Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
96 user(s) are online (83 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 96

more...




Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users




(1) 2 »


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#42
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2006/11/13 18:42
Last Login :
2022/2/28 7:31
From 280 Grove Street
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4192
Offline
stop bothering god and get back on topic - Just got off the phone to the man upstairs, and he doesn't give a hoot about the art

Posted on: 2015/11/1 5:19
My humor is for the silent blue collar majority - If my posts offend, slander or you deem inappropriate and seek deletion, contact the webmaster for jurisdiction.
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#41
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/11/6 21:13
Last Login :
2023/7/17 17:42
From Hamilton Park
Group:
Banned
Posts: 5775
Offline
Quote:

HeightsBrat wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
.....and without Christmas, there would not be Christians, I would not want to ban that either.


Huh? That has got to be the most outrageous thing yet.

"Christmas or Christmas Day is an annual festival commemorating the birth of Jesus Christ, observed most commonly on December 25 as a religious and cultural celebration among billions of people around the world."

There were christians CENTURIES before a formal day of celebration was designated. In fact, many cultures celebrate January 6th, Epiphany, as the true birthdate of Christ.

You disagree with anything that does not fit neatly into your myoptic world & that is truly sad because there are as many good things happening, as bad, that we should all be contributing to.


Oh you can go further than that, there were plenty of early Protestant sects that banned celebrations of Christmas, but I would guess Yvonne will say they weren't really Christians so it don't count.

Wiki
Quote:
Christmas celebrations in New England were illegal during part of the 17th century, and were culturally taboo or rare in Puritan colonies from foundation until the 1850s. The Puritan community found no Scriptural justification for celebrating Christmas, and associated such celebrations with paganism and idolatry. The earliest years of the Plymouth Colony were troubled with non-Puritans attempting to make merry, and Governor William Bradford was forced to reprimand offenders.


More the point, Yvonne you are utterly humorless, you must be a blast to be around. "Cancel Christmas" is a quote from the great character actor Alan Rickman (Severus Snape) in the role of Sheriff of Nottingham.

Posted on: 2015/11/1 4:58
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#40
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/10/11 3:28
Last Login :
2023/1/15 1:13
From Leashless Glory.
Group:
Banned
Posts: 3002
Offline
Quote:

Haizum wrote:
Um...Michelangelo's Last Judgement on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican is full of naked and half naked people in close proximity to each other for christ's sake. His statue of David, a biblical figure, stands in full naked glory, pubic hair and all. Equating nudity with pornography is a product of your own perverted mind.

I do not compare these photos to Michelangelo; they're mediocre and derivative at best.


First rule of Catholicism is make people ashamed of their own bodies and bodily functions. SIN! SIN! SIN!

Posted on: 2015/11/1 3:47
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#39
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/1/31 17:07
Last Login :
2018/9/12 16:59
From 2nd St.
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 49
Offline
Um...Michelangelo's Last Judgement on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican is full of naked and half naked people in close proximity to each other for christ's sake. His statue of David, a biblical figure, stands in full naked glory, pubic hair and all. Equating nudity with pornography is a product of your own perverted mind.

I do not compare these photos to Michelangelo; they're mediocre and derivative at best.

Posted on: 2015/11/1 2:44
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#38
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/10/11 3:28
Last Login :
2023/1/15 1:13
From Leashless Glory.
Group:
Banned
Posts: 3002
Offline
Quote:

heights wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Hey wishful thinking, didn't you read what I wrote? I said my condo, not the building. The place where I reside. The blessing takes places inside my door, not outside. The priest uses Holy Water and prayers. By the way, many Jewish families have Mezuzah which is on the outside of their door. They do not need my OK for that so I am not seeking an OK for the blessing on my condo.

The Mezuzah would be in their doorframe. I don?t care about you blessing your condo.

Considering the Catholic Church chooses to depict a nearly naked man with spikes through his hands, thorns around his head and slashes and cuts dripping blood throughout his body, I find it rather comical that a bunch of healthy people in a photograph would be alarming, disturbing or embarrassing?

This is blasphemy and offensive towards Catholics and religion it should be removed and you should be chastised for posting this. I am surprised the webmaster has not done so yet.


ISIS called. They want their playbook back.

