Asif wrote:
I know people on here especially the right wing conservatives and neocon reactionaries will find this horrible....but this is such a brilliant idea.

Really great idea and it would cost nothing to implement or oversee. :)


Quote:

fat-ass-bike wrote:
I'm all for the idea that requires all Mayors and State Officials to wear jackets that display all sponsor logos like NASCAR drivers do.
This will allow 'Joe Citizen' to understand who actually has the 'ears' and support / purse strings from our elected officials and public servants ... At times I wonder why we need to vote in individuals in the first place, when we are really voting on the sponsors and what they want !

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

heights wrote:
It was ISIS so now what ??
http://nypost.com/2016/07/16/isis-cla ... -for-bastille-day-attack/

What do you mean "now what"? You know "what now".

This:

TIME is already questioning that the dude was a jihadist:

http://time.com/4409306/france-nice-attack-terrorist/

As I said before - "a pissed-off Uber driver".

I was very close - apparently "a pissed-off delivery van driver".

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:

This should be fun.... military used to be fairly pro-west, but that is day-to-day. Not a good week for Obama/Clinton/Kerry Foreign Policy of Muslim Terror Appeasement. At least they didn't have to answer a 3:00am phone call.

Well at least Kerry did have some good fortune this week. He scored tickets to catch Lin-Manuel Miranda?s final appearance in Hamilton. And he only had to fly back from the NATO summit in Poland early to catch it.


Kind of a joke? the news (MSNBC) is saying that the WH / State Department are viewing news reports to find out what is happening in Turkey. The US government didn?t have a clue this might happen. Way to go!

hero69 wrote:
lol. turkish army has taken control of the country. assad has lasted longer than erdogan.

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Hillary wants to import many more of the same Muslim "migrants" and "refugees" who keep mowing down people in France. No surprise that France has the most Muslims in the EU.

Racists being racists? just keep ignoring the facts that the terrorists were from France. It?s cool. It isn?t like you care about facts anyway?

Canada has taken close to 30,000 immigrants from Syria and not a peep. But, yeah, you keep hiding under your bed like the pathetic little coward you are.

AlexC wrote:
do we have confirmation that it is radical Islamists?

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
So.... There is a news report that the Nice killer was a gay man confused about his sexuality with a bad driving record who just happened to be Muslim. What's up with those people.

Obviously the answer is more gun control on law abiding citizens!

this just proves that anyone can weapons almost anything into a terror weapon.....sick. and neither trump nor anyone can stop sick people from doing the unthinkable so let's not pretend.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Latest Quinnipiac poll has Trump leading crooked Hillary in PA, Florida, and tied in Ohio.

Old Ruthie seems to have lost it, hasn't she? Is there a way to remove a SC justice who's clearly addled?

She did lose it. Said something about emigrating to New Zealand if Donald wins. I guess Canada is too cold for her. I won't miss her.

Funny that these liberals who always threaten to move inevitably choose very white countries.

You never see them threaten to move to Mexico, anywhere in South America or Africa or Asia or the Middle East. Curious case.

Atsushi wrote:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/stor ... est-accomplishment-213157

What Is Hillary?s Greatest Accomplishment?

Quote:

?If you want to stump a Democrat, ask them to name an accomplishment of Hillary Clinton,? Carly Fiorina quipped at Wednesday?s Republican debate. The line got hearty applause?but it also cut to the core of one of the defining lines of attacks against the former first lady and Democratic presidential frontrunner. After nearly forty years in public life, what exactly has she accomplished?

It?s a question that even, at times, has tripped up Clinton herself: During her 2014 book tour, when ABC?s Diane Sawyer asked her about her ?marquee achievement,? Clinton changed the subject and she fumbled over a similar question during a women?s forum in Manhattan last year. ?I see my role as secretary?in fact leadership in general in a democracy?as a relay race. You run the best race you can run, you hand off the baton. Some of what hasn?t been finished may go on to be finished,? she told Thomas Friedman. ?I?m very proud of the [economic] stabilization and the really solid leadership that the administration provided that I think now leads us to be able to deal with problems like Ukraine because we?re not so worried about a massive collapse in Europe.?

