TheBigGuy wrote:
Douche Bag.... no comment about the Syrian assault in Massachusetts???
Here is some Canadian News ,,, http://www.therebel.media/cbc_won_t_n ... use_he_s_a_muslim_migrant
Now you try to connect the dots...

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
Here you go recent news and very much on topic.....

NYT: German Police Kill Assailant After Ax Attack Aboard a Train

By MELISSA EDDYJULY 18, 2016

WEIMAR, Germany ? A 17-year-old Afghan youth who came to Germany as a migrant last year attacked several passengers with an ax and a knife on a local train near the southern German city of W?rzburg late on Monday, injuring at least four people, while 14 others were treated for shock, the police said.

The attacker fled the train as police officers moved in and was fatally shot while trying to escape, according to the interior minister of the state of Bavaria, Joachim Herrmann. The motive for the attack remained unclear. The police were interviewing witnesses.

The young man had entered Germany without his parents and applied for asylum, Mr. Herrmann said.

The train was traveling from Treuchtlingen in the southern state of Bavaria to W?rzburg when the attack occurred, the German federal police in W?rzburg said.
Last month, police killed an armed assailant who had taken several hostages at a multiplex movie theater in the western German city of Viernheim.

Germany has not experienced attacks on the same scale as France or Belgium, but it remains on edge amid threats on social media by Islamic extremists. Several plots have been foiled by the police.

Oh now that's not fair. According to Pebbles, we are not supposed consider Muslim immigrants violence, or similar PEEPS in Europe... Or Canada. Especially when it comes to allowing "Muslim Refugees" unchecked into the United States. I assume Pebbles is a misogynist since he can't seem to recognize organized Muslim Terror against women across continents. Or he could just be an arrogant fool and believe in coincidences?

JCMan8 wrote:
That's because when Muslims go on child raping sprees, the authorities don't go after them for fear of being seen as "racist."

TheBigGuy wrote:
And your point is what... that we should not identify the perpetrators of these mass rapes because it is racist.

TheBigGuy wrote:
The Muslim Terrorists have a track record of systematic rape of infidel women. Rape is a war crime and there is an abnormal amount of rape or sexual assaults being committed by these male Muslim immigrants in their host countries. Are these crimes being committed by uneducated ignorant men who think it is culturally acceptable to abuse women, possibly, but I tend to think this is another terror tactic.

As in any sexual assault, you disrespect the victims if you ignore or do not recognize a problem exists... is it just horny Muslim Men or criminal conspiracy to commit terrorist acts?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/01/europe/germany-concert-sex-assaults/

Monroe wrote:
Exactly. Not a single email, text, phone call-despite millions of dollars of public money spent in a partisan attack has shown that Governor Christie knew or had any knowledge of the small traffic disruption. We have more tying Fulop to the PA port than this.

It's not like he deleted 30,000 emails from a non-secured private, illegal server like the presumptive Democrat POTUS candidate, lol.

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

user1111 wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
oh no, she didn't! melanoma trump is accused of plagiarizing michelle obama. what nerve!

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/mela ... gop-convention-2016-07-18

Her speech writer gets Troll of the Year. Hands down. I'm glad she stopped before she got to the part about how hard it was growing up as a black woman in Chicago, though.

well, maybe the speechwriter was re-purposing michelle obama's speech.

dr_nick_riviera wrote:
I'm not going to agree or disagree with whatever discussion comes of this, but is there a way for us to filter stuff that really isn't Jersey City or local politics related out of the forum feed?

There are a million other places people can go to where national politics can be debated. And no, clicking all the other forum categorizations doesn't work as this nonsense cuts across all forum categories.

Garbage like this bubbling to the top is the reason why nonsense threads like the Muslim thread and despicable Yvonne's rantings get so many responses. What happened to the forum upgrade that was being discussed a couple of months ago?

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
[quote]

Hillary wants to import many more of the same Muslim "migrants" and "refugees" who keep mowing down people in France. No surprise that France has the most Muslims in the EU.

Racists being racists? just keep ignoring the facts that the terrorists were from France. It?s cool. It isn?t like you care about facts anyway?

