JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

CatDog wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Is this a serious post? You admit that voter registration fraud is common and easy to commit and then claim without any evidence that it's very difficult to turn these fake registrations into actual votes?

Why exactly do you think these Democrats are breaking the law and registering dead people to vote? For the fun of it?

THIS IS EXACTLY MY POINT! You don't even understand the difference between voter registration fraud and voter fraud!

Committing voter registration fraud doesn't require you to be successful in the act. The example in that article is a perfect demonstration of it. Someone tries to register dead people for voting, or for Mickey Mouse. The elections board reviews the registrations and says "of course this person can't vote."

See? It's incredibly easy to fill out a registration form for whatever you want. Actually getting that registration accepted and then getting somebody to show up and vote is an entirely different thing.

The main occasion when voter fraud happens is when somebody votes early or by absentee ballot and then shows up to their regular polling place to vote again (which wouldn't be stopped by ID laws). And guess what?? The election board catches that stuff! Just like the example posted in that other thread.

You say you want proof that voter fraud isn't an issue, but the proof is out there, constantly, in easy to find places, and yet you will willfully ignore it to push this stupid narrative of a problem that does not exist.

Here's a source for you to promptly ignore:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/th ... -id-laws-and-voter-fraud/
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/v ... re-in-american-elections/

Even if there were hundreds of cases of voter fraud each year (which is an extremely generous estimate) it's not enough to sway any election.


If you really are concerned about elections being stolen, you should be concerned about laws that disenfranchise voters, or voter roll purges, or the fact that many ballot boxes are easy hackable electronics that have no paper audit trail and are proprietary software being handled by private companies. THOSE are the real issues.

Not some random jagoff like Ann Coulter voting twice in an election.

You are so full of it, linking to Nate Silver of all people (along with the Washington Post, owned by a guy who bragged about buying the paper just to influence this election) as if that means anything.

Want some facts? Just today, the Pennsylvania State Police raided the offices of a (surprise surprise) Democratic organization for engaging in suspected voter fraud. Hopefully all responsible get arrested, and voter ID laws are passed to help thwart these fraud schemes.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/ ... oup-evidence-voter-fraud/

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

stillinjc wrote:
Donald J. TrumpVerified account
?@realDonaldTrump

It came out that Huma Abedin knows all about Hillary?s private illegal emails. Huma?s PR husband, Anthony Weiner, will tell the world.

8:50 AM - 3 Aug 2015


I am still amazed how Trump called this one...

He has been right about many things this election season. He has a deeper insight into the world than most people.

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
When you fill out the registration form one question is asked, are you a citizen? If you answer yes, you can proceed. If you answer no, then you do not proceed. Let's not forget the form is in English and Spanish and has been for awhile. I remember when Cubans were voting in the 1960s and early 1970s before they were granted citizenship. They claimed they were Puerto Ricans who do have citizenship.

It seems that there is an additional step, no?

Steps 3-5 ? Provide your name, date of birth and your valid New Jersey Driver?s License or ID card number. If you don't have one, provide the last 4 digits of your Social Security number.

Come Manu snap out of it.... stop posting silly stuff. So for voter registration we start with a valid driver's license... then state issued id card and then last (and least verifiable) the last 4 digits of SSN. Only a liberal democrat would believe that is a sound process.

Here is my SS # 1-2-3-4. Have at it!

Yvonne wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
When you fill out the registration form one question is asked, are you a citizen? If you answer yes, you can proceed. If you answer no, then you do not proceed. Let's not forget the form is in English and Spanish and has been for awhile. I remember when Cubans were voting in the 1960s and early 1970s before they were granted citizenship. They claimed they were Puerto Ricans who do have citizenship.

It seems that there is an additional step, no?

Steps 3-5 ? Provide your name, date of birth and your valid New Jersey Driver?s License or ID card number. If you don't have one, provide the last 4 digits of your Social Security number.

You can make up the last four numbers, it is not the whole sequence. I remember Times Square had these store fronts which for $65.00 would give you an ID. This was awhile ago, but I was amazed how they advertised so brazenly. Children who are enrolled in public schools are supposed to have Social Security numbers too, but North Hudson towns have a lot of children enroll from illegal parents where the children were not born here and the schools do not turn them down. People here forget former mayor McCann voted in the school election and later the board of elections said he was not qualifed after his vote was counted. You cannot vote while on parole or probation. It takes a while to catch violations and really how do you catch someone with only 4 digits from Social Security?