The question Fiorina posed has also tripped up members of the Obama administration. When State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki was asked last year to ?identify one tangible achievement? accomplished through one of Hillary Clinton?s key projects as Secretary of State?the first-ever audit of the department?Psaki punted, ?I am certain that those who were here at the time, who worked hard on that effort, could point out one.?

Hillary?s supporters have been stumped too. When Bloomberg Politics? Mark Halperin asked a focus group of Iowans this summer about Hillary Clinton?s accomplishments, one Democratic supporter said, ?I honestly can?t say I followed along [with] everything that was going on.?

So is Fiorina right? Are Democrats really unable to defend Clinton?s record on the merits? To find out, Politico Magazine on Thursday asked the nation?s top Democratic leaders and thinkers to name Hillary Clinton?s biggest accomplishment.

What is the most impressive item on Clinton?s record? Which legislative or policy triumph from her many years in office will be most important on the campaign trail? Not surprisingly, those surveyed all came up with an answer to defend their party?s likely presidential nominee. Whether these count as ?marquee,? ?significant,? or ?tangible?? You be the judge.

***

?It?s kind of hard to pick one accomplishment?

By Bill Burton, former senior strategist for Priorities USA Action, a super PAC in support of President Barack Obama.

It?s kind of hard to pick one accomplishment for Hillary Clinton. Personally, I?m sure she?d say her daughter and grandchild are her greatest accomplishments. Professionally, how about these three?

1. Her China speech on women.
2. Her role in killing Osama bin Laden.
3. Management of the State Department during which time we saw a 50 percent increase in exports to China, aggressive work on climate (particularly at Copenhagen), and the effort to create and implement the toughest sanctions ever on Iran?helping to lead us to the agreement currently on the table.

***

?The sanction on Iran that brought them to the table?

Howard Dean is the former governor of Vermont and the former chair of the Democratic National Committee.

Hillary Clinton was the principal author of the sanction on Iran that brought them to the table. We cannot afford any Know Nothings like Carly in the White House.

***

?Nearly every foreign policy victory of President Obama?s second term has Secretary Clinton?s fingerprints on it?

By Harry Reid, Senate Democratic leader.

American foreign policy was stronger when Hillary Clinton left the State Department than when she arrived. She took the reins from a Bush administration that had left America?s reputation deeply damaged and planted the seeds for the foreign policy successes we see today. From the agreement to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, to the landmark normalization of relations with Cuba, nearly every foreign policy victory of President Obama?s second term has Secretary Clinton?s fingerprints on it.

Her accomplishments extend to health care, as well. As First Lady, she helped create and guide through Congress Children?s Health Insurance Program, a key program that brought health care coverage to millions of children. As a Senator, she worked across the aisle to provide full military health benefits to reservists and National Guard members.

Secretary Clinton was also an outspoken champion for women around the world. She set records for travel while leading the State Department and used every trip to empower the women of the 112 countries she visited. She made gender equality a priority of U.S. foreign policy. And she created the ambassador at large for global women?s issues, a post charged with integrating gender throughout the State Department.

***

?The SCHIP program ? which expanded health coverage to millions of lower-income children?

By Anita Dunn, Democratic political strategist.

After universal health care failed in 1994, the Clinton Administration was reluctant to go anywhere near healthcare again?Democrats lost the Senate and the House in 1994, and losing the house was for the first time in 40 years. Then-First Lady Hilary Clinton ended up being the White House ally and inside player who worked with Ted Kennedy and Orrin Hatch to create the SCHIP program in Clinton's second term, which expanded health coverage to millions of lower-income children. She has other accomplishments but this one made a huge difference, and came at a time when politically the Administration was cutting deals with Newt Gingrich on the budget and not necessarily all that enthusiastic about revisiting health care.

This obviously isn't her only accomplishment but it is meaningful because she took a political battering after the failure in 1994 but came back to fight again, and was able to work on a bipartisan basis during a very polarized time to get this done. Seems relevant!

***

?Clinton is one of the most accomplished people ever to run?

By Chuck Schumer, U.S. Senator for New York, Democratic party.

