Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
167 user(s) are online (138 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 167

more...




Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users






Re: 2015’s Best & Worst Cities for Recreation
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/1/11 18:21
Last Login :
2019/12/26 15:30
From GV Bayside Park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 5356
Offline

Posted on: 2015/8/13 21:03
 Top 


Re: 2015’s Best & Worst Cities for Recreation
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/3/29 21:43
Last Login :
2023/9/5 18:27
From Bergen Hill
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1980
Offline
Quote:

WordsOfaHooker wrote:
Just look at the top five:

1) Cincinnati, OH
2) Omaha, NE
3) Scottsdale, AZ
4) Tampa , FL
5) Boise, ID

This list is obvious total clickbait (albeit one that worked, we all looked at it didn't we?).

I've been to Cincinnati, Scottsdale and Tampa.

Cincinnati sucked to the point that I stayed across the river in Kentucky because the small town at least had a road with some classic bars.

I also remember Cincinnati from when I talked with a college kid there and I asked what people do for fun. He basically said that they drive down streets where poor black people live because its "scary" and they get "a rush" from it.

Scottsdale had off-track horse race betting in their "sports" bar.

Tampa had beaches and Scientologists.

Posted on: 2015/7/17 16:06
Dos A Cero
 Top 


Re: 2015’s Best & Worst Cities for Recreation
#4
Newbie
Newbie


Hide User information
Joined:
2014/11/24 15:10
Last Login :
2016/5/9 17:07
From The Village, Jersey City
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 14
Offline
Just look at the top five:

1) Cincinnati, OH
2) Omaha, NE
3) Scottsdale, AZ
4) Tampa , FL
5) Boise, ID

This list is obvious total clickbait (albeit one that worked, we all looked at it didn't we?).

Posted on: 2015/7/17 14:20
 Top 


Re: 2015’s Best & Worst Cities for Recreation
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/3/29 21:43
Last Login :
2023/9/5 18:27
From Bergen Hill
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1980
Offline
I always find this absurd because it is so very subjective which makes it perfect for click-bate.

For instance, what I might find as entertainment, someone else finds annoying. I like bars, someone that is going to AA probably prefers not walking past a million bars on the way home. Some people like walking to the beach. Others like walking around a city. One isn't better than the other outside of that one person's mind.

Personally, I live in Jersey City because I find it to be a place that offers me the most options. I chose to live here. I could have chosen to live just about anywhere.

Posted on: 2015/7/17 14:01
Dos A Cero
 Top 


Re: 2015’s Best & Worst Cities for Recreation
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2014/6/9 22:10
Last Login :
2017/6/16 11:22
From Jersey City, NJ
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 244
Offline
Quote:
Stringer wrote:

2015’s Best & Worst Cities for Recreation

WALLETHUB - by Richie Bernardo

To highlight the benefits of public spaces and recreational activities to consumers and the local economy, WalletHub compared the 100 largest U.S. cities across 27 key metrics. In each city, we examined basic costs, the quality of parks, the accessibility of entertainment and recreational facilities as well as the climate. The results, as well as expert commentary and a detailed methodology, can be found below.

100Jersey City, NJ

http://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-c ... ation/5144/#main-findings

Wallet hub rankings are so stupid. Newark has better entertainment options that JC presumably bc use it has the prudential arena and NJPAC. Still doesn't make it a nice place to live. Anybody who relies on these rankings isn't thinking objectively.

Posted on: 2015/7/17 11:08
 Top 


2015’s Best & Worst Cities for Recreation
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/2/20 18:20
Last Login :
2023/11/26 22:12
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2719
Offline

2015’s Best & Worst Cities for Recreation

WALLETHUB - by Richie Bernardo

To highlight the benefits of public spaces and recreational activities to consumers and the local economy, WalletHub compared the 100 largest U.S. cities across 27 key metrics. In each city, we examined basic costs, the quality of parks, the accessibility of entertainment and recreational facilities as well as the climate. The results, as well as expert commentary and a detailed methodology, can be found below.

100Jersey City, NJ

http://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-c ... ation/5144/#main-findings


Posted on: 2015/7/17 6:17
 Top 








[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017