Yvonne wrote:
When you fill out the registration form one question is asked, are you a citizen? If you answer yes, you can proceed. If you answer no, then you do not proceed. Let's not forget the form is in English and Spanish and has been for awhile. I remember when Cubans were voting in the 1960s and early 1970s before they were granted citizenship. They claimed they were Puerto Ricans who do have citizenship.

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance

Published October 31, 2016

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

The following night, Lee-Anne Walters, a mom whose twin boys stopped growing and whose daughter lost her hair during the Flint water contamination crisis, posed a question to both Clinton, the eventual Democratic presidential nominee, and her primary opponent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... -question-in-advance.html

Brazile just got fired by CNN over this.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-medi ... zile-230534#ixzz4OgJupnb2

But CNN (the Clinton News Network) is just sorry they got caught rigging the debates. They'll instruct future people to feed the debate questions to the Democrat candidate by phone instead.

At least, they are not trying to rig the election by voting multiple times like Trump supporters:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/po ... a/?utm_term=.017266d159a0

The irony...

No the irony here is democrats allowing millions of illegal aliens to vote for our next president. That does not qualify as rigging the election.

Come on Manu, hope all is well. Your most recent posts are vacuous and people are just abusing you!

Really off your game. Did you loose you bookmarks to Huffpo, Kos and the Beast?

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance

Published October 31, 2016

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

The following night, Lee-Anne Walters, a mom whose twin boys stopped growing and whose daughter lost her hair during the Flint water contamination crisis, posed a question to both Clinton, the eventual Democratic presidential nominee, and her primary opponent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... -question-in-advance.html

Brazile just got fired by CNN over this.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-medi ... zile-230534#ixzz4OgJupnb2

But CNN (the Clinton News Network) is just sorry they got caught rigging the debates. They'll instruct future people to feed the debate questions to the Democrat candidate by phone instead.

At least, they are not trying to rig the election by voting multiple times like Trump supporters:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/po ... a/?utm_term=.017266d159a0

The irony...

That's a nice deflection from the fact that CNN was caught by Wikileaks feeding debate questions to Hillary, rigging the vote by unfairly making her look better.

Also I don't think you understand what "supporters" means. You only linked to one person. I can link to the Democratic operative who was caught registering 19 dead people to vote. Committed by the same party who likes to pretend that voter fraud isn't a real thing.

No deflection... putting things in perspective...

2 additional are mentioned in the article...

Don't you find it ironic that supporters of the candidate claiming the election is rigged are caught trying to rig the election? Because I do...

Your idea of putting things into perspective when faced with irrefutable evidence that an "objective" organization that hosted many debates was in direct contact with Hillary's campaign manager in an attempt to rig the debates is to point to the actions of a random woman in Iowa who has no connection to Trump's campaign?

Nice try but you aren't fooling anyone.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance

Published October 31, 2016

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

The following night, Lee-Anne Walters, a mom whose twin boys stopped growing and whose daughter lost her hair during the Flint water contamination crisis, posed a question to both Clinton, the eventual Democratic presidential nominee, and her primary opponent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... -question-in-advance.html

Brazile just got fired by CNN over this.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-medi ... zile-230534#ixzz4OgJupnb2

But CNN (the Clinton News Network) is just sorry they got caught rigging the debates. They'll instruct future people to feed the debate questions to the Democrat candidate by phone instead.

At least, they are not trying to rig the election by voting multiple times like Trump supporters:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/po ... a/?utm_term=.017266d159a0

The irony...

That's a nice deflection from the fact that CNN was caught by Wikileaks feeding debate questions to Hillary, rigging the vote by unfairly making her look better.

Also I don't think you understand what "supporters" means. You only linked to one person. I can link to the Democratic operative who was caught registering 19 dead people to vote. Committed by the same party who likes to pretend that voter fraud isn't a real thing.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance

Published October 31, 2016

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, ?One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,? the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

?Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,? Brazile wrote.

The following night, Lee-Anne Walters, a mom whose twin boys stopped growing and whose daughter lost her hair during the Flint water contamination crisis, posed a question to both Clinton, the eventual Democratic presidential nominee, and her primary opponent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... -question-in-advance.html

Brazile just got fired by CNN over this.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-medi ... zile-230534#ixzz4OgJupnb2

But CNN (the Clinton News Network) is just sorry they got caught rigging the debates. They'll instruct future people to feed the debate questions to the Democrat candidate by phone instead.