Canada has taken close to 30,000 immigrants from Syria and not a peep. But, yeah, you keep hiding under your bed like the pathetic little coward you are.

More BS from the resident expert about Canada.... here is a Muslim Terror Peep you missed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_shootings_at_Parliament_Hill,_Ottawa

I guess you missed the part about the guy growing up in Canada as a Catholic that converted to Islam. But, sure, I guess if you have only about two brain cells you can make the argument that he was a refugee...

Quote:

I guess you haven't been paying attention to all the savage attacks on women by these poor defenseless Muslim immigrants in Europe. We let the Somalis in unchecked and we know there are security issues all the way from Minnesota to Maine. Not sure why you bring up the fact the Muslim Terrorist was a Catholic before getting sucked into Islam. Many of the Muslim Terror Killers here in the US are converts. So we have to deal with the Muslim Killer a--holes we let in... the US born dolts that convert to Islam and only after reading the part in the Koran about getting laid by 70 Muslim Virgins by killing infidels while fools like you and Hillary want to let 500,000 more into the country unchecked? Astounding!
Try defending this douchebag... http://www.eagletribune.com/news/syri ... e6-a636-df236dc0f40f.html and please don't cite the slow immigration article in the link, that liberal rag had to print the local pool story because it went national, the little piece of MSM propaganda about "slow immigration" was because the Syrian poster boy went bad.

Monroe wrote:
'Trump doesn't respect Christie'? Nonsense. Choosing a VP is all about political posturing, and the Indiana guy is a political move. Can we see who crooked Hillary picks to compare?

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

brewster wrote:
So Monroe, what is your fondest fantasy now for your boy: he resigns Nov 9th to run the transition and gets a 2nd tier cabinet post as reward? He'll not get AG, it would be like HUD or Transport.

Trump Victory bad for the USA, but spares NJ one more year of CC. That would be a silver lining to humongous clod (sp?)

What makes you so sure Christie wouldn't get AG? As a former federal prosecutor, he seems like a natural choice.

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Hillary wants to import many more of the same Muslim "migrants" and "refugees" who keep mowing down people in France. No surprise that France has the most Muslims in the EU.

Racists being racists? just keep ignoring the facts that the terrorists were from France. It?s cool. It isn?t like you care about facts anyway?

Canada has taken close to 30,000 immigrants from Syria and not a peep. But, yeah, you keep hiding under your bed like the pathetic little coward you are.

More BS from the resident expert about Canada.... here is a Muslim Terror Peep you missed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_shootings_at_Parliament_Hill,_Ottawa

I guess you missed the part about the guy growing up in Canada as a Catholic that converted to Islam. But, sure, I guess if you have only about two brain cells you can make the argument that he was a refugee...

Quote:

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
as if the coup leaders are going to inform the us of its intentions. Obama should keep his mouth shut and let turkey solve it's own problems

Gee does the Obama administration have any moles around the world? I would hope they did. Or would that not be PC?

You?re amazing! A very specific and small branch of the Turkish military attempted a coup and you believe that US government officials would have known about it before the Turkish government... I really wonder what world you live in.

Ever head of:

- 1953 Iran
- 1961 Cuba
- 1989 Panama
- 2011 Libya

sure. Now point out how those are remotely close to this.

53, we were financing.
61, we were financing.
89, we financed and helped.
11, we were involved.

We weren't involved in the Turkish coup. As such, it is nothing like those and you're comparison is absurd.

I never said we were involved.

My point is that the time the "mole" post was created (on Friday), it would not have been inconceivable for the US to have known about it before Ergodan.

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Hillary wants to import many more of the same Muslim "migrants" and "refugees" who keep mowing down people in France. No surprise that France has the most Muslims in the EU.

Racists being racists? just keep ignoring the facts that the terrorists were from France. It?s cool. It isn?t like you care about facts anyway?

Canada has taken close to 30,000 immigrants from Syria and not a peep. But, yeah, you keep hiding under your bed like the pathetic little coward you are.

