Re: Daniel Wrieden aka 'Queer Eye For The Historic House Guy'
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Newbie
|
Are you actually attempting to apply this ancient doctrince of "commons" to the Jersey City historic ordinance? I hope not, but its totally inapplicable at a variety of levels. For one this is not an agricultural society. More over, commons pertains to land that had usefulness. The color of one's home or style of their windows in no way would fall under this doctrine.
Your explanation is a good example of how a little knowledge could be a dangerous thing. Quote:
Posted on: 2004/10/24 0:02
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel Wrieden aka 'Queer Eye For The Historic House Guy'
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Newbie
|
Quote:
No you do not understand the law. If the house was acquired before the marriage then the non purchasing spouse does not share an ownership interest. I should know I am a divorce attorney.
Posted on: 2004/10/15 19:43
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel Wrieden aka 'Queer Eye For The Historic House Guy'
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Newbie
|
Quote:
You're just an awful person who is frustrated by the fact that Mr. Curtin is working for some change that people could live with. Your comments are childish and mean spirited. You know nothing about what goes before a court nor an evidentiary proceeding. What has Mr. Curtin done that is so mean spirited? He owns two homes in downtown Jersey City, which are very well maintained. On the other hand there are some crazy people who live downtown who call the police when someone trims a tree for the saftey of their families.
Posted on: 2004/10/15 3:14
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel Wrieden aka 'Queer Eye For The Historic House Guy'
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Newbie
|
Quote:
Actually you are totally incorrect. It depends on when the house was acquired and from where the resources to acquire the house came. If one's spouse owned a home prior to a marriage, the house will never be subject to equitable distribution. Also, if someone had money from before their marriage to purchase a house cash and they do so, that house is also not subject to equitable distribution. So you are wrong.
Posted on: 2004/10/15 3:11
|
|||
|
Re: Daniel Wrieden aka 'Queer Eye For The Historic House Guy'
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Newbie
|
Quote:
For one, there are a lot fo people who take medications for nerves or hyperactive behavior. So what? The pharmaseutical industry has run such a campaign that its now probably fashionable as a result. Still its a personal issue which you should not touch. Secondly, your slanderous comments are actionable and mostly untrue. Warren Curtin is not alone on this. He submitted testiments from a many neighbors whose experiences were abominable. More people shared their bad experiences during the last HPNA meeting. Merely because he is enthusiastic does not warrent the sort of nasty and vicous comments you have made. There needs to be dramatic adjustments to the enforcement and application of the historic ordinance. The arbitrary applications go as far back as Clair Davis. But there are currently too many rules that a lot of folks really can't afford. $20,000 for railings is a bit much as are some of the window requirements. Similarly people should refrain from making hateful comments about Wreidan. He is also enthusiastic about his role, yet he makes little money doing it. Still he has been incorrect about some stuff. In one instance he advised a neighbor his curb had to be blue stone, when the rules as they are written clearly provide otherwise. This only suggests Dan could use some more guidance and mentoring. Warren brought this issue to the forefront, while others did nothing more than just sit around whinning and complaining about this. The constitution protects and encourages his actions.
Posted on: 2004/10/14 22:39
|
|||
|