Pitfalls of renting to a foreign contract tech worker?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
A nice young Indian gent wants to rent an apartment from me, but he has no local credit history as he works for an Indian firm doing contract work for Goldman-Sachs. He is going to provide me with documentation of his visa, employment and his salary, which is plenty sufficient to afford the place. But the local contact is not at G-S, but at the US offices of his firm.
Any clues as to what should I be cautious of, if anything, in this deal? It's kinda new territory for me, but I've rented in the past, before getting cautious, to folks with less apparent substance.
Posted on: 2006/11/9 17:56
|
|||
|
Re: As prices flatten in popular suburban areas, prices still surge upwards in Jersey's cities.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
While I do expect prices to drop, what the above means is debatable. Sellers pulling back from fantasy prices to reality might not be considered an actual drop, unlike someone being unable to sell for at least what they bought for. Only when people start losing money on the flip will the oxygen masks fall and you know there's real trouble ahead. The fantasy prices, especially at the high end, are what fueled the bubble. Sellers would set a crazy high price and get it from someone taking an interest only 3 year fixed loan, then everyone else would take that as their benchmark, buyer & sellers alike. I remember reading last year about hyperluxury properties being marked down from like $20m to $10m. That wasn't real money lost, just a wake up from a dream.
Posted on: 2006/10/30 16:23
|
|||
|
Re: Want property tax reform? Consider municipal consolidations mergers- Jersey City, Hoboken & Bayo
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
From what I've read, the problem is, and what Manzo tries to address, that NJ taxes are regressive rather than progressive, that RE taxes cost the middle class and the poor more, while income taxes hit the rich more. According to this website posted by niceguyeddie, our overall taxload isn't high, it's simply unfairly distributed and enforced. The actual rates are so high because so many weasel out of paying.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/1834.html "- New Jersey?s surprisingly low state and local tax burden, as calculated by the Tax Foundation, is a powerful signal that the state?s tax system is riddled with credits, deductions and exemptions. With corporate and individual tax rates at 9 percent (without the surtax) and 8.97 percent respectively, New Jersey should be on the top of the tax burden ranks. It is not because its tax systems are riddled with holes." This table http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/469.html says we are only 0.2% above national average in tax burden. My point is that there's lots of hyperbole thrown around about our taxes, most of it false and inflammatory stuff about how we are overtaxed. As for mergers, hahahahahaha!!. just like people will say all politicians are rascal and should be thrown out, except their congressman, they'll say mergers are a great idea but would never give up their local gov't. There's just too much graft and nepotism opportunities there for that to happen. Hoboken giving up its Mayor would be like a Texas town giving up football.
Posted on: 2006/10/20 15:20
|
|||
|
Re: Jersey's high cost of housing tops nation - Ownership eats up residents' incomes
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
What's the right answer?
There are people around here who bought a town house in a drug infested area 25 years ago for $10k, who would be paying that yearly if they were accurately reassessed. But many couldn't afford that and would lose their homes. Should the assessement only be changed on turnover, or continually using a computerized comp system like Zillow? Neither seems fair, so we end up with the sloppy system we have.
Posted on: 2006/10/6 1:22
|
|||
|
Re: How to develop western JC? 160 acres including warehouse on agenda for Planning Board
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Well, here's a quote from your 3rd link "- New Jersey?s surprisingly low state and local tax burden, as calculated by the Tax Foundation, is a powerful signal that the state?s tax system is riddled with credits, deductions and exemptions. With corporate and individual tax rates at 9 percent (without the surtax) and 8.97 percent respectively, New Jersey should be on the top of the tax burden ranks. It is not because its tax systems are riddled with holes." So much for taxing and spending too much, rather than poorly. I note also that many (not all) of the cited business friendlier states are in the boonies, where they need to incentivize companies to move there. From the 1st link: The ten best states in the Tax Foundation?s 2006 State Business Tax Climate Index are as follows: 1. Wyoming 2. South Dakota 3. Alaska 4. Florida 5. Nevada 6. New Hampshire 7. Texas 8. Delaware 9. Montana 10. Oregon
Posted on: 2006/9/28 14:43
|
|||
|
Re: How to develop western JC? 160 acres including warehouse on agenda for Planning Board
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Can you provide data proving that we tax and spend too much relative to other cities or state's overall tax load? I'm perfectly willing to believe it, but all I've seen or heard is statements like yours. On the other hand I've seen a Rutgers study I linked in another thread that said our tax load wasn't actually high, just imbalanced & overeliant on property tax. Lets see numbers like per capita tax load comparisons, or per capita municipal expeditures, rather than ideology.
