Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
41 user(s) are online (16 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 3
Guests: 38

light12v, BergenHill, JonnyF86, more...




Browsing this Thread:   2 Anonymous Users




« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 »


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#89
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/9/30 21:03
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1099
Offline
Quote:

Mao wrote:
Doesn't the guy in charge of this failure of a museum which closes at 4 every day, make over 400k a year?!


He does, plus another 40K+ in benefits and who knows what other perks. The COO makes 200K+ plus around another 20K in benefits and other perks. Then there are another seven or so Vice Presidents and other high level employees making well over 100-150K per year as well.

On the most recently available Form 990 tax return, the organization lists travel expenses at well over $ 100,000 (it's one location, where do they need to be traveling to so much) and also spent close to $ 200,000 going to conferences, conventions and meetings. They used to use KPMG, a Big 4 accounting firm to prepare their tax returns when a smaller less expensive firm would have done fine (fortunately, this is a change they did make last year).

Total management cesspool with bloated overhead (which used to be worse) that has a long way to go before they can be in the hotel/convention center business - God only knows how bloated things will become and what accounting tricks they will try to hide and/or justify certain costs when that happens.

But it does stay open until 530 on weekends.

Posted on: 3/18 19:10
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#88
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/5/15 10:11
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3890
Offline
Sorry, Dolomiti, I mistyped-it is 78 million. And in this link, the exec dir of the JCRA says that

'the Science center is currently raising 78 million of the 280 million cost and THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE PAID BACK FIRST FROM REVENUE GENERATED.'

That's what needs to repaid before the city gets a dime.

'Raising' and 'paid back'. Does that sound like a one way donation from supporters?

Do we know if they're borrowing against their endowment (if they have one), or will the city float bonds for this-who gives anyone 78 million with the expectation of getting it back without a plan, and that's before JC gets the land value back.

http://www.hudsonreporter.com/view/fu ... y_top_story#ixzz4b5OgoHst

Posted on: 3/18 18:45
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#87
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3901
Offline
How can the land be estimated at $20 when developers brought land one minute by car according to the google map for $35 million? That land is 7 1/2 acres.

Posted on: 3/18 16:58
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#86
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/8/6 18:56
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 762
Offline
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
I respectfully disagree. They haven't put a value on the land.

It's estimated at $20 million. They just haven't had it formally appraised yet.


Quote:
They don't have a single projection of what, if any, profit will be realized.

Yes, probably because that doesn't matter much. Getting the school, plus a better project than a bunch of condos, is a decent deal -- even without getting direct revenue any time soon.

I mean, really. Would you feel better if the city told you it'd be repaid in 20 years? Would that give you the warm fuzzies?

You do understand that the goal is to help the project succeed, rather than treat it like a revenue generator?

Or, let's compare this to a similar project. NYC had around 14 acres of unused space on the south end of Roosevelt Island -- and I'm guessing that's worth more than $20 million. Instead of selling it to the highest bidder, they donated the land and $100 million to Cornell University for a $2 billion science and technology graduate school.

So instead of thinking of this as lost revenue, or being utterly mercenary about every public project, think of it more as a (hopefully) good project that benefits JC as a whole, far more than a one-time sale.


Quote:
Without the value (cost basis), and the payback plan (what is the expected revenue from the gift shop/other 'profit' generators?)

good grief

Again, the revenues will come almost entirely from rents on the commercial and residential parts of the project. Not from a non-existent gift shop.


Quote:
How long will it take to 'pay back' the borrowed $85 million, before JC gets a cent back from the 'profit' generators?

What are you talking about? What $85 million loan? Where did you get this from?

They're raising $78 million in donations -- not loans, not credit, not venture capital. Donations. There is no requirement for that to be paid back.


Quote:
I'll repeat what I've said-I'd give Steve props if he just came out and told us the truth-the $ don't make sense, but he wants to do it anyway. If all these donors are waiting to jump aboard, let them pay fair market price for the land.

I have no idea what he does and doesn't know, and of course there is more to this than a few paragraphs on a local web forum. However, there certainly is a plan, and we seem to know most of the critical elements. I see no indication that he's leaving a bunch of sneaky clauses out. Rather, I see what could be a good project that enhances the city, and in particular benefits our students.

