Register now !    Login  
Main Menu
Who's Online
87 user(s) are online (74 user(s) are browsing Message Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 87

more...


Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (brewster)




Re: Where can I live and be 25 - 30 minutes from Midtown?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

ErinMaiden wrote:
Now I live right near the elevator (congress) and i just walk to the bus in hoboken (on clinton in bound and willow outbound). the walk to the bus is about 10-12 minutes and the ride can be 15-20 or if there's an accident you could be 45 but normally i'm ok.
good luck!


Have you found this to be better than the 91S (?) bus that stops at Congress & Palisade? I thought that was the "accepted route" to PA from there.

Posted on: 2007/5/14 16:43
 Top 


Re: Where can I live and be 25 - 30 minutes from Midtown?
Home away from home
Home away from home


The path from Grove is great to 33 & 6th, but the obstructed walk through the clueless milling crowds to my frequent client on 8th at 36th gets me postal. A place with good bus service to Port Authority, like the Heights or Weehawken, should be considered, particularly if you can avoid peak rush.

I recommend scouting expeditions of the routes, don't take our word for it either. Come and spend a few hours looking at hoods and traveling rails & wheels.

Posted on: 2007/5/14 16:19
 Top 


Re: Comcast posting "no parking" on whole block for 2 days?
Home away from home
Home away from home


2nd day: no Comcast.

Do they have to pay for this "no parking", or can they simply do the same next week when they get around to doing whatever they're up to?

Posted on: 2007/5/11 17:11
 Top 


Re: Comcast posting "no parking" on whole block for 2 days?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

r_pinkowitz wrote:
Brew, Are the signs JCPA sign with a permit #?


yes they are.

Posted on: 2007/5/10 21:54
 Top 


Comcast posting "no parking" on whole block for 2 days?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Comcast has my whole block on one side posted for 2 days. What could they be up to? Of course, by afternoon of day one there's still no sight of them.

Posted on: 2007/5/10 16:43
 Top 


Re: Vessel arrives here on trip to prove Vikings weren't 1st to cross ocean
Home away from home
Home away from home


I don't get it, Thor Heyerdahl did this in the "Ra" 37 years ago, I read his books as a teen (Kon Tiki was better).

This must be the aquatic silly season, the NY Times had an article today about some crazy swiss who arrived here in a solar panel powered electric boat. I got news for them, they're several millennia late for the solar powered, zero carbon, boat game. It's called "sailing" and worked a hell of a lot better, not mention more elegantly. In the 117 days they took to cross the Middle Atlantic a 1000 ton clipper could be in China round Cape Horn.

Posted on: 2007/5/8 20:00
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

NNJR wrote:
When is it the responsibility of buyer to do some research or find out things for themselves?

I don't agree with mortgage brokers taking advantage of people but they buyers of these houses need to know they can't afford what they're buying.

People just want more than they can afford, and when shit goes south they want to blame everyone but themselves.


My only problem with the above is that I don't see the buyers of a no money down deal that goes under as a victim, because they never had the money to buy the place to begin with. They didn't lose anything but a credit rating that sucked to begin with.

As the saying goes, "follow the money", to know who's the robber and who's the robbed. It's the bondholders, who are left holding the bag in this debacle, that have been robbed by the lending mob. Though if there's a bailout, the victim will be the taxpayers, as it was in the S&L mess.

Posted on: 2007/5/8 0:57
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


As I see it the real issue with the subprime market is it failed to function efficiently as a market. There's nothing wrong with a market compensating for risk with high interest rates. But it appears that the buyers of the mortgage bonds, without whom the banks wouldn't have lent a dime, had insufficient knowledge of just how bad the risks were. Had they known about our Jersey City neighbor they would never have bought a subprime bond. These buyers were mostly institutional, not amateurs, so it raises the question of when limiting the info to investors by the middlemen (the brokers & banks) constitutes fraud. IMO, this market is rife with criminal fraud.

The SEC's job is to make sure everyone has the right info. Unfortunately the powers on The Street are trying to gut Sarbanes-Oxley as we speak.

Posted on: 2007/5/7 17:53
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


Saw this AP story mentioning JC on Digg.
Tip of the iceberg, anyone? I would like to see criminal charges against the mortgage broker.

http://digg.com/business_finance/The_Bubble_Bursts

Deborah Beatty recognizes that she and her family could lose their home in Jersey City, N.J., across the Hudson River from New York, because they can't afford the mortgage. The newly constructed three-level home offers a view of the Manhattan skyline and the Statue of Liberty from Beatty's master bedroom window.