More BS from the resident expert about Canada.... here is a Muslim Terror Peep you missed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_shootings_at_Parliament_Hill,_Ottawa

I guess you missed the part about the guy growing up in Canada as a Catholic that converted to Islam. But, sure, I guess if you have only about two brain cells you can make the argument that he was a refugee...

Quote:

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
as if the coup leaders are going to inform the us of its intentions. Obama should keep his mouth shut and let turkey solve it's own problems

Gee does the Obama administration have any moles around the world? I would hope they did. Or would that not be PC?

You?re amazing! A very specific and small branch of the Turkish military attempted a coup and you believe that US government officials would have known about it before the Turkish government... I really wonder what world you live in.

Ever head of:

- 1953 Iran
- 1961 Cuba
- 1989 Panama
- 2011 Libya

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
Quote:

Hillary wants to import many more of the same Muslim "migrants" and "refugees" who keep mowing down people in France. No surprise that France has the most Muslims in the EU.

Racists being racists? just keep ignoring the facts that the terrorists were from France. It?s cool. It isn?t like you care about facts anyway?

Canada has taken close to 30,000 immigrants from Syria and not a peep. But, yeah, you keep hiding under your bed like the pathetic little coward you are.

More BS from the resident expert about Canada.... here is a Muslim Terror Peep you missed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_shootings_at_Parliament_Hill,_Ottawa

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
as if the coup leaders are going to inform the us of its intentions. Obama should keep his mouth shut and let turkey solve it's own problems

Gee does the Obama administration have any moles around the world? I would hope they did. Or would that not be PC?

Monroe wrote:
Someone allegedly overheard a conversation between two other people. Quite the rock solid source!

Monroe wrote:
Latest Quinnipiac poll has Trump leading crooked Hillary in PA, Florida, and tied in Ohio.

Old Ruthie seems to have lost it, hasn't she? Is there a way to remove a SC justice who's clearly addled?

Monroe wrote:
Even crooked Hillary is staying away from that, mostly because her husband has spent a lot of time with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein-who is the guy named in the phony Trump lawsuit. You do know Epstein has taken Clinton on trips on his private plane, to his private island?? And Epstein (who has done prison time for being a pedophile) gave millions to the Clinton 'foundation'. You can't make this stuff up!

SOS wrote:
Pence it is:

http://www.indystar.com/story/news/po ... -trumps-vp-pick/87075866/

That's one way to avoid a nasty uphill battle for re-election, LOL!

neverleft wrote:
Donald J. Trump ?@realDonaldTrump 2m2 minutes ago

In light of the horrible attack in Nice, France, I have postponed tomorrow's news conference concerning my Vice Presidential announcement.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
Donald J. Trump ?@realDonaldTrump 2m2 minutes ago

In light of the horrible attack in Nice, France, I have postponed tomorrow's news conference concerning my Vice Presidential announcement.

Hillary wants to import many more of the same Muslim "migrants" and "refugees" who keep mowing down people in France. No surprise that France has the most Muslims in the EU.

Monroe wrote:
The list was predictable, but not awful.

Monroe wrote:
Weeks ago, Bernie said Hillary was unfit to become POTUS. Now, he endorses!

stillinjc wrote:
Btw, Ruth Bader Ginsburg needs to STFU. She is unfit for SCOTUS. I don't see how she can continue serving.

WhoElseCouldIBe wrote:
Like I already said, 538 has Trump with a 1 in 4 chance of winning.

If this doesn't worry you, you have your head in the sand.

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
if donald is such a successful businessman, why have so many of his companies gone bankrupt?

Trump is involved in over 500 businesses according to his election filing. Do you think he is allowed a few bankruptcies out of the 500?

Just think of how many people are employed in those 500 businesses.

Yet the media and Hillary just harp on the few bankruptcies he has had.

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
better crooked hillary than PATHOLOGICAL liar donald. how many of his companies ended up bankrupt

State can't account for six BILLION dollars under crooked Hillary-taxpayer dollar dollars. I'd say 'lol', but it's our tax dollars.

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

user1111 wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

hero69 wrote:
better crooked hillary than PATHOLOGICAL liar donald. how many of his companies ended up bankrupt

State can't account for six BILLION dollars under crooked Hillary-taxpayer dollar dollars. I'd say 'lol', but it's our tax dollars.

if donald is such a successful businessman, why have so many of his companies gone bankrupt?