Posted on: 3/18 16:21
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#85
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2008/5/8 22:53
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 284
Offline
Doesn't the guy in charge of this failure of a museum which closes at 4 every day, make over 400k a year?!

Posted on: 3/18 15:51
Print Top


Re: Stop the give away of taxpayers' city owned land. Ordinance 17-023
#84
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/8/6 18:56
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 762
Offline
Quote:

JCGuys wrote:
I don't disagree with any of your points, Dolomiti. I'll clarify my point: I don't believe Sci-Tech City, as originally planned, is economically feasible and thus will never be built or significantly scaled back from the fancy renderings we're seeing now.

I see no reason for such dire pessimism, especially since this is the kind of project that tends to draw big donations - and LSC has lots of corporate donors, and was able to raise $110 million just to renovate the existing building.

And I'm not sure what will happen if the project completely and utterly fails, but I doubt that LSC will be allowed to scrap the deal, and sell the land to a casino instead.


Quote:
The entire site is 16 acres. Three or four or those acres will need to be sold to traditional developments to maximize the highest and best use of the land in order to fund the other improvements, in my opinion.

That's nice, but your opinion seems to have no basis in fact, or in any description I've heard of the contracts.


Quote:
Please, someone, prove me wrong and demonstrate that Liberty Science Center has the financial capacity to carry out SciTech City as planned.

What proof would you accept?

Posted on: 3/18 15:41
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#83
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/5/15 10:11
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3890
Offline
Quote:

Dolomiti wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
While I appreciate Steve coming here and giving his 2 cents, it's clear that there isn't a plan, but there is a dream.

Sure sounds like a plan.

They have a master plan; programming; a purpose; a board of directors; a structure for repaying the city for the land. They have more than enough of a plan to fundraise.

Given that construction won't start until at least late 2018, and it won't open until around 2021, how much more of a plan do you expect to see at this point?

LSC also has numerous corporate donors. Johnson & Johnson, United Airlines, Bloomberg, Pfizer, PSE&G, Bank of America, BASF... the list goes on. While this certainly does not guarantee they will raise the funds they want, it doesn't make sense to assume it's doomed from the start.

Sorry, but your comments just sounds like just sour grapes.


I respectfully disagree. They haven't put a value on the land. They don't have a single projection of what, if any, profit will be realized.

Without the value (cost basis), and the payback plan (what is the expected revenue from the gift shop/other 'profit' generators? How long will it take to 'pay back' the borrowed $85 million, before JC gets a cent back from the 'profit' generators? Will JC get interest on this delayed payback? There is no plan, at least not that anyone has seen. And I'd imagine it's for good reason, as JC will never see a dime for this land.

I'll repeat what I've said-I'd give Steve props if he just came out and told us the truth-the $ don't make sense, but he wants to do it anyway. If all these donors are waiting to jump aboard, let them pay fair market price for the land.

Posted on: 3/18 15:40
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#82
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/8/6 18:56
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 762
Offline
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
While I appreciate Steve coming here and giving his 2 cents, it's clear that there isn't a plan, but there is a dream.

Sure sounds like a plan.

They have a master plan; programming; a purpose; a board of directors; a structure for repaying the city for the land. They have more than enough of a plan to fundraise.

Given that construction won't start until at least late 2018, and it won't open until around 2021, how much more of a plan do you expect to see at this point?

LSC also has numerous corporate donors. Johnson & Johnson, United Airlines, Bloomberg, Pfizer, PSE&G, Bank of America, BASF... the list goes on. While this certainly does not guarantee they will raise the funds they want, it doesn't make sense to assume it's doomed from the start.

Sorry, but your comments just sounds like just sour grapes.

Posted on: 3/18 15:29
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#81
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/5/15 10:11
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3890
Offline
While I appreciate Steve coming here and giving his 2 cents, it's clear that there isn't a plan, but there is a dream.

Sorry, dreams without a plan (especially a dream that will cost hundreds of millions of dollars) don't work. How the city could hand over a plot of land worth millions of dollars for nothing would get someone fired in the real world.

Posted on: 3/18 7:21
Print Top


Re: Stop the give away of taxpayers' city owned land. Ordinance 17-023
#80
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2015/5/27 20:34
From Jersey City
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 576
Offline
Quote:

Dolomiti wrote:
Quote:

JCGuys wrote:
Quote:



Quote:
Now we're to believe that a $22 Million organization, which can't break even, can build a $230 Million++ SciTech Scity. The redeveloper is UNKNOWN...

