While reading this thread, I found it odd that no one mentioned the amount of focus the feds would have likely placed on the Healy to include him on the list of those indicted.
I don't think it's that far fetched to entertain the notion that he is not guilty, especially considering that his record shows no incident of bribery, extortion or anything close to it.

In contrast, the runners-up in the last election can't claim the same.