"I'm going to miss that," said Beatty, 53, who collects disability payments and does not work. "When I come in, I like to see the lady (the statue), especially when it's a beautiful clear night."

Her 29-year-old daughter, a graduate student with an annual income of less than $20,000, qualified for a mortgage of $600,000 with no money down, split into two different loans at 8.75 percent and 12.5 percent interest rates.

With income from tenants, which didn't come right away, Beatty's daughter thought she could afford monthly payments of nearly $5,000.

But she hasn't made a mortgage payment in more than three months, and she's receiving letters threatening foreclosure.

Beatty's daughter had to take out a nontraditional loan because she would not have qualified to borrow that much money through a traditional 30-year-fixed mortgage, said Judith Brzuskiewicz, a loan counselor with Citizen Action, a nonprofit advocacy group that is helping the Beattys and other families avoid foreclosure.

Beatty acknowledged the mortgage was probably too good to be true, and now her house is on the market. The family wouldn't be able to afford buying another house and would likely rent, she said.

"It's embarrassing," Beatty said. "It hurts your pride, your respect."

Posted on: 2007/5/7 16:57
 Top 


Re: Meeting on Flooding Issues - Steven Fulop
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

GrovePath wrote:
A DROUGHT OF IDEAS FROM CITY
Wednesday, May 02, 2007

We Americans love grand ideas.................................



Boy, I was going to rag on G-P about being sure to paste the attribution of his press clippings, but the JJ site has none either!! Was this an editorial, op-ed or snarky reporting? Perhaps it's clearer in the print edition, but damn, the JJ is sloppy.

Posted on: 2007/5/2 15:15
 Top 


Re: Meeting on Flooding Issues - Steven Fulop
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

BrettDavis wrote:
It's 10:08 and raining...Will my living room once again become the City's toilet????? It's a crapshoot.....

Maybe the magical underground rivers the MUA likes to talk about will take all the excrement out to sea!!!!


An optimistic view would be that a thunderstorm doesn't have a big low pressure system to raise the tide like a noreaster, so the sewer should drain as well as it is able to, till it is overfull of course.

Posted on: 2007/5/2 2:20
 Top 


Re: Meeting on Flooding Issues - Steven Fulop
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

loucheNJ wrote:
4. I think basement is probably the most accurate term.


That's my understanding too. What I've heard is that a basement is less than 50% beneath grade, thus occupiable, while a cellar is more than 50% and thus not legal for primary occupancy.

These guys have been blowing smoke up downtown's collective butt for decades, they've got lots of practice at it and expect it to work again. They "divide & conquer" by blaming the victims property infrastructure, and thus defusing community momentum for demanding system upgrade. They came prepared to do it once more last night with their "survey forms" that will lead to a drawn out process of owners spending thousands of dollars to still get flooded. But by then the group outrage will have subsided.

We can't let the storm blow over on them again (pardon the metaphor). The crowd last night was great, but I'm sure it was a fraction of those who should have been there, but couldn't or didn't know about it. Keep spreading the word about the movement to pressure the MUA to actually fix something.

Posted on: 2007/5/1 18:51
 Top 


Re: ideas for more parks in newport
Home away from home
Home away from home


Can't you see just by looking at your image what a fruitless idea you have? LeFrak is like a poster child for "The Corporation" film, an entity that will never do anything other than the most profitable. That means developing every lot they can, since parks don't turn profit, and they calculate the extra profit from that development easily offsets any stunting of prices due to a lower quality of life in the area with no parks.

The point of the redevelopment plan was to insure they DID create parks, but our compliant government hasn't found the will to hold them to their agreements, including their environmental impact statement.

Sad to say, public or private, there's no one looking out for our future. Reservoir 3 was a rare win, and I wouldn't be surprised if that game isn't really over.

Posted on: 2007/4/26 0:42
 Top 


Re: Meeting on Flooding Issues - Steven Fulop
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Scottacus wrote:
If as the MUA has stated, the biggest problem is that the pipes that empty into the Hudson back up when the river level rises, why not look into installing a pumping station that can pump the water to an exit pipe located at a higher level when the river rises? That might help to alleviate at least part of the problem and would seem to be a lot cheaper than running an entirely new, parallel sewer system.