Hillary Clinton is one of the most accomplished people ever to run for the Presidency. I?m lucky enough to have seen those accomplishments up close from her time as Senator from New York and as Secretary of State. Hillary Clinton was instrumental in helping secure $21 billion in federal aid to help New York rebuild after 9/11. She fought tooth and nail to protect the first responders who rushed into danger when the towers collapsed and was pivotal in the passage of legislation that helped those first responders who got sick get the care and treatment they deserved. She worked night and day to protect and create jobs in New York, whether that was at the Niagara Falls Air Force base or the Center for Bioinformatics at the University of Buffalo. She also led the charge on the Lilly Ledbetter Pay Equity Act, which is now the law of the land.

As Secretary of State, Secretary Clinton was not only inspirational figure for billions of women around the globe, she also did much to restore the shattered credibility of the United States, which had lost so much influence following the failed foreign policies of the previous administration. She negotiated the cease-fire in Gaza that stopped the Hamas from firing rocket after rocket into Israel. She helped secure the START treaty?s ratification, and has advanced women?s rights in countries around the globe. That?s just a snapshot of what Hillary Clinton has accomplished over a lifetime of public service to New York and the country. If you really want to stump a Democrat, you should ask them which of Hillary?s accomplishments is your favorite?there are too many to choose from

***

?Rebuilding America?s leadership and prestige overseas after the Bush years?

Bill Richardson is a former secretary of energy and governor of New Mexico.

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was key in rebuilding America?s leadership and prestige overseas after the Bush years. She restored our alliances with the EU and key Asian allies as well as key relationships in Africa and Latin America.

***

?The Pediatric Research Equity Act?

By Chris Dodd, former U.S. Senator for Connecticut, Democratic party.

Having worked with her in the Senate and on the HELP Committee, the first thing that came to mind was her authorship of the Pediatric Research Equity Act. This law requires drug companies to study their products in children. The Act is responsible for changing the drug labeling of hundreds of drugs with important information about safety and dosing of drugs for children. It has improved the health of millions of children who take medications to treat diseases ranging from HIV to epilepsy to asthma. Millions of kids are in better shape and alive because of the law Senator Clinton authored.

***

?Crippling sanctions against Iran?

By Paul Begala, political analyst for CNN and counselor to President Bill Clinton.

Easy: Iran sanctions. Sec. Clinton accomplished the nearly impossible mission of getting China, Russia, the European Union and the civilized world on board with crippling sanctions against Iran. This is what brought Iran to the negotiating table.

Ms. Fiorina may not see that as an accomplishment, since while she was CEO of Hewlett-Packard the firm sold hundreds of millions of dollars of computer products the the terrorist regime in Tehran, evading US sanctions.

Sounds like people have plenty of positive things to say about Hilary Clinton's accomplishments as Secretary of States.

user1111 wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
better crooked hillary than PATHOLOGICAL liar donald. how many of his companies ended up bankrupt

State can't account for six BILLION dollars under crooked Hillary-taxpayer dollar dollars. I'd say 'lol', but it's our tax dollars.

if donald is such a successful businessman, why have so many of his companies gone bankrupt?

I hope you don't expect a answer to this, Donny supporters don't answer question about the Orange one they just reply with a silly insult about Clinton

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
better crooked hillary than PATHOLOGICAL liar donald. how many of his companies ended up bankrupt

State can't account for six BILLION dollars under crooked Hillary-taxpayer dollar dollars. I'd say 'lol', but it's our tax dollars.

if donald is such a successful businessman, why have so many of his companies gone bankrupt?

And if Hillary is such a statesperson.... tell me one successful diplomatic accomplishment she had as SoS or one landmark bill she authored and pushed through Congress as a senator. The Washington DC crowd love her because she is already bought and paid for.... why waste good money corrupting Trump.

well, if you are so concerned about money being wasted on corrupting donald, then just vote for hillary. Isn't that simple?

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
better crooked hillary than PATHOLOGICAL liar donald. how many of his companies ended up bankrupt

State can't account for six BILLION dollars under crooked Hillary-taxpayer dollar dollars. I'd say 'lol', but it's our tax dollars.

if donald is such a successful businessman, why have so many of his companies gone bankrupt?

Atsushi wrote:
https://newrepublic.com/article/134949 ... nton-derangement-syndrome

The Return of Clinton Derangement Syndrome

Quote:

If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results, then Republicans lost their minds chasing the Clintons down rabbit holes years ago.

They spent the 1990s turning every gnat fart in the Clinton White House into a six-part inquiry, and at the end of it, Bill left office historically popular. They?ve spent the better part of the 2010s doing the same thing to Hillary, and though she is emphatically not historically popular, Republicans have, in the process, tended to humiliate themselves and abet Donald Trump?the one person politically incorrect enough to call her crooked and accuse her of playing the woman card, at last, at last.

What we witnessed Thursday was part of a pattern that goes back more than 20 years. A Clinton does something?in some cases innocuous, in this case worthy of criticism?and her political nemeses respond completely out of proportion. They?ve invested so heavily in the fantasy that Hillary?s one email or utterance away from complete self-destruction that they can?t bring themselves to accept anything less than the highest return. A sunk cost fallacy of power politics and partisan score-settling.

The pattern has become familiar enough that reporters now anticipate it. When FBI Director James Comey excoriated Clinton for her sloppy email protocol, it was almost a foregone conclusion that Republicans would peer so deeply into the mouth of the gift horse he?d just given them that they?d pop out the other end. On Thursday, they hauled him up to Capitol Hill knowing that any number of right-wing members on the House Oversight Committee might attack his integrity, and sure enough they did. Now the chase continues.

What made this episode unique is that the same media that expected Republicans to overreach played a critical role in increasing their expectations of a political windfall.

Republicans in Congress and their conservative media allies largely brought this upon themselves. They were the ones who made right-wing sop out of baseless speculation that Clinton might be indicted for violating a law nobody?s ever been convicted of violating.

But due to a strange brew of incentives that proved toxic?the competition for eyeballs, the lack of subject matter expertise, the industry standard of reportorial balance?the mainstream media did nothing to puncture this myth. To the contrary, it treated the threat of indictment as a permanent question mark hovering over Clinton?s campaign like a dark cloud. In a different media ecosystem, this wouldn?t have happened. A mix of common sense and truly basic research and reporting would have established a consensus that Republicans were trying to gin up intrigue and damaging innuendo, but that an indictment was extraordinarily unlikely. Instead, the remote odds of one came to be seen as something like a 50-50 proposition, to the point where even professional Democrats began to worry Clinton might be charged with a felony and prosecuted.

By the time Comey handed down his utterly predictable recommendation that prosecuting Clinton would not be reasonable, it had become a foregone conclusion on the right that an indictment was imminent, and could only be sidestepped through corruption.

The ensuing dissonance between what this unimpeachable, Republican FBI director had concluded and what the Republican Party had trained its voters to expect explains why some members of the oversight panel felt compelled to question Comey?s honor. It also made it impossible for Republicans to congratulate themselves on a job well done, thank Comey for laying out the truth about Clinton?s ?extreme carelessness,? and use his statement as ammunition in the election.

The only other way to resolve the inconsistency was to suggest that Clinton must have lied criminally along the way?to Congress under oath, or to the FBI in an effort to obstruct justice, or both. Jason Chaffetz, the committee?s chairman, thus promised to refer Clinton to the FBI for another investigation.

This will likely produce another disappointing finding (Clinton may have presented facts in a misleading way, but there?s no reason to believe she perjured herself). It will leave the conspiracy-minded GOP base blindsided once again, and give way to some other tangentially related but probably fruitless inquisition. We will be dealing with the fallout of the email investigation well into Clinton?s first term in the White House, unless Democrats reclaim the House and Senate. But now, instead of investigating Clinton for endangering national security or for some other crime related to her public service, it will transform into a shameless witch hunt. The kind of partisan onslaught that only seems to make the Clintons more powerful. And thus the insanity begets itself.

"Clinton may have presented facts in a misleading way, but there?s no reason to believe she perjured herself."

Monroe wrote:
Jennifer Morrill 'didn't know' if the mayor was at Zeppelin Hall?

Jeez.

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote: FULL STOP!
Let?s get some facts out there. CNN is not ?lefty?. They are centrist, if anything. Mostly, they are crap and just pander to the top story.

