in it's very public racist position? How can he send his children to a church where they are told that white people are trying to infect them with the aids virus?

How can he stand on a stage with a straight face, and tell america that he wants to unite our country and end racism, when he belongs to a church that tells young black kids that white people are un-evolved human beings?

Now, i am somewhat sympathetic to Rev. Wright. I understand that the black community has faced a great deal of racism in it's history here in America. I understand that he is angry. But there is NO EXCUSE to go on stage and shout hate speech and propaganda towards an entire race of people. These men talk about a future where racism doesn't exist, how is that going to happen when they are telling children to hate white people?

Barack Obama IS A MEMBER of this church for 20 years. Whether he says it to a camera or not, it is proof that he at least condones this type of hate speech.

Think of it on the flip side...If John McCain was found out to be a member of a white supremest group, He'd be done, he'd be finished, NO QUESTION ABOUT IT....and I'd be glad. Because there is no excuse for that type of racist thinking.



As a tree hugging liberal... I agree 100%

Posted on: 2008/3/21 0:53
 Top 


Re: Barack Obama for President
#11
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Revoke the tax exempt status for religious organizations. Then they can exercise their free speech legally. Problem solved.

Posted on: 2008/2/28 2:19
 Top 


Re: This City Needs an Indie Movie Theater
#12
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


You all should check the schedule of the Loew's Jersey Theatre. They may have something of interest. Mostly classics, but "Blade Runner: The Final Cut" is on the books for May. A must see in my book.

http://www.loewsjersey.org/

Posted on: 2008/2/26 19:56
 Top 


Re: Beacon Area / McGinley Square: Thug used bat, Chinese delivery man remains in intensive care
#13
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


For him: aggravated assault, robbery and weapons offenses
For Her: conspiracy to commit robbery

Don't these charges seem a bit weak?
I thought that the use of a baseball bat to the head would be considered attempted murder with the use of a deadly weapon. (Or is aggravated assault legally the same thing?) Add to the fact that the robbery and attack was pre-orchestrated... I am particularly bothered by the lack of charges for Jasmine Rios.

Posted on: 2008/2/26 18:39
 Top 


Re: Hearing delay irks gun store owner: Owner's licenses to sell and carry firearms still revoked
#14
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


These guys were at a comedy show. Do you really think they were in the mood to kick some ass? If David Murray was in the right, why was he the only charged by JCPD? If the incident went down as Mr. Murray claims then the other party would have been charged with assault. They were not.

David Murray broke the law. How do you defend that?

Posted on: 2008/2/23 5:17
 Top 


Re: Law and Order Hotties
#15
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

XenoSerge wrote:
I'm absolutely smitten with Robert Goren (Vincent D'Onofrio) from Criminal Intent. *Rowr*


Pvt. Leonard "Gomer Pyle":
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDRevi ... tal-jacket-PDVD_00901.jpg

Posted on: 2008/2/22 19:52
 Top 


Re: Renting at New Jersey - safe + closer to the trains - $1500 budget
#16
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Someone I work with recently moved to Great Neck, New York. It's in the Queens area. She says she moved there because they have a good public school system for her two children and reports a 25 minute Express train ride to Penn Station (8th and 34th) via the Long Island RR. I visited her for a house warming and I have to say it was quite nice. It reminded me of some areas in Marin County.

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Great+Neck,+NY

Posted on: 2008/2/19 15:45
 Top 


Re: Violent Home Invasion - Coles & Monmouth
#17
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Quote:

Jeebus wrote:
There is a large amount of criminology research that has shown that allowing law abiding citizens to carry either decreases crime or at worst has no effect. The very argument that you make was made before Florida enacted a "shall issue" concealed carry law yet crime went way down afterwards. It is obvious that those inclined toward crime are made less likely to do so when a potential victim may be armed.

I suspect that you have little experience with people who legally own and carry firearms. In my experience, those who do so are much more careful to avoid putting themselves in a position where they would be involved in a violent confrontation than the average person.

You are also more than a bit mistaken in terms of your faith in the police having extensive firearms training above and beyond those who have a carry license. My father was a police officer and qualifying with a handgun amounted to hitting some stationary targets a couple times a year. Some cops practice on their own time but in general they are as much all over the map as private gun owners. Nevertheless, their having firearms is a huge deterrent to criminals and most cops never have to shoot at someone. It's mostly about deterring rather than shooting, and this is even more true of private gun owners.

Quote:

mr_bunny wrote:
On the subject of people carrying concealed handguns...

Believing that having "law abiding citizens" walking around the streets armed would make us all safe is a fantasy. People get in arguments all the time in congested urban areas like ours. I do not believe that most "law abiding citizens" with a gun would be able to control themselves in an altercation with another. Even in a simple argument, a person carrying a gun would be more belligerent knowing that they have a gun at their side. I don't trust human nature enough to allow a bunch of "law abiding citizens" to be armed on the streets. To many idiots have not broken the law and that is your only qualification for owning a gun (besides age and mental defect). I don't mind cops with guns because they have extensive training.

If you want a gun in your house... fine, whatever, I don't care. Be responsible. Just don't shoot me through the wall while you are cleaning it.

Sorry to get off topic.


My point is that most of the people in this country are idiots or a$$holes and that I would not like them walking the streets with a gun just because they are paranoid. Many gun owners are responsible, know proper gun safety and have a cool head, but many do not. Looking at the general population of this country, I think it would be safer if they didn't have a gun in hand.

I know several people that own guns and they use them to hunt game, not humans. THAT IS WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT HERE. Statistics show that you will kill yourself or a loved one before you kill a armed robber. The gun owners I know would never consider walking the streets with a gun on their side. To top it off one had his house broken into and all 20+ guns were stolen and are now on the streets. Good times.