LSC is in charge, and have appointed trustees. They are raising money already for the project. It's a bit early for too much more than a master plan.

Oddly enough, Fulop hated the 2008 loan, and is backing this plan. Go figure.

I also have to say, I vastly prefer to the previous plan, which was a 10 story hotel and conference center. Don't you?


Why not also include a hotel and conference center on a portion of the site if it makes the project and Sci-Tech City more economically feasible.

10 story hotel and huge conference center is not a good fit for the site in general.

That said, it sounds like the site will have a small conference center, and 50 units of temporary housing for visitors.

It's also a little difficult to have a big hotel and conference center occupying the same space as a project that combines commercial, residential and a school.


I don't disagree with any of your points, Dolomiti. I'll clarify my point: I don't believe Sci-Tech City, as originally planned, is economically feasible and thus will never be built or significantly scaled back from the fancy renderings we're seeing now. This reliance on philanthropic dollars is fantasy and the rushing through of this without an appraisal of the land reeks of something.

Don't get me wrong, the land could be worth $100 million. I still think it's a great project. I just lack confidence that the appropriate funding is in place without tapping into that land value by selling a portion for traditional development with proven track record of producing income (i.e. offices, residential).

The entire site is 16 acres. Three or four or those acres will need to be sold to traditional developments to maximize the highest and best use of the land in order to fund the other improvements, in my opinion. I hope my opinion is wrong, but I just don't see Liberty Science Center's board pulling this off.

Please, someone, prove me wrong and demonstrate that Liberty Science Center has the financial capacity to carry out SciTech City as planned.


Posted on: 3/18 0:08
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#79
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2015/4/14 23:56
From JC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 625
Offline
Quote:

135jc wrote:
Not likely. A day at the liberty science center with lunch and parking is already an arm and a leg



It's an embarrassment when taking guests with their kids to visit and parking, admission with IMAX film for 5 ppl costs over $150 - hard to explain it's a private "Not For Profit" and they arbitrarily can charge whatever they want.

Can someone pull the salaries for these folks, they work for a NonProfit ya know:



http://lsc.org/about-us/our-leadership/senior-management/


Posted on: 3/17 23:47
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#78
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/7/16 23:05
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 553
Offline
Not likely. A day at the liberty science center with lunch and parking is already an arm and a leg

Posted on: 3/17 23:00
Print Top


Re: Stop the give away of taxpayers' city owned land. Ordinance 17-023
#77
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2015/5/27 20:34
From Jersey City
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 576
Offline
Quote:

brewster wrote:
Naysayers & critics: What's your point? What would you prefer?

1: Current plan

2: LSC gets charged market value for land, which likely sinks the project, and leads to 3.

3: The land gets sold to highest bidder, which is back to JC business usual, where nothing but money talks. The land is built out to the maximum possible revenue generating structures with no regard to benefiting the community.

Is there a "4"?


There's gotta be a mix. Don't get me wrong, I like Plan #1, but the only way it's getting funded if there is an infusion of private investment if a small portion of the site is sold at market value to private interest for a condo/apartment/office/hotel/etc...

Please prove me wrong, but there is no way this nearly $300,000,000 project moves forward without tapping into the awesome values in the real estate market. Please prove me wrong.

Posted on: 3/17 21:41
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#76
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3901
Offline
Yes, bodhipooh, you do attack on a personal level. It is something I don't do because it is wrong. But returning to the subject. The land belongs to the citizens of Jersey City and the citizens are facing a revaluation where one third of its homeowners will see a tax increase. A short distance from this 16 acres was a sale of 71/2 acres for $35 million that was reported in the newspaper. Something is wrong that the city refuses to have this land assessed before its transferred. Have the land assessed.

Posted on: 3/17 16:42
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#75
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2008/8/12 14:31
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3024
Offline
Quote:

caj11 wrote:
Quote:

bodhipooh wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Councilman Boggiano said the director of Liberty Science Center makes over $400,000 a year in a salary, more than the salary of the president. If they can afford to pay him a salary like that they the center can afford to pay for land. This is the last large open space in JC and reval is around the corner. The city should sell and place in the budget to soften the blow for the reval.


