Asif wrote:


Just write up whatever questions/complaints you have for them on this thread here. I am going to present them with any feedback......and also let them know about this forum........so if they want they can come and see for themselves.

Beachguy wrote:
Yvonne, when you were talking with your husband about who your children would look like, did you also discuss whether they would be have characteristics of your husband's Caucasian heritage or your mixed race? Since you like to quote the bible:


The Old Testament Law commanded the Israelites not to engage in interracial marriage (Deuteronomy 7:3-4).

Genesis 28:1: "And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan."
Leviticus 19:19: "Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind?
Deuteronomy 22:9: "Thou shalt not sow thy vineyard with divers seeds: lest the fruit of thy seed which thou hast sown, and the fruit of thy vineyard, be defiled."

Will this, at long last, make you think about your hatred of those not like you? As Pope Francis said about gay people in his church, "Who am I to judge?" If you think yourself more holy, more Christ-like than the Pope, I'd like to understand why.
Quote:

Vigilante wrote:
Quote:

Yvonne wrote:
Before I married my husband, we talked about our future children and who they might look like, I guess that is one conversation same sex couple will not have.

Well they can decide ahead of time before making a deposit with the surrogate mommy.

http://celebritybabies.people.com/201 ... s-son-elijah-first-photo/

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
This brief advertisement shows why people who hide their bigotry behind the guise of religion are on the wrong side of history.

And pretty soon will have no choice but to get with the program or steep in their own bitterness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ganRbr-WBiI

The intolerance of those who demand tolerance amuses rather than angers me.

LoKo498 wrote:
3 dead cats over the years, 3 Craftsman toolboxes buried about 2 feet in the tomato garden in the yard. Guess whats in the toolboxes!

nyrgravey9 wrote:
Yes I know this, I did what was called "sarcasm", as in a joke.

Some of you guys on here have no sense of humor. Lighten the F up already.

Quote:

VanVorster wrote:
Parkhurst is hardly racist and the phrase has nothing to do with black people having a purported predilection for chicken http://www.urbandictionary.com/define ... ner+Winner+Chicken+Dinner

nyrgravey9 wrote:
What does it matter? Bookers position has been preordained because the electorate is too goddamn stupid to know otherwise. God help this country for it knows not what it does.

You're all just sheep following the flashing light. God help you all.

heights wrote:
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/10/1 ... passengers-on-path-train/
6 Teens Charged With Assaulting, Robbing Passengers On PATH Train

asny10011 wrote:

Did they improve Saturday service though?
Any decrease is bad ...wonder what the reason was for changing Sunday service on the 33rd line.



Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
I picked up a hard copy of the new schedule at one of the PATH stations.

May 2013 = Sunday service reduced for the Newark/WTC line to once every 20 minutes.

October 2013 = Sunday service reduced for the JSQ/33rd St line to once every 20 minutes. And of course the WTC service reduction remains.

The Port Authority are bastards...

corybraiterman wrote:
Quote:

GrovePath wrote:
The deal with Tozzoli?s group came out of an era when the Port Authority ? which runs the region?s airports, major bus terminals, PATH train system, seaports ? was often criticized for leading an imperial, self-interested existence in which its executives were rewarded with travel and other perks unusual in government.

nice to see how much things have changed in 30 years...

...

...............................

fat-ass-bike wrote:
"Jersey City police spokesman Bob McHugh refused to comment on the investigation on the grounds the student is a juvenile".

Doesn't this suggest the Police didn't make a comment - I read nowhere the police are charging the kid for anything.

This is still a kid, no gang affiliation or criminal record - What the kid did was unquestionably wrong but the school handled it extremely poorly as well ... in my opinion.

The school could have simply said the investigation uncovered that the nature of racist remarks where unfounded and reframe from making further comments.

If the school is so disgusted or outraged by this kids behavior, why don't they expel him from the school or sue for damages?

nyrgravey9 wrote:
For those of you who think off leash dogs are harmless, here's a little story for you.

Someone I know in JC was walking their dog ON leash, when someone else's off leash dog did this damage:



But you're right, this is stupid and we shouldn't address it.

fat-ass-bike wrote:
The school had the option to say 'No Comment' like the Police and Father did.

Instead the school didn't, which the news report stated:

The black St. Peter?s Prep student who purportedly received racist text messages warning him to drop out of the Jersey City high school's student government election sent the texts to himself, a school official confirmed last week.

I still believe the school could have handled it much much better instead of the media circus it will create.

A no comment statement would have null / voided or reduced any further news reports.

Once again its a sad situation, but it's a kid that probably doesn't have a criminal history that made a VERY poor judgement call.

I'm not even sure if a crime has been committed here and Police haven't charged the kid for anything, yet the actions by the school to confirm the information still remains in my eyes, as unprofessional and compounded the problems for this kid.

AlexC wrote:
as a few of the posters here stated, what kind of person pulls a gun and shoots another for such a minor infraction? he, what, bumped and stepped on another person, gets reprimanded and his reaction is to shoot someone?

this is not an issue of gun control or law enforcement - these fuckers need to prove that no one can tread on them without consequence, any perceived slight, or imagined disrespect merits this response because of the culture in which they were raised

you can enact all kinds of laws and preventive measures to protect yourself from people like these, but nothing beats good upbringing in preventing shit like this from happening

bradleybeachbrawl wrote:
How come Fat Ass and the other legal scholars aren't questioning why the driver wasn't tested for DWI? Anybody?

SammyTheT wrote:
The building is historic and will NOT be torn down. It is owned by a major developer.

ianmac47 wrote:
1. The new station at Harrison include lengthening the platforms to accommodate longer trains to the World Trade Center line.

2. The new design will provide better access for larger crowds.

3. Glass in recent years became a popular way of cladding structures because it was cheaper than brick.

4. Harrison is a rapidly growing station with some 10,000 housing units planned for the area around the station, as well as the Red Bulls soccer stadium; a new station is necessary to accommodate the number of people.

5. Transit stations are places people spend a huge amount of time. They should not be ugly, they should be well designed and well thought out. Think about spending 10 minutes a day, five days a week coming and going from a structure. Thats hours a year you spend in a place and you want it to be ugly? Come on. The aesthetics are a nominal cost added to necessary renovation.

Christine wrote:
How do you give someone who leaves the scene a breathalyzer test? Let's stay with the facts here. No, I'm not a "cop"...but I don't like to generalize about any groups. I think it's a bad idea. Also, until breathalyzers are law, let's not take a stand that there was foul play because he wasn't given one. Would an 80 year-old likely be given one? I just like to stick to the facts as they are revealed.

Christine wrote:
I think that some people here think that having a car accident is a crime. It is not. What factors contributed to the accident are another story. There are people here wondering why this guy wasn't being treated as a criminal for speeding or careless driving. Nobody ever is. 95% of the population would be behind bars. I want justice like everyone else, but c'mon now...learn the difference between moving violations and crime.