Posted on: 2015/11/1 1:06
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#37
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/12/12 0:13
Last Login :
2018/7/28 23:29
From Right here!
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 847
Offline
Quote:

heights wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Hey wishful thinking, didn't you read what I wrote? I said my condo, not the building. The place where I reside. The blessing takes places inside my door, not outside. The priest uses Holy Water and prayers. By the way, many Jewish families have Mezuzah which is on the outside of their door. They do not need my OK for that so I am not seeking an OK for the blessing on my condo.

The Mezuzah would be in their doorframe. I don?t care about you blessing your condo.

Considering the Catholic Church chooses to depict a nearly naked man with spikes through his hands, thorns around his head and slashes and cuts dripping blood throughout his body, I find it rather comical that a bunch of healthy people in a photograph would be alarming, disturbing or embarrassing?

This is blasphemy and offensive towards Catholics and religion it should be removed and you should be chastised for posting this. I am surprised the webmaster has not done so yet.


Oh Webmaster, webmaster can we give heights an atomic wedgie because he is such a dork?

Posted on: 2015/10/31 22:32
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#36
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/12/12 0:13
Last Login :
2018/7/28 23:29
From Right here!
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 847
Offline
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
.....and without Christmas, there would not be Christians, I would not want to ban that either.


Huh? That has got to be the most outrageous thing yet.

"Christmas or Christmas Day is an annual festival commemorating the birth of Jesus Christ, observed most commonly on December 25 as a religious and cultural celebration among billions of people around the world."

There were christians CENTURIES before a formal day of celebration was designated. In fact, many cultures celebrate January 6th, Epiphany, as the true birthdate of Christ.

You disagree with anything that does not fit neatly into your myoptic world & that is truly sad because there are as many good things happening, as bad, that we should all be contributing to.

Posted on: 2015/10/31 22:25
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#35
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/17 2:16
Last Login :
3/21 23:34
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 5375
Offline
Who said I want to ban anything? Those parents have a legitimate gripe. Yes, I think trees in urban areas near water, sewerage, and gas lines should be in pots. But I have no opinion on the rest. Actually Halloween means Holy Evening before All Saints Day, so I wouldn't want to ban that and without Christmas, there would not be Christians, I would not want to ban that either.

Posted on: 2015/10/31 19:36
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#34
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2006/11/13 18:42
Last Login :
2022/2/28 7:31
From 280 Grove Street
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4192
Offline
If you had to pay an entry fee or it was displayed in an art gallery then no-body should feel that the artwork is inappropriate, however if you're displaying it in a condo lobby then that's a different thing altogether as its a common area for all residents.
Did the residents vote on it and were resident fees used to purchase it?

Posted on: 2015/10/31 19:34
My humor is for the silent blue collar majority - If my posts offend, slander or you deem inappropriate and seek deletion, contact the webmaster for jurisdiction.
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#33
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/11/6 21:13
Last Login :
2023/7/17 17:42
From Hamilton Park
Group:
Banned
Posts: 5775
Offline
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
There is a difference, HeightsBrat, you cannot change people's attire you see in the street but you can change the pictures on the wall.


Sure you can.

BAN YOGA PANTS!

AND BAN TREES!

AND BAN ANYTHING NEW!

AND ESPECIALLY BAN THIS DAMN PAGAN HALLOWEEN!

AND CANCEL CHRISTMAS!

Posted on: 2015/10/31 19:18
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#32
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2014/8/25 19:18
Last Login :
2018/6/1 0:23
From the village
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 337
Offline
Quote:

heights wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Hey wishful thinking, didn't you read what I wrote? I said my condo, not the building. The place where I reside. The blessing takes places inside my door, not outside. The priest uses Holy Water and prayers. By the way, many Jewish families have Mezuzah which is on the outside of their door. They do not need my OK for that so I am not seeking an OK for the blessing on my condo.

The Mezuzah would be in their doorframe. I don?t care about you blessing your condo.

Considering the Catholic Church chooses to depict a nearly naked man with spikes through his hands, thorns around his head and slashes and cuts dripping blood throughout his body, I find it rather comical that a bunch of healthy people in a photograph would be alarming, disturbing or embarrassing?

This is blasphemy and offensive towards Catholics and religion it should be removed and you should be chastised for posting this. I am surprised the webmaster has not done so yet.


