Re: JC Council to Vote on Canceling Two Abatement Deals for Non Compliance

Posted by dr_nick_riviera on 2019/1/11 9:58:31

K-Lo2 wrote:
Let's be sure to add the city suing the Bright & Varick developer at the behest of Yvonne and the VVPA.

1. The BV developer sued the City, not the other way around.

2. Yvonne has never been involved with this issue. I have my own beefs with some of what she posts, but she had nothing to do with this dispute over this site.

You may view these corrections as rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, but other people may be interested in the facts.

It was the decision of the city and the VVPA that decided to pursue legally weak fated appeals after the developer received judgement. Yes, the developer sued the city first, but the dragged out appeals process and hundreds of thousands wasted was all the VVPA.

This Post was from: