Monroe wrote:
And from today's headlines, Muslim Somali migrant uses car and knife to injure 10 Ohio State students. Doubly bad for the loony left who want to bring in more 'refugees' and limit guns. Thankfully the only one dead is the perp.

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
This thread continues the great JCList tradition of catering to racists.

"Joe Legal" v. "Jose Illegal" because of course there are no legal people named Jose in the country.

Monroe, you can drink if you want. That doesn't change the fact that Trump appointed a white supremacist as his top adviser. I don't know anyone that has any self-respect finding it acceptable.

Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2 ... t.html#incart_river_index

Yup. You continue to be an idiot.

And you continue to be a phony attacking me behind a silly name. I stand behind what I say. I have seen jobs in this country go to other non-Americans. So I guess you are anti-America.

I've met you and told you to your face that you are an idiot. So, no, I don't just say this behind a keyboard.

You demonstrate your absurd xenophobia routinely. The crap you spew is garbage backed up by nothing more than your own preconceived notions born from stupidity. The planet improves when ideas like yours dissipate...

No you have not, you Pebble hide behind your phony name attacking people. Saying Americans should have jobs instead of going to H1B and illegal immigrants is not xenophobia, it is putting the people in this country first. Liberals really have a hard time being loyal to their own country.

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
This thread continues the great JCList tradition of catering to racists.

"Joe Legal" v. "Jose Illegal" because of course there are no legal people named Jose in the country.

Monroe, you can drink if you want. That doesn't change the fact that Trump appointed a white supremacist as his top adviser. I don't know anyone that has any self-respect finding it acceptable.

Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2 ... t.html#incart_river_index

Yup. You continue to be an idiot.

And you continue to be a phony attacking me behind a silly name. I stand behind what I say. I have seen jobs in this country go to other non-Americans. So I guess you are anti-America.

Yvonne wrote:
http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2 ... t.html#incart_river_index

stillinjc wrote:
Wow, Pebble recovered after the crushing blow on Nov 9. And he's back to his usual babble - racist this, racist that... No lessons learned, nada.

Still looking at the world through the lens of racism.

It is more complex than that.

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

GrovePath wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Trump...oppose(s) illegal immigrants...

Trump's wife worked illegally during her first weeks in the US, documents show

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... in-us-documents-show.html

What happened to "the rule of law"? Either it's legal or illegal. If it's illegal, she broke the law.

A 'handful' of gigs, 'weeks' before she was legit. I can live with that.

JCMan8 wrote:
The voters have woken up to the continued lies and smears that are spewed out of the left and the mass media.

Look no further than the title of this article (and thread). Fulop is welcoming to "immigrants." We all know full well that "immigrants" aren't the issue, illegal immigrants are.

So they aren't fooling anyone yet they continue to lie and deceive, only hurting their credibility further in the eyes of everyone who isn't part of their echo chambers.

Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Another attempted left smear that failed to capture the attention of the voters.

At least she was paying her income taxes through the company that employed her.

How many illegal given the choice to file or pocket the federal/state taxes, ssi etc.



Quote:

GrovePath wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Trump...oppose(s) illegal immigrants...

Trump's wife worked illegally during her first weeks in the US, documents show

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... in-us-documents-show.html

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

rescuelife wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Jersey Journal statement on the open space tax:

"Voters should say no, though, on Jersey City Public Question No. 2, which would levy a new tax dedicated to creating a trust fund for parks and historic preservation.

The tax would amount to 2 cents per $100 of assessed value, which is not a large sum. But with a citywide property revaluation set to be completed next year, one that will change assessments for many homeowners, voters owe it to property owners to wait until the new assessments are cemented before approving a new property tax."

Can you also provide their statement on whether to move the elections?

Different forum

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
It is not racist to prevent dangerous people from immigrating here. We owe nothing to them and they will only drain us. I'm happy with the polls and think enough Americans will agree with me come Tuesday.

As for evidence of Hillary's corruption, there has been plenty of ink spilled on the subject over the years. There's a great book called Clinton Cash, which actually sparked the ongoing FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire ... nvestigation-clinton-cash

More recently, Wikileaks released a memo drafted by Bill Clinton's longest serving and most trusted advisor where he detailed the quid pro quo arrangement. I encourage you to read the entire memo and the book for the evidence you pretend you are interested in.

I asked for specifics and you don't provide them. Either they exist or they don't.

Clinton Cash is a book written by Trumps campaign CEO. It isn't a factual source.

As for your racism, it is on display here in multiple threads. It isn't only for your desire to deport brown people.

I did provide them. Do you know how to read? There is an entire book written on the subject containing specifics, along with the Wikileaks memo.

And while you may employ the typical liberal strategy of shoot the messenger while ignoring the message, the FBI does not see things your way. The book obviously matters for them to conduct an investigation into the Clinton Foundation after reading it.

Investigations are not evidence. Your book link isn't evidence as the author is not a newsman, he's the CEO of Trump's campaign.

I asked for evidence. You have not provided it.

Wikileaks does not contain anything either. If it did, you'd be able to provide a link to it. So... Provide or walk the claim back. Burden of proof is on you.

The book contains the evidence. The investigation stemming from the book is just proof that the book is true. If what you were saying was correct, the FBI would have laughed at the book and thrown it in the garbage.

As for the Wikileaks memo, here is an article from NBC (pro Hillary) discussing it:

Hacked Memo Reinforces Worst Perception of the Clintons

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first ... rception-clintons-n673806

Here is a good quote:


"The memo ? lays out the aggressive strategy behind lining up the consulting contracts and paid speaking engagements for Bill Clinton that added tens of millions of dollars to the family's fortune, including during the years that Hillary Clinton led the State Department. It describes how Band helped run what he called 'Bill Clinton Inc.,' obtaining 'in-kind services for the President and his family?for personal travel, hospitality, vacation and the like.'"

What the memo makes clear is how inseparable the Clinton Foundation was to business interests."

manu wrote:
Nate Silver is a statistician. Maybe you disagree with his methodology? What part(s) do you disagree with?

You are like Trump: you like polls when they are in your favor but are rigged when they are not... Got it.

135jc wrote:
Quote:

kencares wrote:
I'm all for good police--Police who both protect civilians and police the police. But the thin blue line was not recently "invented" as 135JC suggests, it's part of a systemic us-vs-them mentality that is at the root of the problem we face.

Cops do not inherently deserve respect. They have to earn it. You don't get respect through corruption or by painting lines on our streets.

Who painted/approved the lines? Terrence, can you please investigate?

From what I have researched this practice was started in 2015 by home owners. They painted blue lines on curbs to show their support for the police. This was done as a response to the negative publicity aimed at the police after the recent string of shootings involving police officers. It may have been adopted by municipalities but it is not an "us against them" demonstration as is kencares suggested.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
When did we start honoring people that apply and take a job that pays well, has good benefits and provides a pension?

I didn't realize they had it so hard!

You must not pay much attention to our biased media. Cops have been under siege, both literally and figuratively.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

hamhock wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
There is absolutely nothing racist with what I said here. You are a child, unable to deal with the world as it is so you lash out at those who point out highly relevant truths that make you uncomfortable.

Hopefully for your sake you will mature in time.

Perception is more important than intent. It doesn't matter if you think you're a racist. It matters if the rest of us do.

Not at all. Consensus is not a substitute for truth.

TheBigGuy wrote:
It is expected? Is that all that is left of your "hope and change" The Obama DOJ never prosecuted one Wall Street Crony Capitalist... in fact they became key members of his cabinet.

What do expect Hillary will do??? it really sounds like you are surrendering by voting for HRC.

bill wrote:
I was interested to see if there was any proof, as a starting point I found this from politifact.com

"In a pre-emptive measure against potential conflicts of interest, the foundation signed a memorandum of understanding with President Barack Obama?s administration in December 2008. The foundation promised to report its donors in order to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest. Hillary Clinton also signed a separate ethics agreement with the State Department, pledging to keep her distance from foundation matters as secretary of state.

Emails from Clinton?s State Department, detailed in media reports, show how fuzzy the line was between the department and the foundation. Clinton took many meetings with foundation donors and offered assistance to several. And at times, foundation staff reached out to Clinton?s staff to inquire about opportunities for donors."

So all we have to do now is find the reports that specifically detail the assistance she offered.

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:

Why wouldn't they work to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

Why wouldn't they cheat to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

You meant that, right?

How is it "cheating"?

I forgot that I am in discussion with a guy who just recently claimed that the mainstream media are not biased against Trump.

Goodbye to you sir.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
It is not racist to prevent dangerous people from immigrating here. We owe nothing to them and they will only drain us. I'm happy with the polls and think enough Americans will agree with me come Tuesday.

As for evidence of Hillary's corruption, there has been plenty of ink spilled on the subject over the years. There's a great book called Clinton Cash, which actually sparked the ongoing FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire ... nvestigation-clinton-cash

More recently, Wikileaks released a memo drafted by Bill Clinton's longest serving and most trusted advisor where he detailed the quid pro quo arrangement. I encourage you to read the entire memo and the book for the evidence you pretend you are interested in.

I asked for specifics and you don't provide them. Either they exist or they don't.

Clinton Cash is a book written by Trumps campaign CEO. It isn't a factual source.

As for your racism, it is on display here in multiple threads. It isn't only for your desire to deport brown people.

I did provide them. Do you know how to read? There is an entire book written on the subject containing specifics, along with the Wikileaks memo.

