Re: Fulop Calls for Resignation of Police Chief Robert Troy
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
shipwreck1 wrote: That's a good point. When god was handing out Yuppies, you thought he said Puppies and everybody knows Puppies don't have anything except cuteness and yips. I'll have to consider this new development.
Posted on: 2006/1/25 20:38
|
|||
|
Re: Fulop Calls for Resignation of Police Chief Robert Troy
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
Well, now wait a minute, Pisces1979 may be on to something here. What do you need for crime? You need stuff. And who has stuff? Yuppies. QED
Posted on: 2006/1/25 20:22
|
|||
|
Re: Does the HPNA represent the community?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
darenot has a very good point here, but I'm not sure it's the point he thinks he has. HPNA is not a governmental arm. It's simply a private group that declared itself the representative of community interests before the city. So what does that mean? First, in and of itself, the HPNA has no right or reason to exist. It derives its right and reason not just from how well it represents the community interests, but from the community's assessment of how well HPNA represents its interests. That's because every member of the community has an equal interest in the community. Particular people don't get (or at least don't deserve) special status just because they form a group that puts itself out as the community representative. Let's be clear here: the HPNA represents the community at the community's pleasure, not the other way around. And how do we judge the success of the group? I would think we judge by looking to its relations with the community it claims to represent. And does anybody here, darenot included, think the HPNA doesn't have it exactly backwards? In their meetings, they set barriers to participation. They don't announce important topics to be covered in the meeting. They don't welcome dissenting opinions. They make it the community's job to reach out to them to find out what's going on. There's no real effort to discover and represent the community interest as the community sees it. Instead the HPNA seeks to represent the community's interest as the leadership of the HPNA sees it. That's unacceptable. They've forgotten why they're there.
Posted on: 2006/1/8 19:24
|
|||
|
Re: Does the HPNA represent the community?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
If the problem with an association is apathy, is making it more difficult to participate really a solution?
Have the people defending the requirement that a member must serve one year as a trustee before running for officer bothered to note the number of trustees provided in the bilaws (it's not an unlimited honor)? If so, have they also noted the number of officers provided for in the bi-laws? If so, have they drawn any conclusions from the similarity of these two numbers? As for meeting packing, the HPNA represents the interests of the community. Any person living in that community has an equal interest in the affairs of that community regardless of their participation in the organization. And some dastards have the unmitigated gall to pack the meeting of the community organization with members of the community? How dare they!! Finally, it is almost universal practice in committees to bifurcate the voting process. Absent an emergency, an item is brought up first as 'new business'. It is brought up at the following meeting as 'old business'. Only 'old business' is voted on. That way, interested people have time to discuss and think about the issue, to make an informed vote. There was obviously no emergency here. Though some of the changes have merit, both the timing and the procedure reek of corruption. I disagree with SuperFurry's thought that if you agree with the changes, then fine. Even if you agree with the changes, you should be offended at how they were brought about. (And worried--who says next time you'll agree with the change?) Process matters.
Posted on: 2005/12/12 4:32
|
|||
|
Re: Does the HPNA represent the community?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
medfever555:
Since you're obviously thinking of something specific, would you mind being specific? If you're going to call people hypocrites for supporting one thing while opposing another (without, by the way, identifying any particular person who supports one while opposing the other), you should spend a few words showing how those positions are inconsistent. I can't even tell which side is pissing you off. And Bright Moments: would you mind doing a little less of that? It makes the threads harder to follow and rarely adds anything.
Posted on: 2005/12/9 15:47
|
|||
|
Re: Does the HPNA represent the community?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
What do you mean "deemed them unworthy"? They run afowl of the sparkling new requirements?
Posted on: 2005/12/8 19:06
|
|||
|
Re: Does the HPNA represent the community?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
brewster:
From what you write here, it sounds like you want to encourage more people to get involved, not make it more difficult for them. Do you know why did the HPNA board recently made some important bylaw changes unannounced, late in the meeting, that severely limit who can run for officer and (less severly) limit who can vote? Maybe I'm misinformed on that because it seems odd and at odds with the new guard inclusiveness that your post above indicates you want.
Posted on: 2005/11/15 23:49
|
|||
|
Re: Does the HPNA represent the community?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
I think it's worth highlighting the provision that "Members have to be a trustee for a minimum of 12 months to be eligible for officer positions."
Since there are six officer positions and a limit of 10 trustees (minimum of three, maximum of 10), there are two problematic consequences of this provision: 1. Some or most officers will run unopposed. This means the outcome will be largely decided ahead of time (when the slate is chosen) and voting will be an empty exercise. 2. The 12 month requirement for trustees creates a real potential that the candidate pool will not be deep enough to fill the officer positions.
Posted on: 2005/11/15 22:43
|
|||
|
Re: HPNA neglects to hold Nominations for Elections
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
How does one get a copy of the bylaws? And the HPNA charter? There has to be an amendment process, a way to alter the bylaws in the face of board opposition.
Posted on: 2005/11/3 16:28
|
|||
|