LOL

Posted on: 2015/10/31 18:09
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#31
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/17 2:16
Last Login :
3/21 23:34
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 5375
Offline
This art does send mixed messages, if any school age student touched someone in that fashion, he/she would be in trouble. Touching has gotten some students in trouble.
http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/Ma ... -touching-teacher/4763164

Posted on: 2015/10/31 16:05
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#30
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2014/6/9 22:10
Last Login :
2017/6/16 11:22
From Jersey City, NJ
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 244
Offline
Quote:

heights wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Hey wishful thinking, didn't you read what I wrote? I said my condo, not the building. The place where I reside. The blessing takes places inside my door, not outside. The priest uses Holy Water and prayers. By the way, many Jewish families have Mezuzah which is on the outside of their door. They do not need my OK for that so I am not seeking an OK for the blessing on my condo.

The Mezuzah would be in their doorframe. I don?t care about you blessing your condo.

Considering the Catholic Church chooses to depict a nearly naked man with spikes through his hands, thorns around his head and slashes and cuts dripping blood throughout his body, I find it rather comical that a bunch of healthy people in a photograph would be alarming, disturbing or embarrassing?

This is blasphemy and offensive towards Catholics and religion it should be removed and you should be chastised for posting this. I am surprised the webmaster has not done so yet.


It's a statement of fact without judgement. What's blasphemous or offensive about that?


Posted on: 2015/10/31 15:34
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#29
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/7/13 15:03
Last Login :
2023/6/11 23:48
From Western Slope
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4638
Offline
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Hey wishful thinking, didn't you read what I wrote? I said my condo, not the building. The place where I reside. The blessing takes places inside my door, not outside. The priest uses Holy Water and prayers. By the way, many Jewish families have Mezuzah which is on the outside of their door. They do not need my OK for that so I am not seeking an OK for the blessing on my condo.

The Mezuzah would be in their doorframe. I don?t care about you blessing your condo.

Considering the Catholic Church chooses to depict a nearly naked man with spikes through his hands, thorns around his head and slashes and cuts dripping blood throughout his body, I find it rather comical that a bunch of healthy people in a photograph would be alarming, disturbing or embarrassing?

This is blasphemy and offensive towards Catholics and religion it should be removed and you should be chastised for posting this. I am surprised the webmaster has not done so yet.

Posted on: 2015/10/31 15:20
Get on your bikes and ride !
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#28
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1674
Offline
You are making my point... this is a private property and this became a news story for discussion because of the larger social issues that you summed up nicely. You talk and teach your children in an age appropriate manner. Who knows what a 5 year old is thinking when they hear some dope screaming and swearing into their cellphone on the street? Something clicked into my mind the other day with the cold weather coming about those cold winter days February when the US male population could not wait for the Sports Illustrated Swim Suit issue to come on the newsstands... that was a media sensation then and it is hardly noteworthy today. Parents have a tough job to do with so many outside influences... good or bad. Why make it more complicated in their living spaces even if it is a common area. I am not a censorship person but sometimes a little more consideration for all the residents in the building goes a long way.



Quote:

HeightsBrat wrote:
Quote:

devilsadvocate wrote:
I find this hilarious, particularly from the point of view of "omg, young children might see this!" Have any of you outraged people been around young children? The sexual connotations you bring to the artwork are the product of an adult mind. It isn't inherent in the artwork, and certainly not going to be brought by a prepubescent child's mind.

Which is all pretty amusing since any child can turn on the TV or browse common internet sites and see things that are dramatically more sexual in nature at any given moment. Hell, certain advertisements are more overtly sexual in nature than this.


I'm with you on this. People are going into OMG mode over pictures hanging in a building that may/may not be offensive but fail to realize that our own children dress in a pornographic manner. Just walk down any street & you see children & adults alike with their pants hanging below their arse's, young women with body parts jiggling with little left to the imagination. The artwork can be taken down but what are you going to do about the exposure the children are subjected to everyday?

Posted on: 2015/10/31 14:40
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#27
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/17 2:16
Last Login :
3/21 23:34
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 5375
Offline
There is a difference, HeightsBrat, you cannot change people's attire you see in the street but you can change the pictures on the wall.