Fox News had an employee whose wife worked on Bush?s campaign. They thought it was fine that their reporter remain covering the Bush campaign and thought there was not conflict.

CNN had a person covering Kerry during the campaign. They found that the person had a spouse which worked for Kerry. They removed that person from covering Kerry.

You wonder why I think you don?t know what you?re talking about. That?s an example. One organization saw a clear conflict of interest and removed the person. The other kept them on staff and on message. The fact that you think this is some sort of argument shows how far removed you are.

You do realize that CNN (Clinton News Network) just decided this year that there are other people in America besides Liberals right? They added a few conservatives to boost their ratings during this election year. It still has a too strong of a stable of liberal voices for me.

WSJ May 2016: ?I think it was a legitimate criticism of CNN that it was a little too liberal,? Mr. Zucker said. ?We have added many more middle-of-the-road conservative voices to an already strong stable of liberal voices. And I think that we are a much more-balanced network and, as a result, a much more inviting network to a segment of the audience that might not have otherwise been willing to come here.?

Gee if you want to talk about employees let?s not forget how CNN?s Candy Crowley inserted herself into the 2012 presidential debate.

?Obama objected, telling Romney to check the transcript. At that point, Crowley attempted a rare feat during a presidential debate: fact-checking in real time. ?He did in fact, sir,? Crowley told Romney referring to the president?s initial description of the assault on the U.S. Consulate.?

I have never read such twisted posts. You should rename yourself as the Twister. You take what someone posted and completely twist it around and reply to your twisted version of the post. You even twisted FBI Director Comey?s transcript from the fbi web site. That?s ballzy .

?He answered, ?Yes, and I?m not looking to pick on Gmail. Their security is actually pretty good. The weakness is in the individual users. But, yes, Gmail has full time security staff, and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here.?(aka Hillary?s "unsophisticated" bargain basement server)


Quote:

Pebble wrote: "The word ?unsophisticated? is your term. Given your current technical knowledge I accept that description as much as I accept what Cookie Monster might describe a nuclear fusion reactor to be like?

un?so?phis?ti?cat?ed: not complicated or highly developed; basic. "unsophisticated computer software"

You are right I know nothing about IT after 40 years nothing has sunk in yet. I am still stuck on how to use the computer punch card machine. The damm thing keeps jamming.

.

SOS wrote:
Ted Cruz Accepts Trump's Offer To Speak At The RNC Without Endorsing Him

But wait...not long ago Donald referred to Cruz as 'Lyin Ted' - so what gives? Did Cruz somehow become 'honest' in the last month? Is it Donald that was lying when he called Cruz a liar? Was it all political theater? Does Donald think this is a new season of The Apprentice? If Donald was telling the truth and Ted is still a liar - we can assume anything that Cruz says at the convention is a fib . Donald is making this election cycle so confusing. And dangerous.

hero69 wrote:
State department reopening probe is a big waste.....better crooked Hillary than donald, the pathological liar.

neverleft wrote:
Wow the RNC already came out with a Hillary email lie video..

https://www.youtube.com/embed/O0vHZqVn-io



.

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

papadage wrote:
It's bullshit because she used them in turn (desktop, laptop, phone), not multiple phones. And she also was denied a secure device anyway.

Nobody denied her a secure device and they pointed out that the devices she was using were insecure

Atsushi wrote:
What James Comey and John Roberts have in common

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-sh ... roberts-have-common#break

Quote:

In conservative circles, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts used to be a respected figure, held in high regard. Roberts enjoyed a lengthy record as a center-right jurist, and when then-President George W. Bush nominated him to the high court, Republicans everywhere were delighted.

Roberts did not, however, stay in the right?s good graces. After the chief justice voted to uphold the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act ? twice ? quite a few conservatives, and even some Republican presidential candidates, turned on Roberts, questioning his judgment, intellect, and integrity.

Right about now, I suspect FBI Director James Comey can relate to how Roberts must feel about his former admirers abruptly changing their opinions.

Comey, in case anyone?s forgotten, is a lifelong Republican who served as a top official in the Bush/Cheney Justice Department. He cut his teeth as a public-sector attorney in the 1990s, when Comey signed on ?as deputy special counsel to the Senate Whitewater Committee,? where he went after, of all people, Hillary Clinton.