I hope you don't expect a answer to this, Donny supporters don't answer question about the Orange one they just reply with a silly insult about Clinton

At the moment, I do not see Trump or any of his family in a soup line. People who criticize Trump's business failures do not understand the inherent risk in starting a business. For every Jeff Bezos Amazon success story, there are dozens of failures. Since Clinton has Zero business background we have to look at her "accomplishments " as a professional politician. And that circles back to my earlier question. What significant accomplishments did she have as Secretary of State or as a US Senator? Has her time in office contributed anything that has improved the lives of American citizens? Is she capable of delivering on all of her promises?

neverleft wrote:
CNN (Clinton News Network)? still has a too strong of a stable of liberal voices for me.

neverleft wrote:
I have never read such twisted posts. You should rename yourself as the Twister. You take what someone posted and completely twist it around and reply to your twisted version of the post. You even twisted FBI Director Comey?s transcript from the fbi web site. That?s ballzy .

neverleft wrote:
You are right I know nothing about IT after 40 years nothing has sunk in yet. I am still stuck on how to use the computer punch card machine. The damm thing keeps jamming.

TheBigGuy wrote:
Pebbles is the is the most insufferable BS artist on this blog... he makes the most outrageous personal attacks when he is proven wrong or challenged. His lightweight opinions are dressed with this faux intellectual superiority that would embarrass even the extreme narcissist. His pompous attitude must be barely tolerable to friends and family. What an empty suit.

JCMan8 wrote:
Pretty sure it's a she. And my description of "our resident know it all dope" is probably the most accurate thing ever said about her.

There's enough articulation and confidence that you think she actually knows what she's talking about, but when you probe the substance, it's a bunch of hot air. A classic example of the Dunning Kruger effect in action.

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Gov. Christie's cell phone is no longer missing

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2016 ... 2box_nj-homepage-featured

...The defendants were hoping to get the phone and other devices used by Christie and his top staff to see what may have been discussed about the alleged politically motivated September 2013 lane closures at the George Washington Bridge. At issue in the federal corruption case are a dozen deleted text messages sent between Christie and his then-chief of staff, Regina Egea, during testimony by Port Authority staff before the state Legislature then investigating the 2013 shutdown of local toll lanes at the George Washington Bridge...

and this -

http://www.mcall.com/news/nationworld/pennsylvania/mc-
nj-chris-christie-cellphone-bridgegate-20160707-story.html


Attorneys for former allies of Republican Gov. Chris Christie can't get access to his cellphone as part of pretrial preparation in the George Washington Bridge lane-closing case, a judge ruled Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton granted a motion by the law firm representing Christie's office to quash a subpoena by former allies Bill Baroni and Bridget Kelly, who face trial in the fall on charges they conspired to close lanes to create traffic jams in 2013 to punish a Democratic mayor for not endorsing Christie...

christie, pathological liar?

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote: Nothing you have written here demonstrates a remote knowledge of IT systems let alone a server. What you know of computers is exceptionally minimal.

You write this ?The FBI does have evidence that her staffs email accounts were hacked because they were on a private company server. Which means any emails Hillary sent to them were hacked.? And want me to take you seriously as someone that knows IT. Do you even know what a hack is? That an email was hacked means someone got in, not that they have repeated access. You also assume that the hole wasn?t sealed when the hack occurred. This is willfully simple thinking and a largess of assumptions for someone that has been in IT for 40 years.

Nothing in the FBI report states that her server?s security was ?unsophisticated.? They only noted that it is possible someone could have hacked it without detection. This is a fact that applies to every server on the planet with internet access.

This is from the FBI Directors statement from the other day. Are you saying he made this up? That the private commercial email accounts that Clinton sent email to were not hacked?

? We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account.?

** **
Also if the hostile actors (aka hackers) got into a private commercial system do you think they didn?t get into Clintons basement setup?

?Comey was asked whether a previous statement he made comparing Clinton?s servers to Gmail was implying ?that the private email servers of Secretary Clinton?s were perhaps less secure than a Gmail account, that is used for free, by a billion people around this planet??