While a giant catch basin with a giant pump is certainly the most feasible short term solution, which should certainly be implemented (as it in other low lying cities), it is not the best long term plan. Not least among the reasons is because dumping raw sewage into the Hudson every time a decent rainstorm hits is unconscionable and illegal.

There needs to be a plan to modernize the 100+ year old sewers made of cracking bricks, even if it's a 50 year plan. As it stands we don't even have that.

I hope to be a the meeting if I can get a babysitter. We had a meeting 9 years ago at Grace VV Church with Mr Beckmeyer (chief sewer engineer) who said "flooding sewers are an act of God". That statement of bureaucratic apathy and contempt has stuck in my craw ever since.

Posted on: 2007/4/25 0:29
 Top 


Re: WTF Healy & Fulop...GET THE SIMPLE SH*T RIGHT - SORT OUT OUR SEWERS!
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

DanL wrote:
This can / should be an election issue. Getting the funding to study the sewer system city-wide and create a plan to fix/improve/meet future demand etc.

To start with, ask the questions.

Yes, a member of HPNA did a great deal of research on this issue and shared with others.

Seems to me that it is our municipal government's job/responsibility to keep sewer water out of our homes.


It was Tom Gibbons who has dealt extensively with this issue, he posted on the subject here
previous flooding thread

This flooding of our homes is not an act of god or due to flaws in our basements, its a failure of the basic infrastructure of this city. The plumbing of 130 year old houses gets renovated, so too should the sewer system. But the city won't recognize the problem because that would correctly imply they're responsible for fixing it.

Posted on: 2007/4/16 20:41
 Top 


Re: WTF Healy & Fulop...GET THE SIMPLE SH*T RIGHT - SORT OUT OUR SEWERS!
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

ianmac47 wrote:
Part of the problem is that the catch basins drain to the River. With a storm system as large as the one this weekend, the storm is basically pulling the ocean closer to the shore line and preventing the rivers from draining by raising the water levels. On top of this, record rainfalls are filling the catch basins and soaking the ground, so rain water can't go down into the ground and can't go out to the sea.


Correction: the OVERFLOW drains to the river. The catch basins are supposed to be pumped over the hill to the treatment plant, a system which totally fails in storms due to the antiquated and environmentally irresponsible combined sewer system. I don't buy the storm surge argument since the sewers flood in summer thunderstorms too, which arrive without a regional low pressure system. The system is simply inadequately sized and maintained.

At the very least a large catch pool and pumping station could be built to drain the system into the river rather than have it back up into the streets and homes of the city. But looking for solutions requires acknowledging there's a problem, a step our city won't take.

Posted on: 2007/4/16 18:24
 Top 


Re: WTF Healy & Fulop...GET THE SIMPLE SH*T RIGHT - SORT OUT OUR SEWERS!
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Mr_X wrote:
the lines in the street aren't forcing the water through your (our) walls and floors. the rain settling in front and back "yard" combined with a hundred years of cracks and the lack of any waterproofing is causing the seepage. if you're blaming the sewer, its because the sewer is backing up through the pipes. if you have a floating drain plug, the flow won't reverse.

do you live on montgomery between jersey and barrow? then you have the exact same house as me. yes it sucks, but it's the fault of the building design, not the sewer.


I'm sorry, but you haven't a clue what you're talking about, or are a shill for the sewer authority that tells us lies to absolve themselves of any responsibility. I've posted this before but it bears retelling, like the Passover story.

It goes like this: the sewers overcharge. that's sewerman talk for fill way too high, and they do it because they are seriously undersized for a combined storm and waste system. Because they are 100+ years old and full of cracks and offsets (I've seen this when they video'd my block) the water leaks out and starts to charge the fill, the dirt between the sewer and your house, with water. Then it comes in, whatever way it can whether an unchecked pipe or any opening: the cracks in my basement slab spurt like arteries.

There are no underground rivers here. Its all BS. The flood abates as soon as the sewer drains. Period.

They lie to us and tell us it's an act of nature when it's an environmental crime upon us all. Not only does this poorly managed city have no money to repair it's sewers, they don't even have a plan, even if they got the money. That's how deep the denial is.