Posted on: 2006/9/27 23:00
|
|||
|
Re: How to develop western JC? 160 acres including warehouse on agenda for Planning Board
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Does anyone remember the first incarnation of the plan for the Brooklyn Bridge Park waterfront redevelopment? It included commercial and residential development along with quite a lot of active and passive parkspace. It got slammed by the Brooklyn Heights crowd as a sellout, probably rightly as that area is no longer in need of help to develop economically. But it seems to me that kind of vision would be just right for the enviromentally and economically blighted area between 440 and the Hackensack.
Lets stop trying to reinvent the wheel in JC and look at what other cities have done or planned for their deindustrialized zones. Lets think about other industries to attract. Fim sound stages? gourmet vegetable greenhouses? Film sound stages with gourmet vegetable greenhouses on the roof? Why can't JC think like a city of the future rather than a city of the past, building warehouses.
Posted on: 2006/9/27 21:47
|
|||
|
Re: Does the HPNA represent the community?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Please visit the HPNA Website at: www.hamiltonpark.org To receive our newsletters electronically, please register at our yahoo groups site at. HPNA-JC-Public-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Posted on: 2006/9/26 2:12
|
|||
|
Re: How to develop western JC? 160 acres including warehouse on agenda for Planning Board
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Sweet thought, but trust me, you wouldn't want to eat anything that grew in that ground. ITS A TOXIC DUMP, A SUPERFUND SITE!!! Geez...what's the next suggestion, a NASCAR track? A solar panel plantation? A cricket stadium?
Posted on: 2006/9/25 3:20
|
|||
|
Re: How to develop western JC? 160 acres including warehouse on agenda for Planning Board
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Boy, people complained about the tennis courts in HP as being low density usage of a park, that's nothing compared to a golf course!
It's so pathetic, you've got a blank slate over there and this is all they can come up with. The only way you'd get a visionary in our city hall was if you put LSD in their bottled water.
Posted on: 2006/9/25 2:28
|
|||
|
Re: Zoning Board to Consider Building Housing on the Embankment
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
No. The cost of building and maintaining a drawbridge across the mouth of the canal is totally prohibitive. Give it up, and look forward to the day when the recycler is gone and the ride to the footbridge is more pleasant. You can't be further from the bridge than I am in HP and I get there quite quickly. Pazman, All your reasons FOR are quite wonderful and in a perfect world indisputable, but you fail to address in real terms the safety issue. Please don't suggest cameras, recent events have made clear the police consider them useless. Does anyone know how NYC plans to secure the Highline park?
Posted on: 2006/9/20 23:20
|
|||
|
Re: Zoning Board to Consider Building Housing on the Embankment
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I'm pro parks too, but it seems to me the embankment coalition folks are in denial on that issue. I can't see a park being created that can't be observed, at least in this city. As it is there's condoms and KY being pulled out of the HP gazebo shrubbery. Can you imagine what would go on up on an embankment?
Posted on: 2006/9/20 19:47
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The problem I see with this process is that as of right now there doesn't actually appear to be any accountability in the meetings with T&M. It seems individuals can suggest all we want, but so far there's been no indication of a concensus building process in this stage.
When HPNA was shown the plans for the Enos Jones Park renovation 8 years ago residents had all sorts of suggestions, including a dog run. All of them were ignored. I'd hate to see that happen here. My first thought was that a show of hands "straw vote" would be useful on the issues that are negotiable within the accepted guidelines of the survey results, but that doesn't seem in the cards. So, since your opinion will not actually be asked, if you want your voice to be heard on the suggestions and issues discussed in this thread or anyting else you had better stand up and speak tonight.
Posted on: 2006/9/5 14:57
|
|||
|
Re: McNair Academic Ranked #1 in NJ!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I dug around on that website a little. What nonsense!!!
How about the "best towns to live" listing. Hoboken ranks 11th of 12 in Hudson County and 429 of 566 for the state, well behind JC's 284. Anybody buy this crap? Maybe someone should tell Corzine he's doing a Corey Booker and actually slumming it.