And while you may employ the typical liberal strategy of shoot the messenger while ignoring the message, the FBI does not see things your way. The book obviously matters for them to conduct an investigation into the Clinton Foundation after reading it.

JCMan8 wrote:
It is not racist to prevent dangerous people from immigrating here. We owe nothing to them and they will only drain us. I'm happy with the polls and think enough Americans will agree with me come Tuesday.

As for evidence of Hillary's corruption, there has been plenty of ink spilled on the subject over the years. There's a great book called Clinton Cash, which actually sparked the ongoing FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire ... nvestigation-clinton-cash

More recently, Wikileaks released a memo drafted by Bill Clinton's longest serving and most trusted advisor where he detailed the quid pro quo arrangement. I encourage you to read the entire memo and the book for the evidence you pretend you are interested in.

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:

Why wouldn't they work to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

Why wouldn't they cheat to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

You meant that, right?

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
so...doanld used his charity to buy a painting for his golf course?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/polit ... ndation-article-1.2854613

Sure. And Hillary used her charity to exchange favors to donors, including foreign governments, in exchange for bribes. That's how the Clintons made over $200 million since leaving the White House. The Washington Post called it Clinton Inc.

But don't worry, it seems that she will be in jail soon enough...

You did not read the article. Did you? Otherwise, you would know that it was not the Washington Post calling it 'Clinton Inc.'

You are right. It was Bill Clinton's longest held and most trusted advisor who called the Clinton Foundation "Clinton Inc." The Washington Post reported on it.

But that makes it worse. The Clinton insiders themselves brag about how their charity is just a slush fund for doing favors for donors in exchange for bribes. Think what the Healy administration got in trouble for, only its 10,000x worse.

So basically you were once again talking about something you did not (and atill don't) know anything about...

And you continue to make shit up. It is becoming a full time job to call you on all of them...

You are lying, yet again. The Clinton Foundation, or Clinton Inc., was a slush fund that got Bill and Hillary millions of dollars in exchange for buying "access" or "influence," aka favors.

I understand why you defend this corrupt woman so much, because you want Muslim "migrants" to pour into this country, but that doesn't make your statements true.

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
I find it very funny that there is "outrage" over Bernie getting "cheated." Seriously, why is anyone surprised that a political party didn't want someone that wasn't a member to be their nominee?

Why wouldn't they work to make Hillary, the only member of the Democratic Party, win the Democratic Party nomination...?

As for the emails... There is no actual information about them. All we know is that Anthony Weiner's computer had emails on them which contained the ClintonMail domain. They could be emails we've already seen. They could be emails that aren't classified. They could be emails talking about the latest pant suit that should be ordered. Heck, we don't even know if these emails are from or to Hillary.

In the end, Donald Trump is a racist that courts racists. If you're ok voting for a guy like that and having a racist represent the United States of America, by all means. Otherwise, you'll pull the lever for someone else.

And if you are comfortable turning the country over to the Clinton Family, a family who indulge in extreme crony capitalism, possess questionable ethics and embrace a morality on par with 19th century robber barons so be it.

If we accept your premise that Trump is a racist, at least we have hope that he will act in a civil manner similar to party leading democrats like Bryd and Gore who were members of the Ku Klux Klan and changed their racist views with time.

But who knows, like Hillary says... you need to have a public face and a private face with public policy.... now which one are you voting for?

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Today Obama threw down the 'sexist' attack, saying that's what men are if they don't vote for crooked Hillary.

Does anyone remember him thinking this in 2008 when he said she wasn't fit to be POTUS??

Panic mode Level Hard.

psyop wrote:
Why does nj.com keep posting her garbage?

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2 ... o_on_ballot_question.html

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
The line Hillary delivered about Trump being a puppet was very effective. It would likely have lived on as the highlight had Trump not pulled the "nasty woman" line out or threatened to not support the candidate when he eventually loses.

I listened to last night's Al Smith Dinner. I thought Trump was very funny for much of it. Some of his jokes bombed, but it was more that they weren't exactly jokes, just attack lines. Hillary was also pretty funny. Comparatively, she was more consistent while his best jokes were better than her best and his worst was infinitely worse than hers. Basically, it was a metaphor for the candidates themselves...

The corrupt line made me cringe just the way he delivered it with that pause.... did like the pardon me joke.

She delivered some very funny lines too. Statute of Liberty line was funny, I think she blew the delivery, probably reading left out a word such as He "ranks" or "rates", by the time she hit 5 or 6. if she looses the torch, changes her hair etc. it was old.

Would love to know the writers... at least we didn't see any offensive closings like this year's WH Press Dinner.

bill wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
[quote]
I had read that same study and had heard it before. Most recently there have been studies equating broadband internet speed with more radical political views.

Do you have a link? That sounds like such a weird topic to study.

Quote:

The study linked is flawed given the sample size and demographic.

Can you please elaborate on this?