Newsboy wrote:
He sounds a bit power-drunk.

Newsboy wrote:
He sounds a bit power-drunk.

Anonymous wrote:
Okay, here's a million-dollar question.......

It seems the groundswell against Dan is gaining momentum. Do you think he'll move onto "greener pastures" on his own, or remain indignant and stay in a position where he's not wanted (and despised by some)?

Anonymous wrote:
My slight mistake....I started the "Historic Preservation Office" thread, but so much of the subject matter seems interwoven. Anyways.....my question still stands: how do we oust ol' Danny Boy?

I have heard there is a list Dan keeps, a "hit list" of people he wants ticketed.

Anonymous wrote:
Okay.....I should tell you that I'm the guy who started this whole thread and the feedback (and entertainment) has been superb. The only exceptions are the postings from the bleeding-heart morons with ulterior motives who think this has transcended to gay bashing simply because it has been noted that Dan is gay. Newsflash for the morons ---- Dan openly plays the gay card whenever it suits him, so when one plays the gay card, it's no longer taboo to discuss it openly about him or her.

Anyways......now that we have about 100-plus postings, we know this is a huge issue with people. HOW DO WE GET HIM OUT ???????

Anonymous wrote:
You'd think this guy went to school for a long time but he just graduated in 2001. http://www.njcu.edu/dept/acp/coop_student_awards.html#dwrieden

If he doesn't ease up with all the rules I say we put up a collection to have him 'snatched up'. #OOPS# him and his Marvin Windows!

I believe Dan is in his early 40s, although may claim younger.

Anonymous wrote:
What a bunch of nonsense. Dan Wrieden and his partner both own their house on Wayne Street. His partner is not his "sugar daddy" but a well known professional in NYC.
Their relationship is a long term partnership which is a lot more successful than a lot of "marriages" I see in the world on a daily basis.
And
for the record their house on Wayne street is a perfect example of what a brownstone row house would have looked like in the late 19th Century, raised planter and miniature hedges and all. We may not like the way it looks but it is one of the more authentic houses in the neighborhood. We should all look carefully at the detail and follow this example of good taste.

Anonymous wrote:
Thanks for your ignorant, homophobic post.

Anonymous wrote:
Dan knows who we are.

Anonymous wrote:
Architect's are like people, they are not "God" Some are good architects and some are terribly bad architects. I think that all we have to do is look around our environment to understand that.
So to simply say that any architect has credibility, without mentioning the person's name is just not true. There are many practicing architects in and around Jersey City...there are only three, that I can think of, that are truly talented designers, construction experts and are as well versed in 19th C design and building practices, or for that matter modern design and building practices.
To have an architect stand up and make comments in a public forum, doesn't necessary mean that the comments or observations are correct. Some doctors kill patients, some architects destroy otherwise well designed buildings.
Will the registered architect (I am assuming that they were registered) come forward, so we know whether or not they are accomplished and talented.

Anonymous wrote:
These comments are outrageous and hurtful and would not be said if the writers name was on the bottom of the comment. Dan Wrieden is a decent human being, who is warm, friendly helpful and a decent hardworking neighbor.
What is the matter with you people.
Maybe you should examine the center of this whirl wind, Warren Curtin. Warren is a neurotic that has undergone therapy for many years and is taking drugs to calm his nerves and hyper active behavior. Warren is hated in the real estate industry for his mean and nasty behavior and many will not even do business with him. Why people are following this contorted individual much less believing what he says is a mystery. Why don't you put the hate, where the hate belongs on Warren Curtin.

Anonymous wrote:
What a bunch of nonsense. Dan Wrieden and his partner both own their house on Wayne Street. His partner is not his "sugar daddy" but a well known professional in NYC.
Their relationship is a long term partnership which is a lot more successful than a lot of "marriages" I see in the world on a daily basis.
And
for the record their house on Wayne street is a perfect example of what a brownstone row house would have looked like in the late 19th Century, raised planter and miniature hedges and all. We may not like the way it looks but it is one of the more authentic houses in the neighborhood. We should all look carefully at the detail and follow this example of good taste.

Anonymous wrote:
Quote:

He does not own a piece of property and has no idea the cost of some of his requests.

That is correct......although he apparently lives with his sugar daddy partner (who is about ten years older than he from what I understand from a good source).........and have you seen what's in the front of their house? Some hideous staute/sculpture/kinda-fountain thing surrounded by flowers and foliage.

Let one of us come into the Historical Preservation Office asking for that for our property (yes Dan, a property we actually own in our own name), and I'm sure we'd be jumping hurdles like you've never seen!