And don't buy the "high tide" excuse either. Before their shoddily made levees broke New Orleans was a city below sea level able to pump out the biggest rainstorms because they acknowledged the problem and did what it took, like asking for federal money, to deal with it. JC hasn't even admitted there's a problem with shit in the basements of a billion dollars worth of historic downtown townhouses, not to mention the rest of the city. An added bonus is that all that water swirling around under our houses is undermining our foundations and causing settling that can threaten the very structure.

BTW, I understand all the new riverfront developments have modern separate storm and sewer lines. A tale of 2 cities indeed!

Posted on: 2007/4/16 6:16
 Top 


Re: After Des Moines, Jersey City has the safest drivers in the country!
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Br6dR wrote:
People are so aware that some maniac may plow into them at any time that they are paying attention all the time.


Yeah like the drivers so terrified of stop sign runners that they stop at every single block, stop sign or no. I'm ready to go postal following one of those up Monmouth. I don't want to speed, but I want to at least keep moving!

Posted on: 2007/4/6 1:48
 Top 


Re: After Des Moines, Jersey City has the safest drivers in the country!
Home away from home
Home away from home


I doesn't take a genius to figure out that there's less likely to be a fatal crash per mile driven in a dense large city with lots of traffic and lights. I'm sure if they used total accidents, JC would have scored quite differently.

Posted on: 2007/4/5 16:07
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

alb wrote:
Quote:

wibbit wrote:
I think the real estate market will get a lot worse, but even then it wont be at the price level 40 years ago including inflation and interest costs.


But it's still a pain of my neighbors thought they could get $X for their house and, in reality, they can only get 70 percent of that price because the market is so soft. And maybe the original price was 10% higher than they ever could have realistically expected to get, but it's still a shame.


If you've been here 10 years as I have and seen prices quadruple, a 30% correction doesn't seem like the end of the world, just the end of insanity.

Posted on: 2007/3/26 17:24
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

fat-ass-bike wrote:
I'd love to see all this development and high rise apartments empty for 3-5 years, so I can watch the developers and banks struggle to recoup their own money, then be forced to have 'fire sales' to attract buyers.


Uhhh, nope. That won't happen because they're mostly pros who, though playing with other people's money, can make rational decisions and have deep enough pockets to ride out a downturn by renting. My folks rented in the early 90's in a new construction midtown luxury condo with marble bathrooms etc that hadn't sold a unit. Eventually they did sell the units when the market heated up again. While your or I couldn't break even buying that condo and renting it, they only have to keep covering their construction costs, plus hopefully 5-10%. There's only a fire sale when people have seriously f**ked up, like they have in FL.

Posted on: 2007/3/22 2:46
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

JCP wrote:
Timing the real estate market is stupid. Good luck with that. I am buying a condo in JC this year because I want to LIVE here. Debate all you want about prices; I'm just happy to have a home I can call my own, a roof over my head, and to be a part of a great City with loads of potential.


That's perfectly great, as long as you don't anticipate "absolutely needing to sell" within 5 to 10 years or so. A 15% fall when you've put down 5% on a $500k condo can leave you owing $50k to the bank in addition to having lost your $25k.

In the longer run RE is fine leveraged investment with great tax advantages, it's the short run that's risky. People buying rather than renting when they anticipate residing less than 5 years is a relatively new phenomena. The alternative to timing the market is staying in, not ignoring the timing.

Posted on: 2007/3/21 18:20
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

alb wrote:
Quote:

brewster wrote:
d I don't think they'll fall that far, more like 20%. I bought here 10 years, ago so 20% off peak doesn't get me excited, but I'm sure others will be thrilled.


Say Mrs. X bought a house for $200,000 in 1997 and could have sold the house for $500,000 in 2004 but waited till this year to try to sell the house at that price. Because the market is slow, she waits till 2009 and ends up selling the house for $400,000.

Even though the price would only be 20% lower than in 2004, Mrs. X would really be getting about 40% less than expected, because, back in the early aughties, she would have expected the price of the house to go up at least about 10% each year. (Really, a lot of owners probably thought the value would go up 15% each year, so Mrs. X's 2009 sale price really might be 50% lower than she'd expected.)

So, if a typical downtown Jersey City home price is 20% below the peak price in 2009, that might be the moral equivalent of a 50% to 60% drop in a small Midwestern town where prices have stayed about the same for many years.


