Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
43 user(s) are online (28 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 3
Guests: 40

boomer, manojerseycity, deborah, more...




Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users




« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 13 »


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/8/16 23:19
From JC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 174
Offline
Press conference @ City Hall Council Chambers TODAY at NOON

Posted on: 5/8 10:44
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4589
Offline
I spoke to Councilman Boggiano yesterday and he said he brought someone over from the Polish Embassy to speak with Fulop and the mayor refused to speak with him. What a disgrace.

Posted on: 5/8 9:29
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/8/16 21:45
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3020
Offline
Whether to move the Katyn monument is the wrong question. Exchange Place is the prime location for virtually all major JC cultural events. And Exchange Place should pay tribute to the full diversity of JC.

What should be given pride of place at Exchange Place? The 9-11 memorial? A cenotaph? Something else?

Posted on: 5/7 18:42
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/11/28 17:22
From Jersey City yo!
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 615
Offline
My understanding is that local Poles still commemorate anniversaries of the Katyn massacre at the memorial. If Fulop moves it to the median, how the hell are they going to do that?

I say move it to the tip of the Morris Canal Park.

Posted on: 5/7 9:16
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/10/18 14:59
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 519
Offline
It is a gruesome, but I am used to it now. If I had my choice, I’d rather not see it. Though, it might be better to put it to a vote. How many people in jersey city are of polish ancestry? Is the statue still relevant?

Posted on: 5/7 9:01
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/8/16 23:19
From JC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 174
Offline
Quote:

Showtime wrote:
Quote:
light12v wrote:According to The One to be OBEYED


Did you mean Mack Cali?



NO.
'86 ordinance to original location was voted by JC city council.

'89 resolution to relocate to its present location was voted by JC city council.

NOW this Move, desired by a Fulop friendly Developer, is all of a sudden Mandated by Executive Tweet ??

https://twitter.com/StevenFulop/status/992762417036890114


Posted on: 5/6 23:24
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/10/7 11:46
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2716
Offline
.
Fulop: '100%' WWII monument will be moved
updated 8:25 PM; Posted 5:47 PM (5/6/2018)
By Caitlin Mota The Jersey Journal

JERSEY CITY — The Exchange Place monument to the victims of a 1940 Polish massacre is "100% being moved" three blocks west from its longtime home, Mayor Steve Fulop said on social media Saturday morning.

http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/20 ... d.html#incart_2box_hudson

Posted on: 5/6 21:18
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4589
Offline
Quote:

dr_nick_riviera wrote:
What are the NA positions on this? If so many local residents are opposed to moving this, why are the NAs not making statements to the mayor as such? Or has Yvonne effectively ordered them to keep quiet?


This is not about me nicky, although I do have a great deal of respect for the Polish people. I actually remember reading about St. Maximum Kolbe who gave his life for a Jewish man about to be executed by the Nazi. Kolbe was a Catholic priest who wrote articles condemning Nazis for rounding up Jewish people. When someone escaped from a Nazi camp, ten people was chosen to be executed, a Jewish man was in that list and cried because he had a wife and children. So Maximilian Kolbe volunteered to take his place. The Nazis went after the Jews but the Polish people did not fare well during the war. According to wikianswers, 3 million Catholic Polish people died under the Nazis regime.

Posted on: 5/6 16:30
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2015/11/21 17:12
From DTJC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 298
Offline
What are the NA positions on this? If so many local residents are opposed to moving this, why are the NAs not making statements to the mayor as such? Or has Yvonne effectively ordered them to keep quiet?

Posted on: 5/6 15:58
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/2/13 17:53
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 104
Offline
Quote:
light12v wrote:According to The One to be OBEYED


Did you mean Mack Cali?


Posted on: 5/6 15:16
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/10/7 11:46
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2716
Offline
(I found the below post #10 (2009/3/10 9:36) on this thread. I thought it was interesting. I didn’t realize the memorial is at Exchange Place because of one man’s push to get a Katyn Memorial in JC. BTW the READ MORE link is dead but his obit is still out there on the internet)



Quote:

MelissaSurach wrote:
I don't understand why people think that the artist didn't research the massacre before designing it. Stop talking out of your ass.

This is the latest article from the Jersey Journal on it.