135jc wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
LOL what a joke?..

?FINAL HUMA-LIATION? Clinton aide Abedin reportedly pleads ignorance of how emails got on her shared laptop?

Published October 30, 2016 FoxNews.com

Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin reportedly has said she does not know how tens of thousands of emails related to the FBI investigation of her boss' personal server were found on a laptop she shared with her now-estranged husband, former New York Congressman Anthony Weiner.

The Washington Post reported that Abedin was not a regular user of the laptop in question. The paper also reported that Abedin's lawyers did not bother to search the device for work-related emails after she agreed to turn over such messages to the State Department.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... robe-got-on-computer.html

That's my point. How can we trust out national security secrets with this"technology naive" group

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Let's say the negative things about both candidates are true.

Trump is a serial groper, and sometimes says mean things, while Hillary negligently allowed our top secret information to fall into the hands of our enemies after setting up an illegal email server she never told anyone about.

Worse, when confronted, she repeatedly lied to the American people and even lied to the FBI.

Which candidate is worse? Should be a very easy decision.

I would just add that, as the debates demonstrated, Trump has no idea what he is talking about and can't speak intelligently about any topics or policies...

Easy decision indeed...

He knows that Muslims conduct war through migration, so that's one huge advantage over his jailbird opponent.

JCMan8 wrote:
Let's say the negative things about both candidates are true.

Trump is a serial groper, and sometimes says mean things, while Hillary negligently allowed our top secret information to fall into the hands of our enemies after setting up an illegal email server she never told anyone about.

Worse, when confronted, she repeatedly lied to the American people and even lied to the FBI.

Which candidate is worse? Should be a very easy decision.

Voyeur wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

EasyGibson wrote:
I live next door to Talde. It happened. They had cops posted up every 20 feet or so.

None of you heard about it because none of you pathetic peons are worth even a fraction of what they were looking to get in donations. You'd be taking up space that could be potentially occupied by another Goldman higher up.

Somehow, my invitation was also lost in the mail.

Ticket price for the event started at $45. I don't think you have to be a Goldman higher up to afford it...

The "tickets start at $45" canard - while technically true - remains a canard. A half dozen tickets were probably offered at that price - I don't know the exact number. But I do know that the next tier jumped up to $500 apiece. That's longstanding practice at Hillary fundraisers: token entry beginning at $45, then an abrupt jump to $500.

That tells you everything you need to know about how committed the campaign is to having us peons stop by.

Apologies for the interruption - I'll let you folks get back to telling each other how misguided and deluded you are for your political beliefs.

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Pebble, the NYTimes publishes maybe 10 stories a day, online and in print, slamming Trump-which shouldn't surprise anyone, given that its largest shareholder is Mexican billionaire (one of the richest men in the world) Carlos Slim, who hates Trump and is furious that Trump would secure our borders.

I can see you received the memo from the Trump campaign. Good job using it word for word. Lol...

I grew up reading the NYTimes at breakfast, and an old friends dad was the publisher for a short time-so, no, I've followed the Times for quite a while-including the financial position that Carlos Slim has had waaaay before Trump was a candidate.

EasyGibson wrote:
I live next door to Talde. It happened. They had cops posted up every 20 feet or so.

None of you heard about it because none of you pathetic peons are worth even a fraction of what they were looking to get in donations. You'd be taking up space that could be potentially occupied by another Goldman higher up.

Somehow, my invitation was also lost in the mail.

Monroe wrote:
Pebble, the NYTimes publishes maybe 10 stories a day, online and in print, slamming Trump-which shouldn't surprise anyone, given that its largest shareholder is Mexican billionaire (one of the richest men in the world) Carlos Slim, who hates Trump and is furious that Trump would secure our borders.

135jc wrote:
That's not the point. Everyone knows Trump does not give to charity. Either do the Walton's but I'm sure you still shop at Wal-Mart. The Clinton foundation has been exploited to make Bill Hillary and Chelsea rich.

neverleft wrote:
Team Clinton and the media will have to come up with a different tactic. Portraying Trump as a perv is not working. Hmm when will the media report on the WikiLeaks emails?

Sunday, October 16:

Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein ABC News/Wash Post Clinton 47, Trump 43, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:

If Obama doesn't start a war with Russia first?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vide ... _start_a_nuclear_war.html


Frankly I think the democrats already went nuclear with the alleged assaults. democrat internal polling must be troublesome... they have turned to Gloria Allred to coordinate this?