Alb, I'm sorry, but a failure to increase as optimistically as expected doesn't equate to a price drop in my book! But I guess you're talking psychology here, so, whatever does you.

Posted on: 2007/3/21 16:54
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


I agree with you wholeheartedly right up to the end. Great deals will be in markets that are so distressed that foreclosures go through and properties are auctioned. The residual strength in our area means that, while prices will fall somewhat, most distressed owners will be able to sell at "some" price, or if they are foreclosed, it will be sold by a broker rather than at auction. I guess I define a great deal as <60% of peak, and I don't think they'll fall that far, more like 20%. I bought here 10 years, ago so 20% off peak doesn't get me excited, but I'm sure others will be thrilled. Florida and the sunbelt markets will freefall, as they always do, as will some of the recovering rustbelt where the subprimes were pushed hard. Quote:
wibbit wrote: To the original poster, what are you smoking? and where can i get some. The full effect of the subprime implosion hasnt started to trickle down and felt by the average home seller/buyer yet. But they sure will in the near future (~6months), that's a fact. Most people really dont understand the gravity of the situation in the subprime mortgage fallout. Yes i am sure you read the news and saw mortgage firms lined up to file for bankruptcy protection and all the investment banks rushing for the door to hedge against their exposures. But what it really means for the buyer(even those with good credit) is a large percentage of them will not be able to get the mortgage they currently can, actually far from it. For example, before with 650 rating you can qualify for a 250k loan, now you can only get a 200k or 150k loan etc. On top of that, the market is very nervous about the current mortgage approval process (which is a joke), they will tighten that up significantly as well, you will actually required to have the income you wrote down on the application, imagine that! All of this translates to a much more difficult mortgage approval = less people able to buy real estate. For sellers, it's even worse as the <5 yr arms are now due, the estimated default/foreclosure rate is 20% for the next few years on those loans. That's 1 in every 5! The market will be flooded with supply, on top of reduced demand mentioned above. It doesnt take a genius to figure out what will happen to the price.. it may not crash, but you sure will find some very nice deals by next year.

Posted on: 2007/3/21 5:56
 Top 


Re: JC shafted for county funds! Here's a pretty picture of how the game is played in Hudson county
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

Binky wrote:
Maybe this is payback for the PILOT program, with which JC shafts the county.


Touche!

It really is amazing that it's legal for the city to make PILOT deals that cut off the county from it's taxbase growth.

Posted on: 2007/3/19 20:06
 Top 


JC shafted for county funds! Here's a pretty picture of how the game is played in Hudson county
Home away from home
Home away from home


The state assembly speaker's city got nearly 11 times the discretionary county cash per capita as did JC. I voted against this guy for congressman. I don't know what's worse, his actions or JC's pols sitting still for it. You'd think having the largest voter bloc in the county would count for something. Apparently it ain't how big it is, but how you use it.

Kudos to the JJ for some actual reportage!


Jersey Journal
Monday, March 19, 2007
By JARRETT RENSHAW
For the last two years, Christmas time is a year-round celebration in West New York.

A Jersey Journal analysis of the practice of discretionary state grants - commonly referred to as "Christmas tree" grants - doled out by Hudson County's legislators through a secretive budget process reveals that West New York received the overwhelming majority of the pork-barrel spending since 2005.

Among the expenditures were $2.75 million on refurbishments and renovations to the town's Department of Public Works garage and $450,000 on improvements to McEldowney Park.

Some say the wide disparity underscores the power and influence that party leaders wield as they divvy up the discretionary funding among the various legislative districts, as well as raising questions about how those party leaders steer money into their home districts.

Freshman U.S. Congressman Albio Sires doubled as Assembly speaker and West New York mayor during this time period, and the bulk of the pork-barrel money was earmarked toward expensive capital projects in West New York that would have otherwise put a massive strain - or been impossible - to complete using municipal funds.

Sires declined to comment on the issue, referring all questions to a spokesman for the state's Democratic Assembly Office. However, Joe Connolly, a spokesman for that office, said he didn't know Sires had re-directed questions to him, and declined to comment.

Since 2005, West New York nabbed $7.2 million - or 40 percent of all the Christmas tree grants provided to Hudson County over that time period, according to an analysis of records from the state's Treasury Department obtained under the Open Public Records Act.