When I wrote of police having "extensive training", I refer to the total training, not just how to point, pull the trigger and hit a target, but how to use professional judgment of when a firearm is necessary. All drivers have to take a written and practical test in order to be able to drive. To get a gun all I have to do is not drool on the counter.


Sorry again for getting off topic.

Posted on: 2008/2/5 5:15
 Top 


Re: Violent Home Invasion - Coles & Monmouth
#18
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


On the subject of people carrying concealed handguns...

Believing that having "law abiding citizens" walking around the streets armed would make us all safe is a fantasy. People get in arguments all the time in congested urban areas like ours. I do not believe that most "law abiding citizens" with a gun would be able to control themselves in an altercation with another. Even in a simple argument, a person carrying a gun would be more belligerent knowing that they have a gun at their side. I don't trust human nature enough to allow a bunch of "law abiding citizens" to be armed on the streets. To many idiots have not broken the law and that is your only qualification for owning a gun (besides age and mental defect). I don't mind cops with guns because they have extensive training.

If you want a gun in your house... fine, whatever, I don't care. Be responsible. Just don't shoot me through the wall while you are cleaning it.

Sorry to get off topic.

Posted on: 2008/2/4 18:09
 Top 


Re: New PATH trains, then more zip
#19
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


It would be nice if....

They drill new tunnels for the midtown PATH train. Tunnels that are straight and can allow the trains to go faster. Use the old tunnels for pedestrians and bicycles.
------
Next month is the 100 year anniversary of the opening of the Hudson Manhattan Railroad (Hudson Tubes).

Posted on: 2008/1/29 19:46
 Top 


Re: estimates and contractor recommendations for central air/heat or ductless heat/air
#20
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


1. Central Air (Forced Air)
We have a central forced air (standard type) heating and cooling unit on the roof of our 3 story. It works, but the first floor does not heat/cool as well because it is far from unit on the roof. Our house is very well insulated so it is not a big deal. The unit can range in cost from 6 to 10 thousand depending on your needs. Then there is installation. That would be very high for a 4 floor house. There would be a lot of drywall work to cover all the large ducts.

2. Ductless
We have a store that has one of these systems. It works fine for the space of 1000 square feet, but it is ugly. You would need to have these units in multiple areas of the house with the condenser outside and hooked up with what look like black garden hoses. Our single unit was around 7 thousand.

3. Central Air (High Velocity)
I would give this high consideration. Not many people know about this type of central air system, but you may be able to find someone who can give a quote and install it. The air passes through 2 inch hoses that can easily be run through walls and floors. It is great for homes that do not have the space for large ducts. The air exits through small vents, often looking similar to what you see on an airplane, pumping out air like a leaf blower. I have seen one only once and was very impressed.

Here is a link talking about the system.
http://reviews.houseinprogress.net/archives/000646.html

good luck

Posted on: 2008/1/29 18:15
 Top 


Re: Bush backs 145 billion dollar Economic Relief Plan
#21
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


The problem is that politicians have turned Washington into a "free market".

Posted on: 2008/1/18 21:44
 Top 


Re: Is Foghorn Leghorn allowed in Jersey City?
#22
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


Check out this topic.

http://jclist.com/modules/newbb/viewt ... =&topic_id=11719&forum=11

BrightMoment wrote:

Chapter 90 ANIMALS

ARTICLE II Birds and Poultry [Adopted 5-4-1971 as Ch. 5, Art. II, of the 1971 Jersey City Code, as readopted 9-19-1978 by Ord. No. S-128]

? 90-7. License required; fee; expiration. [Amended 4-12-1988 by Ord. No. C-730]*

No person shall keep pigeons, chickens or other poultry without having first obtained a license from the license issuing authority. The annual fee shall be as set forth in Ch. 160, Fees and Charges, and licenses shall expire on April 30 of each year.

* Editor?s Note: Amended at time of adoption of Code; see Ch. 1, General Provisions, Art. I.


90-6. Location; number restricted.

No pigeons, chickens or other poultry shall be kept within 25 feet of any structure owned by another and used for human habitation, occupation or assembly, provided that in no case shall any person or persons be permitted to keep more than 50 chickens, ducks or other poultry, including pigeons. No pigeons, chickens or other poultry shall be permitted to run, fly or stray within 25 feet of such structure, provided that this shall not apply to homing pigeons.

? 90-8. Requirements for housing or coops.

The following regulations and conditions for the keeping and housing of pigeons, chickens and other poultry shall be complied with.

A. The house or coop shall be dry and well ventilated, with windows so placed, if possible, as to admit sunlight.
B. The house or coop shall be well whitewashed or painted therein.
C. The house or coop shall be cleaned at least once a week between November 1 and May 1, twice a week between May 1 and November 1 and, if necessary, to be cleaned more often and to be disinfected.
D. Perches shall be removable and kept clean.
E. Chicken nests shall be removable, cleaned, aired and sunned at frequent intervals.
F. Drinking fountains in the area where the house or coop is located shall be cleaned and supplied at all times with clean water.
G. The yard in the area where the house or coop is located shall be clean and free from odors.

? 90-9. Revocation of license.

If the above conditions and regulations are not complied with the license shall be revoked, provided that nothing herein shall apply to the pigeons, chickens or other poultry confined in coops in regular licensed markets or stores for the sale, slaughter and plucking of poultry.

? 90-10. Revocation due to environmental changes.

Whenever, in the opinion of the Division of Health, the environment in an area has changed since granting the license to keep and maintain pigeons, chickens or other poultry therein to such an extent that the maintenance thereof may constitute a nuisance, such license may be revoked by the Health Officer.

Posted on: 2008/1/15 18:52
 Top 



TopTop






Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017