Posted on: 2006/9/3 19:07
|
|||
|
Re: McNair Academic Ranked #1 in NJ!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Not that I don't want my kids to get into Academic, but these rankings are all hooey. Not only should Academic be excluded due to being a "test in" school, but the Newsweek rankings give them a "by" because they're SAT's are lower than some of the regular public schools!
To give weight to "offering" AP classes, as the Newsweek rankings do, is silly. High schools should be ranked by outcomes, like college admission rates indexed by competitiveness of the college. Getting into a college that accepts 10% would count for more than a school that accepts 90% and you take only the top 3 admissions of any student. Check out Millburn. More teachers with advanced degrees than our "premier" school, higher SAT's, and although fewer students take the AP's they score much better. Much of Academic's record appears to be going through the motions of, rather than actually BEING, a better school. Like JC in general, our schools need improved leadership.
Posted on: 2006/9/3 16:04
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Sounds fine, whatever works. DrEvil, The art of public speaking without a mike is clearly lost. It seems people are taught as children NEVER to raise their voice, even speaking to a crowd. We face this problem continually in Q&A's at HPNA meetings. You ask someone to speak up, and they continue at exactly the same inaudible level. My wife's default voice is nearly a whisper, no matter how much background noise there is! I thought I was going deaf till I was tested and found she was gaslighting me. If you attend theater, you'll know that there is no venue too small for the singers to be body miked, because they have no training to project. Sorry for the rant; a pet peeve from someone often criticised for speaking too loudly. As for kids at the meeting, parents are perennially underrepresented at community meetings, so it was great to see them there if bringing the kids is what it takes!
Posted on: 2006/9/3 1:01
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
I would think it SHOULD showcase local art, but someone's got to be in charge of quality control and space design. If not the museum, then some other responsible arts organization under some sort of deal with the city. Thanks for supporting the plaza idea.
Posted on: 2006/9/2 0:16
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
The surface of dark squares you see in the fountain photo is actually granite slabs with the holes for the jets drilled into them. There's no rubber at all.
Posted on: 2006/8/31 20:43
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
There was a little discussion of perhaps one of the grassy sections left over in the tennis courts area being used for the childrens garden. They are kind of wasted. Another possibility would be the section vacated by the childrens fountain if the idea for moving it flies. Thanks for the supporting comments for the idea, we'll need to be vocal to get changes. I fear he was just yessing us about everything, and we'll see no changes. Hopefully I'm wrong. Another idea brought up by an attendee was local art in the park. Now, I would be opposed to ANY permanent art installations, but what if the vacated fountain spot were to be a "art garden" of temporary installations curated by the JC museum? It's a risky idea, but could be interesting....
Posted on: 2006/8/31 19:09
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
thetruth wrote: Overall, I definitely liked the plan. I think it would be so much cooler to have the fountain in the center of the park but I just that is a non-starter.
Posted on: 2006/8/31 16:02
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
I wouldn't rule out the reporter getting his info from Minnie and not factchecking it.
Posted on: 2006/8/30 18:48
|
|||
|
Re: KILLED IN GUN BATTLE: Booker T. Washington Public Housing Complex on Bright street
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
See the thread about the 7th & Coles robbery to know why cameras are a waste of time. The school wouldn't turn over the tapes and the JCPD couldn't care less. They told the victims they wouldn't view them if they had them.
Posted on: 2006/8/29 22:00
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
There's a doorway on McWilliams Pl just north of the Nursing school building, the southernmost building on the block between 8th & 9th just west of Erie. We had an HPNA meeting in the lobby there, I hope they have a bigger space available if this gets a lot of people. Steve Fulop said why they're not releasing plans before the meeting earlier in the thread, but it sure would deflate some of the disinformation and hyperbole being spread.
Posted on: 2006/8/27 23:31
|
|||
|
Re: Daytime Burglary on Coles and 7th
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Open a free account at Photobucket.com or one of its peers, upload a photo, then cut and paste the "tag" they provide into your post. done. You can even reduce the size of the image from their site.