He answered, ?Yes, and I?m not looking to pick on Gmail. Their security is actually pretty good. The weakness is in the individual users. But, yes, Gmail has full time security staff, and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here.?

Aka an ?unsophisticated? bargain basement server setup.

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote: Do you even know what a hack is?That an email was hacked means someone got in, not that they have repeated access.

Here maybe this will help you understand when email is HACKED. Gee just think if someone HACKS your account they don't necessary have to change the password which means they could have access to your email repeatably for a very long time. Not an in and out HACK.

9 Things You Need to Do When Your Email is Hacked

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/top-th ... acked/story?id=19715483#1

neverleft wrote:
This is what I do I read/watch CNN (lefty) and I read/watch FoxNews (righty).

TheBigGuy wrote:
@ Pebbles

Totally wrong... they hacked the accounts of many of the creepy people like Sidney Blumenthal she consulted with during her Libya catastrophic crusade. You can enter unsecured networks via unsecured email.... ever get a letter from you friend saying the are vacationing in Mexico, have been kidnapped and need $1000? Do you really think foreign governments are going to admit to breaking into Clinton.com? If Hillary is as stupid as the FBI say she is.... I would not be surprised to discover she received an email from scamnigeria.com and sent her SS# and bank account# to claim $6 million from her long lost aunt in Lagos Nigeria. Don't click that link Hillary!

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

SOS wrote:
Ted Cruz Accepts Trump's Offer To Speak At The RNC Without Endorsing Him

But wait...not long ago Donald referred to Cruz as 'Lyin Ted' - so what gives? Did Cruz somehow become 'honest' in the last month? Is it Donald that was lying when he called Cruz a liar? Was it all political theater? Does Donald think this is a new season of The Apprentice? If Donald was telling the truth and Ted is still a liar - we can assume anything that Cruz says at the convention is a fib . Donald is making this election cycle so confusing. And dangerous.

Growup... it is called shoring up the base after a bloody primary. Unlike the democrats there are a number of different voices in in the republican party and Trump needs that support at the state level . Whatever the personal stuff, beating Hillary is #1. HRC would be foolish not to let Sanders speak even after what he did to her publicly in their primaries. It will be interesting to see if she can overcome her personal arrogance and give Sanders a primetime slot. According to her, nothing Sanders proposed would work in today's economic climate. Bernie was just making up numbers.

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

Atsushi wrote: In the end, few people have changed or will change the way they view Hilary Clinton because of this. I get it though; it's more fun to attack the opponent than defending your man. Enjoy the moment while it lasts.

Yes it will change people?s view of her. This is how they view her now??just 37 percent of people believe Hillary Clinton is honest and trustworthy while 57 percent say they don't think she is.? Do you think her numbers will improve after this?

The email server is going to follow Hillary until Election Day especially with what will come out of the Comey testimony today. There will be commercial after commercial with his testimony. Yes we know it is more fun to attack your opponent just look at how the media hits Trump ?. ?Star of David?, ?praising Suddam?, ?AC bankruptcies? , ?playing golf in Scotland? etc

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote: Politifact is correct in that Hillary is ?mostly false.? However, which is worse, housing government data on a server you personally own and is managed by a government employee or housing that government data, as Powell did, on his personal account which is managed and owned by a private company?

This is worse.. housing a store brought server in your basement as Clinton did with absolutely no security what so ever as Comey just stated on Capitol Hill. A personal account on a private company?s server has way more levels of security. Also those private companies are working 24/7 on ways stop attacks on their systems. I don't recall there being a concern that Powell's email account was hacked, no log of it being hacked.

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote: It is truly pathetic to continue the ?left wing media? trope when they are literally run by right wingers? But, enough about those facts, how about the highlighted portion?? Well, that?s a lot of ?could have? and ?possible? but I don?t see any actual evidence that anything happened. As such, a big wad of nothing.