I?m not aware of anyone on the right questioning Comey?s abilities or professionalism ahead of yesterday?s announcement in the email matter. On the contrary, Republicans gave Comey a vote of confidence as recently as June. Politico published this report one month ago today:

Should the FBI not recommend an indictment of Hillary Clinton following its investigation of the setup of her private email server, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) on Monday said he and his Republican colleagues would ?probably? accept the outcome.

?Oh, probably, because we do believe in [FBI Director] James Comey,? the Utah Republican said during an appearance on Fox News? ?Outnumbered.? ?I do think that in all of the government, he is a man of integrity and honesty.?

Yesterday, however, Chaffetz said the exact opposite, and accused Comey of failing to carry out his duties. Other GOP members of Congress made related arguments, while some Republican pundits adopted an even harsher posture.

The pattern matters. John Roberts was an excellent justice, Republicans said, right up until he strayed from the partisan script. Trey Gowdy was the perfect person to lead the GOP?s Benghazi Committee, they said, right up until he failed to dig up dirt on Hillary Clinton.

And Jim Comey was a fine FBI director, right up until he left his party dejected by exercising independent judgment.

In reality, Roberts, Gowdy, and Comey aren?t guilty of corruption or partisan betrayals ? their ?failures? exist solely in the minds of lazy ideologues. What their Republican critics don?t seem to appreciate is that their ostensible allies asked them to go too far, ignore their responsibilities, abuse an otherwise legitimate process, and look out for the ?team,? whether the facts warranted it or not.

Comey didn?t play along with a partisan game, and his reward is a round of condemnations from the same people who, up until 24 hours ago, sang their praises.

Maybe this will give birth to a new (or expanded) conspiracy theory that Right Wingers can entertain themselves.

iGreg wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

jerseymom wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Nothing says 'income equality' more than four white folks attending a $1,000/ticket Broadway show. Fulop put this on his FB page, and is getting shredded (mostly). No word on who paid for the tickets, maybe the Clinton Foundation? Paid
by the Saudis!

http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/20 ... t.html#incart_2box_hudson

The tickets were not $1000.00 each.

Excerpt from article sourced below:

The campaign has rented every seat in the 1,300-seat Richard Rodgers Theatre for the extra performance, and tickets will not be cheap. General Seats for the fundraiser were priced at $2,700, but have since sold out. "Preferred Seats" begin at $5,000, and "Premium Seats," which include a photo reception with Clinton, are priced at $10,000. "Host" seats start at $33,400, and an "Event Chair" seat, which includes an invitation to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, start at a whopping $100,000. At a minimum, the event is expected to raise $3.5 million.

With the proletariat in mind:

Similarly to Hamilton?s lottery system, Clinton's campaign has also launched a contest in which winners will be able to attend the performance and have all their travel and accommodations covered. The contest requires a donation of minimally $3 to enter.

Source

I love the $3 .00 Lottery tickets. God Bless Hillary , ALWAYS thinkIng about the little people - keep figthing for that middle class .

Billy and Hilly with only a combined net worth of 100 million certainly keeps them in touch with what people experience in the struggle.

papadage wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
Regarding her State Department email practices, "my predecessors did the same thing."
? Hillary Clinton on Wednesday, March 9th, 2016 in a Univision/Washington Post Democratic debate

POLITIFACT 3/9/2016:

Our ruling

Clinton said, regarding her State Department email practices, "my predecessors did the same thing."

This is a misleading claim chiefly because only one prior secretary of state regularly used email, Colin Powell.
Powell did use a personal email address for government business, however he did not use a private server kept at his home, as Clinton did.

We rate this claim Mostly False.

Powell grandstanded with classified reports on yellowcake to the General Assembly to justify the invasion of Iraq. Is that information declassified?

I call bullshit on the bullshit.

SwitchboardGirl wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
trump is one sick, demented soul if he truly believes that clinton's email carelessness is worse than david petraeus giving classified info to his girlfriend.

Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice were also guilty of doing the same thing as Hillary, using their personal email for classified information. Where was the outrage there?