We all know facts dont matter to you, but... if you are referring to the US President, the salary for the position is 400K, plus many other perks (including a travel account, entertainment account, around the clock security, etc) and it should be noted that many, many positions (particularly those like directors of non-profits, museums, universities, etc) are seemingly paid obscene amounts not because they are complex jobs, but because these people have a proven track record of fundraising.

Many years ago, I read a very insightful article into the practice. For those looking from the outside, it seems like crazy money, but a well known, effective fundraiser that can bring in millions and millions of dollars year after year on fundraising, gifts, pledges, etc. is a better investment for an organization looking to hire a CEO or director, than a relatively unknown person unable to generate that kind of investments and gifts. So, what does it matter if the head of a well known museum is paid 5 million dollars, if he can bring in 100 million in fundraising? Would you rather have a net ~90MM operating income generated by that single person? Or, have 10 or 20 MM ??


You may be right on that, but... there are at least seven other officers & employees of LSC that make well over $100,000 a year plus other perks and benefits, with few if any of them living in Jersey City. Additionally, when Liberty Science Center laid off all of those people back in 2008 when the economy was in bad shape, guess how many of those six-figure officers were laid off? Zero. Did any of them agree to take a salary cut in light of the times? You know the answer. Somehow this place has the money to pay the $ 100,000/200,000/400,000+ salaries, but has to cut people with $ 30,000+ salaries.

Furthermore, of the five highest independent contractors paid by LSC according to their 2015 tax return, guess how many of those contractors were businesses based in Jersey City? You know the answer.

This place has gotten somewhat better but still sorely lacks the fiscal discipline and commitment to Jersey City needed to build their case for this land.


caj11, I dont dispute the facts you state. And, I definitely I am not an LSC defender. It could very well be that the place is a mismanagement cesspool. I dont know enough about their operations to even begin to form an opinion on that matter. I was just pointing out that highly paid directors are not an uncommon thing, and that organizations often hire well-connected people because they are simply "buying" access to that person's contacts in the form of fundraising drives, etc.

I have been to LSC three times with my daughter. My personal, honest take is somewhere here in JCLIST. I will give you the short version: not impressed, AT ALL. During each visit, it felt like a bunch of the displays were broken. The place, despite its size, feels underwhelming in content and exhibits. Overall, it really was a very disappointing experience each time. I also went to see a blockbuster movie in their dome IMAX screen. That was OK, but nothing great, and the dome form factor was not great for the movie I was watching (Star Trek) so I never went back to see other such movies.

Posted on: 3/17 15:57
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#74
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2008/8/12 14:31
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3024
Offline
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
bodhipooh, you think that attacking someone on a personal level will get you a win, but it shows this administration is running scare and are afraid of facts. They are afraid to do a assessment on the property before it is transferred. Boggiano also made a comment in the value of land at Exchange Place. He said an acre of land is worth $84 million, there. You can find his comments on the city's website or youtube when the council voted for the first reading. Why is the city afraid of doing an assessment before the transfer?


Are you claiming that I have attacked you on a personal level? Because I stated that facts aren't of any importance to you?? That's simply stating the truth. EVERYBODY in JCLIST believes that. You should ask yourself why that is.

And, are you seriously equating land in Exchange Place with contaminated swamp land in the middle of nowhere?? Next thing, you will probably assert that this land is the same as the WTC land, since they are both in the same geographical area and have the same total land area, but we all know that is not true.

Posted on: 3/17 15:52
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#73
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/9/30 21:03
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1099
Offline
Quote:

bodhipooh wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Councilman Boggiano said the director of Liberty Science Center makes over $400,000 a year in a salary, more than the salary of the president. If they can afford to pay him a salary like that they the center can afford to pay for land. This is the last large open space in JC and reval is around the corner. The city should sell and place in the budget to soften the blow for the reval.


We all know facts dont matter to you, but... if you are referring to the US President, the salary for the position is 400K, plus many other perks (including a travel account, entertainment account, around the clock security, etc) and it should be noted that many, many positions (particularly those like directors of non-profits, museums, universities, etc) are seemingly paid obscene amounts not because they are complex jobs, but because these people have a proven track record of fundraising.

