|
Re: Prohibiting Aggressive Begging, Soliciting, and Panhandling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
 
|
Quote:
Nonsense on stilts? What specifically is nonsensical? As to the poster, I don't know. I didn't create it. I merely saw it and took a snapshot of it earlier today and posted it to the thread since it was relevant to the topic. It looks like it might be Tupac Shakur, deceased nephew to the exiled communist Assata Shakur. As for coerced twelve step indoctrination, well, that's a whole other matter.
Posted on: 2014/3/27 0:06
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Prohibiting Aggressive Begging, Soliciting, and Panhandling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Then again, maybe I realized that from the outset. (Sorry if you take umbrage with the vernacular use of the word ?cat.? Guess you?re not a Jimi Hendrix fan, or a fan of anything cool for that matter since no one cool would reply with indignation to the vernacular use of the word ?cat.?) I disagree with your point though. I?m all for the aggressive panhandlers. Hopefully, they become more aggressive and increasingly violent. After all, that really is the only way to start and WIN a revolution -- by way of violence. I?d say the aggressive panhandlers are merely a manifestation of an underlying current of restiveness towards the status quo. Hopefully, they serve to highlight the violence inflicted upon all of us, everyday by the economic elite. I think it?s time for a change. If we could just get a hold of the military...
Posted on: 2014/3/26 23:35
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Prohibiting Aggressive Begging, Soliciting, and Panhandling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
No, devilsadvocate, my claim (which I think is Marxian in nature) is that the ?local loser? wouldn?t be a loser were it not for a capitalistic (turned neo liberal capitalistic) economic system. This isn?t the prosperous America of post World War II. It is a new America rooted in an extreme brand of laissez-faire economics in which ?losers short on cash? have NO shot. Any assault on the ?local loser? is misplaced since neo liberal capitalist policies are more deserving of said assault and are responsible for the deepened societal malaise that began with Reagan and Thatcher. Maybe we wouldn?t be having this discussion if we took care of our people, many of whom are veterans like the guy who was baked to death a few weeks ago in a NYC jail cell after he was arrested for trying to keep warm in a stairwell. I mean, look at the stats! America has a higher rate of infant mortality, drug abuse, alcoholism, suicide, domestic abuse, teen pregnancy, mental illness and incarcerates more people than ALL other industrialized countries governed with a more balanced view. Now why might that be?
The ?local loser?? There?s a cat who panhandles on Newark and Coles almost everyday and night. The guy looks like he?s 70 years old (which means he?s probably only 60.) He is unassuming and not at all aggressive. Sometimes, I fish out some loose change for him and sometimes I don?t. But seriously, who is going to hire this guy? How is he supposed to get a foothold? What truly efficacious services are there for individuals like him? Why are so many homeless? You think that maybe capitalism has something to do with it? Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/26 22:31
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Prohibiting Aggressive Begging, Soliciting, and Panhandling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Right, ?some? panhandlers do have money, lol. I frequently see them making deposits at the bank before returning to their mortgage free properties. The spirit of the proposal is the same in terms of who it targets, regardless of any grey or flimsy distinction between a ?poor? person and a ?panhandler.? The two are interchangeable in the public?s linguistic reservoir.
The transactional nature of reading has to do with meaning making. The public?s reservoir of knowledge is such that the flyer?s message is clearly inferred by the recipient. Might it have been better? Perhaps through the eyes of an advertising executive, an editor at Better Homes and Gardens or a Hollywood production company but to the general public, the 99%, it looks just fine. The suggestion that it should be devoid of meaningless inaccuracies misses the point which is that the flyer?s message is clear. Rally at City Hall, period. Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/26 21:40
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Condo management for 1 unit
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
I live a 6 unit building that uses RELB and I have no complaints whatsoever. Ten years running now.