Stanley Paszul, 85; got Katyn Memorial built
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
By TOM SHORTELL
JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

Stanley Paszul, 85, the driving force behind the Katyn Memorial at Exchange Place in Jersey City, died on Dec. 16.
READ MORE

By the way, it was my grandfather, who recently passed away. He worked with Andrzej Pityski, a prominent Polish sculptor. He was a carpenter. From my understanding, he made the mold for the statue. He used to have a mini war museum in his house on 7th Street. There were little wooden models of the statue all over his house. The house still says "Carpenter Shop" on it.

Posted on: 5/6 10:06
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/8/16 23:19
From JC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 174
Offline
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Curious is the Mayor ever had this similar hardline view when he represented Ward E?


Quote:

light12v wrote:
In Light of the following Fulop Tweet, why is OP taking a Survey of JC Citizens.....
According to The One to be OBEYED, it is DONE :::

https://twitter.com/StevenFulop/status/992762417036890114


Not that I can recall, NEVER, as HE was Playing Reformer Councilman.
BUT Things Changed with his first term victory as Mayor.....wherein he HALTED THE WIP 90% COMPLETE REVAL before BEING SWORN IN & NOW WE ALL KNOW HOW THAT HAS PLAYED OUT !

Remember too, that the previous Ward E Councilperson under his 1st term as Boy King Mayor was HIS,,, a Team Fulop RubberStamp.....

James Solomon is Independent, so he is not Looped-In to any closed door Op's/Deals made between JC Corpoation Counsel, at Fulop's command, & opposing Attorneys.

Posted on: 5/6 0:13
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/5/12 18:51
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1467
Offline
Curious is the Mayor ever had this similar hardline view when he represented Ward E?


Quote:

light12v wrote:
In Light of the following Fulop Tweet, why is OP taking a Survey of JC Citizens.....
According to The One to be OBEYED, it is DONE :::

https://twitter.com/StevenFulop/status/992762417036890114

Posted on: 5/5 20:23
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/8/16 23:19
From JC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 174
Offline
In Light of the following Fulop Tweet, why is OP taking a Survey of JC Citizens.....
According to The One to be OBEYED, it is DONE :::

https://twitter.com/StevenFulop/status/992762417036890114

Posted on: 5/5 19:28
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/2/6 18:13
From Jersey City
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1194
Offline
During the ''pro-old-timers'' term of Mayor Anthony Cucci of Jersey City, it was decided to put at Exchange Place a monument to the 1940 massacre of Polish soldiers in the Katyn forest. The 17-foot statue, a cavalryman with a bayonet through his back, is in the middle of what planners call ''the view corridor,'' framed by the World Trade Center Towers. That placement is itself a sort of memorial to the bygone strength of the old ethnic groups.

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/02/15/nyregion/on-the-waterfront.html

Posted on: 5/4 12:05
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4589
Offline
When former mayor Cucci passed away, the pastor from St. Anthony attended the wake. He told me he wanted to pay his respect to the mayor for putting up the Polish monument. As I stated before I believe all monuments should reflect American history. Then a larger Polish community lived in downtown JC which is evident by having two Polish language Catholic Churches, one in Paulus Hook and the other on 6th Street. It is a reflection of Polish history, plain and simple. Fulop's comments are off base.

Posted on: 5/4 9:54
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/5/12 18:51
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1467
Offline
I would like to know when the city intends to remove the orange barriers outlining what I assume will be the park? Talk about unsightly and unpleasant.

Posted on: 5/4 7:55
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/2/20 13:20
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2432
Offline

Jersey City, Polish officials trade barbs over massacre statue

The proposed removal of a memorial to the victims of a 1940 Polish massacre is officially an international incident, with Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop and Polish Senator Stanislaw Karczewski trading barbs about plans to find a new home for the statue.

Karczewski, speaker of Poland's senate, said Wednesday on Polish Radio that the push to move the Katyn memorial is "scandalous," while Fulop fired back with an accusation that Karczewski is a "known anti-Semite."

http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/20 ... ords_over_massacre_s.html


Posted on: 5/4 0:34
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/11/28 17:22
From Jersey City yo!
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 615
Offline
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Bayonne will take it.


In a twist, Bayonne Mayor Jimmy Davis Thursday evening offered to take the Katyn memorial if Jersey City doesn't want it.

