Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
54 user(s) are online (47 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 54

more...




Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users






Re: Big Fountain in Lincoln Park
#18
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/3/2 4:49
Last Login :
2018/6/12 15:20
From Downtown Ex Pat happy in McGinley Sq.
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 844
Offline
Thanks

Posted on: 2013/4/25 16:32
 Top 


Re: Big Fountain in Lincoln Park
#17
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/10/7 15:46
Last Login :
3/24 18:05
From jersey city
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3377
Offline
(I found this piece from 6/9/12 don?t know if it is still happening or if it is county BS. The nj.com site is acting funny today up and down)


Lincoln Park fountain will undergo $3.9 million renovation

By The Jersey Journal The Jersey Journal
on June 09, 2012 at 12:00 PM

Hudson County freeholders approved a $3.9 million plan to renovate the crumbling fountain at the Lincoln Park circle in Jersey City.

Up to $1.95 million of that money could come from a $1.95 million Green Acres federal grant for the fountain, which was built in 1911. The 108-foot diameter fountain features a 53-foot tall column at it's center and concrete pedestals with sculpted frogs shooting water.

The restoration project will use laser technology to map the fountain and then recast the concrete.


http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/20 ... rk_fountain_will_und.html



Posted on: 2013/4/25 16:17
 Top 


Re: Big Fountain in Lincoln Park
#16
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2013/4/22 23:08
Last Login :
2015/3/10 21:37
From The Heights.
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 265
Offline
I think its pretty obvious: the city's administration does not know how to manage anything.

Posted on: 2013/4/25 16:07
 Top 


Big Fountain in Lincoln Park
#15
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2005/3/2 4:49
Last Login :
2018/6/12 15:20
From Downtown Ex Pat happy in McGinley Sq.
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 844
Offline
Does anyone know why the large fountain at the entrance to Lincoln Park has been water-less for so many summer seasons? Just wondering.

Thanks

Posted on: 2013/4/25 15:36
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#14
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2010/11/17 1:11
Last Login :
1/7 4:19
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1241
Offline
I don't understand why every government project has to cost so much money. $30 million to build two ugly concrete and steel walls in Liberty State? $16 million to re-do the fountain in Washington Square Park in Manhattan? Something like $600 million to re-do the intersection at 1&9? At least the $4 million to restore the Lincoln Park fountain is miniscule in comparison to those, but holy crap! The things I could do with $4 million!

I'm alright with things like fixing up fountains. Love that the pier at Exchange Place was fixed up. Would love to see our parks and public spaces be renovated. Just not sure of the cost of it.

Posted on: 2012/6/15 3:30
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#13
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/5/30 0:05
Last Login :
2018/11/7 2:57
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 124
Offline
if the park can get 3.9 million spread it around, don't waste it on cosmetically improving the fountain.

The fountain is 100 years old, the 3.9 mm seems like a quote for a full (historically correct) rehab. JC does not have the money to waste on such a specific project. If there is a great demand to restore the fountain, get private money to do it.

Posted on: 2012/6/15 2:25
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#12
Newbie
Newbie


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/2/10 20:00
Last Login :
2012/7/2 14:27
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 11
Offline
this burns me up
our playgrounds and parks in the heights are deteriorating

that fountain does not seem like a priority and thats a whole lot of money to spend on it too

Posted on: 2012/6/15 1:51
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/10/7 15:46
Last Login :
3/24 18:05
From jersey city
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3377
Offline
From the JJ comments?.
Quote:

?The current fountain is roughly a foot deep, but was originally several feet deeper, officials said. A new bottom was created over debris that had accumulated over the years, Kennelly said.?

Hey Kennelly are you from around here? ?created over debris that had accumulated over the years?? Do some research. The story goes some HC hack got the bright idea to fill the fountain in with dirt to make it street level and pave it. Rumors at the time were that it would be used for additional parking for the Casino in the Park. (I guess parking wasn?t big enough for the HCDO?s ?victory? parties at the time)

There were some civic conscious JC people back then who were outraged and got HC to abandon the plan. But it was decided that the fountain would be filled in with dirt up to a certain point. It was more for safety reasons (dumb kids jumping in) and the cost to get the fountain going again.

Let?s hope that all the original 1911 ornamental concrete does not disappear after new castings are made of them. They better be put right in the JC museum. (how?s that deal going? I heard JCMC got the property for $900K a real bargain basement price considering the $11 million renovation job on it a few years earier.) I don?t want to see the original ornamental concrete in some JC/HC hacks back yard?like the Lincoln Park pergolas. Remember that caper? The case of the two missing pergolas that wound up in the suburbs some where. (Hey maybe Peter S. is with them? What a sin!)

And please make sure the contract doesn?t go to some HC hack?s relative who does concrete work on the weekends! (in his suit jacket)

Posted on: 2012/6/13 0:25
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#10
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/10/29 12:17
Last Login :
2018/9/5 2:01
From Hamilton Park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 449
Offline
I agree... our public space is important and a benefit to everyone.

Quote:

hero69 wrote:
actually i was joking. i agree that there are better ways to spend the money, but if one lets things like public parks deteriorate then the whole community will start to suffer....it's a slippery slope?