What tricks won't she do when she smells free money. Talk about bottom feeders.

Yes Comrade - you tell the truth! Obama wants war not Putin! You want the Truth, plus more than truth?

http://www.pravdareport.com/
http://russia-insider.com/en/izvestia-russian-daily
https://sputniknews.com/

The above is source for Breitbart! Vote Trump!

I quote you Jill Stein concerns and you quote me brietbart???

Let's see what Obama delivers for options dealing with Russians today, now that Kerry walked away.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mid ... ns-exclusiv-idUSKCN12D2B2

BTW Obama missed that option 5 years ago with the line in the sand bravado... no one in their right mind today would follow him into war.

I saw the quote. Does anyone really care what Jill Stein has to say about anything? Especially defense issues...
Have a happy Friday.

And no opinion about the Reuter's news story, Obama may have us at war by Monday. I am sure he will announce it to the Russians on Meet The Press.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

mscottc wrote:
Quote:

bill wrote:
Quote:

mscottc wrote:
Pew research poll, one of the most respected polling organizations around has asked over the last few years, "Which one group of people are least likely to vote for President." This shows the one group that Americans are most bigoted towards. Do you know what that one group is? Atheists. so don't tell me that Atheists don't have anything to fear.

Americans dislike atheists because they are immoral and unAmerican.

And you sir, are the perfect example of what I'm talking about. Just remember one thing, my morality is based on what is in my heart and mind, not based on fear of god and going to hell like your morality. And unlike people like you, I put country, this country, ahead of any church or religion.

You do have a religion, "progressiveism," which is an ideology that demands blind faith, strict adherence to dogma, and punishes Sinners just like any other religion.

Only difference is the State is your higher power.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
will trump be using his foundation to buy 102-year old bottles of bollinger champagne at auction? that's the kind of snake he is

Unlike your baseless speculation, Hillary already stole $200,000 worth of china when she and Bill left the White House. That's the kind of snake she is.

Yes that it TRUE Comrade JCMAN8! Hillary is thief! Also you forget to mention Hillary started birther movement! And Miss Universe Alicia Machado is whore who should lick Donald's boots (and other parts too huh huh).

Keep up good work!

DO NOT read:
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/ ... accuses-clinton-stealing/

Way to cite to Politifact, essentially a Hillary campaign website known for things like this:

https://thehornnews.com/wp-content/upl ... 9/Media-bias-1024x295.jpg

In the article you linked, they try to claim Hillary did not steal $200,000 worth of china because she listed it on some form. But after getting called out on her theft, she repaid the money. That's about the kind of deceit I'd expect from her campaign, lol.

Once a snake always a snake.

Wow. Are you really quoting "The Horn News" to criticize the bias of another publication?

This is hilarious...

No, I am not quoting anything. Of course you would know this if you clicked on the link (hopefully you aren't up to rat behavior again and intentionally misrepresenting it).

The link is an image that contrasts two different Politifact articles about Trump and Sanders saying the same thing. When Sanders says it they rate it as "mostly true." But for Trump it's "mostly false." This is because of Politifact's heavy bias, expected because it is operated by the Tampa Bay Times, a strong Hillary endorser.

For a website that extensively illustrates how Politifact is little more than Hillary's campaign with a guise of "objectivity" behind it, check out http://www.politifactbias.com/?m=1

It is very funny for anyone to expect politifact to be taken seriously.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
will trump be using his foundation to buy 102-year old bottles of bollinger champagne at auction? that's the kind of snake he is

Unlike your baseless speculation, Hillary already stole $200,000 worth of china when she and Bill left the White House. That's the kind of snake she is.

Yes that it TRUE Comrade JCMAN8! Hillary is thief! Also you forget to mention Hillary started birther movement! And Miss Universe Alicia Machado is whore who should lick Donald's boots (and other parts too huh huh).

Keep up good work!

DO NOT read:
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/ ... accuses-clinton-stealing/

Way to cite to Politifact, essentially a Hillary campaign website known for things like this:

https://thehornnews.com/wp-content/upl ... 9/Media-bias-1024x295.jpg

In the article you linked, they try to claim Hillary did not steal $200,000 worth of china because she listed it on some form. But after getting called out on her theft, she repaid the money. That's about the kind of deceit I'd expect from her campaign, lol.

Once a snake always a snake.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
will trump be using his foundation to buy 102-year old bottles of bollinger champagne at auction? that's the kind of snake he is

Unlike your baseless speculation, Hillary already stole $200,000 worth of china when she and Bill left the White House. That's the kind of snake she is.