"As mayor I would be proud to have it at one of our many of our wonderful parks, maybe at Rutkowski Park which is named in honor of one of Bayonne's most prominent Polish-American leaders," Davis said in a statement.

Posted on: 5/4 0:01
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/11/15 16:43
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 705
Offline
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

I_heart_JC wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
This monument was not meant to be bizarre. If it is perceived that way just signifies that it is artistically bad, way too literal.

You don't create Holocaust memorials depicting corpses being loaded into ovens.

The sculptor here resorted to shock value because he had no better ideas to convey the tragedy of mass murder of Polish war prisoners by the Soviets.



it's actually the opposite of literal. it is figurative.
first, they died of machine-gun fire (not bayonettes).
the earliest victims of the massacre were Polish military officers who were instructed not to resist the Russians, and were rounded up and imprisoned for their efforts. it was a huge betrayal, in addition to being a war crime.
they were "stabbed in the back" in the figurative sense.


Do you understand expression "way too literal"?

It does not mean "literal".



that is literally insane.

Posted on: 5/3 18:07
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/11/28 17:22
From Jersey City yo!
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 615
Offline
Quote:

I_heart_JC wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
This monument was not meant to be bizarre. If it is perceived that way just signifies that it is artistically bad, way too literal.

You don't create Holocaust memorials depicting corpses being loaded into ovens.

The sculptor here resorted to shock value because he had no better ideas to convey the tragedy of mass murder of Polish war prisoners by the Soviets.



it's actually the opposite of literal. it is figurative.
first, they died of machine-gun fire (not bayonettes).
the earliest victims of the massacre were Polish military officers who were instructed not to resist the Russians, and were rounded up and imprisoned for their efforts. it was a huge betrayal, in addition to being a war crime.
they were "stabbed in the back" in the figurative sense.


Do you understand expression "way too literal"?

It does not mean "literal".

"Way too literal" as in depicting murder.

In addition, they were not machine-gunned. They were shot from pistols in the back of the head.

Your point about "backstabbing" is valid. But also too literal to make the art powerful.

You want a powerful war crime (in this case Holocaust) memorial?

Check out the Berlin Holocaust memorial. Yes, different scale entirely, but no drastic sculptures there. They are not needed. The stelae say it all.

Posted on: 5/3 17:29
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/11/15 16:43
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 705
Offline
Quote:

HeightsNative wrote:
Quote:

HeightsNative wrote:
I'm going to make a suggestion, and I will try to stay as respectful as possible. Almost every single thread on here worth debating tends to diverge into a Yvonne vs. the world discussion. Let's try a month of completely ignoring any and all comments from Yvonne. I say that not out of disrespect to Yvonne (despite usually disagreeing with her views), but moreso out of respect for dialogue and discussion. Some of you (bodhipooh, etc.) raise great points and offer something to the discussion, and should keep it focused on that.

Can we at least try it? I mean literally no responding to or acknowledging Yvonne's responses, no matter how left field or out of order they are.


Or don't...


I applaud your effort.

Posted on: 5/3 15:37
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/11/15 16:43
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 705
Offline
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
This monument was not meant to be bizarre. If it is perceived that way just signifies that it is artistically bad, way too literal.

You don't create Holocaust memorials depicting corpses being loaded into ovens.

The sculptor here resorted to shock value because he had no better ideas to convey the tragedy of mass murder of Polish war prisoners by the Soviets.



it's actually the opposite of literal. it is figurative.
first, they died of machine-gun fire (not bayonettes).
the earliest victims of the massacre were Polish military officers who were instructed not to resist the Russians, and were rounded up and imprisoned for their efforts. it was a huge betrayal, in addition to being a war crime.
they were "stabbed in the back" in the figurative sense.

Posted on: 5/3 15:34
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/11/28 17:22
From Jersey City yo!
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 615
Offline
Quote:

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
This monument was not meant to be bizarre. If it is perceived that way just signifies that it is artistically bad, way too literal.

You don't create Holocaust memorials depicting corpses being loaded into ovens.