Posted on: 2015/10/31 14:23
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#26
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/12/12 0:13
Last Login :
2018/7/28 23:29
From Right here!
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 847
Offline
Quote:

devilsadvocate wrote:
I find this hilarious, particularly from the point of view of "omg, young children might see this!" Have any of you outraged people been around young children? The sexual connotations you bring to the artwork are the product of an adult mind. It isn't inherent in the artwork, and certainly not going to be brought by a prepubescent child's mind.

Which is all pretty amusing since any child can turn on the TV or browse common internet sites and see things that are dramatically more sexual in nature at any given moment. Hell, certain advertisements are more overtly sexual in nature than this.


I'm with you on this. People are going into OMG mode over pictures hanging in a building that may/may not be offensive but fail to realize that our own children dress in a pornographic manner. Just walk down any street & you see children & adults alike with their pants hanging below their arse's, young women with body parts jiggling with little left to the imagination. The artwork can be taken down but what are you going to do about the exposure the children are subjected to everyday?

Posted on: 2015/10/31 14:12
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#25
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2014/3/4 22:31
Last Login :
2019/8/30 19:03
From Downtown Jersey City
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 820
Offline
I mean, people can be offended at anything for any reason. We live in a society where some people were offended at the new Star Wars movie because one Jedi was female and another was black. Why not be offended at some harmless pictures that weren't even sexual?

Regardless, there is nothing here to "protect" children from. If you want to claim there is, I'd like you to explain the harm they're being protected from. The fact that the parents are offended doesn't mean that the children would be harmed, any more than they're harmed by a black or female Jedi in the next star wars movie.

Also, I'd like to extend a hardy "screw you" to many people in this thread. I'm usually the more conservative guy in the room but holy crap, this is ridiculous.

Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
So you are criticizing parents who want to protect their children from something they find offensive??? This building is part of their living environment, not the food court at the Newport Mall. They have a right to object. Curious why the SL only published two photos from the catalogue... were they the only ones fit to print?

Quote:

devilsadvocate wrote:
I find this hilarious, particularly from the point of view of "omg, young children might see this!" Have any of you outraged people been around young children? The sexual connotations you bring to the artwork are the product of an adult mind. It isn't inherent in the artwork, and certainly not going to be brought by a prepubescent child's mind.

Which is all pretty amusing since any child can turn on the TV or browse common internet sites and see things that are dramatically more sexual in nature at any given moment. Hell, certain advertisements are more overtly sexual in nature than this.

Posted on: 2015/10/30 19:08
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#24
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/1/11 18:21
Last Login :
2019/12/26 15:30
From GV Bayside Park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 5356
Offline
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
So you are criticizing parents who want to protect their children from something they find offensive??? This building is part of their living environment, not the food court at the Newport Mall. They have a right to object. Curious why the SL only published two photos from the catalogue... were they the only ones fit to print?

Quote:

devilsadvocate wrote:
I find this hilarious, particularly from the point of view of "omg, young children might see this!" Have any of you outraged people been around young children? The sexual connotations you bring to the artwork are the product of an adult mind. It isn't inherent in the artwork, and certainly not going to be brought by a prepubescent child's mind.

Which is all pretty amusing since any child can turn on the TV or browse common internet sites and see things that are dramatically more sexual in nature at any given moment. Hell, certain advertisements are more overtly sexual in nature than this.


Quote:
"The coolest pictures are not on display, they're in the closet there someplace."

Posted on: 2015/10/29 21:33
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#23
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/5/12 22:51
Last Login :
1/29 17:59
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1674
Offline
So you are criticizing parents who want to protect their children from something they find offensive??? This building is part of their living environment, not the food court at the Newport Mall. They have a right to object. Curious why the SL only published two photos from the catalogue... were they the only ones fit to print?

Quote:

devilsadvocate wrote:
I find this hilarious, particularly from the point of view of "omg, young children might see this!" Have any of you outraged people been around young children? The sexual connotations you bring to the artwork are the product of an adult mind. It isn't inherent in the artwork, and certainly not going to be brought by a prepubescent child's mind.

Which is all pretty amusing since any child can turn on the TV or browse common internet sites and see things that are dramatically more sexual in nature at any given moment. Hell, certain advertisements are more overtly sexual in nature than this.