135jc wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
'Slow and steady' growth? Obama is the first POTUS to never have a 3% rise in the economy. Hillary would be more of the same. And Obama got those abysmal numbers by doubling he national debt accrued by every single preceding POTUS combined. Just imagine how the economy would be if he hadn't mortgaged our kids lives.

Thank you, Comrade Monroe! The Russian Federation approves of your comments!

yet you can't disagree with the facts huh?

Of course he can't, this sort of deflection is what liberals do.

Also note how hypocritical the "Russia" point is. During the 2012 debates, Romney made a big deal about the threat Russia posed yet Obama scoffed at him, reminding him the Cold War ended decades ago.

Now, in an effort to rally the wagons around their thoroughly corrupt Dear Leader, we start to see this sort of fear mongering, from the party that always accuses Republicans of fear mongering.

We clearly saw during Monday's debate who was the fear mongering candidate...

Do you think fear mongering is limited to one party? Because that would be pretty foolish.

I don't know if it is limited to one party but this election, fear mongering is clearly the platform of only one of the candidate!

Oh yes. Ignoring threats with eye rolls and fake laughter is what u need.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
'Slow and steady' growth? Obama is the first POTUS to never have a 3% rise in the economy. Hillary would be more of the same. And Obama got those abysmal numbers by doubling he national debt accrued by every single preceding POTUS combined. Just imagine how the economy would be if he hadn't mortgaged our kids lives.

Thank you, Comrade Monroe! The Russian Federation approves of your comments!

yet you can't disagree with the facts huh?

Of course he can't, this sort of deflection is what liberals do.

Also note how hypocritical the "Russia" point is. During the 2012 debates, Romney made a big deal about the threat Russia posed yet Obama scoffed at him, reminding him the Cold War ended decades ago.

Now, in an effort to rally the wagons around their thoroughly corrupt Dear Leader, we start to see this sort of fear mongering, from the party that always accuses Republicans of fear mongering.

We clearly saw during Monday's debate who was the fear mongering candidate...

Do you think fear mongering is limited to one party? Because that would be pretty foolish.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
'Slow and steady' growth? Obama is the first POTUS to never have a 3% rise in the economy. Hillary would be more of the same. And Obama got those abysmal numbers by doubling he national debt accrued by every single preceding POTUS combined. Just imagine how the economy would be if he hadn't mortgaged our kids lives.

Thank you, Comrade Monroe! The Russian Federation approves of your comments!

yet you can't disagree with the facts huh?

Of course he can't, this sort of deflection is what liberals do.

Also note how hypocritical the "Russia" point is. During the 2012 debates, Romney made a big deal about the threat Russia posed yet Obama scoffed at him, reminding him the Cold War ended decades ago.

Now, in an effort to rally the wagons around their thoroughly corrupt Dear Leader, we start to see this sort of fear mongering, from the party that always accuses Republicans of fear mongering.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Trump has raised more than $13 million since the debate.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... ion-in-past-24-hours.html

Impressive number but he has raised this amount in the last 24 hours, not since the debate...
Is taking liberty with facts and exaggerations contagious among Trump supporters?

My fault, he's actually raised $18 million since the debate.

You might want to re-read the link, as it has been edited to provide the correct numbers.

Please. That was not the number when you quoted the article, prior to being updated.
Look at the name of the html file in the URL:trump-campaign-has-raised-more-than-13-million-in-past-24-hours.html

You have no shame...

You seem to have difficulty reading, so I will repeat what I said. The link was edited to reflect the most recent information.

And since you admitted $13 million was an impressive number, I'm sure you are even more impressed by the $18 million that he just raised.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

manu wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Trump has raised more than $13 million since the debate.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... ion-in-past-24-hours.html

Impressive number but he has raised this amount in the last 24 hours, not since the debate...
Is taking liberty with facts and exaggerations contagious among Trump supporters?

My fault, he's actually raised $18 million since the debate.

You might want to re-read the link, as it has been edited to provide the correct numbers.

JCMan8 wrote:
Trump has raised more than $13 million since the debate.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/ ... ion-in-past-24-hours.html

135jc wrote:
Quote:

iGreg wrote:

Quote:

Trump seems to agree on the needs of infrastructure improvements as he called the US a third world country...

And in many ways he is correct, imagine if our military budget for protecting sovereign nations was used within our own borders.

Trump can!