Posted on: 2006/8/26 2:21
|
|||
|
Jersey Journal collecting opinions on LSP 9/11 memorial
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Forwarded from Sam Pesin. Note, send emails or call the JJ, not FOLSP. I hope the email is correct, it's odd for the JJ not to have it's own domain, but the elderly lady who answered the JJ phone said it was.
Hi Supporters of Liberty State Park, THE JERSEY JOURNAL IS ASKING FOR CALLS (201-217-2500) OR EMAILS ON MEMORIAL DESIGN. CONTACT INFO IS BELOW. UNDER THE EDITORS' REQUEST FOR OPINIONS IS TODAY'S 4 LETTERS TO EDITOR ON THE MEMORIAL. THANKS FOR CONSIDERING EXPRESSING YOURSELF AT THIS CRUCIAL TIME WHEN GOV NEEDS TO GET PUBLIC INPUT Sam www.folsp.org Below is The Jersey Journal's request for opinions on the LSP Memorial, the 10 foot high by 200 foot hill long Hill, and the 30 foot high by 200 foot long stainless steel Walls that would be inserted into the southern end of the Hill. The architect's renderings are on his website, http://www.schwartzarch.com/nj911memorial.htm - the second image, an aerial one is deceptive as it doesn't show how the hill will block views toward Ground Zero, Lower Manhattan & river, that second image also doesn't show the nearby CRRNJ historic landmark railroad Terminal. The Public Plaza that was used for free summer concerts, festivals, and people sitting and walking and taking in the skyline is now covered over. THE JERSEY JOURNAL EDITORIAL NOTE: The Jersey Journal has received a number of opinions about the proposed memorial at Liberty State Park, which will sit atop a mound at least 10 feet high. Many of our readers have complained the mound blocks views of the New York City skyline. In addition, some believe the location, next to the historic Central Railroad of New Jersey terminal, is inappropriate. What's your opinion? Send an e-mail to jjletters@aol.com or call (201) 217-2500.
Posted on: 2006/8/25 21:13
|
|||
|
Re: Daytime Burglary on Coles and 7th
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
As bad as the robbery was, I find the fact that you couldn't get the security tape outrageous. I live next to Academic too and always assumed that the loss of privacy due to the cameras bristling everywhere on that building was balanced by increased security, both in the form of deterrence and evidence.
Businesses and institutions in our neighborhoods need to be good neighbors, and Academic gave you the finger. I wonder if there's any grounds for lawsuit in there? I don't believe in "lawsuit lottery" mentality, but suits are often the only way to change antisocial behaviors. There needs to be a downside to them for not cooperating with you or the police.
Posted on: 2006/8/23 23:09
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Gee Minnie, maybe insisting on planting your gardens when everyone knew there was a renovation coming wasn't such a brilliant idea. These upcoming meetings are going to be fun, just like those HPNA park committee meetings that you made painfully long with your insistence that you were right and 8 other residents were wrong about every issue. Some things never change I see. Given our past experience and your recent postings, it sure looks like if they want to have a productive community meeting they should have a dart gun filled with Haldol standing by for you.
Posted on: 2006/8/23 15:00
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Thetruth, did you vote? Do you even know the people, your neighbors, who you are casually calling liars, cheats and frauds after they devoted months of their lives to this project to serve their community? Do not take Minnie's paranoid fantasies at face value. HPNA took great pains to conduct the most professional survey ever in this city by a citizen group. We did everything in our power to be fair, even when we all were against a feature that some people proposed on their surveys, like the skatepark, we put the question to the people of HP. If the vote on the BB courts was packed with underage students, there would have been spike in the number of ballots filled out relative to the other surveys. There was not, and as 25Mc pointed out it was "202 to 55 in favor of BB Courts in the park." Not even close. Minnie is simply irresponsibly slandering HPNA to discredit the survey and have it's results thrown out of the park process because the results conflict with her personal views for how the park should be used. She is the one trying force her views down people's throats, claiming only she knows what people "really" want.
Posted on: 2006/8/21 19:43
|
|||
|
Re: Hamilton Park Renovation - Meeting Dates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Steve, Thanks for continuing to work on this. Any chance these drawings could be made available beforehand so we can study them and have a more prepared, coherent commentary? Judging by past developer "presentations" to HPNA, there would also be less stupid, time wasting questions resulting from having just a few moments to study drawings from a distance.
Posted on: 2006/8/18 15:15
|
|||
|