Many years ago, I read a very insightful article into the practice. For those looking from the outside, it seems like crazy money, but a well known, effective fundraiser that can bring in millions and millions of dollars year after year on fundraising, gifts, pledges, etc. is a better investment for an organization looking to hire a CEO or director, than a relatively unknown person unable to generate that kind of investments and gifts. So, what does it matter if the head of a well known museum is paid 5 million dollars, if he can bring in 100 million in fundraising? Would you rather have a net ~90MM operating income generated by that single person? Or, have 10 or 20 MM ??


You may be right on that, but... there are at least seven other officers & employees of LSC that make well over $100,000 a year plus other perks and benefits, with few if any of them living in Jersey City. Additionally, when Liberty Science Center laid off all of those people back in 2008 when the economy was in bad shape, guess how many of those six-figure officers were laid off? Zero. Did any of them agree to take a salary cut in light of the times? You know the answer. Somehow this place has the money to pay the $ 100,000/200,000/400,000+ salaries, but has to cut people with $ 30,000+ salaries.

Furthermore, of the five highest independent contractors paid by LSC according to their 2015 tax return, guess how many of those contractors were businesses based in Jersey City? You know the answer.

This place has gotten somewhat better but still sorely lacks the fiscal discipline and commitment to Jersey City needed to build their case for this land.

Posted on: 3/17 15:08
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#72
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3901
Offline
bodhipooh, you think that attacking someone on a personal level will get you a win, but it shows this administration is running scare and are afraid of facts. They are afraid to do a assessment on the property before it is transferred. Boggiano also made a comment in the value of land at Exchange Place. He said an acre of land is worth $84 million, there. You can find his comments on the city's website or youtube when the council voted for the first reading. Why is the city afraid of doing an assessment before the transfer?

Posted on: 3/17 12:53
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#71
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2015/4/14 23:56
From JC
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 625
Offline
Some very succinct points here and the process seems like a total land grab for some political cronies.



Quote:

paig55 wrote:
I have so many concerns about this transaction. Many concerns that every property taxpayer and voter in JC should have FULL answers to before this transfer is approved.

Why wouldn't the council have the real estate appraised before the closing? Who ever heard of closing on real estate before having it appraised. As a homeowner didn't you have the property you were purchasing appraised before you purchased it?

Why is the Council President Lavarro voting on this transfer when he is also the Chair of JCRA. There must be a conflict of interest here. It may not be unlawful, but is certainly is unethical. As NJRA chair he has information about this transaction that no one else on the council has, yet he is allowed to vote on this transaction. Lavarro should abstain from voting, that is the ethical thing to do.
Also Daniel Rivera who also sits on the JCRA board. This the only ethical thing to do.

Why is the council and mayor promoting this 50/50 and 80/20 revenue share? They forgot to tell the public THERE WILL BE NO REVENUE SHARE. You ask why, this is why. Because the full agreement reads, that revenue will be shared when it exceeds expenses. Also, the revenue share will NOT include any revenue received from donations from individuals or corporate donations. What this means is that SciTech could have $100,000 in expenses, $100,000 in revenue NOT including the revenue of $100,000 in donations and JC will never see a penny of shared revenue. But SciTech will be seating on $100,000 in revenue obtained from donations. Keep in mind a hugh part of income in this type of non-profit could come from donations.
The contract wording MUST BE CHANGED to read: JC will have first right to % compensation before ALL OTHER expenses.

Did the council tell you there is a an article in the contract that allows SciTech to apply for ABATEMENTS? Now, why would a NON-PROFIT need to apply for an abatement? Why, because the plan is to lease hugh amounts of space to developers and they will want ABATEMENTS!

Who will be donating the $78 million needed as seed money? Who are these people/corporations and what relationship do they have with JC? Who are their board members and what is their relationship with JC? Have any of them made donations to the Fulop SUPERPAC?

The council is giving 16-17 acres of land to JCRA which will ultimately be sold to SciTech LLC for $10. If you are selling to SciTech for $10 than please explain the arrangement to pay the city a portion of revenue until value of land is repaid. Although, I have already explained JC will probably never receive all payment for the full value of this land.
It has been projected that this land could be worth somewhere BETWEEN $100-150 million. Is that why the council, mayor and JCRA wants to wait UNTIL CLOSING to appraise this land value. At which point nothing can be done to secure a compensation for this true value.

ALSO, there should be A PUBLIC MEETING to discuss and answer questions about this transaction. AT this time WE ARE LEAVING THE DECISION OF FIVE (5) people who have a pattern of voting in favor of WHATEVER THE MAYOR WANTS to decide the fate of OUR LAND.