As to cost, I don't know what the per unit price is, maybe $150 per unit? I think it is an a la carte type of proposition. For example, do you want the snow shoveled? How about gettig the trash out for collection? Pest control? I'd say pick and choose what services you want to pay for. Then give them a call. Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/26 21:14
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Prohibiting Aggressive Begging, Soliciting, and Panhandling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Well, I looked at the flyer today and managed without the slightest degree of difficulty to comprehend fully that the rally is set for today, March 26th, 2014. Moreover, whoever created the flyer took the time to distribute its message by making the rounds and posting it for the community to see. You think we live in a democracy? That economic elites have no sway in political matters? Were this passed, it most certainly WOULD make it a crime to be poor since it aims to target the poor. This type of grassroots effort -- however misguided and ?idiotic? you THINK it is -- ought to be LAUDED. Not to be met with cynicism, derision and disdain.
So, to characterize the flyer as ?dumb? based on a typographical error that a fourth grader could easily deduce and by disparaging the time and effort vested to rise up and challenge the status quo is really quite smart. Not. As to the ?dumb? ideas underlying the proposed ordinance, I?ll agree that it makes little sense to impose monetary fines upon the homeless. This much I?ll give you. But only from a humanitarian stance and not a pragmatic one. Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/26 21:01
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Prohibiting Aggressive Begging, Soliciting, and Panhandling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Right. Clear the way so the capitalist machine can march on. Put 'em in jail because our property values are more important. Please.
Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/26 20:07
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Prohibiting Aggressive Begging, Soliciting, and Panhandling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Saw a flyer today posted on the SE corner of Hamilton Park saying there is to be a rally today in opposition to proposed ordinance but no information on the flyer as to a time.
Posted on: 2014/3/26 20:02
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Question on Safety of Brunswick Btwn 2/3rd
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
I purchased a condo in this area back in 2003. I sold it a year later and moved to 7th Street, just off B'wick where I have resided since. The thing to remember, is back in that area, especially west of B'wick, it is relatively quiet, especially at night, It is kind of secluded back there by Colgate and 2nd. So it is an excellent neighborhood in my opinion from a noise perspective. Also, the 2nd Street Bakery (family owned, I think) is just a gem of an old school Italian eatery, just out of this world in my opinion, in terms of the food and the value (really inexpensive!)
This area is totally safe, I wouldn't think twice about it but I am a relatively able bodied man, now in my forties. But the place I bought back in '03, was I think considered "new construction" because it was a gut job and total renovation, six units in the building. In deference to the real estate interests of those living there now, I won't say which building. But here's the thing I want to say: it is my strong suspicion that the person or department within Jersey City Government that is responsible for enforcing building code got paid to look the other way during the construction of this building. I look at it now and see a building that will soon be characterized as dilapidated. The construction was so poor, you could literally hear the conversations in units above and below. Very cheap and shoddy work was done. I moved because there was no insulation between the apartments, it was as if I was living in a commune as opposed to a condo. So incredible that an inspector could have signed off in good conscience. This is important because a poorly constructed building affects the entire neighborhood in a negative way. I am very sorry that I did not pursue an independent investigation with an aim to sue. I am not a litigious type of person, but be careful with any purchases around there or anywhere downtown for that matter, especially on the entry-level type of properties. Fortunately, I did manage to sell at a profit just twelve months later but back then, everything was going up. Nonetheless, I am still pissed about the corruption that impacted me. It was dirty business indeed.
Posted on: 2014/3/15 23:37
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: How is the neigborhood on Virginia Terrace between JFK blvd and west side ave?
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
I believe Virginia Terrace is in the Jersey City neighborhood known as "West Side" and in part borders the neighborhood known as "Greenville."
I have never lived in that area, but having lived downtown and with a car for over twelve years. I'd say a major selling point is the expansion or renaissance that is New Jersey City University, only seven blocks to the South. They are building a new west Side campus down by the Home Depot on 440. It is a University that is growing, despite declining enrollments in recent years. It is the one thing about Jersey City that could be a huge game changer for that area, especially if it is able to develop a DI Men's basketball team. Also in the area, there is a gem of an Italian Deli called "Carmine's" that is not far from there, down on Mallory, I think. Having said that, I'd be more inclined to take less space and invest in Downtown JC. Or, maybe in Bergen Lafayette. It is true, that a rising tide raises all boats, and jersey City is certainly rising in spectacular fashion. But, as with all low-socioeconomic areas, the concomitant issues that go along ARE a concern in terms of safety. There's just no getting around it. Where there are bad schools, there is poverty and by extension, there is crime. Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/7 1:45
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: How is the neigborhood on Virginia Terrace between JFK blvd and west side ave?