After Comey?s 15 minute statement did you see any other information come out of it in the media except for the one quote? ?extremely careless? ? I didn?t so I went right to the fbi source/transcript (below) to get the real story. And in that real story is the following highlighted line: . Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton?s personal e-mail account." Isn?t that the scary thing about this whole private server issue? No one knows if her unsecured server was hacked or not?

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pres ... -a-personal-e-mail-system

neverleft wrote:
Quote:

Of course you don?t understand it. The technology and information about said technology flies over your head. That?s perfectly fine given that you likely aren?t involved in technology such as servers, databases, protocols, ports, etc.
It?s actually quite simple: Nobody broke in. Nobody stole data. Nobody had access. There is no evidence to showing that anyone broke in and stole anything.
However, they have to leave the door open to the super hacker that can somehow break into the system without leaving any trace to indicate as such. It?s extremely unlikely.

Ha ha I have been in the IT world for 40 years you are probably using systems I wrote before you were born. The FBI does have evidence that her staffs email accounts were hacked because they were on a private company server. Which means any emails Hillary sent to them were hacked. They can?t tell if Clintons server was hacked because it was so unsophisticated , not many bells and whistles or logs like a private companies server.

"It?s extremely unlikely." ? Again read?.

?With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton?s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton?s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton?s personal e-mail account.

JCMan8 wrote:
You can deflect from Hillary's lies all you want, won't change the fact that she has demonstrably lied on pretty much every public statement she's ever given about her national security scandal.

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

Atsushi wrote:
Quote:

JCMan8 wrote:
Quote:

Atsushi wrote:
I think people misunderstand what lying is.

Even if a statement turned out to be not correct later, it doesn't make it lying.

Based on the intelligence available at the time, Benghazi attack appeared to be inspired by anti-muslim video. That's what CIA advised the administration, and that's why Susan Rice and Hilary Clinton stated so.

It may later turn out to be not correct, but they didn't lie. They made the statement based on available information at the time.

Similarly, Clinton thought that if email is not marked Classified, it isn't classified. You can blame her for not knowing that, but her statement is completely consistent with what she had believed. Just because it later turned out to be incorrect, that's not lying. She thought she had submitted all of her official emails, but because the server didn't have archiving function, many emails had been deleted. That's not lying. That's misunderstanding.

Hater will continue to believe Clinton lied. I don't.

Actually I don't think you understand what lying is. For example, Clinton lied when she said that no documents she received were marked classified. The FBI director specifically said this wasn't true, and in fact they found documents that had classified markings, in addition to thousands more that were classified.

This isn't a "misstatement," it is a flat out lie.

Clinton said she didn't send or receive emails that were marked Classified. She believed that that's how she would know if email contained classified information. Her understanding was incorrect.

FBI said that she sent or received emails that contained classified information even though they weren't labeled classified.

So you can accuse her of not knowing this (I certainly do)--Comey seems to think that she should have known better. But what Clinton said wasn't a lie. It was a statement based on her incorrect understanding of what constitutes classified.

You still don't get it. In addition to Hillary sending and receiving thousands of emails containing classified information that were not marked classified, the FBI said that she also handled emails that WERE marked classified, albeit a much smaller number.

And this was only her latest lie. You obviously don't remember, but when this story first broke, Hillary confidently looked into the camera and proclaimed that there was no classified information at all on her server.

neverleft wrote:
Regarding her State Department email practices, "my predecessors did the same thing."
? Hillary Clinton on Wednesday, March 9th, 2016 in a Univision/Washington Post Democratic debate

POLITIFACT 3/9/2016:

Our ruling

Clinton said, regarding her State Department email practices, "my predecessors did the same thing."

This is a misleading claim chiefly because only one prior secretary of state regularly used email, Colin Powell.
Powell did use a personal email address for government business, however he did not use a private server kept at his home, as Clinton did.