THIS land value could provide an offset to the property tax impact after the REVAL. HOMEOWNER ALL OVER THIS CITY SHOUDL BE OUT QUESTIONING THIS TRANSACTION.

DID YOU KNOW that the Council has NO CONTROL over JCRA. Once this land is TRANSFERRED TO JCRA, we the citizens of JC will be POWERLESS in securing our rights to the land or its TRUE VALUE.


There are so many holes in the current contract, which will leave us the residents of JC with NOTHING.

Please call the City Clerks office and add your name to the speakers list 201-547-2233.
The 2nd and FINAL READING IS CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22 @ 6PM.
PLEASE COME OUT you OWE IT TO YOURSELF AND YOUR NEIGHBORS.

If we let this happen we have no one to blame but ourselves.

Thank you.

J. Paige

Posted on: 3/17 12:40
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#70
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2008/8/12 14:31
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3024
Offline
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Councilman Boggiano said the director of Liberty Science Center makes over $400,000 a year in a salary, more than the salary of the president. If they can afford to pay him a salary like that they the center can afford to pay for land. This is the last large open space in JC and reval is around the corner. The city should sell and place in the budget to soften the blow for the reval.


We all know facts dont matter to you, but... if you are referring to the US President, the salary for the position is 400K, plus many other perks (including a travel account, entertainment account, around the clock security, etc) and it should be noted that many, many positions (particularly those like directors of non-profits, museums, universities, etc) are seemingly paid obscene amounts not because they are complex jobs, but because these people have a proven track record of fundraising.

Many years ago, I read a very insightful article into the practice. For those looking from the outside, it seems like crazy money, but a well known, effective fundraiser that can bring in millions and millions of dollars year after year on fundraising, gifts, pledges, etc. is a better investment for an organization looking to hire a CEO or director, than a relatively unknown person unable to generate that kind of investments and gifts. So, what does it matter if the head of a well known museum is paid 5 million dollars, if he can bring in 100 million in fundraising? Would you rather have a net ~90MM operating income generated by that single person? Or, have 10 or 20 MM ??

Posted on: 3/17 11:40
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#69
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/6/16 22:16
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3901
Offline
Councilman Boggiano said the director of Liberty Science Center makes over $400,000 a year in a salary, more than the salary of the president. If they can afford to pay him a salary like that they the center can afford to pay for land. This is the last large open space in JC and reval is around the corner. The city should sell and place in the budget to soften the blow for the reval.

Posted on: 3/17 11:06
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#68
Newbie
Newbie


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/8/19 10:27
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 8
Offline
I have so many concerns about this transaction. Many concerns that every property taxpayer and voter in JC should have FULL answers to before this transfer is approved.

Why wouldn't the council have the real estate appraised before the closing? Who ever heard of closing on real estate before having it appraised. As a homeowner didn't you have the property you were purchasing appraised before you purchased it?

Why is the Council President Lavarro voting on this transfer when he is also the Chair of JCRA. There must be a conflict of interest here. It may not be unlawful, but is certainly is unethical. As NJRA chair he has information about this transaction that no one else on the council has, yet he is allowed to vote on this transaction. Lavarro should abstain from voting, that is the ethical thing to do.
Also Daniel Rivera who also sits on the JCRA board. This the only ethical thing to do.

Why is the council and mayor promoting this 50/50 and 80/20 revenue share? They forgot to tell the public THERE WILL BE NO REVENUE SHARE. You ask why, this is why. Because the full agreement reads, that revenue will be shared when it exceeds expenses. Also, the revenue share will NOT include any revenue received from donations from individuals or corporate donations. What this means is that SciTech could have $100,000 in expenses, $100,000 in revenue NOT including the revenue of $100,000 in donations and JC will never see a penny of shared revenue. But SciTech will be seating on $100,000 in revenue obtained from donations. Keep in mind a hugh part of income in this type of non-profit could come from donations.
The contract wording MUST BE CHANGED to read: JC will have first right to % compensation before ALL OTHER expenses.

Did the council tell you there is a an article in the contract that allows SciTech to apply for ABATEMENTS? Now, why would a NON-PROFIT need to apply for an abatement? Why, because the plan is to lease hugh amounts of space to developers and they will want ABATEMENTS!