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
I live downtown and walk often to Lincoln Park. From Virginia terrace, Lincoln Park is a hop, skip and a jump.
Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/7 1:21
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Any good Gastroenterologist in JC?
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Thanks and be thankful for finding one you like. I purchase Individual Health Insurance through Oxford of NJ and must stay "in-network." Christ Hospital is not in network but thanks all the same.
Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/7 1:14
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Any good Gastroenterologist in JC?
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Considering the Path train still runs to WTC during the weekdays, it most certainly does count, thanks! I read about Kummer on Yelp or somewhere on the internet. Looks like his YELP review page was closed? (http://www.yelp.com/biz/kummer-bart-a-md-new-york)
I have been having incredibly painful abdominal pain episodes and my current gastroenterologist is not up to the task, quite literally. He has dreadful reviews on YELP, more than 80% of which are with 1 star rating on scale 1-5, lol. The pain episodes I get usually last 3 to 4 hours in duration during which time I am left to squirm about my apartment, seeking temporary respite in a hot bath. I've had a CT scan and a colonoscopy, both of which were negative. I am in and out of the JC Medical center ER on average once per month. The next step is an MRI but I can't seem to convince the ER docs to give me one as they want to first do another CT scan since my last was six months ago. Ugh. I assume you attest that Bart Kummer is good, thanks for the heads up, I will look into scheduling tomorrow. There is also a guy on Jersey Ave, Arthur Stowe who is only a few blocks from me so I will look into him as well. Quote:
Posted on: 2014/3/7 1:11
|
|||
|
||||
|
Any good Gastroenterologist in JC?
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Does anyone know of a good gastroenterologist in or around Jersey City? Any recommendations in terms of a doctor specializing in gastroenterology?
Posted on: 2014/3/6 16:21
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: new in town--which neighborhood safe for single female?
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
$1800 will get you a one bedroom downtown, maybe even $1700. Over the past two years, rents have increased as have prices. Stick to Hamilton Park and forget Paulus Hook because I'd venture to guess there are no $1800 studios down there, let alone one bedroom. Van Vorst might be a possibility, but in terms of safety, Hamilton Park or North of Columbus, especially North of Newark Ave., is where you want to look.
I am hearing that there is a lot of demand. A one-bedroom place on 9th Street, right off the park, is asking $1950. No matter, $1800 should be enough but you'll have to work it hard and might be better off paying a fee to one of the real estate companies like Boyne or Armagno.
Posted on: 2014/2/27 23:20
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Fatal hit-and-run at Duncan & Routes 1&9
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
True. But originating on the westernmost part of Duncan Avenue, you must first traverse the 1&9 in order to get to any route. There was no alternative.
Quote:
Posted on: 2014/2/23 22:13
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Fatal hit-and-run at Duncan & Routes 1&9
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
She worked on Duncan, west of 1&9, way over by the Hudson County Prosecutor's office. She was on her way home, to Magnolia Ave., after work.
That's why. Quote:
Posted on: 2014/2/23 20:43
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Fatal hit-and-run at Duncan & Routes 1&9
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
These photos were taken last night around 5PM. The corners were in bad shape. Walking West on Duncan, on the North side, I was forced out into the street just before making the Northeast corner, then I had to hop back into the mini fjords just to make it to the corner while a minivan rolled up alongside me just inches away. It was a treacherous scene to walk, all the more tricky with a bike 48 hours previous.
There was a ton of truck traffic, going in and coming out of west Duncan and of course, the average speed on the 1&9 seems like 60 mph. Despite traffic lights, nowhere else in this city does traffic move as swiftly as it does along the 1&9 and 440 stretch. Initial reports say police speculate she was walking her bike. If true, this tragedy is on the driver of the car/truck that hit her. Very sad story, one that could have been avoided. You got to wonder about the city's response to the storm(s). Was it all that good? Looking East on Duncan, West of 1&9.  Looking South from Northwest corner of Duncan and 1&9.  Looking South from Southeast corner of Duncan and 1&9. (Note condition of "sidewalk")  Lastly, looking North from Southeast corner. Bottom of pic shows the ice. 