We rate this claim Mostly False.

neverleft wrote:
This is the link to the FBI?s entire statement ?wow? no wonder the media is being very selective on what it is pulling out of it. (wouldn't want to make Hillary look bad)


https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pres ... -a-personal-e-mail-system


"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton?s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton?s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton?s personal e-mail account."

sullyx wrote:
Quote:

Atsushi wrote:
In my view, this was also the state department's system's failure. Yes, she made a dumb mistake, wanting to use one email address for her private business and official business.
But wasn't there anyone (or a system) in the department that told her that what she wanted to do was not a good idea?

she used multiple email addresses, devices and servers despite her claims otherwise making her a flat out liar.

neverleft wrote:
I want him to explain the wording of his below statement from his transcript. They did not find direct evidence that the e-mail domain was successfully hacked but they assess that it would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. Huh?

"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton?s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton?s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton?s personal e-mail account."

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pres ... -a-personal-e-mail-system

stillinjc wrote:
Quote:

dtjcview wrote:
Quote:

devilsadvocate wrote:
...
As to Brexit, I will note that the liberal/conservative argument occurring here mirrors many of the same arguments that occurred over there (including asserting that everyone pro-Brexit were stupid racists)
...

The average net worth of people in the UK is around $200k. Given the collapse in sterling and UK assets is likely to approach 20% by the end of this year - that works out to each voter paying ~$40k to leave the EU.

Freedom is not free.

hero69 wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
I've used the dog run each weekend morning since it opened. The only downside, presently, is the lack of shade. Given the high temperatures, my guy just tires out too quickly to spend a lot of time there.

i agree...one would think there would be plenty of trees in a park...planning needs improvement

user1111 wrote:
Quote:

Pebble wrote:
I've used the dog run each weekend morning since it opened. The only downside, presently, is the lack of shade. Given the high temperatures, my guy just tires out too quickly to spend a lot of time there.

yeah that dog run reminds me of the nasty pedestrian plaza.. no trees just sunshine and concrete.

Monroe wrote:
For all the gleeful Hillary pollsters, keep in mind-she spent $26 million in June in battleground states, Trump not a dime-he's rope-a-doping her.

TheBigGuy wrote:
And what is Hillary Clinton stand on for profit schools? Apparently fine is Bill and her get their taste... one investigation at a time.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2 ... n-on-for-profit-colleges/

TheBigGuy wrote:
Love you final comments about nuance... despite the FBI declaring that there is no evidence from their investigation to say the Muslim Terrorist is Gay. Yet in your empty head, the WH inspired theory that the Muslim Killer in Orlando is a self hating Gay person is still rattling. There is no connection, as I said in earlier posts, he was not cruising bars... he was stalking his prey. Nothing nuanced, stop deflecting the facts.

Monroe wrote:
Judge Curiel not only awarded a scholarship to an illegal alien, but his California La Raza lawyers group hosts a link to the national La Raza hate group.

Gee, if Trump belonged to a group who had an Aryan Nation link on its website, now we'd have a story!

Monroe wrote:
Quote:

neverleft wrote:
BREAKING NEWS: AT LEAST 10 DEAD AS APPARENT SUICIDE BOMBERS HIT ISTANBUL AIRPORT

No claim of responsibility yet

Yup, Obama and Hillary-they sure do know how to deal with the Muslim world!

TheBigGuy wrote:
Quote:

Monroe wrote:
Trump gives millions, and guess who gets most of Hillary's donations? The Clinton Foundation, which then pays out huuuuuge salaries to her friends and family. You can't make this stuff up.

Just ask Chelsea... a fortunate daughter.

TheBigGuy wrote:
Oh please... The Clinton Foundation is the family slush fund.

Monroe wrote:
@pebble, Trump has a lot less exposure over Trump U than Clinton does over her husband getting paid $16.5 million dollars to shill for a 'for profit' university with abysmal graduation rates-a company that scored big US govt funding while Hillary ran state. But I'd be leery about a jurist with radical, pro illegal alien ties being involved with someone wanting to build a border fence. Wait, are the Democrats building a fence and demanding photo ID's for the Philly convention? Is that true?? tee hee

@sushi, lol. I guess growing up in one of the most racist, discriminatory, and jingoistic countries on the planet makes you see racists everywhere. You can probably get professional help for that.

Monroe wrote:
A social justice warrior from one of the most racist, discriminatory, and jingoistic countries on the planet. Isn't it funny how no Democrats called Trump a racist (he's been a national figure for decades) until he ran for President?