Mao wrote:
The peregrinations of the Latin Mass Community in Jersey City (Holy Rosary, then St. Anthony's then St. Paul the Apostle, then Assumption, now OLS) are like the wanderings of the Jews in the desert. Only the Lord knows why. At this, Our Lady of Sorrows, at the intersection of Ocean and Claremont, is the promised land. Thank you for welcoming us, Fr. Mino.

Btw, the parish has a very important food bank and also has a shelter for homeless women. Faith without works is dead!

PS
There is off street parking right across from the church.

MDM wrote:
Quote:

dmark526 wrote:
If you remember, The Apple Tree house was at one time in horrendous shape. I remember that pigeons were living in it beacuse there were hole in the roof. That has since been totally restored.

So who is going to pay for this rehab?

Mao wrote:
Dear DMark:

Are your posts brought to us "by Pfizer"?

Mao

PS
Here's a video brought to you by Pfizer:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hDCIaQqDHif7/

Mao wrote:
Dear DMark:

Firstly the Hill is not a right wing news outlet by any means. It is pretty much a MSM and totally pushing the agenda with no independent reporting.

I think the Atlantic has done one or two ok pieces on Covid even if its covid coverage is entirely underwritten by J&J and FB (As the magazine discloses: "The Atlantic’s COVID-19 coverage is supported by grants from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation."

But you seem unable to think. How can you believe that denouncing anyone who disagrees with the Covid narrative as a misinformation source to be a valid way of conversing. In logic, its known as the ad hominem fallacy.

Can you address the data that Berenson from Australia that Berenson is concerned with.

How about the massive amounts of serious side affects that were reported in servicemen forced to get the vax, e.g. 1000 % increase in neurological complaints. 400% increase in miscarriages. Merely screaming: misinformation is absurd.

Yours,

Mao

Mao wrote:
Dear DMark:

Berenson, Yale grad, award winning NYTimes journalist, noted novelist and science and health writer is a "known quack"? Give me a break.

His reporting in the last two years mostly deals with statistics.

Can you look at the statistics without merely foaming at the mouth like a crazed wind up automaton? They (not sure who they are but they include nearly all Democrats, most Republicans, the Public Health Bureaucracies, the Main Stream Media, the Universities etc) go into attack mode.

Yours,

Mao

MDM wrote:
Quote:

DTMercer wrote:

Do you have any idea on timing of this? I'm trying to get out of town by Friday afternoon...driving south.

I'll post the updated model runs this afternoon. The models right now show rain / sleet for us or a lot of freezing rain.

Last time we had freezing rain my bushes collapsed, blocking the sidewalk. That was a miserable mess to clean up.

Mao wrote:
Alex Bereonson's substac from yesterday:



Real Covid numbers from Australia's largest state. 76 percent of deaths since mid-January are in the vaccinated. Death deaths in the boosted are soaring.
Alex Berenson
Feb 1

Every day, the Australian state of New South Wales reports Covid deaths by age - and vaccination status.

Unlike American figures, these do not depend on inaccurate hospital reporting of vaccination status. They are not manipulated or “age-adjusted.”

They are as close to real time data as exists anywhere in the world. New South Wales even reports whether people under 65 had serious health conditions.

Overall coronavirus deaths have accelerated dramatically in New South Wales in the last month, as the Omicron variant speads. (The state has about 8.2 million people, so 40 deaths a day there is equivalent to 1,600 in the United States.)


So who is dying?

In the last 15 days, 417 of the 552 people who died of Covid in New South Wales were vaccinated, compared to 135 who were unvaccinated.

Sixty of the vaccinated people who died had received a booster shot. Those deaths skew markedly to the last few days. Forty-nine of the 60 boosted people died in the last week - including the most recent, a man in his thirties who had no preexisting conditions.


SOURCE: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/news/Pages/20220201_01.aspx

—

The adult population in New South Wales is roughly 95 percent vaccinated, including about 40 percent boosted. So the “adjusted rate ratios” the Centers for Disease Control and media bluechecks love to present instead of actual numbers probably still show that the vaccinated have great protection.

But NSW also recently provided strong evidence that many of the unvaccinated elderly people who died were too sick to be vaccinated. On Jan. 28, it reported a batch of 35 deaths that had occurred earlier in January from nursing homes.

Nursing home residents are generally the frailest of the elderly - a 2010 study in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society found that 65 percent of residents died within a year of entering the home.