Posted on: 2014/2/23 19:04
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: 6th Street Embankment - US Court of Appeals Ruling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Interesting thought Dolomiti, thanks.
The President of the Embankment Preservation Coalition, Stephen Gucciardo, is quoted as saying: If Hyman does not appeal the recent ruling, Gucciardo said the city will have a chance to buy the property for the original sale price of $3 million. So there is a chance to purchase at the 3 million price tag. Even back in 2003, the Embankment swath was worth way more than 3 million, so I wonder how on earth Conrail agreed to a price this low. Unless, the 3 million was the price of the option, in which case I could undestand. Wold be nice if one of the local media outlets took this story and reported in depth. Quote:
Posted on: 2014/2/22 16:31
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Embankment- Update Thread
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Oh no Danny?
This park is long overdue and should have been built years ago. How about telling your client to leave town permanently and to never come back. Quote:
Posted on: 2014/2/21 21:41
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: 6th Street Embankment - US Court of Appeals Ruling
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Well this certainly sounds hopeful.
Does anyone know how this plays out legally in terms of the invalidation? Does the city now pay an amount equivalent to what Hyman paid? Is there a way the city can sue Hyman for dragging this out for so long to the detriment and consternation of its people? I mean, if it was so obvious and all, shouldn't Hyman be run out of town for this?
Posted on: 2014/2/21 21:31
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Another Catholic school in Jersey City to close doors in June
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
So, I heard the school is being torn down and that a new residential real estate project is going up in its place? Is that right?
Does anyone know what the plans are once the school is closed?
Posted on: 2014/2/4 0:52
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Jersey City Need Not Apply
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
What is "tea party" about the video? And, I love Michael Moore. WTG, Yvonne! Nice video!
Posted on: 2014/1/24 0:57
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Jersey City real estate prices going back to pre-bubble burst prices
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Holy cow! 65K?
Posted on: 2014/1/13 18:30
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Jersey City real estate prices going back to pre-bubble burst prices
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
I'd say that's a pretty big IF. Treasury Bonds were yielding 16 percent back then. What plausible scenario is going to bring that about? Not a chance.
Posted on: 2014/1/13 18:24
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: loud noise
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
After wading through the weeds in order to speak with the Southern drawled SPECTRA invader, my feet are on fire, like a chemical fire. Where the F#$K is Fulop on this? Or the incumbent Healy? Clearly, leadership at NGP is exhausted and can no longer carry the torch (assuming they are not part of the SPECTRA propaganda machine.)
I'll be making some calls this week for sure.
Posted on: 2013/6/15 3:11
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: loud noise
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
I've resided on 7th and B'wick for over eight years now.
The apathy astonishes me! Shall we all have a meet?
Posted on: 2013/6/15 2:58
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: loud noise
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Nonsense. Whatever it was had nothing to do with a "construction machine." What I observed was a large hole in the ground with four or five hard hats standing around with hands on hips while some huge machine was extracting huge amounts of energy from the local power source!
Posted on: 2013/6/15 2:46
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: loud noise
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Oh yeah, that's all it was, no big deal. Spectra will have it all sorted out in no time, lol.
Posted on: 2013/6/15 2:42
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: loud noise
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
|
No you are correct. Hundreds have noticed the same. I walked over and sure enough, the hard hat I spoke to was sporting "SPECTRA ENERGY" on his hat. Where is the No Gas Pipeline on this? What pathetic leadership! This has been ONGOING for weeks...in that specific area! Get over to Jones Park, in the back and underneath the turnpike. They were apparently fixing up some type of spillage. Wow, the NGP leadership is so out to lunch, they can't even offer any surveillance of the SPECTRA invaders. I'll take it from here morons at No Gas Pipeline (who by the way couldn't even process my tee shirt order.) I guess NGP was just a creation of fiction by SPECTRA. Wake up western downtowners!
(I have pictures...but apparently no way to upload pictures on this ridiculous forum?)
Posted on: 2013/6/15 2:39
|
|||
|
||||