Who will be donating the $78 million needed as seed money? Who are these people/corporations and what relationship do they have with JC? Who are their board members and what is their relationship with JC? Have any of them made donations to the Fulop SUPERPAC?

The council is giving 16-17 acres of land to JCRA which will ultimately be sold to SciTech LLC for $10. If you are selling to SciTech for $10 than please explain the arrangement to pay the city a portion of revenue until value of land is repaid. Although, I have already explained JC will probably never receive all payment for the full value of this land.
It has been projected that this land could be worth somewhere BETWEEN $100-150 million. Is that why the council, mayor and JCRA wants to wait UNTIL CLOSING to appraise this land value. At which point nothing can be done to secure a compensation for this true value.

ALSO, there should be A PUBLIC MEETING to discuss and answer questions about this transaction. AT this time WE ARE LEAVING THE DECISION OF FIVE (5) people who have a pattern of voting in favor of WHATEVER THE MAYOR WANTS to decide the fate of OUR LAND.

THIS land value could provide an offset to the property tax impact after the REVAL. HOMEOWNER ALL OVER THIS CITY SHOUDL BE OUT QUESTIONING THIS TRANSACTION.

DID YOU KNOW that the Council has NO CONTROL over JCRA. Once this land is TRANSFERRED TO JCRA, we the citizens of JC will be POWERLESS in securing our rights to the land or its TRUE VALUE.

There are so many holes in the current contract, which will leave us the residents of JC with NOTHING.

Please call the City Clerks office and add your name to the speakers list 201-547-2233.
The 2nd and FINAL READING IS CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22 @ 6PM.
PLEASE COME OUT you OWE IT TO YOURSELF AND YOUR NEIGHBORS.

If we let this happen we have no one to blame but ourselves.

Thank you.

J. Paige

Posted on: 3/17 10:40
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#67
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/1/27 13:52
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 142
Offline
Hero.
The project can't be transferred to a third party. The city is protected and partners in this but of course there is a big philanthropic effort that needs to happen once transferred.

I'm not entirely sure at this point what some people are upset about as I think all the questions that were presented were answered and many people here had some great points as well

Posted on: 3/16 18:10
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#66
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/11/13 21:38
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3248
Offline
this project seems questionable to me. if the city gifts the land to the developer and the project doesn't succeed, can the deveper then sell it to a 3rd party or must he/she give it back to the city?

of course, if the project is not viabile with the gift, why even build it? there is already east river science center and roosevelt island?

Posted on: 3/16 18:00
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#65
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/3/15 21:24
From Van Vorst Park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 90
Offline
It's obvious that this guy works for Mayor Fulop..... In all my years in JC, I've seen it a million times..... His job is to mute any dissension, especially in an election year... He'll never make any sense. That's the problem with anonymous signatures.


jcguy05 wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
jcguy05, I guess it's a fantasy that a developer wants to plant a giant development directly to the north of the LSC . . . http://newyorkyimby.com/2017/01/2265- ... n-avenue-jersey-city.html


It IS definitely a fantasy until breaking ground. please..those plots of land around there has been sitting vacant for decades even during the mega real estate booms in 07 and now.

Even with the golf course next door, port liberte (another disaster), and lsc very close, noone wants to touch those lands because of the location and access to....well nothing.

it's a gift someone is willing to develop it and even build school and public space on it. Just giving it away for free to build high density "cookie cutter" condo/rentals there is much better than what it is now... [/quote]

Posted on: 3/16 17:52
Check out Talking Politics --- 80 shows stream off talkingpolitics.net or see shows on YouTube. The shows broadcast on Channel 51, Mon @ 9:30pm, Wed @ 8:30pm, Thurs @ 7:30pm. On Verizon FIOS: Channel 38, Mon 6pm, Wed 9:30pm, Fri 7pm
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#64
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/5/15 10:11
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3890
Offline
JCguy05, the boom of '07 didn't come close to the LSC area.

I gave you a link to a giant development proposal to LSC, you ignore it.

'Access to nothing'? There is a NJ Turnpike exit right there, and a Hudson Bergen Light Rail stop, both within yards. And Fulop has plans to extend Jersey Avenue south to connect directly to LSP.