SOURCE: https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2010/08/9817 ... 20age%20of%20participants,study%20died%20within%20six%20months.

Thus, for the last year, they have been vaccinated as a matter of course.

Yet New South Wales reported that 14 of the 35 nursing home residents who died - 40 percent - had NOT been vaccinated. The only conceivable explanation for the fact that so many unvaccinated residents are among the dead is that most were too sick to be vaccinated.

When it comes to Covid deaths and vaccines, the adjusted ratios - especially from the United States - are effectively meaningless. The raw numbers are what matter.

Which is why the public health authorities and elite media go out of their way to hide them.

Mao wrote:
Dear Dmark:

I said the mainstream media's glee in deaths of those who were antivax. I did not specifically reference your refernce to the death. Yours was very pithy without comment. Yet you must have posted about the death for a reason.

Carlos Tejehda's death of a heart attack after his vaccine clearly raises the question of whether it was a heart attack caused by the vaccines which are well known to cause heart attacks as well as strokes.

Here's the quote from Pope Francis on Sept 15, 2021, courtesy of France 24.

Aboard the Papal Plane (AFP) –

ADVERTISING


Pope Francis on Wednesday spoke out against "denier" cardinals who refused the coronavirus vaccine, in an apparent swipe at his main opponent who recently contracted Covid-19.

"In the College of Cardinals, there are a few deniers. One of them, the poor man, contracted the virus," the pontiff told reporters as he flew home from a trip to Slovakia.

The 84-year-old did not name the man he was referring to, but conservative US Cardinal Raymond Burke, one of Francis' fiercest and most vocal critics in the Catholic Church, was recently admitted to hospital in the United States with Covid-19.


Yours,

Mao

Mao wrote:
There is something unsettling and creepy about the way the mainstream narrative takes absolute pleasure in the death and suffering of an anti vaxer. Pope Francis, "the merciful," was crowing with delight when Raymond Cardinal Burke was hospitalized. Numerous other vaccinated cardinals and bishops have died of Covid but no matter.

I find it extremely sad when people who have been very pro vax end up dying of the vax, e.g. Carlos Tiejhada the NY Times reporter who died after the booster. https://thecovidblog.com/2021/12/25/ca ... stagram-dead-hours-later/

Anyway, may Meatloaf rest in peace. I wonder if he was still a very large man which would not help him with Covid and I wonder if he had good treatment, eg. Hydroxychloroquine etc

You can access deaths from the vaccine, generally thought to be underestimated by a factor of between 10 to 100. Here is the CDC website.

Here's a video of a guy showing you the data from an under 17 report.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensu ... rs/access-VAERS-data.html


https://www.bitchute.com/video/ukcdGqEdEtYv/

Mao wrote:
Wanted to generate some appreciative feedback for JCLIST, but no luck.

I don't post on FB and have no Twitter Account. I do, however, use Nextdoor. Apparently, they are now owned by FB.

Nextdoor's censor is truly Orwellian. A post there which questions or attacks the vaccines for covid is not allowed to be put up. Moreover, I am then blocked prospectively unless I swear to follow the censor.

If one speaks indirectly or in code, it will be posted. However, it is inevitably taken down within an hour or two.


Even an abstract post to discuss freedom of speech and censorship was taken!

An experience, perhaps, of things to come.

Mao wrote:
OPINION: DON’T VACCINATE YOUNG CHILDREN
By RUSSELL BLAYLOCK, MD
Mon,11/15/21-4:00PM, 2,860 Reads
I find it incredible that several writers have found the deaths of thousands of mostly healthy people after receiving a virtually untested “vaccine” as something we should ignore, all based on manipulated statistics. Benjamin Disraeli was correct— “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies and statistics”. It has been shown by VAERS data that the number of deaths linked to the COVID-19 vaccines after the first six months of their release exceeds all the deaths linked to other vaccines given over the past 30 years. These COVID-19 “vaccine” related deaths are increasing at a shocking rate, by several hundred each week.

What really concerns many of us is the rush to vaccinate children aged five to 11 with, what many of us consider, a deadly “vaccine”. Our children are already over-vaccinated and adding these deadly vaccines will, in my opinion and others, mean thousands of small children will possibly die and tens of thousands more will be left permanently ruined by these biological agents. Do these “vaccine” proponents think it would be acceptable for small children to die from a vaccine they do not need, and which has now been shown to be highly ineffective?