By comparison, the much larger Jersey City received $3.56 million, or 20 percent of the funds allocated to Hudson, during the same period.

In addition, unlike in West New York, the bulk of Jersey City's money went toward non-profit organizations, such as after-school tutoring and medical care for low-weight and HIV-exposed infants.

The latest U.S. Census numbers show Jersey City with a population of 240,055, compared to West New York's population of 45,768.

Mayor Jerramiah Healy said Jersey City put its $3.6 million "to good use" and deserved more.

"As the largest city in the county, Jersey City should have received more of these discretionary funds to support and meet the demand for services that our diverse and growing population requires," Healy said in a written statement.

Overall, Hoboken finished third in amount of funding at $2.4 million. State Sen. Majority Leader Bernard Kenny, D-Hoboken, could not be reached for comment.

Two municipalities in Hudson County haven't received a single dollar in discretionary grants since 2005: Kearny and East Newark.

Political insiders say Kearny hasn't received any money because Mayor Albert Santos is out of favor with state lawmakers.

Asked about the lack of funding, Santos replied: "To be frank, I don't know the answer to that. I know it's a political process."

Posted on: 2007/3/19 18:35
 Top 


Re: Do you as a citizen and resident of Jersey City feel represented by your elected officials?
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

swooshy wrote:
No.
But I have a darn good memory at election time.


Well, that puts you in a tiny minority both in terms of memory and actually voting. In JC it seems a pol could crap on people front steps in broad daylight and they wouldn't bother to vote him out.

Posted on: 2007/3/15 6:18
 Top 


Re: So much for all of you folks who predicted a JC/NYC RE Crash
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

alb wrote:

If, on the other hand, I'm wrong, and low-income/moderate-income owner occupiers have higher default rates than the flippers, then Paulus Hook might fare well and the Heights might suffer more.


I got news for you, the ovestretched are everywhere, both owner/occupiers & speculators. You could have bought a 3 family in the Heights with little down and stated income and never occupied as you were required to it because enforcement of FHA fraud is a wink.

I had a clueless 20something woman come to look at my Downtown $950 rental who said she had just bought a 2 family in Greenville as an investment with an interest only loan. To my knowledge they don't do those for "investment grade" loans, and she didn't even realize she had committed bank fraud. What a time bomb.

I'll be looking for some decent deals in a year or 2.

Posted on: 2007/3/14 21:58
 Top 


Re: Robert Troy's letter re: Stevie Fulop
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

loucheNJ wrote:
Despite his adopting a tone that a third grader would be embarrassed to sign his name to, Troy's accusation that Fulop has accomplished nothing is, in my opinion, pretty close to accurate.


Depends on how you define accomplishment. If by successfully getting a major bill passed by "playing ball" old school style: no. If by shining a bright light on the slime, corruption, and self interest that pervades our gov't and showing not everyone is as jaded as our officeholders and that it doesn't HAVE to be the way it's been, I'd say yes.

Is he perfect and the third coming (after Obama), no. But he's the only JC politician I've met who hasn't depressed me, and my wife believes he got upper Coles repaved in response to her emails, that's an accomplishment.

Machine cogs like Troy hating Fulop is like roaches hating light, it shows them for what they are.

Posted on: 2007/3/10 21:59
 Top 


Re: JJournal: Reservoir No. 3 will be preserved as open space
Home away from home
Home away from home


Quote:

NONdowntown wrote:
Quote:

Minnie wrote:

BTW.. what are you doing to get the NCAA field unlocked so that others can use it too?


There's nothing better than a "I'm doing something, (i am assuming) you're doing nothing, therefore whatever i'm doing must be right" argument!


Welcome to Minnie's world.
She gets "no ball playing" signs posted, then claims she'll magnanimously decline to call the cops if you do, presumably as long as you "play ball" with her. This was one technique that "Atlas Shrugged" opened my eyes to as a youth, passing laws not to get them obeyed but to get leverage in exchange for lenient enforcement. Many zoning laws work like this, it's how NY got full of setback, oversized towers in ugly plazas.

Posted on: 2007/2/16 21:37
 Top 



TopTop
« 1 ... 171 172 173 (174) 175 176 177 ... 179 »






Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!



LicenseInformation | AboutUs | PrivacyPolicy | Faq | Contact


JERSEY CITY LIST - News & Reviews - Jersey City, NJ - Copyright 2004 - 2017