The sculptor here resorted to shock value because he had no better ideas to convey the tragedy of mass murder of Polish war prisoners by the Soviets.
What about these?
Resized Image


Resized Image


Resized Image


Resized Image


Resized Image


Resized Image

(the last one is the irish hunger, not the holocaust)

look, just because you want life to be sunshine and roses doesn't mean it's a bad statue. It's a fantastic statue, and even if it moves, I hope it stays somewhere prominent. It's an icon of this city now, whether you like it or not.


The one that literally depicts murder (gassing with Zyklon B in Auschwitz) seem to be enclosed, so the public can make a choice to view them or not with their eyes wide open.

The others are striking (dead bodies, escapes, etc), but do not depict a graphic act of murder.






Posted on: 5/3 13:19
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4589
Offline
JClist should be renamed, Personal Attack Center, when individuals do not follow the herd. What a shame, this blog as the potential to make positive change.

Posted on: 5/3 11:59
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2017/9/20 21:56
From Chilltown
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 152
Offline
Quote:

HeightsNative wrote:
I'm going to make a suggestion, and I will try to stay as respectful as possible. Almost every single thread on here worth debating tends to diverge into a Yvonne vs. the world discussion. Let's try a month of completely ignoring any and all comments from Yvonne. I say that not out of disrespect to Yvonne (despite usually disagreeing with her views), but moreso out of respect for dialogue and discussion. Some of you (bodhipooh, etc.) raise great points and offer something to the discussion, and should keep it focused on that.

Can we at least try it? I mean literally no responding to or acknowledging Yvonne's responses, no matter how left field or out of order they are.


Or don't...

Posted on: 5/3 11:35
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2015/11/21 17:12
From DTJC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 298
Offline
Quote:

CatDog wrote:
Quote:
You are an example of a liberal who cannot take another point of view and makes personal attacks, something that is morally wrong because you have no facts.
says the lady whining about liberals that are pointing out how wrong she is. Every time someone calls you out on your BS you start crying about "wahhhh the liberals are being so mean to me" "wahhh it's because I'm a Catholic" "oooooh those mean liberals always trying to correct my lies"

You're over here complaining about statues for foreigners, and then demand we have public statues of religious symbols because there were priests on the ship with Columbus? Columbus, the foreign slave-driving psycopathic torture fanatic that never even set foot in the US?


I think we should replace the statue with a PC-friendly LGBT memorial or shrine. I bet she'll change her tune on Katyn real quick.

Posted on: 5/3 11:25
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/11/16 20:11
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1169
Offline
Quote:
You are an example of a liberal who cannot take another point of view and makes personal attacks, something that is morally wrong because you have no facts.
says the lady whining about liberals that are pointing out how wrong she is. Every time someone calls you out on your BS you start crying about "wahhhh the liberals are being so mean to me" "wahhh it's because I'm a Catholic" "oooooh those mean liberals always trying to correct my lies"

You're over here complaining about statues for foreigners, and then demand we have public statues of religious symbols because there were priests on the ship with Columbus? Columbus, the foreign slave-driving psycopathic torture fanatic that never even set foot in the US?

Posted on: 5/3 10:54
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 4589
Offline
Quote:

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
It is pathetic that people here do not know priests were on board the ships when Columbus traveled. You want to whitewash history. Columbus was a religious guy. I guess next you want erase Reverend from the title of Dr. King. The correct title is Reverend Dr. King. https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/ ... le/why-did-columbus-sail/
Columbus never set foot in what is now the United States, you nincompoop.


Where did I say Columbus set foot in the US? He did set foot in what later became the New World which includes the US. You are an example of a liberal who cannot take another point of view and makes personal attacks, something that is morally wrong because you have no facts. It is pathetic you and other do this, what a disgrace. I truly feel sorry for anyone that stoops so low in personal attacks because you lack a moral center.

Posted on: 5/3 9:51
Print Top


Re: Okay, so who here thinks the Katyn monument needs to go?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/11/16 20:11
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1169
Offline
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
It is pathetic that people here do not know priests were on board the ships when Columbus traveled. You want to whitewash history. Columbus was a religious guy. I guess next you want erase Reverend from the title of Dr. King. The correct title is Reverend Dr. King. https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/ ... le/why-did-columbus-sail/
Columbus never set foot in what is now the United States, you nincompoop.

Posted on: 5/2 23:33
Print Top




« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 13 »




[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017