There is a major difference between a perfectly healthy child dying from a naturally spread disease and dying following a so-called “treatment” to protect someone else. Especially when that child’s risk from the disease is virtually nil. Experts in vaccine injuries are warning of a possible explosion of autoimmune diseases in these children, including juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and asthma. Neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases are also a major concern.

Studies have shown that the vast majority of deaths associated with this virus occurred among people over age 70, most in their 80s and that the majority of the 9,367 deaths now reported with the vaccines by VAERS also occurred among this very same age group. Additionally, these COVID-19 deaths are also occurring by far among people who have serious co-morbid conditions and a poor prognosis without the virus.

Two highly regarded studies have recently shown that these COVID-19 vaccines powerfully suppress all immune cells utilized in fighting viruses, thus making these vaccinated children (and adults) highly susceptible to not only the Covid-19 viruses, but all viruses. Another study out of Sweden found that the spike protein from the vaccines, much to their surprise, entered the nucleus of the immune cells and inactivated two essential DNA repair enzymes. They concluded this would incapacitate the immune system of these vaccinated individuals. Paralysis of DNA repair enzymes would also put the vaccinated child at a very high risk of developing one of the hematological malignancies, such as lymphomas or leukemias. In essence, we could see an explosion of childhood leukemias or lymphomas among these vaccinated children.

Mag St. Andrews 211201

We now know that vaccinated individuals can spread the virus variant. Studies have shown that the vaccinated have very high levels of these viruses in their nasopharynx.

Dr. Peter McCullough published his results of early treatment of COVID-19 infected patients and reported that in his patients he has seen an 85% reduction in hospitalizations and especially ICU admissions—that equates to saving the lives of 85% of the infected people in his practice. The CDC ordered doctors not to administer early treatment, but rather allow these people to deteriorate to the point they were severely ill before any treatment was initiated. What this means nationally is that had early treatment been the standard, 595,000 people out of the claimed 700,000 Covid-19 deaths, could have survived, mostly in good health. That means that 85% of the people that died, died unnecessarily because of a CDC imposed policy.

These young children, in essence, would be vaccinated with potentially dangerous vaccines for a virus which in well over 99% of cases, will not make them sick. Worse still, most authorities agree, these children are not transmitting the virus. So, why are they being subjected to these experimental “vaccines”?

We have seen that vaccinating pregnant women can increase the risk of miscarriage if they are vaccinated during the first trimester of their pregnancy. Based on my careful study of the effects of immune stimulation during pregnancy (as with vaccines) I have warned that we could see a dramatic increase in autism and schizophrenia in these offspring, especially if vaccinated during the second and third trimester. I have published this immune mechanism in several scientific journals.

Which one of you proponents of forced vaccination of these very young children would be willing to exchange the life of their own child or grandchild for an elderly relative, a relative with only a few months or years of life left on this earth. I certainly would never consider such a selfish or inhumane idea. I have experienced the terrible agony and ongoing grief of losing my grandchild at age 7 years—I would have been more than glad to have died in his place. The thought that I would sacrifice the life of my child or grandchild so that I could live or extend an elderly relative’s life a few months or years is beyond any consideration.

Mag Benson Companies 211201

These children have an extremely low danger from this virus or the variant, but thousands will die, and hundreds of thousands may be permanently damaged by these “vaccines.” Will the proponents of these “vaccines” respond coldly to these vaccine-induced deaths in “statistical terms” and ignore the thousands of individual children that will have died as these same cold-hearted people have with the tens of thousands of dead vaccinated adults?

What kind of civilization sacrifices its young so the extreme elderly might survive just a little longer? There are many ways to protect the elderly population beyond ineffective, dangerous “vaccinations.” I know, I am one of these elderly.

Russell L. Blaylock, M.D., is a Northsider. He is a retired neurosurgeon and Associate Editor-in-Chief of Surgical Neurology International

Yvonne wrote:
Fully vaccinated man dies from covid, so what is the point? Around 80% had at least one shot but more people have died from covid under Biden than Trump.

https://www.ibtimes.com/fully-vaccinat ... racting-infection-3340528

Yvonne wrote:
Young children do not need a covid vaccine, unless they have childhood illness like cancer. Their immune system is excellent. There is not enough data on the harm that might happen. By the way, in Robert Kennedy, Jr. new book, he states there are no tests on regular vaccines. He said he sued the government to ask for the data and was told there are no tests. I have no problem with regular vaccines but it is wrong not to do tests. Many parents say there is a link between vaccines and autism. I have always thought these parents were nuts, but now I am not sure.