So, we have developers going nuts in the area (four or five active residential projects in the works), lots of commercial development (Sam AM, the old NuBar space, the new noodle shop going up next to the Lafayette Corner Store, two Grind Shop locations), lots of community support for another Light Rail stop west on Pacific)

Yeah, that land next to LSC is practically worthless!

Posted on: 3/16 17:27
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#63
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/1/23 14:44
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 292
Offline
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
jcguy05, I guess it's a fantasy that a developer wants to plant a giant development directly to the north of the LSC . . . http://newyorkyimby.com/2017/01/2265- ... n-avenue-jersey-city.html


It IS definitely a fantasy until breaking ground. please..those plots of land around there has been sitting vacant for decades even during the mega real estate booms in 07 and now.

Even with the golf course next door, port liberte (another disaster), and lsc very close, noone wants to touch those lands because of the location and access to....well nothing.

it's a gift someone is willing to develop it and even build school and public space on it. Just giving it away for free to build high density "cookie cutter" condo/rentals there is much better than what it is now...

Posted on: 3/16 17:03
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#62
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/5/15 10:11
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3890
Offline
jcguy05, I guess it's a fantasy that a developer wants to plant a giant development directly to the north of the LSC . . . http://newyorkyimby.com/2017/01/2265- ... n-avenue-jersey-city.html

Posted on: 3/16 16:11
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#61
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/3/15 21:24
From Van Vorst Park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 90
Offline
While you're looking at Google maps, see the Liberty National Golf Course, which is 9/10 of a mile away and has been there since 2009: " Instead, I'm on the club's private vessel, speeding to a round at the $250 million private golf course–the most expensive ever built. The cost of membership: $500,000 plus annual dues. On shore, Liberty's steel and glass clubhouse reflects the Manhattan skyline. " Jul 24, 2009
Inside A $250 Million Golf Course - Forbes
https://www.forbes.com/.../golf-barcla ... golf-liberty-national.htm


As for the sketchy nearby neighborhood, residents have asked the City Council to stop thru ordinance the actions of aggressive buyers of their homes. See this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yWMbrk_kQw




Monroe wrote:
Quote:

Wishful_Thinking wrote:
Quote:

GrovePath wrote:
16 Acres is a whole lot of land. It is the size of the entire World Trade Center site. What experience and background do those in charge of Liberty Science Center have in developing such a huge and high value project.

While the size of the site may be comparable to the WTC, it's really important to consider the context of this property. While it borders LSP on one side, to the west is I78, train tracks, semi-abandoned industrial properties in the triangle between the HBLR, Craven Point Avenue, and Garfield Avenue. West of Garfield Avenue is the worst neighborhood in JC. Take a look at GoogleEarthMaps!

I'm not sure the site, or the surrounding location, proximity to LSP notwithstanding, will ever support a huge and high value project - there is simply nothing there to attract anyone beyond the park. A casino? Maybe, as it's self-contained and you can ignore the surrounds outside of the park. I can't imagine there being interest in a hotel, when there are plenty of hotels located in areas that have some quality to recommend them as a place to stay.


Of course, Fulop wants to back this, and he was gung ho behind a casino and 90 story hotel a few hundred yards away, which would be built on the same landfill and in proximity to the same industrial and sketchy neighborhoods . . . [/quote]

Posted on: 3/16 15:01
Check out Talking Politics --- 80 shows stream off talkingpolitics.net or see shows on YouTube. The shows broadcast on Channel 51, Mon @ 9:30pm, Wed @ 8:30pm, Thurs @ 7:30pm. On Verizon FIOS: Channel 38, Mon 6pm, Wed 9:30pm, Fri 7pm
Print Top


Re: Wow - LSC's Updated Plans for SciTech Scity
#60
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/1/23 14:44
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 292
Offline
all you whiners forget this is swamp land sitting in the ghetto of jersey city.

you are in fantasy land if you think some developer will come buy this land even to build "cookie cutter" condos or rentals. There are so much vacant lots in the ghettos of jersey city outside of downtown and journal square area, the city couldnt give them away if wanted to for development.

this will transform a blight pocket of land into a nice thing while providing benefits such as the school back to the city.

all you people do is whine and whine whenever there is ANY development going on anywhere in jersey city, be it downtown, jsq, or in the ghettos. I am glad none of you are running jersey city, otherwise the entire city will still be an abandoned warehouse/factory dump

Posted on: 3/16 14:54
Print Top




« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 »




[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017