Posted on: 2015/10/29 21:31
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#22
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2014/3/4 22:31
Last Login :
2019/8/30 19:03
From Downtown Jersey City
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 820
Offline
I find this hilarious, particularly from the point of view of "omg, young children might see this!" Have any of you outraged people been around young children? The sexual connotations you bring to the artwork are the product of an adult mind. It isn't inherent in the artwork, and certainly not going to be brought by a prepubescent child's mind.

Which is all pretty amusing since any child can turn on the TV or browse common internet sites and see things that are dramatically more sexual in nature at any given moment. Hell, certain advertisements are more overtly sexual in nature than this.

Posted on: 2015/10/29 20:28
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#21
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/4/15 3:58
Last Login :
2019/5/9 22:13
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 973
Offline
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Sorry, I don't agree, this is close to porn without being porn, Sommerman.


Wow, if you think this is porn, how about all the biniki girls in commercials / music videos / billboards that's everywhere!?!??! I think these "art work" (the "art" part being questionable) are the least of my concerns, and I have two young boys - it's sad that I can't even let my boys watch music videos anymore because they are so sexualized!!!

Posted on: 2015/10/29 19:52
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#20
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/3/19 18:28
Last Login :
2020/3/10 14:50
From hamilton park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 292
Offline
can't imagine your thoughts on National Geographic magazine and the porn it shows

Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Sorry, I don't agree, this is close to porn without being porn, Sommerman.

Posted on: 2015/10/29 19:29
utterly deplorable
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#19
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/17 2:16
Last Login :
3/21 23:34
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 5375
Offline
Sorry, I don't agree, this is close to porn without being porn, Sommerman.

Posted on: 2015/10/29 17:13
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#18
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2014/12/21 14:43
Last Login :
2015/11/15 0:07
From Harsimus Cove
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 399
Offline
The good father works for an organization that for centuries employed and subsidized artists and encouraged them to push the envelope. In the church's collection, nudity, torture and martyrdom are all represented, some images being very upsetting to me (I turn away from Saint Sebastian, for example). In addition, the good father has been well educated and like AJ Potter Stewart would know porn when he saw it.

Posted on: 2015/10/29 14:33
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#17
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/3/29 21:43
Last Login :
2023/9/5 18:27
From Bergen Hill
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1980
Offline
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Hey wishful thinking, didn't you read what I wrote? I said my condo, not the building. The place where I reside. The blessing takes places inside my door, not outside. The priest uses Holy Water and prayers. By the way, many Jewish families have Mezuzah which is on the outside of their door. They do not need my OK for that so I am not seeking an OK for the blessing on my condo.

The Mezuzah would be in their doorframe. I don?t care about you blessing your condo.

Considering the Catholic Church chooses to depict a nearly naked man with spikes through his hands, thorns around his head and slashes and cuts dripping blood throughout his body, I find it rather comical that a bunch of healthy people in a photograph would be alarming, disturbing or embarrassing?

Posted on: 2015/10/29 14:25
Dos A Cero
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#16
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2015/4/15 3:56
Last Login :
2019/3/11 14:10
From JC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1044
Offline
What does an in house priestly blessing cost these dayz?

Thinking of getting mah ballz blessed and maybe some tasty Shepard Fairy prints of some freaks playing nudie twister.

Holla !

Posted on: 2015/10/29 2:02
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#15
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/3/19 3:39
Last Login :
2023/1/15 1:11
From HamiltonPARK
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 271
Offline
Is there a more ambiguous poll question than "Do you believe America is headed in the right/wrong direction?" I mean really?

Posted on: 2015/10/29 1:41
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#14
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/17 2:16
Last Login :
3/21 23:34
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 5375
Offline
Then I apologize wishing_thinking but the response to Pebble is the same.

Posted on: 2015/10/28 19:54
 Top 


Re: Resident calls Jersey City condo artwork inappropriate
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/10/15 17:32
Last Login :
2017/5/17 13:40
From Heights
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 797
Offline
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Hey wishful thinking, didn't you read what I wrote? I said my condo, not the building. The place where I reside. The blessing takes places inside my door, not outside. The priest uses Holy Water and prayers. By the way, many Jewish families have Mezuzah which is on the outside of their door. They do not need my OK for that so I am not seeking an OK for the blessing on my condo.

That was Pebble's comment, not mine.

Posted on: 2015/10/28 19:28
 Top 




(1) 2 »




[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017