Posted on: 2012/6/11 15:50
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#9
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/11/14 2:38
Last Login :
2023/1/30 21:43
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3792
Offline
actually i was joking. i agree that there are better ways to spend the money, but if one lets things like public parks deteriorate then the whole community will start to suffer....it's a slippery slope?

Posted on: 2012/6/11 14:31
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#8
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/10/29 12:17
Last Login :
2018/9/5 2:01
From Hamilton Park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 449
Offline
Does that make my commentary any different?

Hudson actually has a ton of bonds out there - ranging from general purpose to recreation... again - they are a reasonable tax free investment... especially if you want to recoup some of your taxes.

Quote:

tern wrote:
This is a county project, to restore a county fountain, in a county park! Paid for and bonded by the Hudson County, not Jersey City.

Robin.

Posted on: 2012/6/11 14:25
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2006/5/10 16:36
Last Login :
2023/7/18 1:45
From Hamilton Park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 981
Offline
This is a county project, to restore a county fountain, in a county park! Paid for and bonded by the Hudson County, not Jersey City.

Robin.

Posted on: 2012/6/11 14:04
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2007/10/29 12:17
Last Login :
2018/9/5 2:01
From Hamilton Park
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 449
Offline
Ugh - everyone step back for a moment and read the article again...

The funding used to fix the fountain is coming from 'capital bonds' and a possible grant.

This is exactly what capital bonds are supposed to be used for... to create and restore capital assets. It also means your taxes dollars are not being used for a bulk of the project - investors who believe in the City's credit rating and have invested in our bonds are paying for it. At a very general level, you are only paying for roughly 10% of the total cost of a capital project (based on a 10yr bond) - which is a steal based on what gets done.

We as tax payers for this city are already paying the interest on this bond - as the general improvements bond matures in 2018 and was issued in 2009... (my gamble where the bond funds are being sourced.)

Just for everyone's general knowledge - Jersey City has three primary bonds:
- General Capital Improvement (476576AJ2)
- Primary & Secondary Education (4765757A7)
- Qualified General Improvement (Utilities - I believe) (4765757R0)

If you would like some of your tax dollars back (and keep in mind these are tax free investments as well) you can use the CUSIPs above to buy our city bond from your broker.

The things mentioned above have nothing to (for the most part) do with bond funding - those are general operating cost. If you are dissatisfied with use of those funds let your council person and the mayor know.

Posted on: 2012/6/11 13:06
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/9/29 6:09
Last Login :
2017/9/12 11:53
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 694
Offline
Good point! Also, that is not just a JC problem. In Bayonne for the last 3 years the lines have not been painted on several stretches of roads....especially Kennedy Blvd and Ave C.

Anytime now there will be an accident(hope not) and then the city will be sued.

Posted on: 2012/6/11 8:55
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2009/5/11 2:53
Last Login :
2020/7/22 15:58
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 388
Offline
I wonder what other projects were on the short list to get the funding? If the city has 3.9 million dollars sitting around why didn't they repaint the lines on all the roads, they are all worn to invisibility.

Posted on: 2012/6/11 8:51
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2011/9/29 6:09
Last Login :
2017/9/12 11:53
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 694
Offline
This money should be spent on job training programs, or scholarship money for college students.....or given to non profits that work in the community especially given how bad the economy is and the large cuts in services that have taken place.


I think that fountain is beautiful but right now it should not be a priority. Also, I am sure their are federal grant programs that could assist in fixing that fountain without cost to the city or county. All the money should be found/gathered that way.

Such a waste.

Posted on: 2012/6/11 8:48
 Top 


Re: freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2004/11/14 2:38
Last Login :
2023/1/30 21:43
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3792
Offline
not one thin dime of my taxes should go to pay for this.

Posted on: 2012/6/11 7:57
 Top 


freeholders approve $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park fountain
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home


Hide User information
Joined:
2012/2/20 18:20
Last Login :
2023/11/26 22:12
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2719
Offline
Hudson County freeholders approve spending $3.9M on restoring Lincoln Park?s 100-year-old fountain

June 09, 2012, 3:00 AM
By Charles Hack/The Jersey Journal

Some $3.9 million will be spent to completely restore the century-old ornamental fountain in Jersey?s City?s Lincoln Park.

The Hudson County Board of Freeholders recently approved the funds for the project, which will completely restore the cracking and crumbling sculpture, Hudson County spokesman Jim Kennelly said.

The county will use funds from its capital bonds to pay for the project, Freeholder Bill O?Dea said. The county has also applied for federal Green Acres funding, which could cover as much as $1.95 million of the cost.

Built in 1911, the fountain was designed by Pierre J. Cheron features an eagle perched atop a 53-foot column with a large bowl above sculptures of mythological creatures at its base.

Concrete frogs on pedestals spout water into the 108-foot-diameter pool that is ringed with planters.

Design and engineering consultant Helena Roman is in charge of the project that will use laser technology to map the fountain?s ornaments in order to recast the fountain in new concrete.

The current fountain is roughly a foot deep, but was originally several feet deeper, officials said. A new bottom was created over debris that had accumulated over the years, Kennelly said.

The project will go out to bid by the end of August and the county is to complete the restoration project before next June, officials said.

http://www.nj.com/jjournal-news/index ... y_freeholders_appr_1.html

Posted on: 2012/6/11 5:11
 Top 








[Advanced Search]





Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017